Blog Feed Post

Q1’s Mismatched Earnings Results: Opportunity in Disparity

Think the market makes sense? In some ways it does; in a lot of ways it doesn’t. That’s not a complaint - just a reality we as investors have to acknowledge if we’re to have any hope at beating the market.

This idea surfaced again as the Q1 earnings data and numbers were being crunched on a sector-by-sector basis. Let’s just say there were some standouts, some disappointments, some conclusions to be made, and a lesson to be learned.

Q1’s Mismatched Earnings Results: Opportunity in Disparity

What’s the ultimate driver of stock values? Most would say that earnings results (and growth) are the most important numbers to investors - and we wouldn’t disagree. A lot of factors can have an impact though….  and the size of their impact can vary with the mood of the market.

For that reason, let’s look at the market’s sectors in detail by looking at last quarter’s earnings, revenue growth, earnings ‘beats’ and shortfalls, P/E ratios - the whole shebang. We think you’ll find some surprising (and not always in a good way) numbers. More importantly, the numbers may have you rethinking your allocation as we head into the latter half of the year.

First Things First

First and foremost, know that the first quarter for the S&P 500’s stocks was much better than expected - the bar is set high. When you break it down by sector though, there were some spectacularly good and spectacularly bad relative performances.

The nearby table tells the tale, though it’s a complicated one.

The big buzz was that the financial sector’s earnings indicated that things were finally looking up here. That 201% improvement in earnings though? Keep in mind that we’re comparing Q1-2010 to Q1-2009….. the darkest hour of the recession. The meager 7% increase in total revenue trailed the average sales growth, suggesting that the sector still isn’t back to its old pace yet.

The surprises went the other way too. Take technology and consumer discretionary stocks as an example. The 90% and 93% earnings ‘beat’ rates, respectively, were by far the most significant victories in the minds of investors and the psychology of the trading crowd.

That was certainly helpful for consumer discretionary names - they’re up 7% year-to-date despite only a 9% increase in earnings, and despite this sector now being the most expensive on a projected P/E basis.

Technology, on the other hand, posted a much better 19% increase in sales, and these stocks are technically cheaper than discretionary stocks (and even cheap by tech standards, with a forecasted P/E of 12.1). Their reward? The technology sector is down 7% year-to-date. So much for “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

Telecom was a big letdown, for obvious reasons. And despite the 12% loss for the year so far (the biggest among all sectors), the forward-looking P/E is still an expensive 12.3. We still contend telecom is under-rated and a budding opportunity, but we specifically feel it’s the small caps and wireless names that will do the leading here. AT&T and Verizon were the key reasons for the S&P 500’s telecom sector problems.

We could go on, but the data is right there - you can glean the clues for yourself. We’ll just part with this nugget of wisdom, and a couple of sector-specific calls built around it.

Expectations Are (Usually) as Important as Actual Results

While solid tech numbers (beats as well as absolute improvement) didn’t help its stocks, that may have been the exception to prove the rule.

Take a look at the discretionary sector and the industrials. From an earnings growth and revenue growth perspective, both were a little sub-par [keep in mind that the comparison to Q1-2009 for consumer discretionary names was an easy number to top]. Yet, those two groups are the only two to remain in positive territory for the year in terms of stock prices. How’d they pull it off? They saw a huge - and disproportional - number of positive surprises.

Conversely, the energy sector actually put up the healthiest (real) earnings and revenue growth, and they’re now the market’s cheapest stocks. Yet, they’re also almost the biggest losers year-to-date.

Lesson learned? Beating (or not) estimates can be just as important to finding strong stocks as actual earnings or revenue growth is. It stinks, but there’s your proof that being exclusively married to fundamental analysis can hurt as much as it helps. That’s why we take a half-fundamental, half-technical approach.

Eventually, analysts will get their bearings, and you’ll stop seeing a huge number of positive and negative surprises. It can take a couple of quarters to straighten those guesses out though, which can be really good or really bad for those stocks in the meantime.

The Next Best Bets

Any actionable clues buried in the Q1 earnings and stock performance chart? A few.

Eventually, the fact that energy is doing so well - despite nobody realizing it - will boost the sector’s value. If you’re truly a long-termer, now’s the time to go shopping for energy stocks. Just keep in mind it may take another quarter or two for the market to get past its fear of the energy group, and accept the fact that these companies did quite well in a pretty mediocre environment.

Another hidden gem in there is healthcare. Yes, the federal healthcare overhaul probably gets most of the blame for the weakness here - uncertainty is a stock torpedo. Now that it’s not an unknown anymore, investors should start to realize that (1) there’s been some real growth here, (2) the healthcare bill actually has more opportunity than liability for these stocks, and (3) there are some undervalued names in the group.

And finally, technology offers the best of aspects both healthcare as well as energy….. real growth of earnings and revenues, and depressed prices. And, if the number of positive surprises in Q2 is anywhere near the number we saw from the technology sector in Q1, we’d be willing to bet the result would be buying rather than selling the next time out.

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By James Brumley

James Brumley is a freelance writer and registered investment advisor. He began his career as a broker with a major Wall Street firm, where fundamentals and long-term holding periods were core strategies. After that, he switched gears completely, becoming an analyst at a short-term trading newsletter that focused on technical analysis. He now manages client money using the best of both philosophies. His company, Bluegrass Portfolio Management, offers investors an opportunity to reap superior returns with minimized risk.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...