Click here to close now.


News Feed Item

President Obama Would Lose if Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani Was the Nominee

Republican field problem is one of recognition - most are unknown

NEW YORK, July 26, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- By this time next summer the Republican candidate who will challenge President Obama will be known but at this point the list of candidates and potential candidates for the nomination is still far from finalized. With the "will-he-or-she-run-questions" still being asked and answered, some of the names with the highest familiarity among the general public are still not even declared candidates.


Obviously because of her run for Vice President with John McCain, almost nine in ten Americans (86%) are familiar with Sarah Palin and 75% of U.S. adults are familiar with Rudy Giuliani, both of whom are still undeclared, but possible candidates for the nomination. Majorities of Americans are familiar with declared candidates Newt Gingrich (72%), Mitt Romney (67%), and Ron Paul (52%) while half are familiar with Michele Bachmann (50%). All other potential candidates are at 30% or under in terms of familiarity.

These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,183 adults surveyed online between July 11 and 18, 2011 by Harris Interactive.

Even among Republicans, many declared candidates do not have majorities familiar with them. Tim Pawlenty (33%), Rick Santorum (31%), Herman Cain (29%), and Jon Huntsman (15%) all have one-third of Republicans or less familiar with them.

With this in mind, it's not surprising then that among Republicans over one-quarter (28%) say they are not at all sure who they would vote for if they were voting in the Republican primary. Rudy Giuliani (14%) and Mitt Romney (14%) rise to the top among Republicans followed by Sarah Palin (12%). All the other candidates presented are under 10% including Rick Perry (8%), Michele Bachmann (6%), and Ron Paul (5%). Among Independents there is a three tie for "first place" between Rudy Giuliani (10%), Mitt Romney (10%) and Ron Paul (10%). But over two in five Independents (42%) say they are not at all sure who they would vote for in the Republican primary election.

Against President Obama

Looking ahead to November, it seems there are three possible candidates who could give President Obama a difficult time. President Obama would lose his re-election if Rudy Giuliani (53% to 47%) or Mitt Romney (51% to 49%) was the Republican nominee. Each candidate would receive 50% of the vote if the President was running against Ron Paul. Right now, President Obama would win re-election against the 10 other candidates presented.

So What?

Right now the Republican party needs to figure out who they are and begin the process of coalescing around one candidate. In the study of politics, there is always a debate regarding electability and this election may show that clearly. Should Republicans nominate a candidate who stands for certain values or policies important to a sub-section of the party, even though that candidate may not be electable in the general election? This is a question the Republican party needs to answer if they want to win next November.

                                TABLE 1A
                         REPUBLICAN FAMILIARITY
        "How familiar are you with each of the following people?"
    Base: All adults

                        Familiar     Very     Somewhat
                         (NET)     familiar   familiar
                           %          %          %
    Sarah Palin               86         48         38
    Rudy Giuliani             75         37         39
    Newt Gingrich             72         35         37
    Mitt Romney               67         29         38
    Ron Paul                  52         19         33
    Michele Bachmann          50         19         31
    Rick Perry                30         13         17
    Tim Pawlenty              28          9         19
    Rick Santorum             28         10         18
    Herman Cain               22          7         15
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.         15          4         11
    Gary Johnson               8          3          5
    Thaddeus McCotter          8          3          5

                           Not        Not     Not at
                        familiar     very       all
                         (NET)     familiar   familiar
                           %          %          %
    Sarah Palin               14          8          5
    Rudy Giuliani             25         11         14
    Newt Gingrich             28         14         13
    Mitt Romney               33         16         16
    Ron Paul                  48         21         27
    Michele Bachmann          50         18         32
    Rick Perry                70         20         50
    Tim Pawlenty              72         22         50
    Rick Santorum             72         20         52
    Herman Cain               78         18         60
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.         85         22         63
    Gary Johnson              92         18         74
    Thaddeus McCotter         92         15         77

    Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

                                     TABLE 1B
                              REPUBLICAN FAMILIARITY
            "How familiar are you with each of the following people?"
          Summary of those saying "Very familiar" or "Somewhat familiar"
    Base: All adults

                        Total              Party ID
                                  Rep.      Dem.      Ind.
                          %        %         %         %
    Sarah Palin             86       88         89       89
    Rudy Giuliani           75       77         77       78
    Newt Gingrich           72       76         74       76
    Mitt Romney             67       74         65       73
    Ron Paul                52       55         50       60
    Michele Bachmann        50       50         50       55
    Rick Perry              30       38         26       30
    Tim Pawlenty            28       33         25       33
    Rick Santorum           28       31         27       32
    Herman Cain             22       29         17       25
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.       15       15         17       16
    Gary Johnson             8       11          7        8
    Thaddeus McCotter        8        8          7        8

                        Cons.     Mod.      Lib.
                          %         %         %
    Sarah Palin             85        86        91
    Rudy Giuliani           74        74        80
    Newt Gingrich           76        69        74
    Mitt Romney             69        65        70
    Ron Paul                54        48        59
    Michele Bachmann        53        43        59
    Rick Perry              37        26        29
    Tim Pawlenty            32        25        33
    Rick Santorum           33        23        32
    Herman Cain             32        16        21
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.       17        11        23
    Gary Johnson             9         7         8
    Thaddeus McCotter        6         8         7

    Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

                                      TABLE 2
                            REPUBLICAN PRIMARY ELECTION
       "If you were voting in the Republican primary election and these were
                      the candidates, who would you vote for?"
    Base: All adults

                           Total   Total   Total
                           March    May    July
                            2011    2011    2011

                             %       %       %
    Rudy Giuliani              8       8      11
    Mitt Romney               10      10      11
    Sarah Palin                7       5       8
    Ron Paul                NA         6       7
    Rick Perry              NA      NA         5
    Michele Bachmann           2       2       4
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.       NA         1       3
    Herman Cain             NA         2       3
    Tim Pawlenty               2       2       1
    Newt Gingrich              5       4       1
    Rick Santorum              1     *         1
    Thaddeus McCotter       NA      NA       *
    Gary Johnson            NA         1     *
    Not at all sure           45      42      44

                                 Party ID
                          Rep.    Dem.   Ind.
                            %       %      %
    Rudy Giuliani            14      11     10
    Mitt Romney              14      12     10
    Sarah Palin              12       7      5
    Ron Paul                  5       5     10
    Rick Perry                8       1      6
    Michele Bachmann          6       2      6
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.         2       4      2
    Herman Cain               4       1      4
    Tim Pawlenty              4     *        1
    Newt Gingrich             3     *        1
    Rick Santorum             1       1    *
    Thaddeus McCotter       *       *        1
    Gary Johnson            *         1    *
    Not at all sure          28      53     42

                          Cons.    Mod.   Lib.
                             %       %      %
    Rudy Giuliani             10      12     13
    Mitt Romney               11      11     13
    Sarah Palin                9       8      7
    Ron Paul                   6       6      8
    Rick Perry                10       2      2
    Michele Bachmann           8       3      2
    Jon Huntsman, Jr.          1       2      9
    Herman Cain                5       3      1
    Tim Pawlenty               3       1    *
    Newt Gingrich              3     *        1
    Rick Santorum              1       1    *
    Thaddeus McCotter        *         1    *
    Gary Johnson               1     *      *
    Not at all sure           34      51     44

    Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; * indicates
    less than .05%; NA indicates it was not asked in that poll.

                               TABLE 3A
    "Looking at the list below, assuming each person listed is the
       Republican nominee running against President Obama in the
         2012 presidential election, who would you vote for?"
    Base: All adults

                            Would vote for
                      President       The
                         Obama    Republican
                           %           %
     McCotter                 57           43
    Gary Johnson              56           44
    Herman Cain               56           44
    Jon Huntsman,
     Jr.                      55           45
    Rick Santorum             55           45
    Rick Perry                54           46
    Michele Bachmann          54           46
    Tim Pawlenty              54           46
    Newt Gingrich             54           46
    Sarah Palin               54           46
    Ron Paul                  50           50
    Mitt Romney               49           51
    Rudy Giuliani             47           53

    Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding

                                        TABLE 3B
             "Looking at the list below, assuming each person listed is the
             Republican nominee running against President Obama in the 2012
                    presidential election, who would you vote for?"
               Summary of those who would vote for the Republican nominee
    Base: All adults

                       Total   Total    Total
                       March     May    July
                        2011    2011     2011

                         %       %       %
    Rudy Giuliani         51       51      53
    Mitt Romney           49       49      51
    Ron Paul            NA         45      50
    Sarah Palin           42       42      46
    Newt Gingrich         44       44      46
    Tim Pawlenty          44       42      46
    Michele Bachmann      41       42      46
    Rick Perry          NA       NA        46
    Rick Santorum         43       43      45
    Jon Huntsman,
     Jr.                NA         41      45
    Herman Cain         NA         41      44
    Gary Johnson        NA         43      44
     McCotter           NA       NA        43

                             Party ID
                      Rep.    Dem.   Ind.
                        %       %      %
    Rudy Giuliani        89      24     56
    Mitt Romney          87      21     55
    Ron Paul             83      18     57
    Sarah Palin          79      20     48
    Newt Gingrich        82      15     49
    Tim Pawlenty         83      15     49
    Michele Bachmann     81      18     49
    Rick Perry           82      17     48
    Rick Santorum        81      15     48
    Jon Huntsman,
     Jr.                 81      16     46
    Herman Cain          79      15     46
    Gary Johnson         80      15     45
     McCotter            79      15     44

                             Philosophy          Tea
                      Cons.    Mod.   Lib.
                         %       %      %       %
    Rudy Giuliani         84      48     19       87
    Mitt Romney           84      45     19       87
    Ron Paul              82      42     19       85
    Sarah Palin           78      40     13       83
    Newt Gingrich         81      37     15       82
    Tim Pawlenty          80      38     13       83
    Michele Bachmann      79      39     13       83
    Rick Perry            80      38     14       84
    Rick Santorum         79      37     14       83
    Jon Huntsman,
     Jr.                  77      37     14       81
    Herman Cain           77      37     12       81
    Gary Johnson          78      36     12       80
     McCotter             77      36     12       80

    Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; NA
    indicates it was not asked in that poll.


This Harris Poll was conducted online within the United States between July 11 to 18, 2011 among 2,183 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents' propensity to be online.

All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words "margin of error" as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.

Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

The results of this Harris Poll may not be used in advertising, marketing or promotion without the prior written permission of Harris Interactive.

Q1218, 1225, 1230, 1240, 1250

The Harris Poll(®) #87, July 26, 2011
By Regina A. Corso, SVP, Harris Poll, Public Relations and Youth Research, Harris Interactive

About Harris Interactive

Harris Interactive is one of the world's leading custom market research firms, leveraging research, technology, and business acumen to transform relevant insight into actionable foresight. Known widely for the Harris Poll and for pioneering innovative research methodologies, Harris offers expertise in a wide range of industries including healthcare, technology, public affairs, energy, telecommunications, financial services, insurance, media, retail, restaurant, and consumer package goods. Serving clients in over 215 countries and territories through our North American, European, and Asian offices and a network of independent market research firms, Harris specializes in delivering research solutions that help us - and our clients - stay ahead of what's next. For more information, please visit

Press Contact:
Corporate Communications
Harris Interactive
[email protected]

SOURCE Harris Interactive

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome,” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
As a CIO, are your direct reports IT managers or are they IT leaders? The hard truth is that many IT managers have risen through the ranks based on their technical skills, not their leadership ability. Many are unable to effectively engage and inspire, creating forward momentum in the direction of desired change. Renowned for its approach to leadership and emphasis on their people, organizations increasingly look to our military for insight into these challenges.
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi's VP Business Development and Engineering, will explore the IoT cloud-based platform technologies driv...
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. Migration to cloud shifts computing resources from your data center, which can yield significant advantages provided that the cloud vendor an offer enterprise-grade quality for your application.
The web app is agile. The REST API is agile. The testing and planning are agile. But alas, data infrastructures certainly are not. Once an application matures, changing the shape or indexing scheme of data often forces at best a top down planning exercise and at worst includes schema changes that force downtime. The time has come for a new approach that fundamentally advances the agility of distributed data infrastructures. Come learn about a new solution to the problems faced by software organ...
Achim Weiss is Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of ProfitBricks. In 1995, he broke off his studies to co-found the web hosting company "Schlund+Partner." The company "Schlund+Partner" later became the 1&1 web hosting product line. From 1995 to 2008, he was the technical director for several important projects: the largest web hosting platform in the world, the second largest DSL platform, a video on-demand delivery network, the largest eMail backend in Europe, and a universal billing syste...
Electric power utilities face relentless pressure on their financial performance, and reducing distribution grid losses is one of the last untapped opportunities to meet their business goals. Combining IoT-enabled sensors and cloud-based data analytics, utilities now are able to find, quantify and reduce losses faster – and with a smaller IT footprint. Solutions exist using Internet-enabled sensors deployed temporarily at strategic locations within the distribution grid to measure actual line lo...
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and Containers together help companies to achieve their business goals faster and more effectively.
The buzz continues for cloud, data analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT) and their collective impact across all industries. But a new conversation is emerging - how do companies use industry disruption and technology enablers to lead in markets undergoing change, uncertainty and ambiguity? Organizations of all sizes need to evolve and transform, often under massive pressure, as industry lines blur and merge and traditional business models are assaulted and turned upside down. In this new da...
Cloud computing delivers on-demand resources that provide businesses with flexibility and cost-savings. The challenge in moving workloads to the cloud has been the cost and complexity of ensuring the initial and ongoing security and regulatory (PCI, HIPAA, FFIEC) compliance across private and public clouds. Manual security compliance is slow, prone to human error, and represents over 50% of the cost of managing cloud applications. Determining how to automate cloud security compliance is critical...
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, will explore the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends an...
Chris Van Tuin, Chief Technologist for the Western US at Red Hat, has over 20 years of experience in IT and Software. Since joining Red Hat in 2005, he has been architecting solutions for strategic customers and partners with a focus on emerging technologies including IaaS, PaaS, and DevOps. He started his career at Intel in IT and Managed Hosting followed by leadership roles in services and sales engineering at Loudcloud and Linux startups.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data...
You have your devices and your data, but what about the rest of your Internet of Things story? Two popular classes of technologies that nicely handle the Big Data analytics for Internet of Things are Apache Hadoop and NoSQL. Hadoop is designed for parallelizing analytical work across many servers and is ideal for the massive data volumes you create with IoT devices. NoSQL databases such as Apache HBase are ideal for storing and retrieving IoT data as “time series data.”
In recent years, at least 40% of companies using cloud applications have experienced data loss. One of the best prevention against cloud data loss is backing up your cloud data. In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bryan Forrester, Senior Vice President of Sales at eFolder, will present how organizations can use eFolder Cloudfinder to automate backups of cloud application data. He will also demonstrate how easy it is to search and restore cloud application data using Cloudfinder.