|By Business Wire||
|November 8, 2012 06:21 AM EST||
B Communications Ltd. (NASDAQ Global Market: BCOM)(TASE: BCOM) today reported its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2012.
Bezeq’s Results: For the third quarter of 2012, the Bezeq Group reported revenues of NIS 2.5 billion ($ 638 million) and operating profit of NIS 667 million ($ 171 million). Bezeq’s EBITDA for the third quarter totaled NIS 1 billion ($ 262 million), representing an EBITDA margin of 41%. Net income for the period attributable to the shareholders of Bezeq totaled NIS 342 million ($ 87 million). Bezeq's cash flow from operating activities totaled NIS 1 billion ($ 262 million) during the third quarter of 2012.
Dividend from Bezeq: On October 10, 2012, B Communications received two dividend payments from Bezeq which together totaled NIS 464 million ($ 119 million). These dividend payments included a current dividend of NIS 309 million ($ 79 million), representing B Communications’ share of Bezeq’s net profit for the first half of 2012, and a special dividend of NIS 155 million ($ 40 million), representing B Communications’ share of the fourth installment of six special dividend payments declared by Bezeq and approved by its shareholders last year.
Cash Position: As of September 30, 2012, B Communications’ unconsolidated cash and cash equivalents (including dividend receivable) totaled NIS 853 million ($ 218 million), its unconsolidated total debt was NIS 4.2 billion ($ 1.1 billion), and its net debt totaled NIS 3.3 billion ($ 849 million).
B Communications’ Unconsolidated Balance Sheet Data*
|September 30,||December 31,||September 30,||December 31,|
|(NIS millions)||($ millions)|
|Short term liabilities||470||526||120||134|
|Long term liabilities||3,705||3,874||947||991|
|Cash and cash equivalents||389||354||99||91|
|Total net debt||3,322||4,046||849||1,034|
* Does not include the balance sheet of Bezeq.
B Communications’ Third Quarter Consolidated Financial Results
B Communications’ revenues for the third quarter of 2012 were NIS 2,494 million ($ 638 million), a 15% decrease compared with NIS 2,917 million ($ 746 million) reported in the third quarter of 2011. For both the current and the prior-year periods, B Communications’ revenues consisted entirely of its share of Bezeq’s revenues.
B Communications’ net loss attributable to shareholders for the third quarter totaled NIS 55 million ($ 14 million), compared to NIS 31 million ($ 8 million) reported in the third quarter of 2011. This reflects the impact of two significant expenses:
Amortization of tangible and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the Bezeq acquisition: According to the rules of business combination accounting, the total purchase price of the Bezeq acquisition was allocated to Bezeq’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as determined by an analysis performed by an independent valuation firm. B Communications is amortizing certain of the acquired identifiable intangible assets in accordance with the economic benefit expected from such assets using an accelerated method of amortization.
|During the third quarter of 2012, B Communications recorded amortization expenses related to the Bezeq purchase price allocation (“Bezeq PPA”) of NIS 307 million ($78 million), net. From the Bezeq acquisition date (April 14, 2010) until the end of the reporting quarter, B Communications has amortized approximately 53% of the total Bezeq PPA. It expects to amortize an additional 5% in the fourth quarter of 2012.|
|The Company's Bezeq PPA amortization expense is a non-cash expense that is subject to adjustment. If, for any reason, the Company finds it necessary or appropriate to make adjustments to amounts already expensed, it may result in significant changes to future financial statements.|
Financial expenses: B Communications’ unconsolidated financial expenses for the third quarter totaled NIS 65 million ($ 17 million). These expenses consisted primarily of NIS 64 million ($ 16 million) of interest and CPI linkage expense on the long-term loans incurred to finance the Bezeq acquisition and NIS 14 million ($ 4 million) of expenses related to the Company’s debentures. These expenses were offset by financial income of NIS 13 million ($ 3 million) generated by our short term investments. The significant financial expenses recorded in the third quarter were due primarily to high CPI linkage expenses attributed to the 0.85% increase in the Israeli CPI, to which approximately half of B Communications’ total debt is linked.
B Communications’ Unconsolidated Financial Results
|Quarter ended September 30,||Quarter ended September 30,|
|(NIS millions)||(US$ millions)|
|PPA amortization, net||(95)||(107)||(24)||(27)|
|Interest in Bezeq's net income||106||171||27||43|
Comments of Management
Commenting on the results, Doron Turgeman, CEO of B Communications' said, “The third quarter of 2012 was another stable period for Bezeq, demonstrating the cash flow-generating power of its formidable position in Israel’s telecommunications market. Due to the continued uninterrupted payment of both regular and special dividends, including the latest installment which we received last month, we have succeeded in building our cash reserves to their current strong level, and are on track with plans to continue expanding our financial stability and liquidity in the quarters to come. Despite current conditions in the Israeli capital market, as a long-term communications player with loans that are not burdened by share price-related covenants, we are able to manage our cash position entirely according to plan, relying upon steady and visible cash flow to fulfill all loan commitments while continuing to accelerate our repayments.”
Bezeq Group Results (Consolidated)
To provide further insight into its results, the Company has provided the following summary of the consolidated financial report of the Bezeq Group’s quarter ended September 30, 2012. For a full discussion of Bezeq’s results for the quarter, please refer to http://ir.bezeq.co.il.
|Bezeq Group (consolidated)||
|Net profit attributable to Company shareholders||342||550||-37.8%|
|Diluted EPS (NIS)||0.13||0.20||-35.0%|
|Cash flow from operating activities||1,024||882||16.1%|
|Payments for investments, net||270||374||-27.8%|
|Free cash flow 1||754||508||48.4%|
|Net debt/EBITDA (end of period) 2||1.64||1.24|
|Net debt/shareholders' equity (end of period)||3.69||2.93|
|1 Free cash flow is defined as cash flows from operating activities less net payments for investments.|
|2 EBITDA in this calculation refers to the trailing twelve months.|
Revenues of the Bezeq Group in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 2.49 billion compared with NIS 2.92 billion in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 14.5%. Most of the decrease in the Bezeq Group's revenues was due to lower revenues from the sale of cellular handsets and the erosion of revenues from cellular services.
Operating profit of the Bezeq Group in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 667 million, compared with NIS 944 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 29.3%. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 1.03 billion (EBITDA margin of 41.1%), compared with NIS 1.30 billion (EBITDA margin of 44.6%) in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 21.1%. Net profit attributable to Bezeq shareholders in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 342 million compared with NIS 550 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 37.8%. The decrease in profitability metrics was primarily due to a decrease in profitability in the cellular segment as well as lower capital gains from real estate and copper sales in the Fixed-line segment compared to the corresponding quarter of 2011.
Cash flow from operating activities in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 1.02 billion compared with NIS 882 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, an increase of 16.1% mainly due to improved working capital in the cellular segment. Free cash flow in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 754 million compared with NIS 508 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, an increase of 48.4%. The increase in free cash flow was due to an increase in cash flow from operating activities as well as the completion of large infrastructure projects initiated in prior years.
Gross capital expenditures (CAPEX), in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 346 million compared with NIS 437 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 20.8%. The Bezeq Group's CAPEX to consolidated sales ratio in the third quarter of 2012 was 13.9%, compared with 15.0% in the corresponding quarter of 2011.
As of September 30, 2012, gross financial debt of the Bezeq Group was NIS 8.94 billion, compared with NIS 9.61 billion as of September 30, 2011. The net financial debt of the Bezeq Group was NIS 7.19 billion compared with NIS 5.99 billion as of September 30, 2011. At the end of September 2012, the Bezeq Group's net financial debt to EBITDA ratio was 1.64, compared with 1.24 at the end of September 2011.
Convenience Translation to Dollars: For the convenience of the reader, certain of the reported NIS figures of September 30, 2012 have been presented in millions of U.S. dollars, translated at the representative rate of exchange as of September 30, 2012 (NIS 3.912 = U.S. Dollar 1.00). The U.S. dollar ($) amounts presented should not be construed as representing amounts receivable or payable in U.S. dollars or convertible into U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
Use of non-IFRS Measurements: We and the Bezeq Group’s management regularly use supplemental non-IFRS financial measures internally to understand, manage and evaluate our business and make operating decisions. We believe these non-IFRS financial measures provide consistent and comparable measures to help investors understand the Bezeq Group’s current and future operating cash flow performance.
|These non-IFRS financial measures may differ materially from the non-IFRS financial measures used by other companies.|
|EBITDA is a non-IFRS financial measure generally defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Bezeq Group defines EBITDA as net income before financial income (expenses), net, impairment and other charges, expenses recorded for stock compensation in accordance with IFRS 2, income tax expenses and depreciation and amortization. We present the Bezeq Group’s EBITDA as a supplemental performance measure because we believe that it facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structure, tax positions (such as the impact of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses) and the age of, and depreciation expenses associated with, fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense).|
|EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with IFRS as a measure of profitability or liquidity. EBITDA does not take into account our debt service requirements and other commitments, including capital expenditures, and, accordingly, is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available for discretionary uses. In addition, EBITDA, as presented in this press release, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies due to differences in the way that these measures are calculated.|
|Reconciliation between the Bezeq Group’s results on an IFRS and non-IFRS basis is provided in a table immediately following the Bezeq Group's consolidated results. Non-IFRS financial measures consist of IFRS financial measures adjusted to exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets, as well as certain business combination accounting entries. The purpose of such adjustments is to give an indication of the Bezeq Group’s performance exclusive of non-cash charges and other items that are considered by management to be outside of its core operating results. The Bezeq Group’s non-IFRS financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable IFRS measures, and should be read only in conjunction with its consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.|
About B Communications Ltd.
B Communications is a telecommunications-oriented holding company and its primary holding is its controlling interest in Bezeq, The Israel Telecommunication Corp., Israel’s largest telecommunications provider (TASE: BZEQ). B Communications shares are traded on NASDAQ and the TASE under the symbol BCOM For more information please visit the following Internet sites:
This press release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, general business conditions in the industry, changes in the regulatory and legal compliance environments, the failure to manage growth and other risks detailed from time to time in B Communications' filings with the Securities Exchange Commission. These documents contain and identify other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. Stockholders and other readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement.
B Communications Ltd.
|Consolidated Statement of Financial Position|
|September 30||September 30||September 30||December 31|
|Cash and cash equivalents||679||173||1,595||1,369|
|Investments including derivatives||1,456||372||2,411||1,284|
|Assets classified as held-for-sale||164||42||102||158|
|Total current assets||5,753||1,470||7,550||6,369|
|Investments including derivatives||94||24||115||119|
|Long-term trade and other receivables||1,193||305||1,594||1,499|
|Property, plant and equipment||6,811||1,741||7,392||7,143|
|Deferred and other expenses||406||104||385||412|
|Investments in equity-accounted investee|
|Deferred tax assets||144||37||218||223|
|Total non-current assets||16,821||4,300||19,077||18,540|
B Communications Ltd.
|Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (cont’d)|
|September 30||September 30||September 30||December 31|
Short-term bank credit, current maturities of long-term liabilities and debentures
|Other payables including derivatives||741||189||997||784|
|Current tax liabilities||564||144||521||499|
|Total current liabilities||4,897||1,251||6,159||4,660|
|Loans from institutions and others||546||140||548||544|
|Deferred tax liabilities||1,107||283||1,249||1,426|
|Total non-current liabilities||13,931||3,561||15,339||15,246|
|Total equity attributable to equity holders|
|of the Company||833||213||914||936|
|Total liabilities and equity||22,574||5,770||26,627||24,909|
B Communications Ltd.
|Consolidated Statements of Income|
|(In millions, except per share data)|
|Nine months period ended||Three months period ended||Year ended|
|September 30||September 30||December 31|
|Cost and expenses|
|Depreciation and amortization||2,267||579||2,113||757||194||715||2,984|
|General and operating expenses||3,015||771||3,447||963||246||1,183||4,462|
|Other operating expenses, net||52||13||283||19||5||1||326|
|Finance expenses, net||287||73||401||107||27||162||498|
Income after financing expenses, net
Share in losses of equity-accounted investee
|Income before income tax||447||114||654||44||11||241||773|
|Income (loss) attributable to:|
|Owners of the Company||(105)||(27)||(98)||(55)||(14)||(31)||(219)|
|Net loss per share, basic||(3.53)||(0.90)||(3.39)||(1.84)||(0.47)||(1.10)||(7.34)|
|Net loss per share, diluted||(3.55)||(0.91)||(3.44)||(1.84)||(0.47)||(1.11)||(7.38)|
WebRTC is about the data channel as much as about video and audio conferencing. However, basically all commercial WebRTC applications have been built with a focus on audio and video. The handling of “data” has been limited to text chat and file download – all other data sharing seems to end with screensharing. What is holding back a more intensive use of peer-to-peer data? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Dr Silvia Pfeiffer, WebRTC Applications Team Lead at National ICT Australia, looked at differ...
Jan. 18, 2017 01:15 AM EST Reads: 4,850
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
Jan. 18, 2017 01:00 AM EST Reads: 6,040
"Splunk basically takes machine data and we make it usable, valuable and accessible for everyone. The way that plays in DevOps is - we need to make data-driven decisions to delivering applications," explained Andi Mann, Chief Technology Advocate at Splunk and @DevOpsSummit Conference Chair, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Jan. 18, 2017 01:00 AM EST Reads: 2,000
"Logz.io is a log analytics platform. We offer the ELK stack, which is the most common log analytics platform in the world. We offer it as a cloud service," explained Tomer Levy, co-founder and CEO of Logz.io, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit, held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Jan. 18, 2017 12:45 AM EST Reads: 6,237
Adding public cloud resources to an existing application can be a daunting process. The tools that you currently use to manage the software and hardware outside the cloud aren’t always the best tools to efficiently grow into the cloud. All of the major configuration management tools have cloud orchestration plugins that can be leveraged, but there are also cloud-native tools that can dramatically improve the efficiency of managing your application lifecycle. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, ...
Jan. 18, 2017 12:45 AM EST Reads: 5,935
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Robert Doyle, lead architect at eCube Systems, will examine the issues and need for an agile infrastructure and show the advantages of capturing developer knowledge in an exportable file for migration into production. He will introduce the use of NXTmonitor, a next-generation DevOps tool that captures application environments, dependencies and start/stop procedures in a portable configuration file with an easy-to-use GUI. In addition to captur...
Jan. 18, 2017 12:30 AM EST Reads: 2,773
"ReadyTalk is an audio and web video conferencing provider. We've really come to embrace WebRTC as the platform for our future of technology," explained Dan Cunningham, CTO of ReadyTalk, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at WebRTC Summit at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Jan. 18, 2017 12:00 AM EST Reads: 2,252
Due of the rise of Hadoop, many enterprises are now deploying their first small clusters of 10 to 20 servers. At this small scale, the complexity of operating the cluster looks and feels like general data center servers. It is not until the clusters scale, as they inevitably do, when the pain caused by the exponential complexity becomes apparent. We've seen this problem occur time and time again. In his session at Big Data Expo, Greg Bruno, Vice President of Engineering and co-founder of StackIQ...
Jan. 18, 2017 12:00 AM EST Reads: 7,728
One of the hottest areas in cloud right now is DRaaS and related offerings. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Dale Levesque, Disaster Recovery Product Manager with Windstream's Cloud and Data Center Marketing team, will discuss the benefits of the cloud model, which far outweigh the traditional approach, and how enterprises need to ensure that their needs are properly being met.
Jan. 17, 2017 11:30 PM EST Reads: 4,302
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and Containers together help companies to achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of D...
Jan. 17, 2017 11:15 PM EST Reads: 4,881
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, John Jelinek IV, a web developer at Linux Academy, will discuss why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers...
Jan. 17, 2017 11:00 PM EST Reads: 522
IoT is at the core or many Digital Transformation initiatives with the goal of re-inventing a company's business model. We all agree that collecting relevant IoT data will result in massive amounts of data needing to be stored. However, with the rapid development of IoT devices and ongoing business model transformation, we are not able to predict the volume and growth of IoT data. And with the lack of IoT history, traditional methods of IT and infrastructure planning based on the past do not app...
Jan. 17, 2017 10:30 PM EST Reads: 687
The many IoT deployments around the world are busy integrating smart devices and sensors into their enterprise IT infrastructures. Yet all of this technology – and there are an amazing number of choices – is of no use without the software to gather, communicate, and analyze the new data flows. Without software, there is no IT. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation; Alan Williamson, Principal ...
Jan. 17, 2017 10:30 PM EST Reads: 2,338
DevOps and microservices are permeating software engineering teams broadly, whether these teams are in pure software shops but happen to run a business, such Uber and Airbnb, or in companies that rely heavily on software to run more traditional business, such as financial firms or high-end manufacturers. Microservices and DevOps have created software development and therefore business speed and agility benefits, but they have also created problems; specifically, they have created software securi...
Jan. 17, 2017 09:30 PM EST Reads: 1,769
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
Jan. 17, 2017 09:15 PM EST Reads: 7,538