|By Business Wire||
|November 8, 2012 06:21 AM EST||
B Communications Ltd. (NASDAQ Global Market: BCOM)(TASE: BCOM) today reported its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2012.
Bezeq’s Results: For the third quarter of 2012, the Bezeq Group reported revenues of NIS 2.5 billion ($ 638 million) and operating profit of NIS 667 million ($ 171 million). Bezeq’s EBITDA for the third quarter totaled NIS 1 billion ($ 262 million), representing an EBITDA margin of 41%. Net income for the period attributable to the shareholders of Bezeq totaled NIS 342 million ($ 87 million). Bezeq's cash flow from operating activities totaled NIS 1 billion ($ 262 million) during the third quarter of 2012.
Dividend from Bezeq: On October 10, 2012, B Communications received two dividend payments from Bezeq which together totaled NIS 464 million ($ 119 million). These dividend payments included a current dividend of NIS 309 million ($ 79 million), representing B Communications’ share of Bezeq’s net profit for the first half of 2012, and a special dividend of NIS 155 million ($ 40 million), representing B Communications’ share of the fourth installment of six special dividend payments declared by Bezeq and approved by its shareholders last year.
Cash Position: As of September 30, 2012, B Communications’ unconsolidated cash and cash equivalents (including dividend receivable) totaled NIS 853 million ($ 218 million), its unconsolidated total debt was NIS 4.2 billion ($ 1.1 billion), and its net debt totaled NIS 3.3 billion ($ 849 million).
B Communications’ Unconsolidated Balance Sheet Data*
|September 30,||December 31,||September 30,||December 31,|
|(NIS millions)||($ millions)|
|Short term liabilities||470||526||120||134|
|Long term liabilities||3,705||3,874||947||991|
|Cash and cash equivalents||389||354||99||91|
|Total net debt||3,322||4,046||849||1,034|
* Does not include the balance sheet of Bezeq.
B Communications’ Third Quarter Consolidated Financial Results
B Communications’ revenues for the third quarter of 2012 were NIS 2,494 million ($ 638 million), a 15% decrease compared with NIS 2,917 million ($ 746 million) reported in the third quarter of 2011. For both the current and the prior-year periods, B Communications’ revenues consisted entirely of its share of Bezeq’s revenues.
B Communications’ net loss attributable to shareholders for the third quarter totaled NIS 55 million ($ 14 million), compared to NIS 31 million ($ 8 million) reported in the third quarter of 2011. This reflects the impact of two significant expenses:
Amortization of tangible and identifiable intangible assets resulting from the Bezeq acquisition: According to the rules of business combination accounting, the total purchase price of the Bezeq acquisition was allocated to Bezeq’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as determined by an analysis performed by an independent valuation firm. B Communications is amortizing certain of the acquired identifiable intangible assets in accordance with the economic benefit expected from such assets using an accelerated method of amortization.
|During the third quarter of 2012, B Communications recorded amortization expenses related to the Bezeq purchase price allocation (“Bezeq PPA”) of NIS 307 million ($78 million), net. From the Bezeq acquisition date (April 14, 2010) until the end of the reporting quarter, B Communications has amortized approximately 53% of the total Bezeq PPA. It expects to amortize an additional 5% in the fourth quarter of 2012.|
|The Company's Bezeq PPA amortization expense is a non-cash expense that is subject to adjustment. If, for any reason, the Company finds it necessary or appropriate to make adjustments to amounts already expensed, it may result in significant changes to future financial statements.|
Financial expenses: B Communications’ unconsolidated financial expenses for the third quarter totaled NIS 65 million ($ 17 million). These expenses consisted primarily of NIS 64 million ($ 16 million) of interest and CPI linkage expense on the long-term loans incurred to finance the Bezeq acquisition and NIS 14 million ($ 4 million) of expenses related to the Company’s debentures. These expenses were offset by financial income of NIS 13 million ($ 3 million) generated by our short term investments. The significant financial expenses recorded in the third quarter were due primarily to high CPI linkage expenses attributed to the 0.85% increase in the Israeli CPI, to which approximately half of B Communications’ total debt is linked.
B Communications’ Unconsolidated Financial Results
|Quarter ended September 30,||Quarter ended September 30,|
|(NIS millions)||(US$ millions)|
|PPA amortization, net||(95)||(107)||(24)||(27)|
|Interest in Bezeq's net income||106||171||27||43|
Comments of Management
Commenting on the results, Doron Turgeman, CEO of B Communications' said, “The third quarter of 2012 was another stable period for Bezeq, demonstrating the cash flow-generating power of its formidable position in Israel’s telecommunications market. Due to the continued uninterrupted payment of both regular and special dividends, including the latest installment which we received last month, we have succeeded in building our cash reserves to their current strong level, and are on track with plans to continue expanding our financial stability and liquidity in the quarters to come. Despite current conditions in the Israeli capital market, as a long-term communications player with loans that are not burdened by share price-related covenants, we are able to manage our cash position entirely according to plan, relying upon steady and visible cash flow to fulfill all loan commitments while continuing to accelerate our repayments.”
Bezeq Group Results (Consolidated)
To provide further insight into its results, the Company has provided the following summary of the consolidated financial report of the Bezeq Group’s quarter ended September 30, 2012. For a full discussion of Bezeq’s results for the quarter, please refer to http://ir.bezeq.co.il.
|Bezeq Group (consolidated)||
|Net profit attributable to Company shareholders||342||550||-37.8%|
|Diluted EPS (NIS)||0.13||0.20||-35.0%|
|Cash flow from operating activities||1,024||882||16.1%|
|Payments for investments, net||270||374||-27.8%|
|Free cash flow 1||754||508||48.4%|
|Net debt/EBITDA (end of period) 2||1.64||1.24|
|Net debt/shareholders' equity (end of period)||3.69||2.93|
|1 Free cash flow is defined as cash flows from operating activities less net payments for investments.|
|2 EBITDA in this calculation refers to the trailing twelve months.|
Revenues of the Bezeq Group in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 2.49 billion compared with NIS 2.92 billion in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 14.5%. Most of the decrease in the Bezeq Group's revenues was due to lower revenues from the sale of cellular handsets and the erosion of revenues from cellular services.
Operating profit of the Bezeq Group in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 667 million, compared with NIS 944 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 29.3%. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 1.03 billion (EBITDA margin of 41.1%), compared with NIS 1.30 billion (EBITDA margin of 44.6%) in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 21.1%. Net profit attributable to Bezeq shareholders in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 342 million compared with NIS 550 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 37.8%. The decrease in profitability metrics was primarily due to a decrease in profitability in the cellular segment as well as lower capital gains from real estate and copper sales in the Fixed-line segment compared to the corresponding quarter of 2011.
Cash flow from operating activities in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 1.02 billion compared with NIS 882 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, an increase of 16.1% mainly due to improved working capital in the cellular segment. Free cash flow in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 754 million compared with NIS 508 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, an increase of 48.4%. The increase in free cash flow was due to an increase in cash flow from operating activities as well as the completion of large infrastructure projects initiated in prior years.
Gross capital expenditures (CAPEX), in the third quarter of 2012 amounted to NIS 346 million compared with NIS 437 million in the corresponding quarter of 2011, a decrease of 20.8%. The Bezeq Group's CAPEX to consolidated sales ratio in the third quarter of 2012 was 13.9%, compared with 15.0% in the corresponding quarter of 2011.
As of September 30, 2012, gross financial debt of the Bezeq Group was NIS 8.94 billion, compared with NIS 9.61 billion as of September 30, 2011. The net financial debt of the Bezeq Group was NIS 7.19 billion compared with NIS 5.99 billion as of September 30, 2011. At the end of September 2012, the Bezeq Group's net financial debt to EBITDA ratio was 1.64, compared with 1.24 at the end of September 2011.
Convenience Translation to Dollars: For the convenience of the reader, certain of the reported NIS figures of September 30, 2012 have been presented in millions of U.S. dollars, translated at the representative rate of exchange as of September 30, 2012 (NIS 3.912 = U.S. Dollar 1.00). The U.S. dollar ($) amounts presented should not be construed as representing amounts receivable or payable in U.S. dollars or convertible into U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
Use of non-IFRS Measurements: We and the Bezeq Group’s management regularly use supplemental non-IFRS financial measures internally to understand, manage and evaluate our business and make operating decisions. We believe these non-IFRS financial measures provide consistent and comparable measures to help investors understand the Bezeq Group’s current and future operating cash flow performance.
|These non-IFRS financial measures may differ materially from the non-IFRS financial measures used by other companies.|
|EBITDA is a non-IFRS financial measure generally defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Bezeq Group defines EBITDA as net income before financial income (expenses), net, impairment and other charges, expenses recorded for stock compensation in accordance with IFRS 2, income tax expenses and depreciation and amortization. We present the Bezeq Group’s EBITDA as a supplemental performance measure because we believe that it facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structure, tax positions (such as the impact of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses) and the age of, and depreciation expenses associated with, fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense).|
|EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with IFRS as a measure of profitability or liquidity. EBITDA does not take into account our debt service requirements and other commitments, including capital expenditures, and, accordingly, is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available for discretionary uses. In addition, EBITDA, as presented in this press release, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies due to differences in the way that these measures are calculated.|
|Reconciliation between the Bezeq Group’s results on an IFRS and non-IFRS basis is provided in a table immediately following the Bezeq Group's consolidated results. Non-IFRS financial measures consist of IFRS financial measures adjusted to exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets, as well as certain business combination accounting entries. The purpose of such adjustments is to give an indication of the Bezeq Group’s performance exclusive of non-cash charges and other items that are considered by management to be outside of its core operating results. The Bezeq Group’s non-IFRS financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable IFRS measures, and should be read only in conjunction with its consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.|
About B Communications Ltd.
B Communications is a telecommunications-oriented holding company and its primary holding is its controlling interest in Bezeq, The Israel Telecommunication Corp., Israel’s largest telecommunications provider (TASE: BZEQ). B Communications shares are traded on NASDAQ and the TASE under the symbol BCOM For more information please visit the following Internet sites:
This press release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, general business conditions in the industry, changes in the regulatory and legal compliance environments, the failure to manage growth and other risks detailed from time to time in B Communications' filings with the Securities Exchange Commission. These documents contain and identify other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. Stockholders and other readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement.
B Communications Ltd.
|Consolidated Statement of Financial Position|
|September 30||September 30||September 30||December 31|
|Cash and cash equivalents||679||173||1,595||1,369|
|Investments including derivatives||1,456||372||2,411||1,284|
|Assets classified as held-for-sale||164||42||102||158|
|Total current assets||5,753||1,470||7,550||6,369|
|Investments including derivatives||94||24||115||119|
|Long-term trade and other receivables||1,193||305||1,594||1,499|
|Property, plant and equipment||6,811||1,741||7,392||7,143|
|Deferred and other expenses||406||104||385||412|
|Investments in equity-accounted investee|
|Deferred tax assets||144||37||218||223|
|Total non-current assets||16,821||4,300||19,077||18,540|
B Communications Ltd.
|Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (cont’d)|
|September 30||September 30||September 30||December 31|
Short-term bank credit, current maturities of long-term liabilities and debentures
|Other payables including derivatives||741||189||997||784|
|Current tax liabilities||564||144||521||499|
|Total current liabilities||4,897||1,251||6,159||4,660|
|Loans from institutions and others||546||140||548||544|
|Deferred tax liabilities||1,107||283||1,249||1,426|
|Total non-current liabilities||13,931||3,561||15,339||15,246|
|Total equity attributable to equity holders|
|of the Company||833||213||914||936|
|Total liabilities and equity||22,574||5,770||26,627||24,909|
B Communications Ltd.
|Consolidated Statements of Income|
|(In millions, except per share data)|
|Nine months period ended||Three months period ended||Year ended|
|September 30||September 30||December 31|
|Cost and expenses|
|Depreciation and amortization||2,267||579||2,113||757||194||715||2,984|
|General and operating expenses||3,015||771||3,447||963||246||1,183||4,462|
|Other operating expenses, net||52||13||283||19||5||1||326|
|Finance expenses, net||287||73||401||107||27||162||498|
Income after financing expenses, net
Share in losses of equity-accounted investee
|Income before income tax||447||114||654||44||11||241||773|
|Income (loss) attributable to:|
|Owners of the Company||(105)||(27)||(98)||(55)||(14)||(31)||(219)|
|Net loss per share, basic||(3.53)||(0.90)||(3.39)||(1.84)||(0.47)||(1.10)||(7.34)|
|Net loss per share, diluted||(3.55)||(0.91)||(3.44)||(1.84)||(0.47)||(1.11)||(7.38)|
Adding public cloud resources to an existing application can be a daunting process. The tools that you currently use to manage the software and hardware outside the cloud aren’t always the best tools to efficiently grow into the cloud. All of the major configuration management tools have cloud orchestration plugins that can be leveraged, but there are also cloud-native tools that can dramatically improve the efficiency of managing your application lifecycle. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, ...
Jul. 24, 2016 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 771
As companies gain momentum, the need to maintain high quality products can outstrip their development team’s bandwidth for QA. Building out a large QA team (whether in-house or outsourced) can slow down development and significantly increases costs. This eBook takes QA profiles from 5 companies who successfully scaled up production without building a large QA team and includes: What to consider when choosing CI/CD tools How culture and communication can make or break implementation
Jul. 24, 2016 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,498
The best-practices for building IoT applications with Go Code that attendees can use to build their own IoT applications. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Indraneel Mitra, Senior Solutions Architect & Technology Evangelist at Cognizant, provided valuable information and resources for both novice and experienced developers on how to get started with IoT and Golang in a day. He also provided information on how to use Intel Arduino Kit, Go Robotics API and AWS IoT stack to build an application tha...
Jul. 24, 2016 08:45 AM EDT Reads: 866
It’s 2016: buildings are smart, connected and the IoT is fundamentally altering how control and operating systems work and speak to each other. Platforms across the enterprise are networked via inexpensive sensors to collect massive amounts of data for analytics, information management, and insights that can be used to continuously improve operations. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Brian Chemel, Co-Founder and CTO of Digital Lumens, will explore: The benefits sensor-networked systems bring to ...
Jul. 24, 2016 08:30 AM EDT Reads: 1,456
Whether your IoT service is connecting cars, homes, appliances, wearable, cameras or other devices, one question hangs in the balance – how do you actually make money from this service? The ability to turn your IoT service into profit requires the ability to create a monetization strategy that is flexible, scalable and working for you in real-time. It must be a transparent, smoothly implemented strategy that all stakeholders – from customers to the board – will be able to understand and comprehe...
Jul. 24, 2016 08:30 AM EDT Reads: 2,048
"Tintri was started in 2008 with the express purpose of building a storage appliance that is ideal for virtualized environments. We support a lot of different hypervisor platforms from VMware to OpenStack to Hyper-V," explained Dan Florea, Director of Product Management at Tintri, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Jul. 24, 2016 08:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,808
Identity is in everything and customers are looking to their providers to ensure the security of their identities, transactions and data. With the increased reliance on cloud-based services, service providers must build security and trust into their offerings, adding value to customers and improving the user experience. Making identity, security and privacy easy for customers provides a unique advantage over the competition.
Jul. 24, 2016 08:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,041
SYS-CON Events announced today that Venafi, the Immune System for the Internet™ and the leading provider of Next Generation Trust Protection, will exhibit at @DevOpsSummit at 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Venafi is the Immune System for the Internet™ that protects the foundation of all cybersecurity – cryptographic keys and digital certificates – so they can’t be misused by bad guys in attacks...
Jul. 24, 2016 08:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,115
Security, data privacy, reliability and regulatory compliance are critical factors when evaluating whether to move business applications from in-house client hosted environments to a cloud platform. In her session at 18th Cloud Expo, Vandana Viswanathan, Associate Director at Cognizant, In this session, will provide an orientation to the five stages required to implement a cloud hosted solution validation strategy.
Jul. 24, 2016 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 717
Is your aging software platform suffering from technical debt while the market changes and demands new solutions at a faster clip? It’s a bold move, but you might consider walking away from your core platform and starting fresh. ReadyTalk did exactly that. In his General Session at 19th Cloud Expo, Michael Chambliss, Head of Engineering at ReadyTalk, will discuss why and how ReadyTalk diverted from healthy revenue and over a decade of audio conferencing product development to start an innovati...
Jul. 24, 2016 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 881
SaaS companies can greatly expand revenue potential by pushing beyond their own borders. The challenge is how to do this without degrading service quality. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Adam Rogers, Managing Director at Anexia, discussed how IaaS providers with a global presence and both virtual and dedicated infrastructure can help companies expand their service footprint with low “go-to-market” costs.
Jul. 24, 2016 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,273
For basic one-to-one voice or video calling solutions, WebRTC has proven to be a very powerful technology. Although WebRTC’s core functionality is to provide secure, real-time p2p media streaming, leveraging native platform features and server-side components brings up new communication capabilities for web and native mobile applications, allowing for advanced multi-user use cases such as video broadcasting, conferencing, and media recording.
Jul. 24, 2016 07:45 AM EDT Reads: 713
The competitive landscape of the global cloud computing market in the healthcare industry is crowded due to the presence of a large number of players. The large number of participants has led to the fragmented nature of the market. Some of the major players operating in the global cloud computing market in the healthcare industry are Cisco Systems Inc., Carestream Health Inc., Carecloud Corp., AGFA Healthcare, IBM Corp., Cleardata Networks, Merge Healthcare Inc., Microsoft Corp., Intel Corp., an...
Jul. 24, 2016 07:30 AM EDT Reads: 756
"Avere Systems is a hybrid cloud solution provider. We have customers that want to use cloud storage and we have customers that want to take advantage of cloud compute," explained Rebecca Thompson, VP of Marketing at Avere Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Jul. 24, 2016 07:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,936
Large scale deployments present unique planning challenges, system commissioning hurdles between IT and OT and demand careful system hand-off orchestration. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Smith, Senior Director and a founding member of Incenergy, will discuss some of the key tactics to ensure delivery success based on his experience of the last two years deploying Industrial IoT systems across four continents.
Jul. 24, 2016 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,412