Welcome!

News Feed Item

Biglari Holdings Comments On Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.'s Erroneous Analysis Of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. Return On Investment

SAN ANTONIO, Nov. 9, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BH) today announced that the analysis conducted by Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., a proxy advisory firm ("ISS"), on a critical financial metric for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRL) is fundamentally flawed and inaccurate.

It is incontrovertible that ISS' calculations of Cracker Barrel's return on investment on its 116 new stores opened between 2004 and 2009 simply do not add up.

Background

Cracker Barrel has been telling its shareholders that its return on investment on these 116 new stores is 16.2%.  But Cracker Barrel failed to include relevant expenses. Cracker Barrel CFO Lawrence Hyatt has stated in an SEC filing that "the Company believes that making an allocation of general and administrative, interest and tax expenses to these [116] stores is not material to an investor's understanding of the results for these stores or the Company's decision-making in determining to build new stores." Biglari Holdings and ISS both disagree with Mr. Hyatt on excluding such expenses; in fact, both Biglari Holdings and ISS believe that general and administrative ("G&A") expenses must be factored into the determination of return on new store investment.  ISS states, "The real calculation from a shareholder perspective should be whether the incremental investment, including all incremental costs such as taxes, returned incremental net income at greater than the cost of capital.  Depreciation and G&A expense, therefore, should be included as expenses in the calculation to the extent they are incremental." 

Cracker Barrel does disclose incremental depreciation even though it fails to factor it into its computation of return on investment. Mr. Hyatt discloses 'Store EBITDA' and depreciation for the 116 stores to be $61.8 million and $14.7 million, respectively. The only piece of data he does not disclose, nor apparently believes is important, are G&A expenses for these stores.

The key question is therefore the correct number to use for G&A expenses. We factored in $235,000 per store for it is Cracker Barrel's actual G&A per store for fiscal 2012. In our October 25, 2012 letter we also provided shareholders with per-store G&A expenses for the last 15 years; these data allow each shareholder to choose a different figure based on what he or she believes would be most appropriate. Nevertheless, ISS makes the following statement (referring to return on new store investment as ROIC):

"From 2005 through 2012 total G&A grew by $31.3 million, or an average of $270,000 incremental G&A for each of the 116 new stores opened in that period. If this were the true incremental G&A expense—and even assuming no further adjustments to [Biglari's] assumptions about depreciation and tax expense were necessary to get to true incremental numbers—the calculated ROIC rises from 3.7% to 10.7%."

ISS' above statement is factually wrong. An estimate of $270,000 per store of incremental G&A expense rather than $235,000 per store in our analysis would reduce return on investment. Yet ISS concludes that return increased from 3.7% to 10.7% — a mathematical impossibility! We urge shareholders to do their own analysis.

Even if we factor a zero for incremental G&A expense, the return becomes 8.7%. The following table sets forth the facts:

Calculation of Cracker Barrel's Return on Store Investment Analysis

($ in thousands)






Damodaran

Cracker Barrel


Zero G&A

ISS Analysis

'Store EBITDA'...................................

$                  61,800

$                  61,800

$                  61,800

$                  61,800

     Depreciation.................................

$                  14,700

$                           0

$                  14,700

$                  14,700

     G&A.............................................

$                  27,300

$                           0

$                           0

$                  31,300

Operating income..............................

$                  19,800

$                  47,100

$                  15,800

     Taxes...........................................

$                    5,800

$                           0

$                  13,900

$                    4,700

NOPAT..............................................

$                  14,000

$                  33,200

$                  11,100

Invested capital................................

$                382,000

$                382,000

$                382,000

$                382,000






Return

3.7%

16.2%

8.7%

2.9%






Source: As Reported in SEC Filings.

Note: Taxes based on an effective tax rate of 30% based on Cracker Barrel's 2012 provision for income taxes of $40,575 divided by its 2012 pre-tax income of $137,376 (each, excluding the impact of the 53rd week).

It is clear to us that the correct return for Cracker Barrel's 116 new stores is between 3.7% and 8.7%.  It is certainly not 16.2% as Cracker Barrel contends or even 10.7% as ISS erroneously computes.  Clearly, any return on investment between 3.7%-8.7% is inadequate.

Cracker Barrel has referenced as an authority Aswath Damodaran's calculation on return analyses. However, Cracker Barrel has failed to follow Dr. Damodaran's definitive calculations, which stipulate that net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by investment would be the appropriate formula.

One point on which we do agree with ISS is that Cracker Barrel's return on new store investment is, as ISS emphasizes, "an important consideration for shareholders:  what is at issue is whether the board is adding or destroying value through its expansion strategy." (Emphasis added)  It is clear to us that ISS' incorrect calculations led it to draw the wrong conclusion on this fundamental point in its analysis.

Cracker Barrel is going to continue to spend $155 million to open new stores based on a faulty assessment of return. It is clear this capital allocation will destroy value based on the aforementioned analysis.  We are also concerned about new stores cannibalizing old stores. Furthermore, we demand that Cracker Barrel disclose relevant data on the 116 stores based on vintage so we see the performance of those stores.  ISS also called upon Cracker Barrel to disclose this critical information to shareholders:

"[T]he management … presentations, however, have [not] broken out the view that would be most useful to shareholders considering this aspect of the board's stewardship: the trend in performance by vintage. If stores opened in 2009 are performing substantially better than those opened in 2005, for example, it may indicate that the company has substantially improved the process by which it targets new opportunities—or, if 2009 was substantially worse than 2005, that the strategy is veering wildly off track."

We believe our analysis is sound and we urge shareholders to base their decisions on such facts. Biglari Holdings firmly believes that if a shareholder of Cracker Barrel is seeking to maximize the value of his or her investment, electing the nominees of a near 18% shareholder to the Board of Directors is the clear pathway to value creation.

SOURCE Biglari Holdings Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...