Welcome!

News Feed Item

Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Year-End Earnings for Fiscal 2012

PITTSBURGH, PA -- (Marketwire) -- 11/21/12 -- Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (the "Company") (NASDAQ: FSBI), the holding company for Fidelity Bank, reported net income for the year ended September 30, 2012 of $806,000 or $.13 per diluted share, compared to net income of $1.535 million or $.37 per diluted share for the prior year. The $729,000 decrease in earnings for fiscal 2012 primarily reflects a decrease in net interest income of $925,000, an increase in the provision for loan losses of $375,000 and an increase in operating expenses of $832,000, partially offset by an increase in other income of $1.03 million (excluding impairment charges), and an increase in income tax benefit of $347,000. Other Than Temporary Impairment ("OTTI") charges were $1.5 million for both the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Net loss of $51,000 was recorded for the three-month period ending September 30, 2012, or $.05 per diluted share, compared to net income of $597,000, or $.16 per diluted share for the same period in the prior year. The $648,000 decrease in net income for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 primarily relates to a decrease in net interest income of $435,000 and an increase in operating expenses of $537,000, partially offset by an increase in other income of $150,000 and an increase in income tax benefit of $174,000. Operating expenses were impacted by merger related costs associated with the proposed merger agreement with WesBanco, Inc. announced on July 19, 2012.

Net interest income before provision for loan losses decreased to $13.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2012, compared to $14.8 million in the prior year. The decrease in net interest income before provision for loan losses for the fiscal year reflects lower net earning assets during the period, resulting in a decrease in the net interest spread caused by the average yield on interest-earning assets decreasing more than the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The Company's tax equivalent interest rate spread decreased to 2.32% for the year ending September 30, 2012 compared to 2.39% in the prior year.

Net interest income before provision for loan losses was $3.3 million for the three-months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $3.7 million in the prior year period. The decrease reflects lower net earning assets during the period, as well as a decrease in the net interest rate spread resulting from the average yield on interest-earning assets decreasing more than the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

The Company recorded a $1.575 million provision for loan losses for the year ended September 30, 2012, compared to $1.2 million in the prior year period, an increase of $375,000. For both the three-months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded a $300,000 provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is charged to operations to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects management's best estimate of the losses inherent in the portfolio. When determining the provision for loan losses, the company considers a number of factors some of which include specific credit reviews, non-performing, delinquency and charge-off trends, concentrations of credit, loan volume trends and broader local and national economic trends. Net charge-offs for fiscal 2012 were $2.8 million compared to $1.3 million for fiscal 2011. Non-performing loans increased to $7.3 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $6.8 million at September 30, 2011. Non-performing assets and foreclosed real estate were 2.23% of total assets at September 30, 2012 compared to 1.49% at September 30, 2011. The allowance for loan losses was 61.55% of non-performing loans and 1.37% of net loans at September 30, 2012, compared to 84.51% and 1.64%, respectively, at September 30, 2011.

Other income, excluding OTTI charges, increased $1.0 million or 22.0% to $5.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2012, compared to $4.7 million for the same period last year. Other income, excluding OTTI charges, was $1.7 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2012, compared to $1.2 million in the prior year. The increase for the current fiscal year primarily reflects an increase in the gain on sales of loans of $512,000, an increase in loan service charges and fees of $204,000 and an increase in other income of $294,000. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases in deposit service charges and fees of $72,000. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in the prior year, excluding OTTI charges, primarily reflects an increase in loan service charges and fees of $113,000, an increase in realized gain on sale of securities of $230,000, an increase in gain on sale of loans of $203,000 and an increase in other income of $61,000, partially offset by a decrease in deposit service charges and fees of $38,000.

OTTI charges recorded during the three-month period ending September 30, 2012 were $525,000, compared to $91,000 in the prior year period. The quarterly 2012 charges related to one corporate obligation. OTTI charges were $1.5 million during both the twelve-month periods ending September 30, 2012 and 2011. The impairment charges for the current fiscal year relate to the Company's holdings of a private label mortgage-backed security, a pooled trust preferred security, a corporate obligation and three common stocks of local financial institutions. The impairment charges in the prior year period related to the Company's holdings of five pooled trust preferred securities ("trups"), a single issue preferred security, a private label mortgage-backed security, and common stock of a local financial institution. The impairment charges on pooled trups for both periods resulted from several factors, including a downgrade in their credit ratings, failure to pass their principal coverage tests, indications of a break in yield, and the decline in the net present value of their projected cash flows. Management of the Company has deemed the impairment on the trups to be other-than-temporary based upon these factors and the duration and extent to which the market value has been less than cost, the inability to forecast a recovery in market value, and other factors concerning the issuers in the pooled securities. At September 30, 2012, the Company had holdings in 13 different trust preferred offerings, with a book value of $13.9 million. The cumulative net unrealized loss on these securities amounted to $5.8 million at September 30, 2012.

Operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2012, increased $832,000 or 5.5% to $16.0 million compared to $15.1 million for the prior year. For the final three-month period in this fiscal year, operating expenses were $4.3 million compared to $3.8 million in the prior year period. The increase in operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2012 is attributed to an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $190,000, an increase in office occupancy and equipment expense of $18,000, an increase in professional fees of $241,000, an increase in service bureau expense of $23,000 and an increase in other operating expenses of $605,000, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $35,000, a decrease in advertising expense of $55,000, and a decrease in federal deposit insurance premiums of $155,000. The increase for the three-month period ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily reflects an increase in compensation and benefits of $97,000, an increase in professional fees of $249,000, and an increase in other expenses of $130,000. Operating expenses in fiscal 2012 were impacted by merger related costs associated with the proposed merger agreement with WesBanco, Inc. announced on July 19, 2012.

The Company had an income tax benefit of $211,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, compared to a tax provision of $136,000 in the prior fiscal year. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company had an income tax benefit of $29,000, compared to a tax expense of $145,000 for the same period last year. The tax benefits for the prior periods were significantly impacted by the impairment charges during the respective periods. The OTTI charges recorded in the prior periods caused pre-tax income to be lower than tax-exempt income; therefore a tax benefit was recorded.

Total assets at September 30, 2012 were $647.1 million, a decrease of $19.8 million as compared to assets of $666.9 as of September 30, 2011. Net loans outstanding decreased $13.6 million or 3.9% to $332.7 million at September 30, 2012, compared to September 30, 2011. The decline in the loan portfolio in fiscal 2012 resulted, to a large extent, from the decision to sell residential mortgage loans originated that did not meet certain interest rate levels, rather than retaining them in the portfolio. Savings and time deposits increased $14.6 million to $460.7 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $446.1 million at September 30, 2011. Borrowed funds were $127.9 million at September 30, 2012, a decrease of $36.5 million as compared to September 30, 2011. Stockholders' equity was $53.1 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $50.5 million at September 30, 2011.

The Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available on-line through the Company's Internet website at www.fidelitybancorp-pa.com.

Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. is the holding company for Fidelity Bank, a Pennsylvania-chartered, FDIC-insured savings bank conducting business through thirteen offices in Allegheny and Butler counties.

Statements contained in this news release which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, factors discussed in documents filed by Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.



Fidelity Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Income Statement for the Three Months and Year Ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

                             Three Months Ended            Year Ended
                               September 30,              September 30,
                             2012          2011         2012         2011
                         ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Interest income           $     5,563  $     6,493  $    23,603  $    26,710
Interest expense                2,250        2,745        9,712       11,894
                         ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Net interest income             3,313        3,748       13,891       14,816
Provision for loan losses         300          300        1,575        1,200
                         ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Net interest income after
 provision for loan
 losses                         3,013        3,448       12,316       13,616
Noninterest income              1,221        1,071        4,232        3,176
Noninterest expense             4,314        3,777       15,953       15,121
                         ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Income (loss) before
 income taxes                     (80)         742          595        1,671
Income tax provision
 (benefit)                        (29)         145         (211)         136
                         ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Net income (loss)                 (51)         597          806        1,535
Preferred stock dividend          (88)         (88)        (350)        (350)
Amortization of preferred
 stock discount                   (15)         (15)         (60)         (60)
                         ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Net income (loss)
 available to common
 stockholders             $      (154) $       494  $       396  $     1,125
                         ============  ===========  ===========  ===========

Basic earnings (loss) per
 common share             $     (0.05) $      0.16  $      0.13  $      0.37
Diluted earnings (loss)
 per common share         $     (0.05) $      0.16  $      0.12  $      0.37

Net interest margin (tax
 equivalent)                     2.24%        2.47%        2.32%        2.39%
Annualized return on
 average assets                  0.12%        0.36%        0.22%        0.22%
Annualized return on
 average equity                  1.55%        4.69%        3.06%        3.06%


Balance Sheet Data
 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except
 share data)

                            September    September
                            30, 2012     30, 2011
                         ------------  -----------

Total assets              $   647,077  $   666,915
Cash and cash equivalents      38,429       24,856
Total investment
 securities                   236,405      259,386
Loans receivable, net         332,676      346,285
Deposits                      460,715      446,102
Borrowed funds (includes
 subordinated debt)           127,923      164,407
Stockholders' equity           53,080       50,491
Book value per common
 share                    $     15.03  $     14.24

Average equity to average
 assets                          7.86%        7.34%
Allowance for loan losses
 to loans receivable             1.37%        1.64%
Non-performing assets to
 total assets                    2.23%        1.49%
Non-performing loans to
 total loans                     2.17%        1.97%


Contact:
Mr. Richard G. Spencer
President and Chief Executive Officer
(412) 367-3303 ext. 3121
E-mail: Email Contact

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In addition to all the benefits, IoT is also bringing new kind of customer experience challenges - cars that unlock themselves, thermostats turning houses into saunas and baby video monitors broadcasting over the internet. This list can only increase because while IoT services should be intuitive and simple to use, the delivery ecosystem is a myriad of potential problems as IoT explodes complexity. So finding a performance issue is like finding the proverbial needle in the haystack.
The idea of comparing data in motion (at the sensor level) to data at rest (in a Big Data server warehouse) with predictive analytics in the cloud is very appealing to the industrial IoT sector. The problem Big Data vendors have, however, is access to that data in motion at the sensor location. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Scott Allen, CMO of FreeWave, discussed how as IoT is increasingly adopted by industrial markets, there is going to be an increased demand for sensor data from the outermos...
"Qosmos has launched L7Viewer, a network traffic analysis tool, so it analyzes all the traffic between the virtual machine and the data center and the virtual machine and the external world," stated Sebastien Synold, Product Line Manager at Qosmos, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Between 2005 and 2020, data volumes will grow by a factor of 300 – enough data to stack CDs from the earth to the moon 162 times. This has come to be known as the ‘big data’ phenomenon. Unfortunately, traditional approaches to handling, storing and analyzing data aren’t adequate at this scale: they’re too costly, slow and physically cumbersome to keep up. Fortunately, in response a new breed of technology has emerged that is cheaper, faster and more scalable. Yet, in meeting these new needs they...
When it comes to cloud computing, the ability to turn massive amounts of compute cores on and off on demand sounds attractive to IT staff, who need to manage peaks and valleys in user activity. With cloud bursting, the majority of the data can stay on premises while tapping into compute from public cloud providers, reducing risk and minimizing need to move large files. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Scott Jeschonek, Director of Product Management at Avere Systems, discussed the IT and busin...
Data is the fuel that drives the machine learning algorithmic engines and ultimately provides the business value. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Ed Featherston, director/senior enterprise architect at Collaborative Consulting, will discuss the key considerations around quality, volume, timeliness, and pedigree that must be dealt with in order to properly fuel that engine.
More and more companies are looking to microservices as an architectural pattern for breaking apart applications into more manageable pieces so that agile teams can deliver new features quicker and more effectively. What this pattern has done more than anything to date is spark organizational transformations, setting the foundation for future application development. In practice, however, there are a number of considerations to make that go beyond simply “build, ship, and run,” which changes how...
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
SYS-CON Events has announced today that Roger Strukhoff has been named conference chair of Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo 2017 New York. The 20th Cloud Expo and 7th @ThingsExpo will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. "The Internet of Things brings trillions of dollars of opportunity to developers and enterprise IT, no matter how you measure it," stated Roger Strukhoff. "More importantly, it leverages the power of devices and the Internet to enable us all to im...
Whether your IoT service is connecting cars, homes, appliances, wearable, cameras or other devices, one question hangs in the balance – how do you actually make money from this service? The ability to turn your IoT service into profit requires the ability to create a monetization strategy that is flexible, scalable and working for you in real-time. It must be a transparent, smoothly implemented strategy that all stakeholders – from customers to the board – will be able to understand and comprehe...
"We are the public cloud providers. We are currently providing 50% of the resources they need for doing e-commerce business in China and we are hosting about 60% of mobile gaming in China," explained Yi Zheng, CPO and VP of Engineering at CDS Global Cloud, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"Once customers get a year into their IoT deployments, they start to realize that they may have been shortsighted in the ways they built out their deployment and the key thing I see a lot of people looking at is - how can I take equipment data, pull it back in an IoT solution and show it in a dashboard," stated Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
What happens when the different parts of a vehicle become smarter than the vehicle itself? As we move toward the era of smart everything, hundreds of entities in a vehicle that communicate with each other, the vehicle and external systems create a need for identity orchestration so that all entities work as a conglomerate. Much like an orchestra without a conductor, without the ability to secure, control, and connect the link between a vehicle’s head unit, devices, and systems and to manage the ...
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...