Welcome!

News Feed Item

Former Chairman and CEO Kaleil Isaza Tuzman Sends Letter to KIT digital Board of Directors

Urges Company to Discuss Acquisition Offer and Conduct Open and Transparent Sale Process

NEW YORK, Nov. 23, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --

Board of Directors
KIT digital, Inc.
26 West 17th Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY
10011

Attention: Bill Russell, Chairman

Dear KIT digital Board of Directors,

KIT digital, Inc.'s ("KITD" or the "Company") November 21, 2012 8-K (the "8-K") effectively blamed prior management for the Company's delayed filing of third quarter results and the Company's intent to restate its financial statements for the 2009-2011 period, among other issues.  The Company's attempt to attribute its current problems to prior management is spurious.

As one of KITD's largest shareholders and the Company's former chairman and CEO, I have kept my opinions on the Company's trajectory confidential since my departure in April 2012, in deference to the efforts being expended by current management and to avoid unnecessary discord.  However, I can no longer silently abide the Company's attempt to scapegoat previous management or tolerate the recent record of deficient management and poor business execution.  KITD shareholders deserve to be leveled with on what has occurred at the Company to date, and shown a path forward to success and enhancement of share value, as we have set forth below.

First, some clarifications concerning some implications contained in the Company's recent 8-K.  During my tenure at the Company, all revenue recognition decisions were made in consultation with and approved by the Company's independent accounting firm, and approved by your audit committee. We have no reason to believe any of those decisions were improper.  Since my departure, it is possible that your new audit committee members have elected, in consultation with the firm's outside auditors, to apply different revenue recognition policies. That is not prior management's responsibility, and a change in revenue recognition policies and application may reflect your recently insinuated decision to further separate the "software" and "services" lines of the Company's business.  As shareholders, we cannot yet opine on the merit of your decision, since your 8-K lacked details on the matter.

Similarly, the 8K's vague reference to a lack of disclosure concerning certain undisclosed "related party transactions" is misleading and inappropriate.  During my tenure with KITD, all related party transactions were vetted by KITD's outside counsel and relevant disclosures in KITD financial statements were reviewed and approved by the Company's independent accounting firm.  For instance, as you know, my affiliate investment companies, KIT Media and KIT Capital, supported the Company by investing on four different occasions between 2008 and 2011 in public share issuances alongside other public shareholders.  These transactions were "related party transactions" in nature and were disclosed in great detail in press releases and Company financial statements at the time.  The transactions were very positive for the Company (and included two successfully completed financings during the depth of the 2008-2009 financial crisis) and were broadly lauded by KITD's shareholder base at the time as demonstrating management's "skin in the game."  In addition, stock options and restricted stock grants over time to me or KIT Capital for services rendered were also described in detail in the Company's public filings.  Accordingly, these transactions were all appropriately disclosed and benefited the Company and its shareholders—and, in fact, neither myself nor KIT Capital has ever exercised or sold any of these stock grants or options, nor have I received a single dollar or share in severance. 

By comparison, you granted former CEO Barak Bar-Cohen a $250,000 "success bonus" for an extremely dilutive, death-spiral financing concluded after my departure and JEC Capital (the New York hedge fund which currently controls the Company and for which current KITD CEO Peter Heiland serves as Managing Director) recently lent $2.5 million to the Company without a concomitant press release—and the mention of this related party transaction received only cursory mention in an indirectly related SEC filing. 

Given the 8-K's emphasis on the dire current liquidity situation of the Company, it appears to us that you, in conjunction with the Company's senior creditors, may be conspiring to artificially decrease the Company's stock price so as to acquire the Company at a fire sale price that is unfair to shareholders.  Indeed, the 8-K's disclosure regarding covenant breaches of current lender agreements could be interpreted as a lead-in to a pre-arranged, sweetheart deal with the Company's  lenders.

Previous management presided over a period between December 2007 and March 2012 during which monthly revenues expanded over 20x, operating results went from huge losses to small gains, and the Company's shares appreciated from $2.90 to over $9.00. Despite your attempt to blame past management for your current results, those close to the Company report that current management has shown disregard for the underlying business—including key clients, employees and vendors. Most startlingly, you seem to have presided over the Company burning more cash from operations in the seven months since I left than the Company had burned from operations in the prior two fiscal years.

Adding to KITD's problems, the Company's current management has:

  • failed to visit many, if not most key clients
  • failed to visit more than a handful of Company field locations
  • lost many, if not most, of the Company's key salespeople
  • disassembled the Company's core engineering team
  • demonstrated a lack of sufficient understanding of the Company's core technology, products and capabilities, and failed to make material progress in product development
  • moved the Company headquarters from its low-cost European center of Prague to a high-cost NYC office—despite over 50% of the Company's revenues being European in origin
  • incurred ballooning operating losses
  • poorly executed on an ill-conceived idea of stripping down and selling individual pieces of the Company—without sufficient comprehension of how software and services units complement each other in serving clients
  • failed to attract significant new talent to the business
  • failed to add material new client contracts
  • failed to communicate a coherent vision for the future to staff, clients and industry observers
  • left an impression with staff, clients, vendors and competitors alike that KITD is under "temporary", "hedge fund", "Wall Street-focused" management.

Ignoring these poor managerial decisions, the Company instead seeks to scapegoat prior management in describing its current condition.  It is time to redress this situation.

I originally resigned from my post as CEO of KITD in March 2012 (and subsequently resigned from his role as Chairman in April, 2012) because I had come to irreconcilable differences with the Board at the time concerning strategic decisions and the future of the Company.  As a major shareholder, I ultimately felt I could make a greater positive impact on the Company's development from the outside than from within, especially considering that the Board formed a Special Strategic Committee (the "Special Committee") in January 2012 which had effectively taken control of all CEO-level decisions.

By way of background, in December 2011, my core management team had recommended to the Board that the Company complete a major restructuring and consolidation of operations (a plan that you finally began to implement about two months ago).  We also recommended to the Board at such time that the Company pursue two competing strategic transactions, each with the potential to be a homerun for shareholders (one a private equity buy-out and the other a merger-of-equals).  Instead, the Board rejected management's suggested approach and formed the Special Committee with a broad mandate to oversee "any and all strategic decisions" at the Company.  The Special Committee was comprised of two board members—Wayne R. Walker and Santo Politi—and immediately shut down or irreparably delayed the discussions with the strategic transaction counterparties.  KITD's management-by-special-committee was predictably dysfunctional.  After months of wrestling with the Special Committee to no avail, myself and several members of the core management team eventually resigned.

In connection with my resignation I issued a letter—which was publicly filed by the Company as an 8-K at the time—stating that I intended to independently consider strategic alternatives for the Company.  After my resignation, a bidding group (led by a large private equity firm which I had introduced to the Company), endeavored to obtain approval from the Special Committee to share information with me so that I could participate in connection with a potential offer for KITD.  Unfortunately, the Special Committee refused this request, to the detriment of all shareholders.

Since that time, KIT Capital and other prospective bidders have been repeatedly delayed or stonewalled in our continued efforts to create shareholder value, while the indecision and delay of new management and board continues to result in value destruction.  For example, although KITD's current management and board finally adopted the staff reduction and office consolidation plan prior management first put forward almost a year ago, the delay has caused KITD to effectively run out of money and may put the Company into the pockets of its lenders.

KITD must right its ship. From an operational perspective, KITD management must immediately:

  • Articulate a vision of the "new" KIT digital, with the focus being on clients, employees and vendors—and away from capital markets
  • Halve executive management costs
  • Tour the top 30 clients globally to ensure contract compliance and renewal
  • Implement a program to re-invigorate the core team of top 50-performing employees globally
  • Complete our original cost reduction and office consolidation plan—including keeping headquarters in Prague, consolidating engineering team into two locations, consolidating New York and Atlanta office into one location and shutting down six other locations globally (including Dubai), while expanding sales and business development staff by one-third
  • Cease the "divide-and-sell" approach to assets
  • Clearly articulate a balance sheet-fortification strategy, centered on a significant private equity minority investment and concomitant restructuring of existing debt, while conducting an open and transparent auction of the Company (engaging both private equity and strategic buyer prospects), with a publicly announced minimum price of $3.75 per share.

We do not believe that current management is capable of the actions listed in this letter.  As a result, we are prepared to lead a bidding group to buy the Company at a reasonable and substantial cash premium to the current traded price of the Company's common stock.  Since May 2012, we have repeatedly requested that the board engage with us and certain other private equity firms regarding a strategic transaction for the Company.  In light of KITD's mismanagement and the Company's current circumstances, the Board can no longer afford to ignore these overtures.

Based on our analysis of publicly available information, and subject to due diligence and the execution of a mutually acceptable definitive agreement, we are prepared to lead a bidding group to buy the Company at $3.75 per share in cash, which represents an 81% premium to the closing price of KITD common stock on Wednesday, November 21, 2012 (and an approximately 750% premium to the reported after-market trading price of KITD common stock on that date).  We have reviewed this transaction with two large private equity groups who are interested in participating with us, and believe we have the backing of the Company's prior and current executives, salespeople and senior engineers who would be key to execute on our plan to right the KITD ship.   We believe we can finalize financing and business terms with respect to this acquisition very quickly if the Board responds forthwith.

For the benefit of all the shareholders, we ask that you to cease and desist from defamatory and inaccurate descriptions of KITD's prior management and immediately engage in an open dialogue with us on this offer.

Regards,

Kaleil Isaza Tuzman

On behalf of:
KIT Capital, LLC

Contact: Jonathan Cutler
JCUTLER MEDIA GROUP
[email protected]

SOURCE Kaleil Isaza Tuzman

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...