Welcome!

News Feed Item

Northern Freegold Announces Updated NI 43-101 Resource Estimate for Nucleus Deposit with 1.31 Million Indicated Ounces of Gold, Freegold Mountain, Yukon

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwire) -- 01/09/13 -- Northern Freegold Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:NFR)(OTCQX:NFRGF)(FRANKFURT:8N6) is pleased to announce an updated NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate for the Nucleus deposit at the road accessible Freegold Mountain Project, Yukon.

Highlights:


--  Subcroping higher grade zone containing 25.9 million tonnes grading 1.02
    g/t gold (851,603 oz gold) has the potential to be exploited in the
    initial years of a mining operation; 
--  Grade improvement following 2012 drilling and through stricter resource
    constraints - at 0.4 g/t AuEq cut-off, gold grade increases
    approximately 19% over the previous estimate over all resource
    categories; 
--  Nucleus deposit mineralization begins at surface and is open to
    expansion in all directions and at depth; 
--  Excellent gold metallurgical recoveries of up to 97%; 
--  Nucleus lies adjacent to the Revenue multi-million ounce gold deposit on
    an 8 km geophysical anomaly with multiple further exploration targets;
    and 
--  First economic study on both the Nucleus and adjacent Revenue deposits
    well underway - expected to be completed in Q1 2013. 

The new resource (at a pit optimized 0.25 g/t AuEq cut-off) contains 71.9 million tonnes grading 0.57 g/t gold, 0.85 g/t silver and 0.06% copper (1.31 million oz gold, 1.97 million oz silver and 89 million pounds copper) in the Indicated category and 60.4 million tonnes grading 0.41 g/t gold, 1.48 g/t silver and 0.04% copper (801,235 oz gold, 2.9 million oz silver and 52 million pounds copper) in the Inferred category as shown in Table 1. A 0.25 g/t AuEq cut-off grade is assumed to be reasonable at recent 3 year running average gold prices and the metal recoveries indicated from metallurgical testwork on Nucleus.

Importantly, within the indicated resource there is a significant zone of higher grade mineralization which contains (at a 0.50 g/t AuEq cut-off) 25.9 million tonnes grading 1.02 g/t gold, 1.11 g/t silver and 0.07% copper (851,603 oz gold, 924,040 oz silver and 38 million pounds copper). This higher grade zone subcrops in the centre of the Nucleus deposit and has the potential to be exploited in the initial years of a mining operation.

"With the addition of 2012's drill results, we are pleased that we have made substantial progress in identifying a potential starter gold pit at Nucleus. This higher grade portion of the deposit contains two thirds of Nucleus' indicated resource and averages over 1 g/t Au. Combined with the excellent metallurgical recoveries of gold at Nucleus of up to 97%, this represents a significant positive development for the project. The first economic study is currently underway on the Nucleus gold (with minor silver and copper) deposit and on the adjacent Revenue copper-gold-molybdenum deposit. We expect this initial Preliminary Economic Assessment to be completed in the first quarter of 2013. Both deposits are open in all directions. Nucleus and Revenue already contain 1.3 million Indicated oz and 1.9 million Inferred oz of gold. We believe these deposits form part of a much larger continuous district-scale gold-copper system as evidenced by an 8 kilometre long geophysical anomaly and largely coincidental gold and copper soil anomalies," commented Northern Freegold's President and CEO, John Burges.


Table 1: Mineral Resource Estimate for Nucleus Deposit                     
                                                                           
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                                                                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq(i)                                                                   
(g/t)                                 Au                       Ag         
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
                               Grade                    Grade             
Cut-off           Tonnes        (g/t)         Ozs        (g/t)         Ozs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 g/t       93,733,089       0.480    1,445,425        0.81    2,427,268
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25 g/t      71,904,900       0.567    1,310,039        0.85    1,967,789
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 g/t       36,137,402       0.849      986,549        1.01    1,175,181
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 g/t       25,889,606       1.023      851,603        1.11      924,040
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.75 g/t      12,797,289       1.492      613,956        1.49      613,661
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq(i)                                                      AuEq         
(g/t)                                Cu                   Recovered(i)   
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
                               Grade                    Grade             
Cut-off                           (%)         lbs        (g/t)         Ozs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 g/t                         0.05  110,726,000       0.515    1,553,144
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25 g/t                        0.06   88,544,244       0.604    1,396,568
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 g/t                         0.06   50,631,288       0.892    1,036,736
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 g/t                         0.07   37,782,715       1.069      889,743
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.75 g/t                        0.07   19,023,554       1.544      635,331
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                                                                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq(i)                                                                   
(g/t)                               Au                       Ag           
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
                               Grade                    Grade             
Cut-off           Tonnes        (g/t)         Ozs        (g/t)         Ozs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 g/t       86,660,000        0.34      956,000         1.3    3,545,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25 g/t      60,398,000        0.41      801,000         1.5    2,876,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 g/t       29,182,000        0.55      518,000         2.0    1,866,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 g/t       13,432,000        0.73      315,000         2.2      952,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.75 g/t       3,781,000        1.27      155,000         2.3      283,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq(i)                                                       AuEq        
(g/t)                                  Cu                  Recovered(i)  
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
                               Grade                    Grade             
Cut-off                           (%)         lbs        (g/t)         Ozs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 g/t                         0.04   80,127,000        0.39    1,078,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25 g/t                        0.04   52,244,000        0.46      886,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 g/t                         0.04   27,725,000        0.60      566,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 g/t                         0.04   11,610,000        0.78      337,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.75 g/t                        0.03    2,601,000        1.32      160,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Gold equivalent (AuEq) for the Nucleus Resource is calculated based upon
3 year running average prices of US$1,455/oz for gold, US$27.55/oz for      
silver and US$3.65/lb for copper and assumes metallurgical recoveries of 97%
for gold, 51% for silver and 43% for copper (Note: total contained AuEq    
metal values may not add exactly because of rounding).                     
                                                                           
- Mineral resources do not demonstrate economic viability, and there is  
no certainty that these mineral resources will be converted into mineable  
reserves once economic considerations are applied.                         

Nucleus Zone Resource Estimate

The 2012 updated mineral resource estimate includes results of an additional five diamond drill holes (2,453 metres) from the 2012 drill program. The resource estimate is categorized as Indicated and Inferred as defined by the CIM guidelines for resource reporting. Mineral resources do not demonstrate economic viability, and there is no certainty that these mineral resources will be converted into mineable reserves once economic considerations are applied.

The resource estimate is based on more than 31,000 assay values from 322 drill holes (totaling greater than 50,000 metres). Assay values were verified against drill logs and assay certificates. Drill hole collar locations and down-hole surveys were checked and verified. The mineral resource was estimated using 1.50 metre composites of the assay values, with "zero" grade inserted into intervals that were not sampled.

Geological models were constructed of the porphyry dykes that control the higher grade mineralization, and shells were constructed of greater than 0.4 g/t AuEq core mineralization and a greater than 0.1 g/t AuEq halo surrounding the core. Composite samples were domained by utilizing the geological and the grade shell models.

Separate estimates were run for Au, Ag, and Cu values for all models. AuEq values were calculated based on recovered metals as indicated in recent metallurgical work (see press release dated September 19, 2012) carried out by SGS Canada Inc. (up to 97% Au recovery, 51% Ag recovery, and 43% Cu recovery). Previous resource estimates on Nucleus in 2010 and 2011 had based AuEq values on 100% recovery of insitu grades of all metals and did not take recovery factors into consideration.

The geological models were used to constrain the composite values chosen for interpolation and the blocks reported in the mineral resource. A block model was constructed using 10 m x 10 m x 5 m blocks in the x, y, and z direction respectively. Grades for gold, copper and silver were interpolated into the blocks by the inverse distance squared method using a minimum of 2 and maximum of 12 composites to generate block grades in the indicated category and a minimum of 1 and maximum of 5 composites, with a maximum of 2 composites per drill hole, to generate block grades in the inferred category. Check validation models were carried out using ID, ID3 and ordinary kriging with very similar results for all models. Kriging was not used to report resource values as satisfactory variograms were not generated, and the differences in modeled results were negligible. The resource block model can be viewed on our website at www.northernfreegold.com on the home page under Features.

The Nucleus deposit mineralization begins at surface and is open to expansion laterally and at depth. The existing resource estimate tests only the upper reaches of a high chargeability and high conductivity zone identified by a Titan 24 survey completed in 2010. This zone extends over an area 1.5 km wide by 1.5 km long at an approximate depth of 100 to 500 m below surface. The Nucleus deposit lies adjacent to the Revenue deposit. The Company published its inaugural NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate for Revenue in early 2012. It is believed that the Revenue deposit, the Nucleus deposit to the west, and the Stoddart Zone to the east are all part of a large scale gold-rich porphyry system, which extends in an east-west direction for more than eight kilometres. Maps depicting this can be viewed on our website (http://www.northernfreegold.com/s/Nucleus.asp).

The Indicated and Inferred mineral resource estimate has been prepared in compliance with the standards of NI 43-101 by A. Sexton, M.Sc., P. Geo., and J. Campbell, B.Sc., P. Geo., of GeoVector Management Inc. GeoVector is an Ottawa, Ontario consulting firm specializing in resource estimation, project assessment and project management. Mr. Joe Campbell acted as the Qualified Person, as defined in NI 43-101 and is independent of the Company. An updated NI 43-101 report will be finalized and filed on SEDAR within 45 days of the date of this news release.

Paul Reynolds, B. Sc. P. Geo., Vice President Exploration for Northern Freegold Resources Ltd., is the Qualified Person, as defined by NI 43-101, for the Freegold Mountain Project and has reviewed the technical information in this release.

Revenue Zone

An Inferred resource estimate for the Revenue Zone was calculated in January 2012. This mineral resource estimate is based on 54 drill holes (10,582 meters) with 5,997 assay values collected. A range of mineral resources were estimated at various AuEq cut-off grades for the Revenue zone and are presented in the table below.


Inferred Mineral Resources for the Revenue Deposit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq                                                                      
(g/t)                                   Gold                 Silver       
--------------    Tonnage     ---------------------- ---------------------
Cut-off               (Mt)          g/t       Ounces      g/t       Ounces
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.3                   158          0.27    1,345,000     2.49   12,605,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4                   129          0.30    1,232,000     2.76   11,420,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5                   101          0.34    1,119,000     3.14   10,194,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.6                    81          0.38      994,000     3.40    8,831,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.7                    62          0.43      850,000     3.64    7,211,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq                                                                      
(g/t)            Copper             Molybdenum               AuEq(i)       
------------------------------ --------------------- ---------------------
Cut-off        %        Pounds        %       Pounds      g/t       Ounces
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.3         0.11   370,517,000     0.03  103,560,000     0.83    4,419,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4         0.12   331,554,000     0.03   98,409,000     0.94    4,076,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5         0.13   286,871,000     0.04   89,606,000     1.08    3,659,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.6         0.13   239,407,000     0.05   84,527,000     1.21    3,276,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.7         0.15   199,568,000     0.06   76,941,000     1.38    2,848,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Gold equivalent (AuEq) for the Revenue Resource is calculated based upon
prices of US$1,016/oz for gold, US$15.82/oz for silver, US$2.95/lb for     
copper and US$15.82/lb for molybdenum, and assumes 100% metal recovery with
no discount for metallurgical recovery in contained metal figures (Note:   
total contained AuEq metal values may not add exactly because of rounding).
                                                                           
- The resource estimate is categorized as Inferred as defined by the CIM 
guidelines for resource reporting. Mineral resources do not demonstrate    
economic viability, and there is no certainty that these mineral resources 
will be converted into mineable reserves once economic considerations are  
applied. The Inferred mineral resource estimate has been prepared in       
compliance with the standards of NI 43-101 by Dr. A. Armitage, P. Geol., and
J. Campbell, B.Sc., P. Geo., of GeoVector Management Inc.                  

Roads and Power Access

The Freegold Mountain project is located within the Dawson Range and covers an area in excess of 198 square kilometres (75 square miles). The Nucleus Au-Ag-Cu deposit and the Revenue Cu-Au-Mo deposit cover approximately 30 square kilometres. The project has significant infrastructure advantages. It is located approximately 200 kilometres northwest of Yukon's capital and industrial center in Whitehorse. It is road accessible from Whitehorse, along the main Klondike Highway, a paved all-weather highway running from Whitehorse to Dawson City thence along a 70 kilometre government maintained road from Carmacks, called the Freegold Road. This road currently terminates near the Company's Revenue camp thus giving the Company full road access. Western Copper and Gold Corporation, recently released its feasibility study (January 7, 2013) on the large Casino copper-gold property, which lies a further 132 kilometres to the west. They propose extending the Freegold Road through Northern Freegold's property generally following the alignment of the "Casino Trail". Commercial electrical grid power is available at Carmacks. The publicly owned Yukon electricity utility, the Yukon Energy Company, recently built a new 138kv high voltage transmission line along the Klondike Highway from Carmacks to Stewart Crossing linking the north and south electricity grids. The utility also built a spur electrical line extending into the Minto copper mine 30 kilometres north of the Freegold Mountain project.

About Northern Freegold

Northern Freegold Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:NFR)(OTCQX:NFRGF) trades in Canada on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol "NFR" and in the United States on the OTCQX under the symbol "NFRGF". Northern Freegold is a growth oriented Canadian-based precious metals exploration and development company. Northern Freegold is focused on creating value through the advancement of the district-scale Freegold Mountain project, which hosts one of the largest undeveloped gold and copper resources in the Yukon.

For maps and more information, please visit our website www.northernfreegold.com

On behalf of the Board of Directors

John Burges, President and CEO

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements - The information in this press release includes certain "forward-looking statements". All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein including, without limitation, plans for and intentions with respect to the company's properties, strategic alternatives, quantity of resources or reserves, timing of permitting, construction and production and other milestones, are forward looking statements. Statements concerning Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are also forward-looking statements in that they reflect an assessment, based on certain assumptions, of the mineralization that would be encountered and mining results if the project were developed and mined in the manner described. Forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from NFR's expectations include the uncertainties involving the need for additional financing to explore and develop properties and availability of financing in the debt and capital markets; uncertainties involved in the interpretation of drilling results and geological testing and the estimation of reserves and resources; the need for cooperation of government agencies and First Nations groups in the exploration, and development of properties; and the need to obtain permits and governmental approval. NFR's forward looking statements reflect the beliefs, opinions and projections of management on the date the statements are made. NFR assumes no obligation to update the forward looking statements if management's beliefs, opinions, projections, or other factors should change.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Cloud Expo, Inc. has announced today that Andi Mann returns to 'DevOps at Cloud Expo 2017' as Conference Chair The @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. "DevOps is set to be one of the most profound disruptions to hit IT in decades," said Andi Mann. "It is a natural extension of cloud computing, and I have seen both firsthand and in independent research the fantastic results DevOps delivers. So I am excited to help the great t...
Rapid innovation, changing business landscapes, and new IT demands force businesses to make changes quickly. In the eyes of many, containers are at the brink of becoming a pervasive technology in enterprise IT to accelerate application delivery. In this presentation, attendees learned about the: The transformation of IT to a DevOps, microservices, and container-based architecture What are containers and how DevOps practices can operate in a container-based environment A demonstration of how ...
"At ROHA we develop an app called Catcha. It was developed after we spent a year meeting with, talking to, interacting with senior citizens watching them use their smartphones and talking to them about how they use their smartphones so we could get to know their smartphone behavior," explained Dave Woods, Chief Innovation Officer at ROHA, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"Venafi has a platform that allows you to manage, centralize and automate the complete life cycle of keys and certificates within the organization," explained Gina Osmond, Sr. Field Marketing Manager at Venafi, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
If you haven’t heard yet, CollabNet just put out some very big news for managing and gaining value from DevOps. We introduced CollabNet DevOps Lifecycle Manager (DLM) — a platform designed exclusively for providing a single pane of glass, dashboard, and traceability views across your DevOps toolchain and processes from planning to operations and that can be traced back to planning and development.
@DevOpsSummit taking place June 6-8, 2017 at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers is now open.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Fusion, a leading provider of cloud services, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Fusion, a leading provider of integrated cloud solutions to small, medium and large businesses, is the industry’s single source for the cloud. Fusion’s advanced, proprietary cloud service platform enables the integration of leading edge solutions in the cloud, including cloud...
Video experiences should be unique and exciting! But that doesn’t mean you need to patch all the pieces yourself. Users demand rich and engaging experiences and new ways to connect with you. But creating robust video applications at scale can be complicated, time-consuming and expensive. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Zohar Babin, Vice President of Platform, Ecosystem and Community at Kaltura, discussed how VPaaS enables you to move fast, creating scalable video experiences that reach your aud...
Regulatory requirements exist to promote the controlled sharing of information, while protecting the privacy and/or security of the information. Regulations for each type of information have their own set of rules, policies, and guidelines. Cloud Service Providers (CSP) are faced with increasing demand for services at decreasing prices. Demonstrating and maintaining compliance with regulations is a nontrivial task and doing so against numerous sets of regulatory requirements can be daunting task...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with 20th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry p...
@DevOpsSummit at Cloud taking place June 6-8, 2017, at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long developm...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life sett...
Get deep visibility into the performance of your databases and expert advice for performance optimization and tuning. You can't get application performance without database performance. Give everyone on the team a comprehensive view of how every aspect of the system affects performance across SQL database operations, host server and OS, virtualization resources and storage I/O. Quickly find bottlenecks and troubleshoot complex problems.
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
The 20th International Cloud Expo has announced that its Call for Papers is open. Cloud Expo, to be held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, brings together Cloud Computing, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, Containers, Microservices and WebRTC to one location. With cloud computing driving a higher percentage of enterprise IT budgets every year, it becomes increasingly important to plant your flag in this fast-expanding business opportunity. Submit your speaking proposal ...