Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Osisko Provides Resource Update for Hammond Reef Project

MONTREAL, QUEBEC -- (Marketwire) -- 01/28/13 -- Osisko Mining Corporation (TSX:OSK)(FRANKFURT:EWX) is pleased to provide an updated resource estimate for its 100%-owned Hammond Reef gold project, located near Atikokan, Ontario. Additional drilling by Osisko has allowed for upgrading the bulk of the resource to the measured and indicated (M&I) categories, which will lead to conversion to reserves once the ongoing feasibility is completed. This update reports both global and in-pit resources in all categories.

Key points:


--  Global M&I resources currently stand at 5.43 million ounces gold at an
    average grade of 0.86 g/t Au and the global inferred resource stands at
    1.75 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.72 g/t Au (based on
    0.50 g/t Au lower cut-off; see table below). 
    
--  Global M&I resources currently stand at 7.47 million ounces gold at an
    average grade of 0.65 g/t Au and the global inferred resource stands at
    3.12 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.52 g/t Au, based on a
    0.30 g/t Au lower cut-off; see table below). 
    
--  The in-pit M&I resource is now 5.31 million ounces at an undiluted grade
    of 0.72 g/t gold, based on a Whittle-optimized pit shell using a gold
    price of US$1,400 per ounce. The in-pit inferred resource adds 0.28
    million ounces at an undiluted grade of 0.65 g/t Au. Overall pit
    parameters include an average lower cut-off grade of 0.32 grams per
    tonne gold and a low waste/ore strip ratio of 1.01. 
    
--  At US$2,000 per ounce gold, the in-pit M&I resource increases to 7.87
    million ounces and the inferred resource increases to 2.12 million
    ounces at an average grade of 0.56 grams per tonne gold. 
    
--  The A (Main) and Mitta Zones form a contiguous deposit (west pit), while
    the 41 zone is separate (east pit). The system was modeled as two pits
    with a total strike length of 2500 metres (sections 870E to 3370E).
    Exploration drilling around the Mitta and A zones has been successful in
    extending the deposit in the down-dip (southeast) direction, to a
    maximum distance (along dip) of 850 metres. 

Sean Roosen, President and CEO of Osisko, commented: "We are very pleased with Osisko's updated resource estimate for the Hammond Reef Project, which has achieved a significant increase with respect to the initial acquisition from Brett Resources estimate. It is important to note that the new in-pit resource for Hammond Reef has a low strip ratio of 1.01 and is quite robust, as it is based on current processing and mining costs at Canadian Malartic, adjusted for Ontario power rates. With over 625,000 metres of drilling completed, 76% of the in-pit resource is contained in the measured category, which is the highest achievable confidence level."

SGS Canada Inc. of Montreal, Quebec ("SGS") are the independent resource estimate consultants who have authorized the release of the following estimates. Global M&I resources currently stand at 5.43 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.86 g/t Au and the global inferred resource stands at 1.75 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.72 g/t Au. The table below summarizes the SGS estimates using variable lower cut-off grades:


                   Hammond Reef Global Resource Estimates                   
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category                  Grade (g/t)   Tonnes (M)    Cut-off (g/t)   Oz (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         0.67        212.9              0.2     4.60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        0.44        268.7              0.2     3.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              0.54        481.6              0.2     8.44
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.44        271.8              0.2     3.80
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         0.74        184.7              0.3     4.38
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        0.55        174.4              0.3     3.09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              0.65        359.1              0.3     7.47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.52        185.2              0.3     3.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         0.90        123.5              0.5     3.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        0.78         72.9              0.5     1.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              0.86        196.4              0.5     5.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.72         75.7              0.5     1.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         1.09         76.8              0.7     2.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        1.03         32.3              0.7     1.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              1.07        109.2              0.7     3.77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.96         27.4              0.7     0.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         1.29         46.8              0.9     1.94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        1.28         16.0              0.9     0.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              1.28         62.8              0.9     2.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         1.22         11.0              0.9     0.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         1.39         36.2              1.0     1.61
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        1.40         11.6              1.0     0.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              1.39         14.7              1.0     2.13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         1.35          7.5              1.0     0.32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

G Mining Services Inc of Montreal, in collaboration with SGS, also estimated resources within a Whittle-optimized pit shell using a base case gold price of US$1,400 per ounce and pit limits that are unconstrained by lakeshores. The optimization yielded two distinct pits separated by approximately 200 metres with an average strip ratio of 1.01. The total in-pit M&I resource for the Hammond Reef gold deposit is 5.31 million ounces of gold at an average undiluted grade of 0.72 g/t Au, based on a derived lower cut-off grade of 0.31 g/t Au (west pit) and 0.33 g/t Au (east pit).


 Hammond Reef Undiluted Resource Estimates within US$1,400 Whittle pit shell


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIT AREA     Category    Grade (g/t)    Tonnes (M)    Cut-off (g/t)   Oz (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West         Measured           0.75         151.2             0.31     3.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West        Indicated           0.58          44.7             0.31     0.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West              M+I           0.71         195.9             0.31     4.46
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West         Inferred           0.65          13.1             0.31     0.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East         Measured           0.80          24.1             0.33     0.62
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East        Indicated           0.75          9.43             0.33     0.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East              M+I           0.79          33.6             0.33     0.85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East         Inferred           0.50          0.27             0.33     0.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All          Measured           0.75         175.3             0.32     4.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All         Indicated           0.61          54.1             0.32     1.06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All               M+I           0.72         229.5             0.32     5.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All          Inferred           0.65          13.3             0.32     0.28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sensitivity of the undiluted in-pit resource (based on variable minimum cut-off grades) to gold price is as follows:


   Sensitivity of Hammond Reef in-pit Resource Estimates to variable gold   
                                   prices                                   
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Price (US$)         Cut-off  Category  Grade (g/t)  Tonnes (M)   Oz (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,000                      0.45       M&I         0.86       140.6     3.90
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,000                      0.45  Inferred         0.77         8.2     0.20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,200                      0.37       M&I         0.78       183.5     4.61
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,200                      0.37  Inferred         0.70        11.0     0.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,400                      0.32       M&I         0.72       229.5     5.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,400                      0.32  Inferred         0.65        13.3     0.28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,600                      0.28       M&I         0.66       313.1     6.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,600                      0.28  Inferred         0.60        29.9     0.57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,800                      0.25       M&I         0.62       368.7     7.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,800                      0.25  Inferred         0.52        61.3     1.02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,000                      0.23       M&I         0.58       419.7     7.87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,000                      0.23  Inferred         0.49       136.1     2.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,200                      0.21       M&I         0.56       448.8     8.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,200                      0.21  Inferred         0.47       167.8     2.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Details on the parameters of the resource estimates are as follows:


--  The database comprised a total of 2,144 holes for 629,367 metres of
    drilling completed and assayed by Brett Resources and Osisko as of the
    end of April 2012 on a minimum 25 m x 25 m grid. (All NQ core assays
    reported by Osisko were obtained by standard 50 g fire assaying-AA
    finish or gravimetric finish at ALS Chemex laboratories.) 
    
--  The database also comprised a total of 413,412 assays with an average of
    1.5 metre per sample for a total of 618,596 assayed metres. 
    
--  The estimates were done using Ordinary Kriging (OK) interpolation as the
    geostatistical method based on 5.0 metres analytical composites. 
    
--  All estimates are based on a block dimension of 10 metres E, 10 metres N
    and 12 metres height with estimation parameters determined by
    variography. 
    
--  Geological interpretation identified a Main domain and several smaller
    domains (that surround the Main domain. The Main domain is a tabular
    zone that dips to the southeast and includes the A, Mitta and 41 zones
    on surface. The RAB was recognized as a separate southern domain that
    was ignored for the purposes of the global and in-pit resource estimate.
    
--  Calculations are based on original samples capped to a maximum of 15 g/t
    Au for the Main domain, resulting in 99 capped intervals with an overall
    gold loss of 2.0%. Capping for the smaller domains was at 10 g/t for
    variable gold losses between 0.8% and 2.2%. All 5-metres composites are
    calculated based on cut original data. 
    
--  Tonnage estimates are based on an average rock density of 2.74
    tonnes/cubic metre for the altered tonalite host rock. 
    
--  The global resource estimates using the lower cut-off of 0.50 g/t Au is
    emphasized for reporting purposes, which is higher than the in-pit cut-
    off of 0.31-0.33 g/t Au estimated for the US$1,400 Whittle shell. 
    
--  With respect to the previously published in-pit inferred resource (see
    November 7, 2011 press release), although base-case gold price was
    increased from US$1,200/oz to US$1,400/oz, the increased unit processing
    cost (from US$6.66/t to US$8.75/t) and mining costs (from US$1.61/t to
    US$1.98/t) and decreased recovery (from 91% to 87-88%) have made the new
    pit shells slightly smaller than before.  

The two US$1,400 Whittle shells have approximate maximum dimensions of 2,500 metres in total length, 1,050 metres in width and a vertical depth to 380 metres. Pit optimization parameters are summarized in the table below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parameter                                          Unit                Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold price                                       US$/oz                 1400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties                                             %                 2.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refining cost                                    US$/oz                  5.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing cost                            US$/t milled                 8.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administration                             US$/t milled                 1.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rehabilitation                             US$/t milled                 0.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining capital                         US$/t milled                 0.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ore cost                             US$/t milled                11.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery West Pit                                     %                88.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery East Pit                                     %                87.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining dilution                                       %                   0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining loss                                           %                   0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut-off grade West Pit                            g/tAu                 0.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut-off grade East Pit                            g/tAu                 0.33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base mining cost rock                       US$/t mined                 1.98
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference elevation                                   m                  430
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per bench below                  US$/bench/t mined                0.046
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining cost overburden                      US$/t mined                 3.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max pit slope West Pit                         degrees   From 41.3 to 50.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max pit slope East Pit                         degrees   From 45.4 to 48.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Density overburden                                 t/m3                  2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

About Hammond Reef

Osisko acquired the Hammond Reef project through the acquisition of Brett Resources in August 2010. To date, Osisko has drilled over 629,000 metres at Hammond Reef, is completing an EIA that will be filed in accordance with the accepted terms of reference and will table a feasibility study in the first half of 2013. The project is located approximately 20 kilometres from grid power, and is located 23 kilometres north of the town of Atikokan. Osisko signed a Resource Sharing Agreement with eight first nations groups in December 2010 as well as a Memorandum of Understanding with the Metis Nation of Ontario in April 2012.

About Osisko Mining Corporation

Osisko Mining Corporation operates the Canadian Malartic Gold Mine in Malartic, Quebec and is pursuing exploration on a number of properties, including the Hammond Reef Gold and Upper Beaver projects in Northern Ontario.

Mr. Michel Dagbert, Eng. of SGS Canada Inc. (global resource estimate) and Mr. Louis-Pierre Gignac, Eng. of G Mining Services Inc. (Whittle-optimized in-pit resource estimate) are the Qualified Persons responsible for the technical information reported herein, including verification of the data disclosed. Ms. Anne Charland, P. Geo. and Vice-President of Exploration Canada for Osisko, has also reviewed and approved the technical contents of this news release.

Cautionary Notes Concerning Estimates of Mineral Resources

This news release uses the terms measured, indicated and inferred resources as a relative measure of the level of confidence in the resource estimate. Readers are cautioned that mineral resources are not economic mineral reserves and that the economic viability of resources that are not mineral reserves has not been demonstrated. In addition, inferred resources are considered too geologically speculative to have any economic considerations applied to them. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies or economic studies except for Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Readers are cautioned not to assume that further work on the stated resources will lead to mineral reserves that can be mined economically.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this press release may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this release, other than statements of historical fact, that address events or developments that Osisko expects to occur, are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "potential", "scheduled" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could" or "should" occur including, without limitation, the commencement of commercial production. Although Osisko believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, including, without limitation, that all technical, economical and financial conditions will be met in order to warrant further development of the project, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in forward looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include gold prices, access to skilled consultants, mining development personnel, results of exploration and development activities, Osisko's limited experience with production and development stage mining operations, uninsured risks, regulatory changes, defects in title, availability of personnel, materials and equipment, timeliness of government approvals, actual performance of facilities, equipment and processes relative to specifications and expectations, unanticipated environmental impacts on operations market prices, continued availability of capital and financing and general economic, market or business conditions. These factors are discussed in greater detail in Osisko's most recent Annual Information Form and in the most recent Management Discussion and Analysis filed on SEDAR, which also provide additional general assumptions in connection with these statements. Osisko cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. Investors and others who base themselves on forward-looking statements should carefully consider the above factors as well as the uncertainties they represent and the risk they entail. Osisko believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this press release should not be unduly relied upon. These statements speak only as of the date of this press release.

Contacts:
John Burzynski
Vice-President Corporate Development
(416) 363-8653
www.osisko.com

Sylvie Prud'homme
Director of Investor Relations
(514) 735-7131
Toll Free: 1-888-674-7563

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Learn how to solve the problem of keeping files in sync between multiple Docker containers. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Aaron Brongersma, Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Modulus, discussed using rsync, GlusterFS, EBS and Bit Torrent Sync. He broke down the tools that are needed to help create a seamless user experience. In the end, can we have an environment where we can easily move Docker containers, servers, and volumes without impacting our applications? He shared his results so yo...
Palerra, the cloud security automation company, announced enhanced support for Amazon AWS, allowing IT security and DevOps teams to automate activity and configuration monitoring, anomaly detection, and orchestrated remediation, thereby meeting compliance mandates within complex infrastructure deployments. "Monitoring and threat detection for AWS is a non-trivial task. While Amazon's flexible environment facilitates successful DevOps implementations, it adds another layer, which can become a ...
With SaaS use rampant across organizations, how can IT departments track company data and maintain security? More and more departments are commissioning their own solutions and bypassing IT. A cloud environment is amorphous and powerful, allowing you to set up solutions for all of your user needs: document sharing and collaboration, mobile access, e-mail, even industry-specific applications. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Shawn Mills, President and a founder of Green House Data, discussed h...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
Chuck Piluso presented a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. Prior to Secure Infrastructure and Services, Mr. Piluso founded North American Telecommunication Corporation, a facilities-based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier licensed by the Public Service Commission in 10 states, serving as the company's chairman and president from 1997 to 2000. Between 1990 and 1997, Mr. Piluso served as chairman & founder of International Te...
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner, Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., discussed the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and conducte...
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Arch...
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...