Welcome!

News Feed Item

Osisko Provides Resource Update for Hammond Reef Project

MONTREAL, QUEBEC -- (Marketwire) -- 01/28/13 -- Osisko Mining Corporation (TSX:OSK)(FRANKFURT:EWX) is pleased to provide an updated resource estimate for its 100%-owned Hammond Reef gold project, located near Atikokan, Ontario. Additional drilling by Osisko has allowed for upgrading the bulk of the resource to the measured and indicated (M&I) categories, which will lead to conversion to reserves once the ongoing feasibility is completed. This update reports both global and in-pit resources in all categories.

Key points:


--  Global M&I resources currently stand at 5.43 million ounces gold at an
    average grade of 0.86 g/t Au and the global inferred resource stands at
    1.75 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.72 g/t Au (based on
    0.50 g/t Au lower cut-off; see table below). 
    
--  Global M&I resources currently stand at 7.47 million ounces gold at an
    average grade of 0.65 g/t Au and the global inferred resource stands at
    3.12 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.52 g/t Au, based on a
    0.30 g/t Au lower cut-off; see table below). 
    
--  The in-pit M&I resource is now 5.31 million ounces at an undiluted grade
    of 0.72 g/t gold, based on a Whittle-optimized pit shell using a gold
    price of US$1,400 per ounce. The in-pit inferred resource adds 0.28
    million ounces at an undiluted grade of 0.65 g/t Au. Overall pit
    parameters include an average lower cut-off grade of 0.32 grams per
    tonne gold and a low waste/ore strip ratio of 1.01. 
    
--  At US$2,000 per ounce gold, the in-pit M&I resource increases to 7.87
    million ounces and the inferred resource increases to 2.12 million
    ounces at an average grade of 0.56 grams per tonne gold. 
    
--  The A (Main) and Mitta Zones form a contiguous deposit (west pit), while
    the 41 zone is separate (east pit). The system was modeled as two pits
    with a total strike length of 2500 metres (sections 870E to 3370E).
    Exploration drilling around the Mitta and A zones has been successful in
    extending the deposit in the down-dip (southeast) direction, to a
    maximum distance (along dip) of 850 metres. 

Sean Roosen, President and CEO of Osisko, commented: "We are very pleased with Osisko's updated resource estimate for the Hammond Reef Project, which has achieved a significant increase with respect to the initial acquisition from Brett Resources estimate. It is important to note that the new in-pit resource for Hammond Reef has a low strip ratio of 1.01 and is quite robust, as it is based on current processing and mining costs at Canadian Malartic, adjusted for Ontario power rates. With over 625,000 metres of drilling completed, 76% of the in-pit resource is contained in the measured category, which is the highest achievable confidence level."

SGS Canada Inc. of Montreal, Quebec ("SGS") are the independent resource estimate consultants who have authorized the release of the following estimates. Global M&I resources currently stand at 5.43 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.86 g/t Au and the global inferred resource stands at 1.75 million ounces gold at an average grade of 0.72 g/t Au. The table below summarizes the SGS estimates using variable lower cut-off grades:


                   Hammond Reef Global Resource Estimates                   
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category                  Grade (g/t)   Tonnes (M)    Cut-off (g/t)   Oz (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         0.67        212.9              0.2     4.60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        0.44        268.7              0.2     3.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              0.54        481.6              0.2     8.44
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.44        271.8              0.2     3.80
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         0.74        184.7              0.3     4.38
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        0.55        174.4              0.3     3.09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              0.65        359.1              0.3     7.47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.52        185.2              0.3     3.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         0.90        123.5              0.5     3.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        0.78         72.9              0.5     1.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              0.86        196.4              0.5     5.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.72         75.7              0.5     1.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         1.09         76.8              0.7     2.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        1.03         32.3              0.7     1.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              1.07        109.2              0.7     3.77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         0.96         27.4              0.7     0.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         1.29         46.8              0.9     1.94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        1.28         16.0              0.9     0.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              1.28         62.8              0.9     2.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         1.22         11.0              0.9     0.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured                         1.39         36.2              1.0     1.61
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated                        1.40         11.6              1.0     0.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I                              1.39         14.7              1.0     2.13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                         1.35          7.5              1.0     0.32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

G Mining Services Inc of Montreal, in collaboration with SGS, also estimated resources within a Whittle-optimized pit shell using a base case gold price of US$1,400 per ounce and pit limits that are unconstrained by lakeshores. The optimization yielded two distinct pits separated by approximately 200 metres with an average strip ratio of 1.01. The total in-pit M&I resource for the Hammond Reef gold deposit is 5.31 million ounces of gold at an average undiluted grade of 0.72 g/t Au, based on a derived lower cut-off grade of 0.31 g/t Au (west pit) and 0.33 g/t Au (east pit).


 Hammond Reef Undiluted Resource Estimates within US$1,400 Whittle pit shell


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIT AREA     Category    Grade (g/t)    Tonnes (M)    Cut-off (g/t)   Oz (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West         Measured           0.75         151.2             0.31     3.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West        Indicated           0.58          44.7             0.31     0.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West              M+I           0.71         195.9             0.31     4.46
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
West         Inferred           0.65          13.1             0.31     0.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East         Measured           0.80          24.1             0.33     0.62
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East        Indicated           0.75          9.43             0.33     0.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East              M+I           0.79          33.6             0.33     0.85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
East         Inferred           0.50          0.27             0.33     0.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All          Measured           0.75         175.3             0.32     4.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All         Indicated           0.61          54.1             0.32     1.06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All               M+I           0.72         229.5             0.32     5.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
All          Inferred           0.65          13.3             0.32     0.28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sensitivity of the undiluted in-pit resource (based on variable minimum cut-off grades) to gold price is as follows:


   Sensitivity of Hammond Reef in-pit Resource Estimates to variable gold   
                                   prices                                   
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Price (US$)         Cut-off  Category  Grade (g/t)  Tonnes (M)   Oz (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,000                      0.45       M&I         0.86       140.6     3.90
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,000                      0.45  Inferred         0.77         8.2     0.20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,200                      0.37       M&I         0.78       183.5     4.61
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,200                      0.37  Inferred         0.70        11.0     0.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,400                      0.32       M&I         0.72       229.5     5.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,400                      0.32  Inferred         0.65        13.3     0.28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,600                      0.28       M&I         0.66       313.1     6.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,600                      0.28  Inferred         0.60        29.9     0.57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,800                      0.25       M&I         0.62       368.7     7.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,800                      0.25  Inferred         0.52        61.3     1.02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,000                      0.23       M&I         0.58       419.7     7.87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,000                      0.23  Inferred         0.49       136.1     2.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,200                      0.21       M&I         0.56       448.8     8.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,200                      0.21  Inferred         0.47       167.8     2.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Details on the parameters of the resource estimates are as follows:


--  The database comprised a total of 2,144 holes for 629,367 metres of
    drilling completed and assayed by Brett Resources and Osisko as of the
    end of April 2012 on a minimum 25 m x 25 m grid. (All NQ core assays
    reported by Osisko were obtained by standard 50 g fire assaying-AA
    finish or gravimetric finish at ALS Chemex laboratories.) 
    
--  The database also comprised a total of 413,412 assays with an average of
    1.5 metre per sample for a total of 618,596 assayed metres. 
    
--  The estimates were done using Ordinary Kriging (OK) interpolation as the
    geostatistical method based on 5.0 metres analytical composites. 
    
--  All estimates are based on a block dimension of 10 metres E, 10 metres N
    and 12 metres height with estimation parameters determined by
    variography. 
    
--  Geological interpretation identified a Main domain and several smaller
    domains (that surround the Main domain. The Main domain is a tabular
    zone that dips to the southeast and includes the A, Mitta and 41 zones
    on surface. The RAB was recognized as a separate southern domain that
    was ignored for the purposes of the global and in-pit resource estimate.
    
--  Calculations are based on original samples capped to a maximum of 15 g/t
    Au for the Main domain, resulting in 99 capped intervals with an overall
    gold loss of 2.0%. Capping for the smaller domains was at 10 g/t for
    variable gold losses between 0.8% and 2.2%. All 5-metres composites are
    calculated based on cut original data. 
    
--  Tonnage estimates are based on an average rock density of 2.74
    tonnes/cubic metre for the altered tonalite host rock. 
    
--  The global resource estimates using the lower cut-off of 0.50 g/t Au is
    emphasized for reporting purposes, which is higher than the in-pit cut-
    off of 0.31-0.33 g/t Au estimated for the US$1,400 Whittle shell. 
    
--  With respect to the previously published in-pit inferred resource (see
    November 7, 2011 press release), although base-case gold price was
    increased from US$1,200/oz to US$1,400/oz, the increased unit processing
    cost (from US$6.66/t to US$8.75/t) and mining costs (from US$1.61/t to
    US$1.98/t) and decreased recovery (from 91% to 87-88%) have made the new
    pit shells slightly smaller than before.  

The two US$1,400 Whittle shells have approximate maximum dimensions of 2,500 metres in total length, 1,050 metres in width and a vertical depth to 380 metres. Pit optimization parameters are summarized in the table below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parameter                                          Unit                Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold price                                       US$/oz                 1400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties                                             %                 2.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refining cost                                    US$/oz                  5.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing cost                            US$/t milled                 8.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administration                             US$/t milled                 1.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rehabilitation                             US$/t milled                 0.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining capital                         US$/t milled                 0.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total ore cost                             US$/t milled                11.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery West Pit                                     %                88.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery East Pit                                     %                87.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining dilution                                       %                   0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining loss                                           %                   0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut-off grade West Pit                            g/tAu                 0.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut-off grade East Pit                            g/tAu                 0.33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base mining cost rock                       US$/t mined                 1.98
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference elevation                                   m                  430
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per bench below                  US$/bench/t mined                0.046
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining cost overburden                      US$/t mined                 3.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max pit slope West Pit                         degrees   From 41.3 to 50.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max pit slope East Pit                         degrees   From 45.4 to 48.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Density overburden                                 t/m3                  2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

About Hammond Reef

Osisko acquired the Hammond Reef project through the acquisition of Brett Resources in August 2010. To date, Osisko has drilled over 629,000 metres at Hammond Reef, is completing an EIA that will be filed in accordance with the accepted terms of reference and will table a feasibility study in the first half of 2013. The project is located approximately 20 kilometres from grid power, and is located 23 kilometres north of the town of Atikokan. Osisko signed a Resource Sharing Agreement with eight first nations groups in December 2010 as well as a Memorandum of Understanding with the Metis Nation of Ontario in April 2012.

About Osisko Mining Corporation

Osisko Mining Corporation operates the Canadian Malartic Gold Mine in Malartic, Quebec and is pursuing exploration on a number of properties, including the Hammond Reef Gold and Upper Beaver projects in Northern Ontario.

Mr. Michel Dagbert, Eng. of SGS Canada Inc. (global resource estimate) and Mr. Louis-Pierre Gignac, Eng. of G Mining Services Inc. (Whittle-optimized in-pit resource estimate) are the Qualified Persons responsible for the technical information reported herein, including verification of the data disclosed. Ms. Anne Charland, P. Geo. and Vice-President of Exploration Canada for Osisko, has also reviewed and approved the technical contents of this news release.

Cautionary Notes Concerning Estimates of Mineral Resources

This news release uses the terms measured, indicated and inferred resources as a relative measure of the level of confidence in the resource estimate. Readers are cautioned that mineral resources are not economic mineral reserves and that the economic viability of resources that are not mineral reserves has not been demonstrated. In addition, inferred resources are considered too geologically speculative to have any economic considerations applied to them. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies or economic studies except for Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Readers are cautioned not to assume that further work on the stated resources will lead to mineral reserves that can be mined economically.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this press release may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this release, other than statements of historical fact, that address events or developments that Osisko expects to occur, are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "potential", "scheduled" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could" or "should" occur including, without limitation, the commencement of commercial production. Although Osisko believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, including, without limitation, that all technical, economical and financial conditions will be met in order to warrant further development of the project, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in forward looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include gold prices, access to skilled consultants, mining development personnel, results of exploration and development activities, Osisko's limited experience with production and development stage mining operations, uninsured risks, regulatory changes, defects in title, availability of personnel, materials and equipment, timeliness of government approvals, actual performance of facilities, equipment and processes relative to specifications and expectations, unanticipated environmental impacts on operations market prices, continued availability of capital and financing and general economic, market or business conditions. These factors are discussed in greater detail in Osisko's most recent Annual Information Form and in the most recent Management Discussion and Analysis filed on SEDAR, which also provide additional general assumptions in connection with these statements. Osisko cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. Investors and others who base themselves on forward-looking statements should carefully consider the above factors as well as the uncertainties they represent and the risk they entail. Osisko believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this press release should not be unduly relied upon. These statements speak only as of the date of this press release.

Contacts:
John Burzynski
Vice-President Corporate Development
(416) 363-8653
www.osisko.com

Sylvie Prud'homme
Director of Investor Relations
(514) 735-7131
Toll Free: 1-888-674-7563

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Cloud resources, although available in abundance, are inherently volatile. For transactional computing, like ERP and most enterprise software, this is a challenge as transactional integrity and data fidelity is paramount – making it a challenge to create cloud native applications while relying on RDBMS. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Claus Jepsen, Chief Architect and Head of Innovation Labs at Unit4, will explore that in order to create distributed and scalable solutions ensuring high availa...
An increasing number of companies are creating products that combine data with analytical capabilities. Running interactive queries on Big Data requires complex architectures to store and query data effectively, typically involving data streams, an choosing efficient file format/database and multiple independent systems that are tied together through custom-engineered pipelines. In his session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Tomer Levi, a senior software engineer at Intel’s Advanced Analytics ...
Internet-of-Things discussions can end up either going down the consumer gadget rabbit hole or focused on the sort of data logging that industrial manufacturers have been doing forever. However, in fact, companies today are already using IoT data both to optimize their operational technology and to improve the experience of customer interactions in novel ways. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Gordon Haff, Red Hat Technology Evangelist, shared examples from a wide range of industries – including en...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Detecting internal user threats in the Big Data eco-system is challenging and cumbersome. Many organizations monitor internal usage of the Big Data eco-system using a set of alerts. This is not a scalable process given the increase in the number of alerts with the accelerating growth in data volume and user base. Organizations are increasingly leveraging machine learning to monitor only those data elements that are sensitive and critical, autonomously establish monitoring policies, and to detect...
"We're a cybersecurity firm that specializes in engineering security solutions both at the software and hardware level. Security cannot be an after-the-fact afterthought, which is what it's become," stated Richard Blech, Chief Executive Officer at Secure Channels, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Most companies are adopting or evaluating container technology - Docker in particular - to speed up application deployment, drive down cost, ease management and make application delivery more flexible overall. As with most new architectures, this dream takes a lot of work to become a reality. Even when you do get your application componentized enough and packaged properly, there are still challenges for DevOps teams to making the shift to continuous delivery and achieving that reduction in cost ...
Enterprise architects are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies as they seek to utilize existing data center assets, leverage the advantages of cloud computing and avoid cloud vendor lock-in. This requires a globally aware traffic management strategy that can monitor infrastructure health across data centers and end-user experience globally, while responding to control changes and system specification at the speed of today’s DevOps teams. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Gray, Chie...
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. Jack Norris reviews best practices to show how companies develop, deploy, and dynamically update these applications and how this data-first...
Intelligent Automation is now one of the key business imperatives for CIOs and CISOs impacting all areas of business today. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Boeggeman, VP Alliances & Partnerships at Ayehu, will talk about how business value is created and delivered through intelligent automation to today’s enterprises. The open ecosystem platform approach toward Intelligent Automation that Ayehu delivers to the market is core to enabling the creation of the self-driving enterprise.
"At the keynote this morning we spoke about the value proposition of Nutanix, of having a DevOps culture and a mindset, and the business outcomes of achieving agility and scale, which everybody here is trying to accomplish," noted Mark Lavi, DevOps Solution Architect at Nutanix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
"We're here to tell the world about our cloud-scale infrastructure that we have at Juniper combined with the world-class security that we put into the cloud," explained Lisa Guess, VP of Systems Engineering at Juniper Networks, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Historically, some banking activities such as trading have been relying heavily on analytics and cutting edge algorithmic tools. The coming of age of powerful data analytics solutions combined with the development of intelligent algorithms have created new opportunities for financial institutions. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Sebastien Meunier, Head of Digital for North America at Chappuis Halder & Co., discussed how these tools can be leveraged to develop a lasting competitive advantage ...
As businesses adopt functionalities in cloud computing, it’s imperative that IT operations consistently ensure cloud systems work correctly – all of the time, and to their best capabilities. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Bernd Harzog, CEO and founder of OpsDataStore, presented an industry answer to the common question, “Are you running IT operations as efficiently and as cost effectively as you need to?” He then expounded on the industry issues he frequently came up against as an analyst, and ...
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and how fast. The key is to adopt and deploy an intelligent application strategy while simultaneously preparing to scale that intelligence. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sangeeta Chakraborty, Chief Customer Officer at Ayasdi, will provide a tactical framework to become a truly intelligent enterprise, including how to identify the right applications for AI, how to build a Center of Excellence to ...