|By Marketwired .||
|February 1, 2013 09:30 AM EST||
TORONTO, ONTARIO -- (Marketwire) -- 02/01/13 --
Attention: Business Editors
Pizza Pizza Royalty Corp. (the "Company") (TSX:PZA) and Pizza Pizza Limited ("PPL") today announced that effective January 1, 2013, the pool of restaurants (the "Royalty Pool"), on which royalties are paid to the Company by PPL, has been adjusted to reflect restaurant openings and closures.
Effective January 1, 2013, 21 new Pizza Pizza restaurants and one new Pizza 73 restaurant were added to the Royalty Pool. There were 18 non-traditional locations closed and removed from the Royalty Pool. Of the 21 new Pizza Pizza restaurants opened during 2012, ten were traditional restaurants and eleven were non-traditional locations. The one new Pizza 73 restaurant was a non-traditional location opened during the period from September 2, 2011 to September 1, 2012. Of the 18 non-traditional closures, 17 were Pizza Pizza locations and one was a Pizza 73 location.
After this annual adjustment, the 2013 Royalty Pool increases by a net of four restaurants to 694. In exchange for adding new restaurants to the Royalty Pool, PPL will be compensated in equivalent shares using an agreed-upon formula which includes estimating future royalties to be paid to the Company based on the new restaurant sales. Additional details about this formula are provided in the following paragraphs.
Annually, on January 1 (the "Adjustment Date"), the Royalty Pool is adjusted to include the forecasted system sales from new Pizza Pizza restaurants opened on or before December 31 of the prior year, less system sales from any Pizza Pizza restaurants that have been permanently closed during the year. Similarly, on the Adjustment Date, the Royalty Pool is adjusted to include the forecasted system sales from new Pizza 73 restaurants opened on or before September 1 of the prior year, less the system sales of any Pizza 73 restaurants permanently closed during the prior calendar year. These Pizza 73 forecasted system sales may also be reduced by any decrease in system sales attributable to certain Pizza 73 restaurants whose territory may have been adjusted during the year (an "adjusted restaurant" as defined in the License and Royalty Agreement for the Pizza 73 Royalty Pool restaurants).
PPL holds Class B and Class D units of Pizza Pizza Royalty Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), which are exchangeable for a number of Company shares ("Shares") based on the Class B and Class D Exchange Multipliers (the "equivalent Shares"). At each annual Adjustment Date, the Class B and Class D Exchange Multipliers for the coming year are determined in accordance with the Partnership's limited partnership agreement. This, in turn, affects the number of equivalent Shares held by PPL. The formula for determining the Exchange Multipliers is based on the Determined Amounts which are calculated using the forecasted system sales from new restaurants less system sales from any closed and adjusted restaurants, multiplied by the applicable royalty rate, divided by the yield of the Shares, and discounted by 7.5%.
Beginning with last year's Adjustment Date on January 1, 2012 and going forward, the Determined Amounts are multiplied by a number equal to (1-Tax%) where "Tax%" is an estimate of the Company's effective entity level tax rate for the year. This maintains the accretive effect to shareholders of the annual Royalty Pool adjustment. This estimate of the effective tax rate will be subject to an adjustment when the year's actual tax rate of the Company is known.
From January 1 Adjustment Date, PPL is entitled to receive 80% of the calculated, additional equivalent Shares and distributions thereon resulting from a change in an Exchange Multiplier. The final equivalent Shares entitlement is determined following the year-end when the restaurants' actual sales performance is known with certainty. At that time, if the actual system sales exceeded 80% of the forecasted system sales, PPL would be entitled to additional equivalent Shares to reflect that difference. Conversely, if the actual system sales are less than 80% of the forecasted system sales, PPL must return a calculated portion of the equivalent Shares with which it was previously credited. In any given year, the calculated Exchange Multipliers cannot be less than at the end of the previous year.
Effective January 1, 2013, the Class B Exchange Multiplier is adjusted based on the 2013 forecasted system sales of $6.6 million from the 21 new Pizza Pizza restaurants, less sales of $3.4 million from 17 permanently closed Pizza Pizza non-traditional restaurants resulting in net, forecasted Pizza Pizza system sales of $3.2 million added to the Royalty Pool. The Class D Exchange Multiplier will not be adjusted at this time since the 2013 forecasted additional system sales from the one new Pizza 73 non-traditional restaurant, estimated at $100,000, is offset by $100,000 in sales from one permanently closed non-traditional restaurant, resulting in no estimated sales being added to the Royalty Pool.
In exchange for adding the forecasted Pizza Pizza system sales to the Royalty Pool, PPL has received 163,054 additional equivalent Shares (through the change to the Class B Exchange Multiplier). These represent 80% of the forecasted equivalent Shares entitlement to be received (203,817 equivalent Shares represent 100%), with the final equivalent Shares entitlement to be determined when the new restaurants' 2013 actual sales performance is known with certainty in early 2014.
On January 1, 2013, PPL added no Pizza 73 system sales to the Royalty Pool due to one non-traditional Pizza 73 restaurant opening and one closing. Therefore, PPL has received no additional Class D equivalent Shares. Final Class D equivalent Shares will be determined when the new restaurant's 2013 actual sales performance is known with certainty in early 2014.
After giving effect to these additional, equivalent Share entitlements at January 1, 2013, PPL now owns equivalent Shares representing 27.1% of the Company's fully diluted Shares.
Table 1 - Summary of the Company's Outstanding and Fully-Diluted Shares, including an analysis before and after the 20% entitlement holdback:
Issued & Outstanding Issued & Shares, Outstanding Equivalent Shares Shares outstanding & issuable Shares, and and Holdback of on December 31, 2012 Equivalent Shares Equivalent Shares ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public float 21,818,392 21,818,392 Class B equivalent Shares held by PPL 6,338,554 6,338,554 (1) PPL Additional Class B equivalent Shares - 20% Holdback as of December 31, 2012 - 66,205 (1) Class D equivalent Shares held by PPL 1,547,131 1,547,131 (2) PPL Additional Class D equivalent Shares - 20% Holdback as of December 31, 2012 - 940 (2) ----------------------------------------- Fully-diluted Shares 29,704,077 29,771,222 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Percentage of fully-diluted Shares available for exchange by PPL at December 31, 2012 26.5% 26.7% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares outstanding & issuable after January 1, 2013 Annual Adjustment Public float 21,818,392 21,818,392 Class B equivalent Shares held by PPL 6,404,759 6,404,759 (1) Class D equivalent Shares held by PPL 1,548,071 1,548,071 (2) Additional PPL Class B equivalent Shares as of January 1, 2013 (80%) 163,054 163,054 (3) Additional PPL Class B equivalent Shares - 20% Holdback as of January 1, 2013 - 40,763 (4) Additional PPL Class D equivalent Shares as of January 1, 2013 (80%) - - (3) Additional PPL Class D equivalent Shares - 20% Holdback as of January 1, 2013 - - (4) ----------------------------------------- Number of fully-diluted Shares 29,934,276 29,975,039 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Percentage of fully-diluted Shares available for exchange by PPL at January 1, 2013 27.1% 27.2% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) The final calculation of the equivalent Shares entitlement related to the six net Pizza Pizza restaurants that were removed from the Royalty Pool on January 1, 2012 was completed and independently reviewed in early 2013, and became effective as of January 1, 2012. Actual Additional System Sales of new restaurants for 2012 were greater than Forecasted Additional System Sales. As a result of the true-up, PPL's Class B equivalent Shares increased by 66,205 and 2012 distributions thereon were paid to PPL in January 2013 from the Partnership effective January 1, 2012. (2) The final calculation of the equivalent Shares entitlement related to the one net Pizza 73 restaurant that was added to the Royalty Pool on January 1, 2012 was completed and independently reviewed in early 2013, and became effective as of January 1, 2012. Actual Additional System Sales of the new restaurant for 2012 was slightly higher than Forecasted Additional System Sales. As a result of the true-up, PPL's Class D equivalent Shares increased by 940 and 2012 distributions thereon were paid to PPL in January 2013 from the Partnership effective January 1, 2012. (3) Additional Class B and Class D equivalent Shares available January 1, 2013 are shown in the table. The final equivalent Shares entitlement will be determined in early 2014, effective January 1, 2013, once actual sales of the restaurants are known. Note that forecasted Pizza 73 system sales added to the Royalty Pool were zero due to one non-traditional Pizza 73 restaurant opening and one closing. Therefore, PPL has received no additional Class D equivalent Shares on January 1, 2013. (4) A preliminary calculation of the 20% holdback of equivalent Shares entitlement was done as of January 1, 2013 using the net, positive, forecasted sales from the addition of 22 restaurants to the Royalty Pool less the closure of 18 non-traditional restaurants subtracted from the Royalty Pool on January 1, 2013. The final Class B and D equivalent Shares entitlement will be determined in early 2014, effective January 1, 2013 once actual sales of the restaurants are known.
Certain statements in this press release, including those concerning forecasted sales performance of new restaurants and related adjustments to the Exchange Multipliers, may constitute "forward-looking" statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
When used in this press release, such statements include such words as "may", "will", "expect", "believe", "plan", and other similar meaning in conjunction with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. These statements reflect management's current expectations regarding future events and operating performance of the restaurants added to the Royalty Pool and speak only as of the date of this press release. Material factors or assumptions reflected in the presentation of Forecasted Additional System Sales include: demographic and competitive studies, historical sales performance of similar stores and economic forecasts for the retail industry. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The following are some factors that could affect the forecasted performance of these restaurants, causing actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying such forward-looking statements: competition, the store owner's performance, changes in demographic trends, changing consumer preferences and discretionary spending patterns, changes in national and local business and economic conditions, and legislation and governmental regulation. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and should be considered in conjunction with the other risks and uncertainties described in the Fund's 2011 Annual Information Form. The Company assumes no obligation to update these forward looking statements, except as required by applicable securities laws.
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
Dec. 3, 2016 08:00 PM EST Reads: 3,944
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
Dec. 3, 2016 08:00 PM EST Reads: 1,737
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
Dec. 3, 2016 06:15 PM EST Reads: 1,506
"IoT is going to be a huge industry with a lot of value for end users, for industries, for consumers, for manufacturers. How can we use cloud to effectively manage IoT applications," stated Ian Khan, Innovation & Marketing Manager at Solgeniakhela, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Dec. 3, 2016 05:30 PM EST Reads: 4,035
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
Dec. 3, 2016 05:15 PM EST Reads: 2,132
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
Dec. 3, 2016 05:15 PM EST Reads: 1,996
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Dec. 3, 2016 04:30 PM EST Reads: 1,469
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
Dec. 3, 2016 04:00 PM EST Reads: 4,857
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Dec. 3, 2016 03:30 PM EST Reads: 1,584
Information technology is an industry that has always experienced change, and the dramatic change sweeping across the industry today could not be truthfully described as the first time we've seen such widespread change impacting customer investments. However, the rate of the change, and the potential outcomes from today's digital transformation has the distinct potential to separate the industry into two camps: Organizations that see the change coming, embrace it, and successful leverage it; and...
Dec. 3, 2016 03:15 PM EST Reads: 3,220
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service. In his session at 19th Cloud Exp...
Dec. 3, 2016 03:00 PM EST Reads: 468
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to simplify and streamline our lives by automating routine tasks that distract us from our goals. This promise is based on the ubiquitous deployment of smart, connected devices that link everything from industrial control systems to automobiles to refrigerators. Unfortunately, comparatively few of the devices currently deployed have been developed with an eye toward security, and as the DDoS attacks of late October 2016 have demonstrated, this oversight can ...
Dec. 3, 2016 02:45 PM EST Reads: 689
Extracting business value from Internet of Things (IoT) data doesn’t happen overnight. There are several requirements that must be satisfied, including IoT device enablement, data analysis, real-time detection of complex events and automated orchestration of actions. Unfortunately, too many companies fall short in achieving their business goals by implementing incomplete solutions or not focusing on tangible use cases. In his general session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products...
Dec. 3, 2016 02:45 PM EST Reads: 518
Regulatory requirements exist to promote the controlled sharing of information, while protecting the privacy and/or security of the information. Regulations for each type of information have their own set of rules, policies, and guidelines. Cloud Service Providers (CSP) are faced with increasing demand for services at decreasing prices. Demonstrating and maintaining compliance with regulations is a nontrivial task and doing so against numerous sets of regulatory requirements can be daunting task...
Dec. 3, 2016 02:45 PM EST Reads: 713
Fact: storage performance problems have only gotten more complicated, as applications not only have become largely virtualized, but also have moved to cloud-based infrastructures. Storage performance in virtualized environments isn’t just about IOPS anymore. Instead, you need to guarantee performance for individual VMs, helping applications maintain performance as the number of VMs continues to go up in real time. In his session at Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, Product and Marketing at Tintri, sha...
Dec. 3, 2016 02:45 PM EST Reads: 783