|By Marketwired .||
|February 6, 2013 06:41 PM EST||
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwire) -- 02/06/13 -- Banks Island Gold Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:BOZ) (the "Company") reports that as a result of a review by the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC), the Company is issuing the following news release to clarify our disclosure.
The Company is now filing amended technical reports on its Banks Island (Yellow Giant) and Red Mountain properties. An amended Banks Island report was required to carry forward a previous Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA), to apply gold grade cutting to the Kim deposit, and to provide additional information required by NI 43-101 about assumptions, parameters, and methods used for resource estimates. There are no material changes to resources and no changes to the previous PEA in the amended Banks Island report.
The Red Mountain report required amendment to document a personal property inspection required by NI 43-101, and to provide additional information about assumptions, parameters, and methods used for resource estimates. There are no changes to the Red Mountain resource estimate and PEA in the amended Red Mountain Report.
Additional details about the amended reports are in following sections of this news release.
Clarification of Non-Compliant Disclosure by Fundamental Research Corp.
Fundamental Research Corp. (Fundamental) distributed a report dated November 5, 2012 (the "Fundamental Report"). Banks Island Gold has no control or influence over Fundamental. All reports prepared by Fundamental are the work and property of Fundamental and they bear the full responsibility for those reports. The Company cautions readers that the Fundamental Report is not complaint with NI43-101, for example it summarized the Company's PEA at Yellow Giant without disclosing the type of mining study (a PEA), and omitted mandatory cautionary language always required by NI 43-101 with disclosure of PEA results. In particular, the Yellow Giant PEA is preliminary in nature, is based on inferred resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources that are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The Fundamental Report also disclosed a change to parameters of the PEA, which the Company cannot support at this time. The company disassociates itself from this and other information in the Fundamental Research Report.
Clarification of disclosure in Corporate Website, Investor Presentation, and Factsheet
The Company's provides clarification of its December 2012 Investor Presentation (the "Presentation"), a Fact Sheet, and additional information on the Corporate website.
1. The Presentation disclosed a "mineable resource"; a class restricted under NI 43-101. The Company retracts the use of the term "minable resource" and has removed it from all materials. 2. The Presentation included resource estimates not compliant with N43-101. To correct this, the Company has revised its mineral resource statements to always include classifications, disclose all classes of Mineral Resources separately, and not add inferred quantities to other classes. 3. The Corporate Presentation disclosed a high-grade subset of the current Red Mountain resource estimate. This disclosure omitted resource classifications and was not supported by the current Technical Report. The Company retracts this high-grade subset resource estimate. 4. The Company's website disclosed that the Yellow Giant Property has "potential for a major ore deposit" and provides a definition of a major ore deposit using a large gold ounce quantity. The Company retracts this gold ounce quantity, which did not comply with NI 43-101 rules for disclosure of a potential exploration target and is unsupported in the current Technical Report, and cautions that "a major ore deposit", may or may not exist on the Property. 5. The company's Presentation also disclosed exploration potential at Yellow Giant using a large gold ounce quantity with a fixed gold grade, and by comparing it to a significant deposit in British Columbia. As previously indicated, the Company retracts prior disclosure of exploration potential on the Property, as it is unable to provide a basis for such estimates, and its disclosure failed to use ranges of grade and tonnes, and did not include cautionary language always required by NI 43-101 for potential exploration targets. 6. The Presentation displays a graph displaying cashflows projected from the 2011 PEA study at Yellow Giant at various gold prices. The graph highlights cases with gold price higher that the PEA's $1360/oz base case, does not identify the base case, and does not equally present downside gold price risk. The Company retracts the information contained in this graph. 7. The Company's December 2012 Factsheet (the "Fact Sheet") displays information form the 2011 PEA at a $1700/oz gold price, but omits the $1360/oz base-case of the PEA. The Company retracts this information and will provide balanced sensitivities around the base-case in future disclosure. 8. A map showing historic production and current resources of various properties contained in the Company's presentation and Factsheet had an error which overstated the mineral resources at Red Mountain. The M&I resource at Red Mountain contains 435,000oz of gold and not 540,000oz as was shown in that figure. This error has been corrected. 9. The resource table in the Presentation contained an error in the silver grade of the M&I resources for Red Mountain. The average silver grade of the M&I resources at Red Mountain is 29gpt Ag and not 39gpt Ag as shown in the table. This error has been corrected.
Clarification Regarding Production Decisions and Development Periods
The Company disclosed information on its Presentation with production plans and schedules which are not supported by a technical report. The Company is actively working on bringing the Yellow Giant Gold Property into production within the next 12 months. However, readers are cautioned that the Company has not completed a pre-feasibility or feasibility study which establishes mineral reserves with demonstrated economic and technical viability. Further, the Company cautions readers that any potential production may not be economically feasible and historically projects taken to production without establishing reserves through a feasibility study have a much higher risk of economic or technical failure.
The Company is currently evaluating its plans for the advanced Red Mountain Gold Property. The Company plans to do further technical and geological work in the summer of 2013 which will be used in studies to evaluate mining rates, methods, permitting, and site infrastructure. The company does not currently have the financial capability to advance the Red Mountain project to a production decision and retracts information on the timing of any potential production from Red Mountain which was disclosed in the Presentation.
Amended Technical Report for the Banks Island Mineral Property (Yellow Giant) Property
The Company has previously released a Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "2011 PEA") for the Yellow Giant Gold Property which is contained in the technical report "Technical Report & Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Banks Island Mineral Property" dated November 23rd 2011 authored by Robert Baldwin, P.Eng. Subsequent to the release of the 2011 PEA, the Company released a resource update for the Banks Island Mineral Property technical report "Resource Update on the Banks Island Mineral Property" dated October 22th 2012 (the "2012 Report") by Robert Baldwin P.Eng.
The company has amended its Technical Report to include the results of the 2011 PEA. The 2011 PEA was based on a previous current inferred resource estimate contained in the 2011 PEA document. The PEA's information has not been updated to consider the revised mineral resource statement in the current Technical Report. The current Technical report summarizes the PEA results and presents the key conclusions and recommendations reproduced. Mr. Baldwin considers that significant components of the 2011 PEA remains valid. The author has included a commentary in the current technical report regarding the potential effects of the revised resource estimate on the results of the 2011 PEA.
The amended Technical Report provides further details on the selection of cut-off grades and additional information on the selection of search ellipsoids for the resource block model.
The amended Technical Report incorporates a grade cap for the Kim Zone. Mr. Baldwin applied a 98 percentile grade cap for the Kim Zone which resulted in a revised estimate for the Kim Zone as displayed in Table 1. The cut grade for the gold at the Kim Zone resulted in a reduction from 9.0gpt Au to 8.7gpt Au.
Table 1 - Kim Zone Inferred Resource - Effect of Grade Capping ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Au Au - Cut (1) Ag Ag - Cut (2) Zone Tonnes (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kim 59,000 9.0 8.7 29.5 22.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) - Au grades cut to 55 g/t (2) - Ag grades cut to 116 g/t
There is no change in the mineral resource calculation for the Bob, Tel, and Discovery Zones previously disclosed in the news release dated October 22nd 2012.
The Company clarifies the cut-off grade used in the calculation of the mineral resource for Yellow Giant is 6gpt gold.
Mr. Baldwin, P.Eng prepared an updated current Mineral Resource estimate for four mineral zones at Yellow Giant incorporating diamond drilling completed in 2011 and 2012. Mr. Baldwin modeled the significant mineralized zones at Yellow Giant and calculated the Mineral Resource for gold and silver using a 6gpt cutoff grade. The current Mineral Resource is displayed in Table 2 and is effective as of February 1th 2013. The resource calculation incorporates a 98th percentile top capping of gold and silver assays.
Table 2 - Yellow Giant Mineral Resource at a 6gpt cutoff grade ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Measured Indicated Inferred ------------------------------------------------------------------ Au Ag Au Ag Au Ag Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Zone Tonnes (gpt) (gpt) Tonnes (gpt) (gpt) Tonnes (gpt) (gpt) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tel 15,000 21.1 43 21,000 18.5 41 8,000 20.6 40 Bob 6,000 32.0 63 11,000 30.9 58 8,000 29.3 50 Discovery 10,000 22.1 36 15,000 22.8 36 6,000 30.8 36 Kim 59,000 8.7 22 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 31,000 23.4 44 47,000 22.7 43 81,000 13.7 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Measured & 78,000 tonnes @ 23.0gpt=57,624oz Gold, 109,000oz Silver Indicated: Au & 44gpt Ag Total Inferred: 81,000 tonnes @ 13.7gpt=35,678oz Gold, 73,000oz Silver Au & 28gpt Ag
The NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Yellow Giant Gold Property dated February 1st 2013 was prepared by independent consultant, Mr. Robert Baldwin, P.Eng, has been posted on SEDAR and will be available on the Company's website.
Amended Technical Report - Red Mountain Gold Property
The Company has amended its Technical Report on the Red Mountain Gold Property.
The amended Technical Report provides further details on Mr. Baldwin's 2012 site visit to Red Mountain (disclosed by previous new release on Oct 15, 2012), additional details on the selection of cut-off grades, and additional information on the selection of search ellipsoids for the resource block model.
There are no changes to the PEA results and Mineral Resource calculation previously disclosed in the news release dated June 18th 2012.
The Company clarifies the cut-off grade used in the calculation of the mineral resource at Red Mountain is 3gpt gold.
The NI43-101 Technical Report & Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Red Mountain Gold Property dated February 1st 2013 was prepared by independent consultants, Mr. Robert Baldwin, P.Eng and Mr. Lyn Jones, P.Eng., has been posted on SEDAR and will be available on the Company's website.
Mr. Benjamin Mossman P.Eng, CEO of Banks Island Gold is the qualified person who reviewed and approved the contents of this news release.
The Company is a junior mining resource exploration company focused on exploring for and developing economically viable mineral resources. The Company's mineral properties are located in British Columbia. For more information, please refer to the Company's website at www.banksislandgold.com.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Benjamin W. Mossman, P.Eng, President, Director & Chief Executive Officer
This press release contains forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, constitute "forward-looking statements" and include any information that addresses activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future including the Company's strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance and other statements that express management's expectations or estimates of future performance.
Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of the words "may", "will", "should", "continue", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", "believe", "intend", "plan" or "project" or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These statements, however, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed, implied by or projected in the forward-looking information or statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include but are not limited to: risks related to the exploration and potential development of the Company's project, the actual results of current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, future prices of gold, as well as those factors discussed in the sections relating to risk factors of the Company prospectus dated September 30, 2011 filed on SEDAR.
There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements. Except as required by law, the Company does not intend to revise or update these forward-looking statements after the date of this document or to revise them to reflect the occurrence of future unanticipated events.
The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this release. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Banks Island Gold Ltd.
Benjamin W. Mossman, P.Eng
President, Director & Chief Executive Officer
With SaaS use rampant across organizations, how can IT departments track company data and maintain security? More and more departments are commissioning their own solutions and bypassing IT. A cloud environment is amorphous and powerful, allowing you to set up solutions for all of your user needs: document sharing and collaboration, mobile access, e-mail, even industry-specific applications. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Shawn Mills, President and a founder of Green House Data, discussed h...
Jul. 31, 2015 04:30 PM EDT Reads: 423
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
Jul. 31, 2015 03:00 PM EDT Reads: 493
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
Jul. 31, 2015 02:30 PM EDT Reads: 274
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
Jul. 31, 2015 02:30 PM EDT
Chuck Piluso presented a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. Prior to Secure Infrastructure and Services, Mr. Piluso founded North American Telecommunication Corporation, a facilities-based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier licensed by the Public Service Commission in 10 states, serving as the company's chairman and president from 1997 to 2000. Between 1990 and 1997, Mr. Piluso served as chairman & founder of International Te...
Jul. 31, 2015 02:00 PM EDT Reads: 365
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
Jul. 31, 2015 01:45 PM EDT
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
Jul. 31, 2015 11:45 AM EDT Reads: 131
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.
Jul. 31, 2015 11:45 AM EDT Reads: 119
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
Jul. 31, 2015 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 146
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner, Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., discussed the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and conducte...
Jul. 31, 2015 08:45 AM EDT Reads: 304
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
Jul. 31, 2015 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 161
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Arch...
Jul. 30, 2015 07:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,401
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...
Jul. 30, 2015 06:30 PM EDT Reads: 894
Malicious agents are moving faster than the speed of business. Even more worrisome, most companies are relying on legacy approaches to security that are no longer capable of meeting current threats. In the modern cloud, threat diversity is rapidly expanding, necessitating more sophisticated security protocols than those used in the past or in desktop environments. Yet companies are falling for cloud security myths that were truths at one time but have evolved out of existence.
Jul. 30, 2015 06:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,806
Digital Transformation is the ultimate goal of cloud computing and related initiatives. The phrase is certainly not a precise one, and as subject to hand-waving and distortion as any high-falutin' terminology in the world of information technology. Yet it is an excellent choice of words to describe what enterprise IT—and by extension, organizations in general—should be working to achieve. Digital Transformation means: handling all the data types being found and created in the organizat...
Jul. 30, 2015 05:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,093