Welcome!

News Feed Item

Banks Island Gold Ltd. Clarifies Technical Disclosure

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwire) -- 02/06/13 -- Banks Island Gold Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:BOZ) (the "Company") reports that as a result of a review by the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC), the Company is issuing the following news release to clarify our disclosure.

The Company is now filing amended technical reports on its Banks Island (Yellow Giant) and Red Mountain properties. An amended Banks Island report was required to carry forward a previous Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA), to apply gold grade cutting to the Kim deposit, and to provide additional information required by NI 43-101 about assumptions, parameters, and methods used for resource estimates. There are no material changes to resources and no changes to the previous PEA in the amended Banks Island report.

The Red Mountain report required amendment to document a personal property inspection required by NI 43-101, and to provide additional information about assumptions, parameters, and methods used for resource estimates. There are no changes to the Red Mountain resource estimate and PEA in the amended Red Mountain Report.

Additional details about the amended reports are in following sections of this news release.

Clarification of Non-Compliant Disclosure by Fundamental Research Corp.

Fundamental Research Corp. (Fundamental) distributed a report dated November 5, 2012 (the "Fundamental Report"). Banks Island Gold has no control or influence over Fundamental. All reports prepared by Fundamental are the work and property of Fundamental and they bear the full responsibility for those reports. The Company cautions readers that the Fundamental Report is not complaint with NI43-101, for example it summarized the Company's PEA at Yellow Giant without disclosing the type of mining study (a PEA), and omitted mandatory cautionary language always required by NI 43-101 with disclosure of PEA results. In particular, the Yellow Giant PEA is preliminary in nature, is based on inferred resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources that are not reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The Fundamental Report also disclosed a change to parameters of the PEA, which the Company cannot support at this time. The company disassociates itself from this and other information in the Fundamental Research Report.

Clarification of disclosure in Corporate Website, Investor Presentation, and Factsheet

The Company's provides clarification of its December 2012 Investor Presentation (the "Presentation"), a Fact Sheet, and additional information on the Corporate website.


1.  The Presentation disclosed a "mineable resource"; a class restricted
    under NI 43-101. The Company retracts the use of the term "minable
    resource" and has removed it from all materials. 
    
2.  The Presentation included resource estimates not compliant with N43-101.
    To correct this, the Company has revised its mineral resource statements
    to always include classifications, disclose all classes of Mineral
    Resources separately, and not add inferred quantities to other classes. 
    
3.  The Corporate Presentation disclosed a high-grade subset of the current
    Red Mountain resource estimate. This disclosure omitted resource
    classifications and was not supported by the current Technical Report.
    The Company retracts this high-grade subset resource estimate. 
    
4.  The Company's website disclosed that the Yellow Giant Property has
    "potential for a major ore deposit" and provides a definition of a major
    ore deposit using a large gold ounce quantity. The Company retracts this
    gold ounce quantity, which did not comply with NI 43-101 rules for
    disclosure of a potential exploration target and is unsupported in the
    current Technical Report, and cautions that "a major ore deposit", may
    or may not exist on the Property. 
    
5.  The company's Presentation also disclosed exploration potential at
    Yellow Giant using a large gold ounce quantity with a fixed gold grade,
    and by comparing it to a significant deposit in British Columbia. As
    previously indicated, the Company retracts prior disclosure of
    exploration potential on the Property, as it is unable to provide a
    basis for such estimates, and its disclosure failed to use ranges of
    grade and tonnes, and did not include cautionary language always
    required by NI 43-101 for potential exploration targets. 
    
6.  The Presentation displays a graph displaying cashflows projected from
    the 2011 PEA study at Yellow Giant at various gold prices. The graph
    highlights cases with gold price higher that the PEA's $1360/oz base
    case, does not identify the base case, and does not equally present
    downside gold price risk. The Company retracts the information contained
    in this graph. 
    
7.  The Company's December 2012 Factsheet (the "Fact Sheet") displays
    information form the 2011 PEA at a $1700/oz gold price, but omits the
    $1360/oz base-case of the PEA. The Company retracts this information and
    will provide balanced sensitivities around the base-case in future
    disclosure. 
    
8.  A map showing historic production and current resources of various
    properties contained in the Company's presentation and Factsheet had an
    error which overstated the mineral resources at Red Mountain. The M&I
    resource at Red Mountain contains 435,000oz of gold and not 540,000oz as
    was shown in that figure. This error has been corrected. 
    
9.  The resource table in the Presentation contained an error in the silver
    grade of the M&I resources for Red Mountain. The average silver grade of
    the M&I resources at Red Mountain is 29gpt Ag and not 39gpt Ag as shown
    in the table. This error has been corrected. 

Clarification Regarding Production Decisions and Development Periods

The Company disclosed information on its Presentation with production plans and schedules which are not supported by a technical report. The Company is actively working on bringing the Yellow Giant Gold Property into production within the next 12 months. However, readers are cautioned that the Company has not completed a pre-feasibility or feasibility study which establishes mineral reserves with demonstrated economic and technical viability. Further, the Company cautions readers that any potential production may not be economically feasible and historically projects taken to production without establishing reserves through a feasibility study have a much higher risk of economic or technical failure.

The Company is currently evaluating its plans for the advanced Red Mountain Gold Property. The Company plans to do further technical and geological work in the summer of 2013 which will be used in studies to evaluate mining rates, methods, permitting, and site infrastructure. The company does not currently have the financial capability to advance the Red Mountain project to a production decision and retracts information on the timing of any potential production from Red Mountain which was disclosed in the Presentation.

Amended Technical Report for the Banks Island Mineral Property (Yellow Giant) Property

The Company has previously released a Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "2011 PEA") for the Yellow Giant Gold Property which is contained in the technical report "Technical Report & Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Banks Island Mineral Property" dated November 23rd 2011 authored by Robert Baldwin, P.Eng. Subsequent to the release of the 2011 PEA, the Company released a resource update for the Banks Island Mineral Property technical report "Resource Update on the Banks Island Mineral Property" dated October 22th 2012 (the "2012 Report") by Robert Baldwin P.Eng.

The company has amended its Technical Report to include the results of the 2011 PEA. The 2011 PEA was based on a previous current inferred resource estimate contained in the 2011 PEA document. The PEA's information has not been updated to consider the revised mineral resource statement in the current Technical Report. The current Technical report summarizes the PEA results and presents the key conclusions and recommendations reproduced. Mr. Baldwin considers that significant components of the 2011 PEA remains valid. The author has included a commentary in the current technical report regarding the potential effects of the revised resource estimate on the results of the 2011 PEA.

The amended Technical Report provides further details on the selection of cut-off grades and additional information on the selection of search ellipsoids for the resource block model.

The amended Technical Report incorporates a grade cap for the Kim Zone. Mr. Baldwin applied a 98 percentile grade cap for the Kim Zone which resulted in a revised estimate for the Kim Zone as displayed in Table 1. The cut grade for the gold at the Kim Zone resulted in a reduction from 9.0gpt Au to 8.7gpt Au.


Table 1 - Kim Zone Inferred Resource - Effect of Grade Capping              
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Au   Au - Cut (1)        Ag   Ag - Cut (2)
Zone                Tonnes     (g/t)          (g/t)     (g/t)          (g/t)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim                 59,000       9.0            8.7      29.5           22.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) - Au grades cut to 55 g/t                                               
(2) - Ag grades cut to 116 g/t                                              

There is no change in the mineral resource calculation for the Bob, Tel, and Discovery Zones previously disclosed in the news release dated October 22nd 2012.

The Company clarifies the cut-off grade used in the calculation of the mineral resource for Yellow Giant is 6gpt gold.

Mr. Baldwin, P.Eng prepared an updated current Mineral Resource estimate for four mineral zones at Yellow Giant incorporating diamond drilling completed in 2011 and 2012. Mr. Baldwin modeled the significant mineralized zones at Yellow Giant and calculated the Mineral Resource for gold and silver using a 6gpt cutoff grade. The current Mineral Resource is displayed in Table 2 and is effective as of February 1th 2013. The resource calculation incorporates a 98th percentile top capping of gold and silver assays.


Table 2 - Yellow Giant Mineral Resource at a 6gpt cutoff grade              
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Measured              Indicated             Inferred       
          ------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Au     Ag             Au     Ag             Au     Ag
                    Grade  Grade          Grade  Grade          Grade  Grade
Zone        Tonnes  (gpt)  (gpt)  Tonnes  (gpt)  (gpt)  Tonnes  (gpt)  (gpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel         15,000   21.1     43  21,000   18.5     41   8,000   20.6     40
Bob          6,000   32.0     63  11,000   30.9     58   8,000   29.3     50
Discovery   10,000   22.1     36  15,000   22.8     36   6,000   30.8     36
Kim                                                     59,000    8.7     22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total       31,000   23.4     44  47,000   22.7     43  81,000   13.7     28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Total Measured &    78,000 tonnes @ 23.0gpt=57,624oz Gold, 109,000oz Silver 
Indicated:          Au & 44gpt Ag                                           
                                                                            
Total Inferred:     81,000 tonnes @ 13.7gpt=35,678oz Gold, 73,000oz Silver  
                    Au & 28gpt Ag                                           

The NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Yellow Giant Gold Property dated February 1st 2013 was prepared by independent consultant, Mr. Robert Baldwin, P.Eng, has been posted on SEDAR and will be available on the Company's website.

Amended Technical Report - Red Mountain Gold Property

The Company has amended its Technical Report on the Red Mountain Gold Property.

The amended Technical Report provides further details on Mr. Baldwin's 2012 site visit to Red Mountain (disclosed by previous new release on Oct 15, 2012), additional details on the selection of cut-off grades, and additional information on the selection of search ellipsoids for the resource block model.

There are no changes to the PEA results and Mineral Resource calculation previously disclosed in the news release dated June 18th 2012.

The Company clarifies the cut-off grade used in the calculation of the mineral resource at Red Mountain is 3gpt gold.

The NI43-101 Technical Report & Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Red Mountain Gold Property dated February 1st 2013 was prepared by independent consultants, Mr. Robert Baldwin, P.Eng and Mr. Lyn Jones, P.Eng., has been posted on SEDAR and will be available on the Company's website.

Mr. Benjamin Mossman P.Eng, CEO of Banks Island Gold is the qualified person who reviewed and approved the contents of this news release.

The Company is a junior mining resource exploration company focused on exploring for and developing economically viable mineral resources. The Company's mineral properties are located in British Columbia. For more information, please refer to the Company's website at www.banksislandgold.com.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Benjamin W. Mossman, P.Eng, President, Director & Chief Executive Officer

This press release contains forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, constitute "forward-looking statements" and include any information that addresses activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future including the Company's strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance and other statements that express management's expectations or estimates of future performance.

Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of the words "may", "will", "should", "continue", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", "believe", "intend", "plan" or "project" or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These statements, however, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed, implied by or projected in the forward-looking information or statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include but are not limited to: risks related to the exploration and potential development of the Company's project, the actual results of current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, future prices of gold, as well as those factors discussed in the sections relating to risk factors of the Company prospectus dated September 30, 2011 filed on SEDAR.

There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements. Except as required by law, the Company does not intend to revise or update these forward-looking statements after the date of this document or to revise them to reflect the occurrence of future unanticipated events.

The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this release. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Contacts:
Banks Island Gold Ltd.
Benjamin W. Mossman, P.Eng
President, Director & Chief Executive Officer
604-245-0066
www.banksislandgold.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Ericsson has been named “Gold Sponsor” of SYS-CON's @ThingsExpo, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York, New York. Ericsson is a world leader in the rapidly changing environment of communications technology – providing equipment, software and services to enable transformation through mobility. Some 40 percent of global mobile traffic runs through networks we have supplied. More than 1 billion subscribers around the world re...
There is an ever-growing explosion of new devices that are connected to the Internet using “cloud” solutions. This rapid growth is creating a massive new demand for efficient access to data. And it’s not just about connecting to that data anymore. This new demand is bringing new issues and challenges and it is important for companies to scale for the coming growth. And with that scaling comes the need for greater security, gathering and data analysis, storage, connectivity and, of course, the...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Peak 10, Inc., a national IT infrastructure and cloud services provider, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Peak 10 provides reliable, tailored data center and network services, cloud and managed services. Its solutions are designed to scale and adapt to customers’ changing business needs, enabling them to lower costs, improve performance and focus inter...
Increasing IoT connectivity is forcing enterprises to find elegant solutions to organize and visualize all incoming data from these connected devices with re-configurable dashboard widgets to effectively allow rapid decision-making for everything from immediate actions in tactical situations to strategic analysis and reporting. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Shikhir Singh, Senior Developer Relations Manager at Sencha, will discuss how to create HTML5 dashboards that interact with IoT devic...
We’ve worked with dozens of early adopters across numerous industries and will debunk common misperceptions, which starts with understanding that many of the connected products we’ll use over the next 5 years are already products, they’re just not yet connected. With an IoT product, time-in-market provides much more essential feedback than ever before. Innovation comes from what you do with the data that the connected product provides in order to enhance the customer experience and optimize busi...
SYS-CON Events announced today the Docker Meets Kubernetes – Intro into the Kubernetes World, being held June 9, 2016, in conjunction with 18th Cloud Expo | @ThingsExpo, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Register for 'Docker Meets Kubernetes Workshop' Here! This workshop led by Sebastian Scheele, co-founder of Loodse, introduces participants to Kubernetes (container orchestration). Through a combination of instructor-led presentations, demonstrations, and hands-on labs, participants learn ...
So, you bought into the current machine learning craze and went on to collect millions/billions of records from this promising new data source. Now, what do you do with them? Too often, the abundance of data quickly turns into an abundance of problems. How do you extract that "magic essence" from your data without falling into the common pitfalls? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Natalia Ponomareva, Software Engineer at Google, will provide tips on how to be successful in large scale machine lear...
Peak 10, Inc., has announced the implementation of IT service management, a business process alignment initiative based on the widely adopted Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) framework. The implementation of IT service management enhances Peak 10’s current service-minded approach to IT delivery by propelling the company to deliver higher levels of personalized and prompt service. The majority of Peak 10’s operations employees have been trained and certified in the ITIL frame...
The increasing popularity of the Internet of Things necessitates that our physical and cognitive relationship with wearable technology will change rapidly in the near future. This advent means logging has become a thing of the past. Before, it was on us to track our own data, but now that data is automatically available. What does this mean for mHealth and the "connected" body? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Lisa Calkins, CEO and co-founder of Amadeus Consulting, will discuss the impact of wea...
In the world of DevOps there are ‘known good practices’ – aka ‘patterns’ – and ‘known bad practices’ – aka ‘anti-patterns.' Many of these patterns and anti-patterns have been developed from real world experience, especially by the early adopters of DevOps theory; but many are more feasible in theory than in practice, especially for more recent entrants to the DevOps scene. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists will dis...
See storage differently! Storage performance problems have only gotten worse and harder to solve as applications have become largely virtualized and moved to a cloud-based infrastructure. Storage performance in a virtualized environment is not just about IOPS, it is about how well that potential performance is guaranteed to individual VMs for these apps as the number of VMs keep going up real time. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, in product and marketing at Tintri, will discu...
trust and privacy in their ecosystem. Assurance and protection of device identity, secure data encryption and authentication are the key security challenges organizations are trying to address when integrating IoT devices. This holds true for IoT applications in a wide range of industries, for example, healthcare, consumer devices, and manufacturing. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lancen LaChance, vice president of product management, IoT solutions at GlobalSign, will teach IoT developers how t...
A critical component of any IoT project is the back-end systems that capture data from remote IoT devices and structure it in a way to answer useful questions. Traditional data warehouse and analytical systems are mature technologies that can be used to handle large data sets, but they are not well suited to many IoT-scale products and the need for real-time insights. At Fuze, we have developed a backend platform as part of our mobility-oriented cloud service that uses Big Data-based approache...
We're entering the post-smartphone era, where wearable gadgets from watches and fitness bands to glasses and health aids will power the next technological revolution. With mass adoption of wearable devices comes a new data ecosystem that must be protected. Wearables open new pathways that facilitate the tracking, sharing and storing of consumers’ personal health, location and daily activity data. Consumers have some idea of the data these devices capture, but most don’t realize how revealing and...
Digital payments using wearable devices such as smart watches, fitness trackers, and payment wristbands are an increasing area of focus for industry participants, and consumer acceptance from early trials and deployments has encouraged some of the biggest names in technology and banking to continue their push to drive growth in this nascent market. Wearable payment systems may utilize near field communication (NFC), radio frequency identification (RFID), or quick response (QR) codes and barcodes...