Welcome!

News Feed Item

Ballard Reports 2012 Results and 2013 Outlook

VANCOUVER, Feb. 20, 2013 /PRNewswire/ - Ballard Power Systems (NASDAQ: BLDP) (TSX: BLD) today announced its consolidated financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2012. All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

"Q4 results reflected a marked turnaround from weak results earlier in the year - both top line and bottom line," said John Sheridan, President and CEO. "This Q4 top line momentum and a solid yearend order book support our business outlook for 2013 revenue growth in excess of 30%. This top line growth, along with continued reductions in the cost base and a projected increase in gross margin, underpin our expectation for improvement in Adjusted EBITDA in excess of 50%."

Background

On January 31, 2013 Ballard closed the sale of its Material Products division, a non-core asset located in Lowell, MA, in order to focus on high growth fuel cell products and to fortify the Company's cash position. Therefore, as per IFRS, Ballard's 2012 audited financial statements reflect "continuing operations" (excluding Material Products). In order to portray results comprehensively relative to the results reported throughout 2012 and to guidance for the full year, the financial results are also shown in the "2012 Financial Highlights" table below in a format which includes the Material Products division. Also, since the sale of the Material Products division was not completed until early 2013, the following section - with commentary on Q4 and full year 2012 results - addresses Ballard's performance including Material Products.

       
Q4 and Full Year 2012 Results (including Material Products)
 
Growth
Q4 revenue improved 50% to $21.3 million over the prior quarter, and improved 1% year-on-year.
    A key driver of the quarter-on-quarter revenue improvement was the addition of methanol-fueled ElectraGenTM systems to the backup power product line in August 2012. In Q4, 204 ElectraGenTM systems were shipped, 75% of which were methanol-fueled.
    In addition, engineering services contributed significantly to the growth, with revenue of $6.6 million in Q4 and more than $10 million for the year, a significant increase from less than $5 million in 2011.
Full year revenue declined $16.8 million or 22% to $59.2 million year-on-year, consistent with the Company's revised guidance for revenue of approximately $60 million.
    This year-on-year decline in 2012 revenue reflected weak performance in Material Products and Bus, in addition to the 2011 wind down of contract manufacturing. Excluding 2011 contract manufacturing, revenue improved 2%.
In terms of product volume metrics, the 204 ElectraGenTM systems shipped for backup power in Q4 represented a 172% improvement over Q4 2011. In addition, Q4 stack shipments for material handling of 468 represented a 41% decline from Q4 2011.
    Full year ElectraGenTM system shipments for backup power of 399 represented a 175% improvement relative to 2011. Full year stack shipments for material handling of 2,022 represented a 42% improvement relative to 2011.
       
Path to Profitability
Q4 gross margin improved 10 points to 24% over Q3, and improved 4 points relative to Q4
2011.
    Full year gross margin improved 2 points to 20%.
Q4 cash operating costs increased 10% to $7.8 million over Q3, but improved 10% relative
to Q4 2011.
    Full year cash operating costs improved 18% relative to 2011, to $32.2 million.
Q4 Adjusted EBITDA improved 65% to ($1.9) million over Q3, and improved 50% relative
to Q4 2011.
    Full year Adjusted EBITDA improved 17% to ($18.5) million, consistent with the
Company's revised guidance for Adjusted EBITDA of approximately ($18) million.  
Q4 cash used by operating activities improved 58% to ($0.5) million over Q3.
    Full year cash used by operating activities improved 15% to ($28.1) million relative
to 2011.
Cash reserves at yearend were $12.5 million net of $9.3 million outstanding on the
Company's bank operating line.
    This cash position was fortified with the sale of the Material Products division on
January 31, 2013, which generated proceeds of up to $12 million.
Q4 normalized net loss from continuing operations was unchanged at ($6.2) million
compared to Q4 2011.
    Full year normalized net loss from continuing operations improved 11% to ($31.5)
million relative to 2011.
       

2013 Business Outlook

The Company expects revenue growth in excess of 30%, led by backup power and engineering services, which together represent more than half of the $36.8 million 2012 yearend order book (excluding Material Products). It is expected that this growth, along with higher gross margins and a lower cost base, will contribute to improvements in bottom line performance.

2013 Guidance

The Company's guidance is for the following improvements in 2013 continuing operations:

  • Revenue growth in excess of 30%; and
  • Adjusted EBITDA improvement in excess of 50%.

2012 Financial Highlights

                 
Results of Operations Three months ended December 31, Twelve months ended December 31,
  2012 2011 % Improvement 2012 2011 % Improvement
(expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts and gross margin %)
Total (including Material Products)           
Revenue:             
  Fuel Cell Products  $16.5 $16.9 (2%) $43.7 $46.5 (6%)
  Contract Automotive - $0.1 (100%) - $9.3 (100%)
  Material Products $4.8 $4.0 19% $15.5 $20.2 (23%)
Total Revenue $21.3 $21.0 1% $59.2 $76.0 (22%)
Gross margin  $5.2 $4.1 27% $11.8 $13.9 (15%)
Gross margin % 24% 20% 4-points 20% 18% 2-points
Cash Operating Costs (1) $7.8 $8.6 10% $32.2 $39.3 18%
Adjusted EBITDA (1) ($1.9) ($3.8) 50% ($18.5) ($22.3) 17%
Cash Used by Operating Activities:             
  Cash Operating Income (Loss) ($2.4) ($4.7) 49% ($22.2) ($26.5) 16%
  Working Capital Changes $1.9 $8.8 (79%) ($5.9) ($6.7) 12%
  Cash Used by Operating Activities ($0.5) $4.1 (113%) ($28.1) ($33.2) 15%
Cash Reserves $21.8 $46.2        
Cash Reserves, Net of Operating Line $12.5 $41.6        
             
From continuing operations             
Revenue:             
  Fuel Cell Products $16.5 $16.9 (2%) $43.7 $46.5 (6%)
  Contract Automotive - 0.1 (100%) - $9.3 (100%)
Total Revenue $16.5 $17.0 (3%) $43.7 $55.8 (22%)
12 Month Rolling Order Book $36.8 $32.0        
Gross margin  $3.7 $2.9 25% $7.4 $7.3 1%
Gross margin %  22% 17% 5-points 17% 13% 4-points
Cash Operating Costs (1) $7.3 $8.2 11% $30.3 $37.0 18%
Adjusted EBITDA (1) ($3.2) ($4.9) 34% ($22.1) ($27.9) 21%
Net loss attributable to Ballard from continuing operations  ($16.8) ($8.0) (111%) ($42.1) ($37.2) (13%)
Net loss attributable to Ballard per share, basic and diluted  ($0.18) ($0.09) (100%) ($0.48) ($0.44) (9%)
Normalized Net Loss (1) ($6.2) ($6.2) - ($31.5) ($35.4) 11%
Normalized Net Loss (1) per share, basic and diluted ($0.07) ($0.07) - ($0.36) ($0.42) 14%
                   
   

 

For a more detailed discussion of Ballard Power Systems' 2012 results, please see the company's financial statements and management's discussion & analysis, which are available at www.ballard.com/investors, www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

Conference Call

Ballard will hold a conference call on Thursday, February 21, 2013 at 8:00 a.m. PST (11:00 a.m. EST) to review its 2012 operating results and 2013 outlook. The live call can be accessed by dialing +1.604.638.5340. Alternatively, a live audio webcast can be accessed through a link on Ballard's homepage (www.ballard.com). Following the call, the audio webcast will be archived in the Quarterly Results area of the Investor section of Ballard's website (www.ballard.com/investors).

About Ballard Power Systems

Ballard Power Systems (NASDAQ: BLDP) (TSX: BLD) provides clean energy fuel cell products enabling optimized power systems for a range of applications. Products deliver incomparable performance, durability and versatility. To learn more about Ballard, please visit www.ballard.com.

Important Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This release contains forward-looking statements concerning projected revenue growth, product shipments, gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, cash operating expenses and product sales. These forward-looking statements reflect Ballard's current expectations as contemplated under section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Any such statements are based on Ballard's assumptions relating to its financial forecasts and expectations regarding its product development efforts, manufacturing capacity, and market demand. For a detailed discussion of the factors and assumptions that these statements are based upon, and factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially, please refer to Ballard's most recent management discussion & analysis. Other risks and uncertainties that may cause Ballard's actual results to be materially different include general economic and regulatory changes, detrimental reliance on third parties, successfully achieving our business plans and achieving and sustaining profitability. For a detailed discussion of these and other risk factors that could affect Ballard's future performance, please refer to Ballard's most recent Annual Information Form. These forward-looking statements are provided to enable external stakeholders to understand Ballard's expectations as at the date of this release and may not be appropriate for other purposes. Readers should not place undue reliance on these statements and Ballard assumes no obligation to update or release any revisions to them, other than as required under applicable legislation.

Endnote:

1 Cash Operating Costs measures operating expenses excluding stock based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, acquisition costs and financing charges. EBITDA measures net loss attributable to Ballard Power Systems Inc. excluding finance expense, income taxes, depreciation of property, plant and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and goodwill impairment charges. Adjusted EBITDA adjusts EBITDA for stock based compensation expense, transactional gains and losses, asset impairment charges, finance and other income and acquisition costs. Normalized Net Loss measures net loss attributable to Ballard from continuing operations, excluding transactional gains and losses and asset impairment charges.

Note that Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Normalized Net Loss, are non GAAP measures. Non GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Ballard believes that Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Normalized Net Loss assist investors in assessing Ballard's operating performance and liquidity. These measures should be used in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows and other measures of financial performance and liquidity reported in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of Cash Operating Costs, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Normalized Net Loss to the Consolidated Financial Statements, please refer to Ballard's Management's Discussion & Analysis. 

 

 

Guy McAree +1.604.412.7919, [email protected] or [email protected]

SOURCE Ballard Power Systems Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of following equation: monolithic to microservices to serverless architecture (FaaS). To keep up with the cut-throat competition, the organisations need to update their technology stack to make software development their differentiating factor. Thus microservices architecture emerged as a potential method to provide development teams with greater flexibility and other advantages, such as the abili...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.