Welcome!

News Feed Item

Ormat Technologies Reports 2012 Fourth Quarter and Year End Results

RENO, Nev., Feb. 27, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Ormat Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: ORA) today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2012.

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20040422/LATH066LOGO)

The highlights for the year and recent 2013 developments:

  • Total revenues increased 17.7 percent for the year to $514.4 million;
  • Product segment revenues increased 65.1 percent to a record of $186.9 million with a record backlog of $262.0 million as of February 15, 2013, 9 percent over last year;
  • Electricity generation increased by 7.3 percent with the addition of 51 MW from Tuscarora and McGinness Hills which became commercial in January 2012 and July 2012, respectively;
  • Adjusted EBITDA increased 11.5 percent to $185.8 million;
  • Obtained favorable financing for Olkaria III Plant 1 and Plant 2 currently under construction and secured financing for the expected construction of Plant 3;
  • Received $35.7 million in a tax equity transaction; and
  • Recorded an impairment charge of $229.1 million relating to the North Brawley power plant which resulted in a net loss of $206.7 million in the year.

Commenting on the results, Dita Bronicki, Chief Executive Officer of Ormat, stated:  "2012 was highlighted by total revenue growth of 17.7 percent as a result of the continued strong performance of our product segment and the steady, consistent growth in our electricity segment. New capacity, and project enhancement implemented during the course of the year enabled us to maintain margins in our electricity segment despite the influence of low natural gas prices on the rates that we get from some of our older PPAs.

"The demand for new geothermal power plants and other power generating units continues to drive significant growth in our product segment. 2013 as well, started with a strong order flow.

"While net income was substantially affected by the non-cash impairment charges of $236.4 million related to the North Brawley and OREG 4 power plants, adjusted EBITDA increased 11.5 percent to $185.8 million with operating cash flow of $93.2 million.

"Our long-term goal remains to develop projects where both resource and markets allow them to be successful and to deliver the best possible products to our customers.  We will also continue to look for technical and commercial ways to improve operations as a way to maximize value to our shareholders."

Ms. Bronicki added, "We expect our 2013 electricity revenues to be between $335 million and $345 million and our product segment revenues to be between $180 million and $190 million."

Financial Summary

Annual Results

For the year ended December 31, 2012, total revenues increased 17.7 percent from $437.0 million in 2011 to $514.4 million in 2012.  Product revenues increased 65.1 percent to $186.9 million, up from $113.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in product revenues reflects the increase in new customer orders that we secured mainly in 2011. Electricity revenues increased slightly to $327.5 million up from $323.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in electricity revenues was primarily due to the following:

  • Revenue contribution of $23.5 million from our Tuscarora and McGinness Hills power plant;
  • Additional net revenue contribution of $3.2 million from other power plants in our portfolio; and
  • Net gain of $2.2 million on derivative contracts on oil and natural gas prices.

This increase was substantially offset by a $25.2 million reduction in revenues due to the transition to short run avoided cost (SRAC) pricing under our SO#4 contracts in California. 

Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $155.1 million, compared to operating income of $64.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The operating loss in 2012 was primarily attributable to the non-cash impairment charges of $236.4 million taken at North Brawley and OREG 4.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the company reported a net loss of $206.7 million, or $4.56 per share, compared to $42.7 million or $0.95 per share for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $185.8 million, compared to $166.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the impairment charges for the North Brawley and OREG 4 power plants. The reconciliation of GAAP net cash provided by operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA and additional cash flows information is set forth below in this release.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $93.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $132.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2011.  The decrease in cash provided by operating activity is mainly due to a substantial change in working capital as a result of decrease in advance payments on project under construction in the product segment.

As of December 31, 2012 cash, cash equivalents and a short-term bank deposit were $69.6 million. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, the company had available committed lines of credit with commercial banks aggregating $445.8 million, of which $184.9 million is unused.

Although the company has completed substantially all of its work on its tax provision, certain review procedures are still to be completed prior to the filing of its annual report on Form 10-K. As a result, while the company believes the results contained in this release are materially correct, certain amounts could be revised when the company files its annual report on Form 10-K.

Fourth Quarter Results

For the three-month period ended December 31, 2012, total revenues decreased 6.2 percent from $123.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 to $116.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. Electricity revenues increased 1.6 percent to $78.8 million from $77.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. Product revenues decreased 19.3 percent to $37.3 million from $46.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. This decrease is principally attributable to the timing of revenue recognition in accordance with the percentage of completion method for each of our products.

For the quarter, the company reported a net loss of $222.9 million or $4.91 per share, compared to $43.0 million, or $0.95 per share for the same period in 2011.

Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2012 was $35.3 million, compared to $45.1 million for the same period last year. The adjusted EBITDA was impacted by various factors including timing of recognition of product segment revenue, reduction in the electricity revenues associated with the SO#4 PPAs and a mining tax in the amount of $3.3 million in respect of the years 2008 – 2010 that we have appealed. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the impairment charge for the North Brawley power plant.  The reconciliation of GAAP net cash provided by operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA and additional cash flows information is set forth below in this release.

Conference Call Details

Ormat will host a conference call to discuss its financial results and other matters discussed in this press release at 10:00 A.M. EST on Wednesday, February 27, 2013.  The call will be available as a live, listen-only webcast at www.ormat.com. During the webcast, management will refer to slides that will be posted on the web site. The slides and accompanying webcast can be accessed through the Webcast & Presentations in the Investor Relations section of Ormat's website.

A webcast will be available approximately two hours after the conclusion of the live call. A replay of the call will be available beginning approximately at 1 p.m. EST on February 27, 2013 until 11:59 p.m. EST on March 6, 2013. To access the replay, interested investors should call: (855) 859-2056 (U.S. and Canada) or (404) 537-3406 (International) and enter the Reply code: 94897605.

About Ormat Technologies

With over four decades of experience, Ormat Technologies, Inc. is a leading geothermal company and the only vertically integrated company solely engaged in geothermal and recovered energy generation (REG). The company owns, operates, designs, manufactures and sells geothermal and REG power plants primarily based on the Ormat Energy Converter – a power generation unit that converts low-, medium- and high-temperature heat into electricity.  With over 82 U.S. patents, Ormat's power solutions have been refined and perfected under the most grueling environmental conditions.  Ormat's flexible, modular solutions for geothermal power and REG are ideal for the vast range of resource characteristics.  The company has engineered and built power plants, which it currently owns or has supplied to utilities and developers worldwide, totaling approximately 1600 MW of gross capacity. Ormat's current generating portfolio of 575 MW (net) includes Brady, Brawley, Heber, Jersey Valley, Mammoth, McGinness Hills, Ormesa, Puna, Steamboat, Tuscarora, OREG 1, OREG 2, OREG 3 and OREG 4 in the U.S.; Zunil and Amatitlan in Guatemala; Olkaria III in Kenya; and, Momotombo in Nicaragua.

Ormat's Safe Harbor Statement

Information provided in this press release may contain statements relating to current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about future events that are "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally relate to Ormat's plans, objectives and expectations for future operations and are based upon its management's current estimates and projections of future results or trends. Actual future results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, see "Risk Factors" as described in Ormat Technologies, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2012 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2012.

These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Ormat Technologies Contact:

Investor Relations Contact:

Dita Bronicki

Todd Fromer/Rob Fink

CEO

KCSA Strategic Communications

775-356-9029

 212-896-1215 (Todd) /212-896-1206 (Rob)

[email protected]

[email protected]/ [email protected]



Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three and Twelve-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)





 Three Months Ended 


 Year Ended 


  December 31, 


  December 31, 


2012


2011


2012


2011














 (In thousands, 


 (In thousands, 


 except per share data) 


 except per share data) 

 Revenues: 












     Electricity

$

78,819


$

77,576


$

327,529


$

323,849

     Product


37,263



46,158



186,879



113,160

          Total revenues


116,082



123,734



514,408



437,009

 Cost of revenues: 












     Electricity


67,284



57,947



244,634



244,037

     Product


26,771



32,796



135,346



76,072

          Total cost of revenues


94,055



90,743



379,980



320,109

          Gross margin


22,027



32,991



134,428



116,900

 Operating expenses: 












     Research and development expenses


2,160



1,673



6,108



8,801

     Selling and marketing expenses


3,089



6,882



16,122



16,207

     General and administrative expenses


7,952



7,130



28,267



27,885

     Impairment Charges


229,113





236,377



     Write-off of unsuccessful exploration activities


720





2,639



          Operating income (loss)


(221,007)



17,306



(155,085)



64,007

 Other income (expense): 












     Interest income


197



138



1,201



1,427

     Interest expense, net


(19,528)



(15,028)



(64,069)



(69,459)

     Foreign currency translation and transaction gains (losses)


1,369



196



242



(1,350)

     Income attributable to sale of tax benefits


2,710



3,850



10,127



11,474

     Other non-operating income (expense), net


246



206



590



671

           Income (loss), before income taxes and equity in losses of investees


(236,013)



6,668



(206,994)



6,770

Income tax benefit (expense)


14,108



(49,261)



2,863



(48,535)

Equity in losses of investees, net


(980)



(407)



(2,522)



(959)

          Net loss


(222,885)



(43,000)



(206,653)



(42,724)

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest


(136)



(80)



(414)



(332)

          Net loss attributable to the Company's stockholders

$

(223,021)


$

(43,080)


$

(207,067)


$

(43,056)













Loss per share attributable to the Company's stockholders -- basic and diluted

$

(4.91)


$

(0.95)


$

(4.56)


$

(0.95)













Weighted average number of shares used in computation of loss per share attributable to the Company's stockholders - basic and diluted


45,431



45,431



45,431



45,431



Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)



 December 31, 


2012


2011


 (In thousands)

 ASSETS 

 Current assets: 






     Cash and cash equivalents

$

66,628


$

99,886

     Marketable securities




18,521

     Short-term bank deposit


3,010



     Restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities


76,537



75,521

      Receivables: 






          Trade


55,680



51,274

          Related entity


373



287

          Other


8,632



9,415

     Due from Parent


311



260

     Inventories


20,669



12,541

     Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts


9,613



3,966

     Deferred income taxes


1,241



1,842

     Prepaid expenses and other


34,144



18,672

               Total current assets


276,838



292,185

Unconsolidated investments


2,591



3,757

Deposits and other


36,187



22,194

Deferred charges


36,521



40,236

Property, plant and equipment, net


1,226,758



1,518,532

Construction-in-process


396,141



370,551

Deferred financing and lease costs, net


31,371



28,482

Intangible assets, net


35,492



38,781

               Total assets

$

2,041,899


$

2,314,718

 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 

 Current liabilities: 






     Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$

98,001


$

105,112

     Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts


25,408



33,104

     Current portion of long-term debt:






          Limited and non-recourse


11,453



13,547

          Full recourse


28,649



20,543

          Senior secured notes (non-recourse)


28,231



21,464

               Total current liabilities


191,742



193,770

Long-term debt, net of current portion:






     Limited and non-recourse


242,815



100,585

     Full recourse:






          Senior unsecured bonds


250,904



250,042

          Other


82,344



63,623

     Revolving credit lines with banks


73,606



214,049

     Senior secured notes (non-recourse)


312,926



341,157

Liability associated with sale of tax benefits


51,126



69,269

Deferred lease income


66,398



68,955

Deferred income taxes


13,873



54,665

Liability for unrecognized tax benefits


7,280



5,875

Liabilities for severance pay


22,887



20,547

Asset retirement obligation


19,289



21,284

Other long-term liabilities


5,148



4,253

               Total liabilities


1,340,338



1,408,074







 Equity: 






      The Company's stockholders' equity: 






          Common stock


46



46

          Additional paid-in capital


732,140



725,746

          Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)


(38,372)



172,331

          Accumulated other comprehensive income


651



595



694,465



898,718

     Noncontrolling interest


7,096



7,926

          Total equity


701,561



906,644

          Total liabilities and equity

$

2,041,899


$

2,314,718




Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and Additional Cash Flows Information

For the Three and Twelve-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)


We calculate EBITDA as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We calculate adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding impairment of long-lived assets. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of financial performance or liquidity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net earnings as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are presented because we believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of a company's ability to service and/or incur debt. However, other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA differently than we do. The following table reconciles net cash provided by or used in operating activities to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:



 Three Months Ended  December 31, 


 Year Ended December 31, 


2012


2011


2012


2011














 (in thousands) 


 (in thousands) 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

30,835


$

34,220


$

93,219


$

132,734

Adjusted for:












Interest expense, net (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs)


16,780



13,874



57,711



65,920

Interest income


(197)



(138)



(1,201)



(1,427)

Income tax provision (benefit)


(14,108)



49,261



(2,863)



48,535

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (excluding depreciation and amortization)


(227,080)



(52,083)



(197,419)



(79,060)

EBITDA


(193,770)



45,134



(50,553)



166,702

Impairment charges


229,113





236,377



Adjusted EBITDA

$

35,343


$

45,134


$

185,824


$

166,702

Net cash used in investing activities

$

(50,926)


$

(102,816)


$

(104,537)


$

(341,002)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

$

49,196


$

109,405


$

(21,939)


$

225,339

Depreciation and amortization

$

26,641


$

25,137


$

102,453


$

96,398

 

SOURCE Ormat Technologies, Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Sometimes I write a blog just to formulate and organize a point of view, and I think it’s time that I pull together the bounty of excellent information about Machine Learning. This is a topic with which business leaders must become comfortable, especially tomorrow’s business leaders (tip for my next semester University of San Francisco business students!). Machine learning is a key capability that will help organizations drive optimization and monetization opportunities, and there have been some...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and how fast. The key is to adopt and deploy an intelligent application strategy while simultaneously preparing to scale that intelligence. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sangeeta Chakraborty, Chief Customer Officer at Ayasdi, provided a tactical framework to become a truly intelligent enterprise, including how to identify the right applications for AI, how to build a Center of Excellence to oper...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.