Click here to close now.



Welcome!

News Feed Item

Con Edison Reports 2013 Second Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwired) -- 08/01/13 -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) today reported 2013 second quarter net income for common stock of $172 million or $0.59 a share compared with $214 million or $0.73 a share in 2012. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of its lease in/lease out (LILO) transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the competitive energy businesses (CEBs), were $160 million or $0.55 a share in 2013 compared with $178 million or $0.61 a share in 2012.

For the first six months of 2013, net income for common stock was $364 million or $1.24 a share compared with $491 million or $1.68 a share in the first six months of 2012. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of its LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs, were $476 million or $1.62 a share in 2013 compared with $473 million or $1.62 a share in 2012.

"Our 14,000 employees have worked hard to prepare our energy delivery systems for the summer and respond to scattered outages during several intense heat waves," said Kevin Burke, Con Edison's chairman, president and chief executive officer. "Our billions of dollars in infrastructure investments, coupled with our effective energy efficiency and demand response programs, are clearly paying off and helping us provide reliable service to our 3.6 million customers."

The following table is a reconciliation of Con Edison's reported earnings per share to earnings per share from ongoing operations and reported net income to earnings from ongoing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.



                         Three Months Ended            Six Months Ended
                                    Net Income                   Net Income
                    Earnings per   (Millions of   Earnings per  (Millions of
                        Share        Dollars)        Share        Dollars)
                   -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------
                    2013    2012   2013    2012   2013   2012   2013   2012
------------------ ------  ------ ------  ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Reported earnings
 per share and net
 income for common
 stock - GAAP
 basis (basic)     $ 0.59  $ 0.73 $  172  $  214 $ 1.24 $ 1.68   $364   $491
Add: LILO
 transactions (a)   (0.10)      -    (29)      -   0.41      -    121      -

Less: Net mark-to-
 market effects of
 the CEBs (b)       (0.06)   0.12    (17)     36   0.03   0.06      9     18
------------------ ------  ------ ------  ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Ongoing operations $ 0.55  $ 0.61 $  160  $  178 $ 1.62 $ 1.62 $  476 $  473
------------------ ------  ------ ------  ------ ------ ------ ------ ------


(a) In January 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
    Circuit reversed an October 2009 trial court ruling and disallowed
    company-claimed tax deductions relating to a 1997 transaction in which
    Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (CED) leased property from the
    owner and then immediately subleased it back to the owner (a "LILO"
    transaction). As a result, the company recorded a charge of $150 million
    (after taxes of $102 million) in the first quarter of 2013 to reflect
    the interest on the disallowed income tax deductions and the
    recalculation of the accounting effect of the 1997 and 1999 LILO
    transactions. In June 2013, the 1999 LILO transaction was terminated, as
    a result of which the company realized a $29 million gain (after taxes
    of $22 million).
(b) After taxes of $(13) million and $27 million for the three months ended
    June 30, 2013 and 2012 and $6 million and $14 million for the six months
    ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.


For the year 2013, the company reaffirms its previous forecast of earnings per share from ongoing operations in the range of $3.65 to $3.85 a share. Earnings per share from ongoing operations exclude the effects of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared with the 2012 periods, reflect changes in the rate plans of Con Edison's utility subsidiaries, the weather impact on steam revenues and increases in certain operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and property taxes. The results of operations include the operating results of the competitive energy businesses, including net mark-to-market effects.

Operations and maintenance expenses reflect higher surcharges for assessments and fees that are collected in revenues from customers, higher operating costs attributable to weather-related events and the movement of company facilities to accommodate municipal projects in the 2013 periods, as compared to 2012. Depreciation and property taxes were higher in the 2013 periods reflecting the impact from higher utility plant balances.

The following table presents the estimated effects on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared with the 2012 periods, resulting from these and other major factors:



                              Three Months Ended        Six Months Ended
                                  Variation                Variation
                                2013 vs. 2012            2013 vs. 2012
                                        Net Income               Net Income
                                        for Common               for Common
                                          Stock                    Stock
                             Earnings   Variation     Earnings   Variation
                            per Share   (Millions    per Share   (Millions
                            Variation  of Dollars)   Variation  of Dollars)
-------------------------- ----------  -----------  ----------  -----------
Consolidated Edison
 Company of New York, Inc.
 (CECONY) (a)
  Rate plans (b)           $    (0.05) $       (15) $     0.16  $        48
  Weather impact on steam
   revenues                      0.02            7        0.10           28
  Operations and
   maintenance expenses
   (b)                           0.04           11       (0.16)         (47)
  Depreciation and
   property taxes               (0.07)         (19)      (0.13)         (37)
  Other                          0.02            6        0.01            2
                           ----------  -----------  ----------  -----------
Total CECONY                    (0.04)         (10)      (0.02)          (6)
Orange and Rockland
 Utilities, Inc. (O&R)          (0.01)          (5)       0.02            6
CEBs (c)                        (0.09)         (28)      (0.44)        (129)
Other, including parent
 company expenses                   -            1           -            2
-------------------------- ----------  -----------  ----------  -----------
Total variation            $    (0.14) $       (42) $    (0.44) $      (127)
========================== ==========  ===========  ==========  ===========


(a) Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY's electric and gas
    rate plans and the weather-normalization clause applicable to the gas
    business, revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery
    volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Under CECONY's
    rate plans, pension and other postretirement costs and certain other
    costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates for such costs.
(b) The rate plan variations include a decrease in revenues in the three
    months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the 2012 period, when
    revenues reflected the use of certain regulatory liabilities (after-tax
    $18 million or $0.06 per share) to offset a temporary surcharge under
    CECONY's electric rate plan. The variations in operations and
    maintenance expenses include a decrease in pension costs in the 2013
    period, as compared to the 2012 period, when certain pension costs that
    were deferred from earlier periods (after-tax $21 million or $0.07 per
    share) were recognized under CECONY's electric rate plan.
(c) These variations include, for the three months ended June 30, an after-
    tax gain of $29 million or $0.10 a share in 2013 relating to the LILO
    transactions and reflect after-tax net mark-to-market losses of $17
    million or $0.06 a share in 2013 and after-tax net mark-to-market gains
    of $36 million or $0.12 a share in 2012. These variations include, for
    the six months ended June 30, an after-tax charge of $121 million or
    $0.41 a share in 2013 relating to the LILO transactions, a tax benefit
    of $15 million or $0.05 a share in 2013 resulting from the acceptance by
    the Internal Revenue Service of the company's claim for manufacturing
    tax deductions and reflect after-tax net mark-to-market gains of $9
    million or $0.03 a share in 2013 and after-tax net mark-to-market gains
    of $18 million or $0.06 a share in 2012.


The weighted average number of common shares was 293 million shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The changes in the energy delivered by the company's utility subsidiaries, both for actual amounts and as adjusted primarily for variations in weather and billing days, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared with the 2012 periods, were as follows (expressed as a percentage of 2012 amounts):



                           Second Quarter Variation   Six Months Variation
                                 2013 vs. 2012            2013 vs. 2012
                              Actual      Adjusted     Actual     Adjusted
-------------------------- -----------  -----------  ----------  ----------
Con Edison of New York
  Electric                        (1.1)        (1.2)        0.1        (1.0)
  Firm - Gas                      25.3          6.1        20.0         2.7
  Steam                           10.0         (2.7)       16.7        (2.9)
O&R
  Electric                        (0.9)        (1.3)       (0.5)       (1.7)
  Firm - Gas                      11.6         (3.9)       20.5        (0.2)
-------------------------- -----------  -----------  ----------  ----------


Refer to the company's Second Quarter Form 10-Q, which is being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Additional information related to utility sales and revenues is available at www.conedison.com (select "Shareholder Services" and then select "Press Releases").

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect expectations and not facts. Actual results may differ materially from those expectations because of factors such as those identified in reports the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This press release also contains a financial measure, earnings from ongoing operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income, which is an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. Management uses this non-GAAP measure to facilitate the analysis of the company's ongoing performance as compared to its internal budgets and previously reported financial results. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure is also useful and meaningful to investors.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $42 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through the following subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., a regulated utility providing electric, gas, and steam service in New York City and Westchester County, New York; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,350 square mile area in southeastern New York state and adjacent sections of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania; Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., a retail energy supply and services company; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc., a company that participates in infrastructure projects.

Contact:
Robert McGee
212-460-4111

Media Relations
212 460 4111 (24 hours)

Consolidated Edison, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New York NY 10003
www.conEdison.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Men & Mice, the leading global provider of DNS, DHCP and IP address management overlay solutions, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. The Men & Mice Suite overlay solution is already known for its powerful application in heterogeneous operating environments, enabling enterprises to scale without fuss. Building on a solid range of diverse platform support,...
Father business cycles and digital consumers are forcing enterprises to respond faster to customer needs and competitive demands. Successful integration of DevOps and Agile development will be key for business success in today’s digital economy. In his session at DevOps Summit, Pradeep Prabhu, Co-Founder & CEO of Cloudmunch, covered the critical practices that enterprises should consider to seamlessly integrate Agile and DevOps processes, barriers to implementing this in the enterprise, and pr...
Cognitive Computing is becoming the foundation for a new generation of solutions that have the potential to transform business. Unlike traditional approaches to building solutions, a cognitive computing approach allows the data to help determine the way applications are designed. This contrasts with conventional software development that begins with defining logic based on the current way a business operates. In her session at 18th Cloud Expo, Judith S. Hurwitz, President and CEO of Hurwitz & ...
The principles behind DevOps are not new - for decades people have been automating system administration and decreasing the time to deploy apps and perform other management tasks. However, only recently did we see the tools and the will necessary to share the benefits and power of automation with a wider circle of people. In his session at DevOps Summit, Bernard Sanders, Chief Technology Officer at CloudBolt Software, explored the latest tools including Puppet, Chef, Docker, and CMPs needed to...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Commvault, a global leader in enterprise data protection and information management, has been named “Bronze Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7–9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Commvault is a leading provider of data protection and information management...
The cloud promises new levels of agility and cost-savings for Big Data, data warehousing and analytics. But it’s challenging to understand all the options – from IaaS and PaaS to newer services like HaaS (Hadoop as a Service) and BDaaS (Big Data as a Service). In her session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Hannah Smalltree, a director at Cazena, will provide an educational overview of emerging “as-a-service” options for Big Data in the cloud. This is critical background for IT and data profes...
One of the bewildering things about DevOps is integrating the massive toolchain including the dozens of new tools that seem to crop up every year. Part of DevOps is Continuous Delivery and having a complex toolchain can add additional integration and setup to your developer environment. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, Miko Matsumura, Chief Marketing Officer of Gradle Inc., will discuss which tools to use in a developer stack, how to provision the toolchain to minimize onboa...
SYS-CON Events announced today that VAI, a leading ERP software provider, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. VAI (Vormittag Associates, Inc.) is a leading independent mid-market ERP software developer renowned for its flexible solutions and ability to automate critical business functions for the distribution, manufacturing, specialty retail and service sectors. An IBM Premier Business Part...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Alert Logic, Inc., the leading provider of Security-as-a-Service solutions for the cloud, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Alert Logic, Inc., provides Security-as-a-Service for on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures, delivering deep security insight and continuous protection for customers at a lower cost than traditional security solutions. Ful...
Fortunately, meaningful and tangible business cases for IoT are plentiful in a broad array of industries and vertical markets. These range from simple warranty cost reduction for capital intensive assets, to minimizing downtime for vital business tools, to creating feedback loops improving product design, to improving and enhancing enterprise customer experiences. All of these business cases, which will be briefly explored in this session, hinge on cost effectively extracting relevant data from ...
In most cases, it is convenient to have some human interaction with a web (micro-)service, no matter how small it is. A traditional approach would be to create an HTTP interface, where user requests will be dispatched and HTML/CSS pages must be served. This approach is indeed very traditional for a web site, but not really convenient for a web service, which is not intended to be good looking, 24x7 up and running and UX-optimized. Instead, talking to a web service in a chat-bot mode would be muc...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Catchpoint Systems, Inc., a provider of innovative web and infrastructure monitoring solutions, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's DevOps Summit at 18th Cloud Expo New York, which will take place June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Catchpoint is a leading Digital Performance Analytics company that provides unparalleled insight into customer-critical services to help consistently deliver an amazing customer experience. Designed...
It's easy to assume that your app will run on a fast and reliable network. The reality for your app's users, though, is often a slow, unreliable network with spotty coverage. What happens when the network doesn't work, or when the device is in airplane mode? You get unhappy, frustrated users. An offline-first app is an app that works, without error, when there is no network connection.
With the Apple Watch making its way onto wrists all over the world, it’s only a matter of time before it becomes a staple in the workplace. In fact, Forrester reported that 68 percent of technology and business decision-makers characterize wearables as a top priority for 2015. Recognizing their business value early on, FinancialForce.com was the first to bring ERP to wearables, helping streamline communication across front and back office functions. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Kevin Roberts...
As someone who has been dedicated to automation and Application Release Automation (ARA) technology for almost six years now, one of the most common questions I get asked regards Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS). Specifically, people want to know whether release automation is still needed when a PaaS is in place, and why. Isn't that what a PaaS provides? A solution to the deployment and runtime challenges of an application? Why would anyone using a PaaS then need an automation engine with workflow ...