Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Con Edison Reports 2013 Third Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwired) -- 11/04/13 -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) today reported 2013 third quarter net income for common stock of $464 million or $1.58 a share compared with $440 million or $1.50 a share in 2012. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of its lease in/lease out (LILO) transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the competitive energy businesses (CEBs), were $434 million or $1.48 a share in 2013 compared with $423 million or $1.44 a share in 2012.

For the first nine months of 2013, net income for common stock was $828 million or $2.83 a share compared with $931 million or $3.18 a share in the first nine months of 2012. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of its LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs, were $911 million or $3.11 a share in 2013 compared with $896 million or $3.06 a share in 2012.

"Since Superstorm Sandy, we continue to invest heavily in fortifying our infrastructure to enhance reliability," said Kevin Burke, Con Edison's chairman, president and chief executive officer. "Our energy delivery system performed extremely well this summer, meeting the test of a new peak electricity delivery record of 13,322 megawatts in New York City and Westchester on July 19. We also remain committed to energy efficiency initiatives, as well as an aggressive oil-to-gas conversion program that will lower costs and improve air quality in the region."

The following table is a reconciliation of Con Edison's reported earnings per share to earnings per share from ongoing operations and reported net income to earnings from ongoing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.


                            Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                          Earnings     Net Income     Earnings    Net Income
                             per      (Millions of      per       (Millions
                            Share       Dollars)       Share     of Dollars)
                       -------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
                        2013    2012   2013   2012  2013   2012   2013  2012
                       ------  ------ -----  ----- ------ ------ ----- -----
Reported earnings per
 share and net income
 for common stock-
 GAAP basis (basic)    $ 1.58  $ 1.50 $ 464  $ 440 $ 2.83 $ 3.18 $ 828 $ 931
Add: LILO transactions
 (a)                    (0.09)      -   (26)     -   0.32      -    95     -

Less: Net mark-to-
 market effects of the
 CEBs (b)                0.01    0.06     4     17   0.04   0.12    12    35
                       ------  ------ -----  ----- ------ ------ ----- -----
Ongoing operations     $ 1.48  $ 1.44 $ 434  $ 423 $ 3.11 $ 3.06 $ 911 $ 896
                       ------  ------ -----  ----- ------ ------ ----- -----

(a) In January 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
    Circuit reversed an October 2009 trial court ruling and disallowed
    company-claimed tax deductions relating to a 1997 transaction in which
    Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (CED) leased property from the
    owner and then immediately subleased it back to the owner (a "LILO"
    transaction). As a result, the company recorded a charge of $150 million
    (after taxes of $102 million) in the first quarter of 2013 to reflect
    the interest on the disallowed income tax deductions and the
    recalculation of the accounting effect of the 1997 and 1999 LILO
    transactions. In June 2013, the 1999 LILO transaction was terminated, as
    a result of which the company realized a $29 million gain (after taxes
    of $22 million), and in August 2013, the 1997 LILO transaction was
    terminated, as a result of which the company realized a $26 million gain
    (after taxes of $18 million).
(b) After taxes of $3 million and $13 million for the three months ended
    September 30, 2013 and 2012 and $9 million and $27 million for the nine
    months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The company expects its earnings from ongoing operations for the year 2013 to be in the range of $3.70 to $3.80 a share. The company's previous forecast of 2013 earnings was in the range of $3.65 to $3.85 a share. Earnings per share from ongoing operations exclude the effects of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared with the 2012 periods, reflect changes in the rate plans of Con Edison's utility subsidiaries, increases in certain operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and property taxes and, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the weather impact on steam revenues. The results of operations include the operating results of the CEBs, including net mark-to-market effects.

Operations and maintenance expenses reflect primarily higher surcharges for assessments and fees that are collected in revenues from customers and higher operating costs attributable to weather-related events, offset in part by healthcare costs in the 2013 periods, as compared to 2012. Depreciation and property taxes were higher in the 2013 periods reflecting the impact from higher utility plant balances.

The following table presents the estimated effects on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared with the 2012 periods, resulting from these and other major factors:




                         Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                              Variation                   Variation
                            2013 vs. 2012               2013 vs. 2012
                                        Net                        Net
                                    Income for                  Income for
                                      Common                      Common
                                       Stock                       Stock
                        Earnings     Variation      Earnings     Variation
                       per Share   (Millions of    per Share   (Millions of
                       Variation     Dollars)      Variation     Dollars)
                     ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Consolidated Edison
 Company of New
 York, Inc. (CECONY)
 (a)
 Rate plans (b)      $      (0.02) $         (5) $       0.16  $         48
 Weather impact on
  steam revenues            (0.01)           (2)         0.09            27
 Operations and
  maintenance
  expenses (b)               0.08            24         (0.07)          (23)
 Depreciation,
  property taxes and
  other tax matters
  (c)                       (0.05)          (16)        (0.18)          (53)
 Other                       0.04            11          0.03             8
                     ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Total CECONY                 0.04            12          0.03             7
Orange and Rockland
 Utilities, Inc.
 (O&R)                      (0.01)           (5)            -             2
CEBs (d)                     0.03             9         (0.41)         (120)
Other, including
 parent company
 expenses (c)                0.02             8          0.03             8
                     ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
Total variation      $       0.08  $         24  $      (0.35) $       (103)
                     ============  ============  ============  ============

(a) Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY's electric and gas
    rate plans and the weather-normalization clause applicable to the gas
    business, revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery
    volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Under CECONY's
    rate plans, pension and other postretirement costs and certain other
    costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates for such costs.
(b) The rate plan variations include a decrease in revenues in the three and
    nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the 2012 periods
    when revenues reflected the use of certain regulatory liabilities to
    offset a temporary surcharge under CECONY's electric rate plan ($27
    million, after-tax, or $0.09 a share). The variations in operations and
    maintenance expenses include a decrease in pension costs in the three
    and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the 2012
    periods when certain pension costs that were deferred from earlier
    periods were recognized under CECONY's electric rate plan ($20 million,
    after-tax, or $0.07 a share and $18 million, after-tax, or $0.06 a
    share, respectively).
(c) Variations for the three and nine months ended September 30 reflect
    certain federal income tax benefits and related interest in the 2013
    periods for Con Edison (parent company): $7 million or $0.02 a share;
    CECONY: $9 million or $0.03 a share.
(d) These variations include, for the three months ended September 30, an
    after-tax gain of $26 million or $0.09 a share in 2013 relating to the
    LILO transactions and reflect after-tax net mark-to-market gains of $4
    million or $0.01 a share in 2013 and after-tax net mark-to-market gains
    of $17 million or $0.06 a share in 2012. These variations include, for
    the nine months ended September 30, an after-tax charge of $95 million
    or $0.32 a share in 2013 relating to the LILO transactions, a tax
    benefit of $15 million or $0.05 a share in 2013 resulting from the
    acceptance by the Internal Revenue Service of the company's claim for
    manufacturing tax deductions and reflect after-tax net mark-to-market
    gains of $12 million or $0.04 a share in 2013 and after-tax net mark-to-
    market gains of $35 million or $0.12 a share in 2012.

The weighted average number of common shares was 293 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The changes in the energy delivered by the company's utility subsidiaries, both for actual amounts and as adjusted primarily for variations in weather and billing days, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared with the 2012 periods, were as follows (expressed as a percentage of 2012 amounts):


                          Third Quarter Variation    Nine Months Variation
                               2013 vs. 2012             2013 vs. 2012
                            Actual      Adjusted      Actual      Adjusted
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Con Edison of New York
  Electric                      (2.5)        (2.2)        (0.9)        (1.5)
  Firm - Gas                     5.9          6.2         17.8          3.2
  Steam                         (6.6)        (7.1)        10.0         (4.0)
O&R
  Electric                      (2.9)        (2.6)        (1.4)        (1.6)
  Firm - Gas                    13.8          3.1         19.9          0.5
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Refer to the company's Third Quarter Form 10-Q, which is being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the consolidated income statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Additional information related to utility sales and revenues is available at www.conedison.com (select "Shareholder Services" and then select "Press Releases").

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect expectations and not facts. Actual results may differ materially from those expectations because of factors such as those identified in reports the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This press release also contains a financial measure, earnings from ongoing operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income, which is an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. Management uses this non-GAAP measure to facilitate the analysis of the company's ongoing performance as compared to its internal budgets and previously reported financial results. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure is also useful and meaningful to investors.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $42 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through the following subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., a regulated utility providing electric, gas, and steam service in New York City and Westchester County, New York; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,350 square mile area in southeastern New York state and adjacent sections of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania; Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., a retail energy supply and services company; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc., a company that participates in infrastructure projects.

Contact:
Robert McGee
212-460-4111

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
With SaaS use rampant across organizations, how can IT departments track company data and maintain security? More and more departments are commissioning their own solutions and bypassing IT. A cloud environment is amorphous and powerful, allowing you to set up solutions for all of your user needs: document sharing and collaboration, mobile access, e-mail, even industry-specific applications. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Shawn Mills, President and a founder of Green House Data, discussed h...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
Chuck Piluso presented a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. Prior to Secure Infrastructure and Services, Mr. Piluso founded North American Telecommunication Corporation, a facilities-based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier licensed by the Public Service Commission in 10 states, serving as the company's chairman and president from 1997 to 2000. Between 1990 and 1997, Mr. Piluso served as chairman & founder of International Te...
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner, Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., discussed the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and conducte...
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Arch...
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...
Malicious agents are moving faster than the speed of business. Even more worrisome, most companies are relying on legacy approaches to security that are no longer capable of meeting current threats. In the modern cloud, threat diversity is rapidly expanding, necessitating more sophisticated security protocols than those used in the past or in desktop environments. Yet companies are falling for cloud security myths that were truths at one time but have evolved out of existence.
Digital Transformation is the ultimate goal of cloud computing and related initiatives. The phrase is certainly not a precise one, and as subject to hand-waving and distortion as any high-falutin' terminology in the world of information technology. Yet it is an excellent choice of words to describe what enterprise IT—and by extension, organizations in general—should be working to achieve. Digital Transformation means: handling all the data types being found and created in the organizat...