Welcome!

News Feed Item

Pulse Seismic Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited 2013 Financial Results

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 01/16/14 -- Pulse Seismic Inc. (TSX: PSD)(OTCQX: PLSDF) ("Pulse" or "the Company") reports the following preliminary selected unaudited financial and operating results for the three months and year ended December 31, 2013. The financial information contained herein is based on management's estimates and has not yet been approved by the Company's Audit Committee or Board of Directors, or reviewed by the Company's auditors.

Due to the Company's record level of data library sales in 2012, the year-over-year comparative financial results have decreased substantially. A $27.8 million data library sale in the first quarter of 2012 resulted in record financial results for the year. Revenue fluctuations are a normal part of the seismic data library business.

"Pulse's historically strong fourth quarter data library sales came in at only $4.6 million in 2013, bringing the total for the year to $27.1 million," stated Neal Coleman, Pulse's President and CEO. "In 2013, low natural gas drilling activity combined with fewer asset and corporate transaction-based sales of seismic data than we experienced in 2012 had a significant negative affect on our year-over-year financial results."

Coleman noted that Pulse continues to benefit from its low cost structure and strong financial position. Having a lean organization with low fixed costs enables Pulse to continue delivering positive cash EBITDA in years like 2013. Cash EBITDA was $19.1 million or 70 percent of data library sales for the year and $2.9 million or 63 percent of data library sales in the fourth quarter. "We returned $13.2 million of capital to our shareholders through dividends and share buybacks in 2013, with the remainder contributing to our 2012/2013 winter participation survey capital program," said Coleman.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

Pulse achieved the following results:

--  Seismic data library sales of $27.1 million, a 58 percent decrease from
    the record $64.0 million achieved in 2012;

--  Total seismic revenue (including participation survey revenue) of $40.5
    million compared to $86.4 million in 2012;

--  Cash EBITDA(a) of $19.1 million, a 64 percent decrease from $54.7
    million in 2012, and a 63 percent decrease on a per-share basis from
    $0.87 to $0.32 per share basic and diluted;

--  Funds from operations(b) of $27.7 million ($0.46 per share basic and
    diluted) compared to $74.3 million ($1.19 per share basic and diluted)
    for 2012(i);
--  Pulse completed three 3D participation surveys totalling 1,182 square
    kilometres, with total gross capital expenditures amounting to $58.0
    million. Some of these survey costs were incurred in 2012 when the
    surveys were initiated;

--  Pulse purchased and cancelled, through its normal course issuer bid, a
    total of 2,447,222 common shares (4 percent of the total outstanding at
    December 31, 2012) at a total cost of approximately $8.4 million;

--  Pulse paid four quarterly dividends of $0.02 per common share at a total
    cost of $4.8 million; and

--  At December 31, 2013 Pulse's cash balance was $1.7 million and long-term
    debt(c) was $21.8 million, resulting in a net debt position of $20.1
    million.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

Pulse achieved the following results:

--  Seismic data library sales of $4.6 million, down 62 percent from $11.9
    million in the same period of 2012;

--  Total seismic revenue of $4.6 million (no participation survey revenue)
    compared to $27.8 million (including participation revenue of $15.9
    million) for the comparable period in 2012;

--  Cash EBITDA of $2.9 million or $0.05 per share basic and diluted
    compared to $9.7 million or $0.16 per share basic and diluted in the
    fourth quarter of 2012;

--  Funds from operations of $2.7 million ($0.04 per share basic and
    diluted) compared to $25.3 million ($0.41 per share basic and diluted)
    for the three months ended December 31, 2012(i).

(i) Funds from operations for the comparative three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012 reflect a reclassification to conform to the current year's financial statement presentation.

On Monday, March 17, 2014 Pulse intends to release its complete audited financial results for the year ended December 31, 2013. A conference call and webcast to review the 2013 results is scheduled for Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 1:00 EDT (11:00 am MDT). Further details of the conference call, including dial-in numbers, will be provided at a later date.

a.  The Company's continuous disclosure documents provide discussion and
    analysis of "cash EBITDA" and "cash EBITDA per share". These financial
    measures do not have standard definitions prescribed by IFRS and,
    therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other
    companies. The Company has included these non-GAAP financial measures
    because management, investors, analysts and others use them as measures
    of the Company's financial performance. The Company's definition of cash
    EBITDA is cash available for interest payments, cash taxes if
    applicable, debt servicing, discretionary capital expenditures and the
    payment of dividends, and is calculated as earnings (loss) from
    operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less
    participation survey revenue, plus any non-cash and non-recurring
    expenses. Cash EBITDA excludes participation survey revenue as these
    funds are directly used to fund specific participation surveys and this
    revenue is not available for discretionary capital expenditures. The
    Company believes cash EBITDA assists investors in comparing Pulse's
    results on a consistent basis without regard to participation survey
    revenue and non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, which
    can vary significantly depending on accounting methods or non-operating
    factors such as historical cost. Cash EBITDA per share is defined as
    cash EBITDA divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding
    for the period

b.  Funds from operations is an additional GAAP measure. Funds from
    operations is defined as cash provided by operations as prescribed by
    IFRS, excluding the impact of changes in non-cash working capital. Funds
    from operations represents the cash that was generated during the
    period, regardless of the timing of collection of receivables and
    payment of payables. Funds from operations per share is defined as funds
    from operations divided by the weighted average number of shares
    outstanding for the period.

c.  Long-term debt is defined as total long-term debt net of deferred
    financing costs.

CORPORATE PROFILE

Pulse is a market leader in the acquisition, marketing and licensing of 2D and 3D seismic data to the western Canadian energy sector. Pulse owns the second-largest licensable seismic data library in Canada, currently consisting of approximately 28,300 square kilometres of 3D seismic and 340,000 kilometres of 2D seismic. The library extensively covers the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin where most of Canada's oil and natural gas exploration and development occur.

DISCLAIMER:

This news release contains preliminary unaudited financial results. These financial results are based upon management's estimates, and have not yet been approved by the Company's Audit Committee or Board of Directors or audited by the Company's auditors. The final audited financial results could differ from these preliminary unaudited financial results.

Contacts:
Pulse Seismic Inc.
Neal Coleman, President & CEO
(403) 237-5559 or 1-877-460-5559

Pamela Wicks, Vice President Finance and CFO
(403) 237-5559 or 1-877-460-5559
E-mail: [email protected]
www.pulseseismic.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
Sometimes I write a blog just to formulate and organize a point of view, and I think it’s time that I pull together the bounty of excellent information about Machine Learning. This is a topic with which business leaders must become comfortable, especially tomorrow’s business leaders (tip for my next semester University of San Francisco business students!). Machine learning is a key capability that will help organizations drive optimization and monetization opportunities, and there have been some...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and how fast. The key is to adopt and deploy an intelligent application strategy while simultaneously preparing to scale that intelligence. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sangeeta Chakraborty, Chief Customer Officer at Ayasdi, provided a tactical framework to become a truly intelligent enterprise, including how to identify the right applications for AI, how to build a Center of Excellence to oper...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.