Welcome!

News Feed Item

Volt Information Sciences Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year Results

Volt Information Sciences, Inc. (OTC:VISI) today reported financial results for its fiscal fourth quarter and fiscal year ended November 3, 2013. The Company reported net income in the fourth quarter of 2013 of $1.6 million, or $0.08 per share, compared to a net loss of $2.0 million, or $0.10 per share, in the fourth quarter of 2012, and a proforma net loss in the fourth quarter of 2013 of $0.3 million compared to a proforma net loss in the fourth quarter of 2012 of $4.4 million. For the full fiscal year the Company reported a net loss in 2013 of $30.9 million, or $1.48 per share compared to a net loss of $13.6 million, or $0.65 per share, in fiscal 2012.

Non-GAAP Proforma Measures – Unrecognized Revenue – Volt subsidiaries sometimes provide services despite a customer arrangement not yet being finalized, or continue to provide services under an expired arrangement while a renewal arrangement is being finalized. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) usually requires that services revenue be deferred until arrangements are finalized or in some cases until cash is received, which causes some periods to include the expense of providing services although the related revenue is not recognized until a subsequent period (“Unrecognized Revenue”). The following discussion refers to financial data determined both using GAAP as well as on a non-GAAP proforma basis. The non-GAAP proforma basis includes adjustments for Unrecognized Revenue so that revenue is shown in the same period as the related services are provided. This non-GAAP financial information is used by management and provided herein primarily to provide a more complete understanding of the Company’s business results and trends. In addition, the Company believes that lenders, analysts and others in the investment community use this non-GAAP financial information to assess the Company’s historical results, and that failure to report this non-GAAP measure could result in a potentially misplaced perception that the Company’s results have either met, exceeded or underperformed expectations. This non-GAAP information should not be considered an alternative for, or in isolation from, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, this measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Fourth Fiscal Quarter Results

Operating income of $2.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 included restructuring costs of $2.8 million, restatement and associated investigation expenses of $2.5 million and recognition of previously deferred software systems revenues and costs, net of current period deferrals, of $4.6 million. Without these items the Company would have had operating income of $3.5 million and a proforma operating income of $1.6 million.

Operating loss in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 of $0.5 million included restatement and associated investigation expenses of $14.9 million, recognition of previously deferred software systems revenues and costs, net of current period deferrals, of $1.3 million and a gain on the sale of building of $4.4 million. Without these items the Company would have had operating income of $8.7 million and proforma operating income of $6.3 million.

In addition to the above, operating results and proforma operating results decreased in the fourth quarter of 2013 over 2012 due to a decrease in Computer Systems results of approximately $6.0 million due to lower transaction volumes, pricing and maintenance levels with relatively fixed costs and investment in developing the Company’s directory assistance software platform into full-featured call center software, partially offset by an increase in Staffing Services results of approximately $0.7 million primarily due to higher traditional staffing margins.

Net revenue in the fourth quarter of 2013 decreased $24.8 million to $546.8 million from $571.6 million in 2012, and proforma net revenue decreased by $24.3 million, or 4.3%, to $544.9 million from $569.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. The change in revenue was primarily the result of decreased Staffing Services revenues by $26.2 million (proforma of $25.7 million) resulting from the Company’s increased focus on exiting or reducing business levels with customers where profitability or business terms are unfavorable, lower staffing levels at a few large customers related to their particular business demand level, slightly lower managed services revenue, and from lower Computer Systems revenues from several large implementations reaching the end of the maintenance periods over which the projects were being amortized and lower transaction volumes, pricing and maintenance levels.

 

Fiscal Year Results

Unaudited (in Thousands)

 

Results of Operations by Segment (Fiscal 2013 vs. 2012)

 
    Year ended November 3, 2013     Year ended October 28, 2012
(in thousands) Total    

Staffing Services

    Computer Systems     Other     Total     Staffing Services     Computer Systems     Other
Net Revenue $2,090,937     $1,899,723     $73,465     $117,749     $2,246,127     $2,027,601     $99,679     $118,847
Expenses
Direct cost of staffing services revenue 1,634,365 1,634,365 - - 1,738,933 1,738,933 - -
Cost of other revenue 160,199 - 65,680 94,519 163,853 - 68,281 95,572
Selling, administrative and other operating costs 284,748 239,105 24,314 21,329 300,116 251,410 26,897 21,809
Amortization of purchased intangible assets 1,369 34 858 477 1,382 47 859 476
Restructuring costs 4,726     781     3,945     -     -     -     -     -
Segment operating income (loss) 5,530 25,438 (21,332) 1,424 41,843 37,211 3,642 990
Corporate general and administrative 9,286 10,731
Gain on sale of building - (4,418)
Restatement and associated investigations 24,828 42,906
Operating loss (28,584) (7,376)
Other expense, net (1,822) (3,836)
Income tax provision 469 2,391
Net loss $(30,875) $(13,603)
 
NON-GAAP PROFORMA TABLE
Year ended November 3, 2013     Year ended October 28, 2012
(in thousands) Total     Staffing Services     Computer Systems     Other     Total     Staffing Services     Computer Systems     Other
Net Revenue $2,090,937 $1,899,723 $73,465 $117,749 $2,246,127 $2,027,601 $99,679 $118,847
Recognition of previously unrecognized revenue (11,166) (11,166) - - (30,090) (30,090) - -
Additions to unrecognized revenue 4,869     4,869     -     -     11,731     11,731     -     -
Net non-GAAP proforma adjustment (6,297) (6,297) - - (18,359) (18,359) - -
                                           
Non-GAAP proforma net revenue 2,084,640     1,893,426     73,465     117,749     2,227,768     2,009,242     99,679     118,847
 
Expenses

Direct cost of staffing services revenue

1,634,365 1,634,365 - - 1,738,933 1,738,933 - -
Cost of other revenue 160,199 - 65,680 94,519 163,853 - 68,281 95,572
Selling, administrative and other operating costs 284,748 239,105 24,314 21,329 300,116 251,410 26,897 21,809
Amortization of purchased intangible assets 1,369 34 858 477 1,382 47 859 476
Restructuring costs 4,726     781     3,945     -     -     -     -     -
Non-GAAP proforma segment operating income (loss) (767) 19,141 (21,332) 1,424 23,484 18,852 3,642 990
 
Non-GAAP proforma operating loss (34,881) (25,735)
 
Non-GAAP proforma net loss $(37,172) $(31,962)
 

Operating loss of $28.6 million included restatement and associated investigation expenses of $24.8 million, restructuring costs of $4.7 million and recognition of previously deferred software systems revenues and costs of $7.9 million. Without these items the Company would have had an operating loss of $7.0 million and a proforma operating loss of $13.3 million.

Operating loss of $7.4 million in fiscal 2012 included restatement and associated investigation expenses of $42.9 million and recognition of previously deferred software systems revenues and costs, net of current period deferrals, of $19.1 million. Without these items the Company would have had operating income of $16.4 million and a proforma operating loss of $2.0 million.

Operating results and proforma operating results were lower in fiscal 2013 than fiscal 2012 due to the above reasons and a decrease in Computer Systems results of $9.8 million due to lower transaction volumes, pricing and maintenance levels with relatively fixed costs of revenue and investment in developing the Company’s directory assistance software platform into full-featured call center software and a gain on sale of building of $4.4 million in 2012 with no similar gain in 2013. The decreases were partially offset by an increase in Staffing Services results of $1.0 million primarily due to higher traditional staffing margins.

Net revenue in fiscal 2013 decreased $155.2 million to $2,090.9 million from $2,246.1 million in fiscal 2012, and proforma net revenue decreased by $143.2 million, or 6.4%, to $2,084.6 million from $2,227.8 million in fiscal 2012. The change in revenue, including the impact of fiscal 2013 consisting of 53 weeks while fiscal 2012 consisted of 52 weeks, was primarily the result of decreased Staffing Services revenues by $127.9 million (proforma of $115.8 million) resulting from the Company’s increased focus on exiting or reducing business levels with customers where profitability or business terms are unfavorable, lower staffing levels at a few large customers related to their particular business demand level, slightly lower managed services revenue, and $12.1 million lower recognition of previously unrecognized staffing revenues, and from lower Computer Systems revenues of $26.2 million from lower transaction volumes, pricing and maintenance levels as well as several large implementations reaching the end of the maintenance periods over which the projects were being amortized. Revenue and proforma revenue included recognition of previously deferred software systems revenues, net of current period deferrals, of $7.6 million in fiscal 2013 and $31.6 million in fiscal 2012, a decrease of $24.0 million.

Fiscal Year Results By Segment

The Company’s Staffing Services segment operating income in fiscal 2013 decreased $11.8 million to $25.4 million from $37.2 million in fiscal 2012, and proforma operating income in fiscal 2013 increased by $0.2 million, or 1.5%, to $19.1 million from $18.9 million in fiscal 2012. The change in operating income is primarily due to a $3.0 million indirect tax recovery, lower traditional staffing revenue, although at higher margin ratios, and selling, administrative and other operating costs decreases lagging the decrease in revenue. GAAP results include $12.1 million lower recognition of previously unrecognized staffing revenue.

Staffing Services net revenue in fiscal 2013 decreased $127.9 million to $1,899.7 million from $2,027.6 million in fiscal 2012, and proforma net revenue decreased by $115.8 million, or 5.8%, to $1,893.4 million from $2,009.2 million in fiscal 2012. This decrease is primarily due to the Company’s increased focus on exiting or reducing business levels with customers where profitability or business terms are unfavorable, lower staffing levels at a few large customers related to their particular business demand level, slightly lower managed services revenue, and $12.1 million lower recognition of previously unrecognized staffing revenues.

The Company’s Computer Systems segment operating results in fiscal 2013 decreased by $24.9 million to a loss of $21.3 million compared to income of $3.6 million in fiscal 2012 primarily due to lower amortization of previously deferred revenue and previously deferred costs of $11.2 million as several large system implementations reaching the end of the maintenance periods over which the revenue and costs of projects are being amortized. Without the recognition of previously deferred software systems revenues and costs, the segment operating loss would have been $29.3 million in 2013 and $15.5 million in 2012. The decline was primarily due to $9.9 million of lower transaction and maintenance revenues with relatively fixed data acquisition costs and restructuring costs of $3.9 million as we reduced headcount in response to lower revenue levels.

Computer Systems net revenue in fiscal 2013 decreased by $26.2 million, or 26.3%, to $73.5 million from $99.7 million in fiscal 2012. This decrease was primarily a result of lower transaction revenues by $12.4 million due to both lower volumes and pricing, lower maintenance revenue by $5.0 million, and lower systems revenues by $8.8 million as several large implementations reaching the end of the maintenance periods over which the revenue of projects were being amortized and were not replaced by similar levels of new system implementations.

The Company’s Other reportable segment operating income remained relatively flat at $1.4 million in fiscal 2013 from $1.0 million in fiscal 2012. The segment’s net revenue in fiscal 2013 decreased $1.1 million, or 0.9%, to $117.7 million from $118.8 million in fiscal 2012. The decrease was due to lower telecommunications infrastructure services revenue primarily due to lower volume of projects partially offset by higher information technology infrastructure services revenue driven primarily by a higher volume of business resulting primarily from new customers and to a lesser extent from net expanded business with existing customers at billing rates that remained relatively consistent between the periods.

Liquidity

During fiscal 2013, the Company disbursed $37.3 million in connection with the restatement and related investigations and provided cash of from all other operating activities $7.6 million. The Company used $11.3 million for capital expenditures, net of $0.3 million received from the sale of property and equipment, and received $0.4 million for the sale of investments net of purchases. Borrowing under the accounts receivable securitization program increased by $22.0 million and decreases in restricted cash as collateral for foreign currency borrowings and banking facilities provided $3.8 million, partially offset by repayment of approximately $0.8 million of long-term debt.

 

VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC.

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

Unaudited (in Thousands)

    Three Months Ended     Fiscal Year Ended
November 3, 2013     October 28, 2012     November 3, 2013     October 28, 2012
           
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period $21,389 $33,118 $26,483 $44,567
 
Cash used in connection with restatement and related investigations (2,674) (11,826) (37,292) (37,160)
Net cash provided by (used in) all other operating activities (4,726)     2,010     7,581     (3,637)
Net cash used in operating activities (7,400) (9,816) (29,711) (40,797)
 
Net cash used in investing activities (4,353) 2,257 (10,953) (7,642)
 
Net cash released (restricted) as collateral for borrowings (614) (328) 3,796 (1,391)
Net cash provided by all other financing activities 2,092     1,252     21,499     31,746
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,478 924 25,295 30,355
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (10,275) (6,635) (15,369) (18,084)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period $11,114 $26,483 $11,114 $26,483
 
 

Supplemental information:

 

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

$811

$732

$2,925

$2,866

Income taxes

$999

$1,246

$10,822

$3,740

 

On November 3, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $11.1 million and an additional $31.8 million of cash restricted as collateral for foreign currency credit lines and banking facilities. The Company also had approximately $25.5 million available from its short-term financing program. Excluding $8.9 million of long-term debt, the Company’s consolidated borrowings were $167.3 million at November 3, 2013, which included $22.3 million of foreign currency borrowings used primarily to hedge net investments in foreign subsidiaries that are fully collateralized by restricted cash, and $142.0 million drawn under the $200.0 million short-term financing program. The amount drawn under the short-term borrowing financing program was subsequently decreased to $120.0 million in January 2014 at which time there was approximately $20.3 million additional borrowing available.

 

Balance Sheets

Unaudited (in Thousands, except share amounts)

   

November 3, 2013

    October 28, 2012
ASSETS    
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $11,114 $26,483
Restricted cash 47,356 61,927
Short-term investments 6,144 5,611
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,811 and $1,899, respectively 293,305 334,947
Recoverable income taxes 17,150 13,884
Prepaid insurance 14,248 11,138
Other current assets 21,097     15,406
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 410,414 469,396
Prepaid insurance and other assets, excluding current portion 43,473 38,479
Property, equipment and software, net 37,324 39,052
Purchased intangible assets, net and goodwill 9,101     10,645
TOTAL ASSETS $500,312     $557,572
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accrued compensation $53,474 $58,183
Accounts payable 57,165 86,523
Accrued taxes other than income taxes 19,520 29,361
Accrued insurance and other 44,133 34,927
Deferred revenue, net, current portion 13,335 24,240

Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term debt

168,114     145,727
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 355,741 378,961
Accrued insurance, excluding current portion 13,003 9,010
Deferred revenue, net, excluding current portion 2,839 4,268
Income taxes payable, excluding current portion 8,659 10,424
Deferred income taxes 1,702 2,759
Long-term debt, excluding current portion 8,127     9,033
TOTAL LIABILITIES 390,071 414,455
 
Commitments and contingencies
 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, par value $1.00; Authorized - 500,000 shares; Issued - none - -

Common stock, par value $0.10; Authorized - 120,000,000 shares;

Issued - 23,536,769 and 23,500,103, respectively; Outstanding - 20,849,462 and 20,812,796, respectively

2,354

2,350

Paid-in capital 72,003 71,591
Retained earnings 83,007 113,795
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (5,243) (2,739)
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,687,307 shares (41,880)     (41,880)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 110,241     143,117
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $500,312     $557,572
 

Preliminary Nature of Information

The financial information contained in this press release is preliminary and unaudited, and has been prepared by management based on currently available Company data. This financial information is subject to change upon the completion of the audit of the Company’s fiscal 2013 annual financial statements by the Company’s independent accountants. There can be no assurance that the amounts reported today will not differ, including materially, from those reported when the Company files its 2013 Form 10-K. Please refer to the Company’s reports filed with the SEC for further information. The Company is not in a position to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 3, 2013, by the prescribed due date of January 17, 2014, because it has not completed its evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K will be filed as soon as practicable, which it expects will be no later than February 3, 2014.

About Volt Information Sciences, Inc.

Volt Information Sciences, Inc. is a leading provider of global infrastructure solutions in technology, information services and staffing acquisition for its FORTUNE 100 customer base. Operating through an international network of servicing locations, the Staffing Services Segment fulfills IT, engineering, administrative, and industrial workforce requirements of its customers, for professional search and temporary/contingent personnel as well as managed services programs. Technology infrastructure services include telecommunications engineering, construction, and installation; and IT managed services and maintenance. Information-based services are primarily directory assistance, operator services, database management, and directory printing. Visit www.volt.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “could,” “seek,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “optimistic,” “confident,” “project,” “intend,” “strategy,” “designed to,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements about the Company’s results of operations, future plans, objectives, performance, intentions and expectations. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, including, among others, the timing of, and effects of the delay in, filing the Company’s financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission, general economic, competitive and other business conditions, the degree and timing of customer utilization and rate of renewals of contracts with the Company, and the degree of success of business improvement initiatives, that could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those described or implied in the forward-looking statements. Information concerning these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are contained in Company reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
One of the biggest challenges with adopting a DevOps mentality is: new applications are easily adapted to cloud-native, microservice-based, or containerized architectures - they can be built for them - but old applications need complex refactoring. On the other hand, these new technologies can require relearning or adapting new, oftentimes more complex, methodologies and tools to be ready for production. In his general session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Chris Brown, Solutions Marketi...
At the keynote this morning we spoke about the value proposition of Nutanix, of having a DevOps culture and a mindset, and the business outcomes of achieving agility and scale, which everybody here is trying to accomplish," noted Mark Lavi, DevOps Solution Architect at Nutanix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
HyperConvergence came to market with the objective of being simple, flexible and to help drive down operating expenses. It reduced the footprint by bundling the compute/storage/network into one box. This brought a new set of challenges as the HyperConverged vendors are very focused on their own proprietary building blocks. If you want to scale in a certain way, let's say you identified a need for more storage and want to add a device that is not sold by the HyperConverged vendor, forget about it...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
Historically, some banking activities such as trading have been relying heavily on analytics and cutting edge algorithmic tools. The coming of age of powerful data analytics solutions combined with the development of intelligent algorithms have created new opportunities for financial institutions. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Sebastien Meunier, Head of Digital for North America at Chappuis Halder & Co., discussed how these tools can be leveraged to develop a lasting competitive advantage ...
From 2013, NTT Communications has been providing cPaaS service, SkyWay. Its customer’s expectations for leveraging WebRTC technology are not only typical real-time communication use cases such as Web conference, remote education, but also IoT use cases such as remote camera monitoring, smart-glass, and robotic. Because of this, NTT Communications has numerous IoT business use-cases that its customers are developing on top of PaaS. WebRTC will lead IoT businesses to be more innovative and address...
Most companies are adopting or evaluating container technology - Docker in particular - to speed up application deployment, drive down cost, ease management and make application delivery more flexible overall. As with most new architectures, this dream takes a lot of work to become a reality. Even when you do get your application componentized enough and packaged properly, there are still challenges for DevOps teams to making the shift to continuous delivery and achieving that reduction in cost ...
Evan Kirstel is an internationally recognized thought leader and social media influencer in IoT (#1 in 2017), Cloud, Data Security (2016), Health Tech (#9 in 2017), Digital Health (#6 in 2016), B2B Marketing (#5 in 2015), AI, Smart Home, Digital (2017), IIoT (#1 in 2017) and Telecom/Wireless/5G. His connections are a "Who's Who" in these technologies, He is in the top 10 most mentioned/re-tweeted by CMOs and CIOs (2016) and have been recently named 5th most influential B2B marketeer in the US. H...
In this presentation, you will learn first hand what works and what doesn't while architecting and deploying OpenStack. Some of the topics will include:- best practices for creating repeatable deployments of OpenStack- multi-site considerations- how to customize OpenStack to integrate with your existing systems and security best practices.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Kevin Jackson joined the faculty of CloudEXPO's "10-Year Anniversary Event" which will take place on November 11-13, 2018 in New York City. Kevin L. Jackson is a globally recognized cloud computing expert and Founder/Author of the award winning "Cloud Musings" blog. Mr. Jackson has also been recognized as a "Top 100 Cybersecurity Influencer and Brand" by Onalytica (2015), a Huffington Post "Top 100 Cloud Computing Experts on Twitter" (2013) and a "Top 50 C...
"Venafi has a platform that allows you to manage, centralize and automate the complete life cycle of keys and certificates within the organization," explained Gina Osmond, Sr. Field Marketing Manager at Venafi, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"This week we're really focusing on scalability, asset preservation and how do you back up to the cloud and in the cloud with object storage, which is really a new way of attacking dealing with your file, your blocked data, where you put it and how you access it," stated Jeff Greenwald, Senior Director of Market Development at HGST, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Rodrigo Coutinho is part of OutSystems' founders' team and currently the Head of Product Design. He provides a cross-functional role where he supports Product Management in defining the positioning and direction of the Agile Platform, while at the same time promoting model-based development and new techniques to deliver applications in the cloud.
In a world where the internet rules all, where 94% of business buyers conduct online research, and where e-commerce sales are poised to fall between $427 billion and $443 billion by the end of this year, we think it's safe to say that your website is a vital part of your business strategy. Whether you're a B2B company, a local business, or an e-commerce site, digital presence is key to maintain in your drive towards success. Digital Performance will take priority in 2018 for the following reason...
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...