Welcome!

News Feed Item

The US Confectionery Market: What Consumers Eat and Why?

LONDON, Jan. 20, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com just published a new market research report:

The US Confectionery Market: What Consumers Eat and Why?

Product Synopsis

This report provides the results for the Confectionery market in the US from Canadean's unique, highly detailed of consumers' Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) consumption habits, and forms part of an overall series covering all CPG product markets. Its coverage includes, but is not limited to, consumption behaviors, the extent to which consumer trends influence their consumption, the value of the market these trends influence, and brand and private label choices as well as retailer choices. Much of this information can also be analyzed by specific consumer groups, providing hard and fast data on consumers and markets at the product category level.

Introduction and Landscape

Why was the report written?
Marketers in the Confectionery market face a major challenge. Understanding market size and segmentation is valuable, but the key to effective targeting is knowing just how valuable specific consumer groups are, and being able to quantify the impact of consumer trends. This data report solves these problems by providing survey-based data on consumer trends and consumer groups and market data that show the exact size of consumer groups, how much of the Confectionery market they account for, and which consumer trends drive their behavior.

What is the current market landscape and what is changing?
As consumer confidence increases proportionally to economic recovery, consumer trends will be directly affected. Since the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 the retail market has been characterized by an increase in the amount of discounted and own-brand products. Chocolate, Gum, and Sugar Confectionary are not considered essential items and therefore consumption patterns have been comparatively affected. The relatively weak US economy means it is essential to understand what pockets of growth might exist and whether they represent value or volume opportunities.

What are the key drivers behind recent market changes?
Consumers' uptake of products and the influence of consumer trends are fundamental causes of change in markets - making knowing what these trends are and the extent of their influence crucial. The survey-based data provided in this report examines over 20 consumer trends that affect the market and examines the share of consumption across 26 consumer groups. This data provides a detailed insight into exactly who the consumer is and just how much impact the latest consumer trends are having.

What makes this report unique and essential to read?
The data provided is unique in the market as it tracks consumer behavior through to its actual value impact on a product market. This provides readers with a unique data analysis of the market, allowing marketing tactics and strategy to be updated in line with the very latest consumer behaviors.

Key Features and Benefits

Consumer data, based upon proprietary surveys and then consumer group tracking and modeling for the following specific categories: chocolate, gum, and sugar confectionery.

Detailed consumer segmentation covering over 26 consumer groups, 20 consumer trends, and consumption frequency for each product category.

Consumer penetration for brands and private labels, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.

Unique retailer choice data at the product category level, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.

Key Market Issues

Females have a share of 56% of the US Confectionery market by value despite accounting for 51% of the population. This disproportionate consumption is heaviest in the Gum market, where females account for 63% of market by value.

Gum consumption peaks among Early Young Adults, after which it declines substantially as consumers get older, to the point where over 62% of Older Consumers are Non-users. This consumption pattern limits the number of premium products in the Gum market, with younger consumers typically recording the lowest levels of disposable income.

Not only do more females consume Sugar Confectionery than males, they do so more often; 15% of females are Heavy frequency consumers compared to 12% of males, while 31% of females are Light frequency users compared to 21% of males.

Key Highlights

Chocolate accounts for 56% of the US Confectionery market by value and 64% of the market by volume. Sugar Confectionery is the second-largest category, with a value market share thrice as large as Gum.

Private label penetration is low in the Confectionery market in the US, highest in the Sugar Confectionery product category at 3% of the volume of products distributed. Confectionery markets tend to be strongly brand-driven, with strong differentiation between products, which explains this low penetration.

Indulgence is the most important trend in the Confectionery market in the US, closely followed by Personal Space and Time. Not only do a large proportion of US consumers, particularly in the Chocolate product category, highlight that these consumer trends have an influence on their consumption, this translates into a significant proportion of actual value being directly influenced as well.

1 Introduction
1.1 What is this Report About?
1.2 Definitions
1.2.1 Consumer Trends
1.2.2 Consumer Groups
1.2.3 End Consumers
1.2.4 Volume Units and Aggregations
1.2.5 Population Profiles (for interpretation of tables and charts)
2 Methodology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Initial data are based on a large scale, international, program of online consumer surveys
2.3 Demographic groups tracking provides time series data
3 Consumer Segmentation, Group Value and Trend Influence
3.1 Cohort Groups and Confectionery Market Value
3.1.1 Age Groups
3.1.2 Gender Groups
3.1.3 Location Groups
3.1.4 Education Achieved Groups
3.1.5 Wealth Groups
3.1.6 Busy Lives Groups
3.2 Cohort Groups and Market Value by Category
3.2.1 Chocolate
3.2.2 Gum
3.2.3 Sugar Confectionery
3.3 Behavioral Trends and Market Value
3.3.1 Chocolate
3.3.2 Gum
3.3.3 Sugar Confectionery
4 Consumption Analysis
4.1 Consumption Frequencies by Age and Gender
4.1.1 Chocolate
4.1.2 Gum
4.1.3 Sugar Confectionery
4.2 Consumer Profiles by Product Category
4.2.1 Chocolate
4.2.2 Gum
4.2.3 Sugar Confectionery
5 Brand vs. Private Label Uptake
5.1 Brand vs. Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.1.1 By Category
5.2 Confectionery Brand Choice and Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.2.1 Chocolate
5.2.2 Gum
5.2.3 Sugar Confectionery
6 The Share of Consumers Influenced by Trends
6.1 Trend Drivers of Consumers' Product Choices
6.1.1 Overall Confectionery
6.1.2 Chocolate
6.1.3 Gum
6.1.4 Sugar Confectionery
7 Consumption Impact: Market Valuation
7.1 Confectionery Value Impact of Consumer Consumption Behavior
7.1.1 Market Value by Category
7.1.2 Market Volume by Category
7.2 Confectionery Value Analysis by Category
7.2.1 Market Value by Category
7.2.2 Expenditure per Capita by Category
7.2.3 Expenditure per Household by Category
7.3 Confectionery Volume Impact of Consumer Behavior Trends
7.3.1 Market Volume by Category
7.3.2 Consumption per Capita by Category
7.3.3 Consumption Per Household by Category
8 Retailer Choice and Category Share
8.1 Retailer Volume Share
8.1.1 Retailer Volume Share in Confectionery
8.2 Retailer Volume Share by Category
8.2.1 Retail Share by Volume - Chocolate
8.2.2 Retail Share by Volume - Gum
8.2.3 Retail Share by Volume - Sugar Confectionery
8.3 Profiles of End-Consumers of Confectionery, by Retailer Used
8.3.1 Costco
8.3.2 Kroger
8.3.3 Publix
8.3.4 Safeway
8.3.5 Wal-Mart
8.3.6 Other
9 Appendix
9.1 About Canadean
9.2 Disclaimer

List of Tables

Table 1: Volume Units for the Confectionery Market
Table 2: United States Survey Respondent profile (weighted), 2012
Table 3: United States Confectionery Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Table 4: United States Confectionery Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Table 5: United States Confectionery Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Table 6: United States Confectionery Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Table 7: United States Confectionery Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Table 8: United States Confectionery Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Table 9: United States Chocolate Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 10: United States Gum Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 11: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 12: United States Total Chocolate Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 13: United States Total Gum Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 14: United States Total Sugar Confectionery Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 15: United States Chocolate Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 16: United States Chocolate Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 17: United States Gum Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 18: United States Gum Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 19: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 20: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 21: United States Chocolate Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 22: United States Gum Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 23: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 24: United States Confectionery Private Label Consumer Penetration (% Consumers Using), by Category, 2012
Table 25: United States Chocolate Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 26: United States Gum Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 27: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 28: United States Confectionery: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 29: United States Chocolate: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 30: United States Gum: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 31: United States Sugar Confectionery: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 32: United States Confectionery Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Table 33: United States Confectionery Market Volume (Kg m), by Category, 2012
Table 34: United States Confectionery Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Table 35: United States Confectionery Expenditure Per Capita (US$), by Category, 2012
Table 36: United States Confectionery Expenditure Per Household (US$), by Category
Table 37: United States Confectionery Market Volume (Kg m), by Category, 2012
Table 38: United States Confectionery Consumption Per Capita (Kg m / Population m), by Category, 2012
Table 39: United States Confectionery Consumption Per Household (Kg m / Households m), by Category, 2012
Table 40: United States Confectionery Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (% of Kg m), 2012
Table 41: United States Chocolate Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 42: United States Gum Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 43: United States Sugar Confectionery Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 44: United States: Profile of Confectionery Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Costco (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 45: United States: Profile of Confectionery Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Kroger (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 46: United States: Profile of Confectionery Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Publix (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 47: United States: Profile of Confectionery Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Safeway (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 48: United States: Profile of Confectionery Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Wal-Mart (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 49: United States: Profile of Confectionery Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Other (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012

List of Figures

Figure 1: Consumer Trends Report Methodology
Figure 2: United States Confectionery Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Figure 3: United States Confectionery Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Figure 4: United States Confectionery Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Figure 5: United States Confectionery Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Figure 6: United States Confectionery Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Figure 7: United States Confectionery Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Figure 8: United States Chocolate Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 9: United States Chocolate Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 10: United States Gum Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 11: United States Gum Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 12: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 13: United States Sugar Confectionery Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 14: United States Confectionery Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Figure 15: United States Confectionery Expenditure Per Capita (US$), by Category, 2012
Figure 16: United States Confectionery Expenditure Per Household (US$), by Category
Figure 17: United States Confectionery Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (% of Kg m), 2012
Figure 18: United States Chocolate Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Figure 19: United States Gum Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Figure 20: United States Sugar Confectionery Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012

Companies Mentioned

Costco, Kroger, Publix, Safeway, Walmart

Read the full report:
The US Confectionery Market: What Consumers Eat and Why?
http://www.reportbuyer.com/food_drink/snacks/us_confectionery_market_consumers_eat_why_1.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Snack_and_Sweet

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]  
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Ovum, a leading technology analyst firm, has published an in-depth report, Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting a DevOps Release Management Solution, 2016–17. The report focuses on the automation aspects of DevOps, Release Management and compares solutions from the leading vendors.
Continuous testing helps bridge the gap between developing quickly and maintaining high quality products. But to implement continuous testing, CTOs must take a strategic approach to building a testing infrastructure and toolset that empowers their team to move fast. Download our guide to laying the groundwork for a scalable continuous testing strategy.
On Dice.com, the number of job postings asking for skill in Amazon Web Services increased 76 percent between June 2015 and June 2016. Salesforce.com saw its own skill mentions increase 37 percent, while DevOps and Cloud rose 35 percent and 28 percent, respectively. Even as they expand their presence in the cloud, companies are also looking for tech professionals who can manage projects, crunch data, and figure out how to make systems run more autonomously. Mentions of ‘data science’ as a skill ...
Adding public cloud resources to an existing application can be a daunting process. The tools that you currently use to manage the software and hardware outside the cloud aren’t always the best tools to efficiently grow into the cloud. All of the major configuration management tools have cloud orchestration plugins that can be leveraged, but there are also cloud-native tools that can dramatically improve the efficiency of managing your application lifecycle. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that LeaseWeb USA, a cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) provider, will exhibit at the 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. LeaseWeb is one of the world's largest hosting brands. The company helps customers define, develop and deploy IT infrastructure tailored to their exact business needs, by combining various kinds cloud solutions.
Amazon has gradually rolled out parts of its IoT offerings in the last year, but these are just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to optimizing their back-end AWS offerings, Amazon is laying the ground work to be a major force in IoT – especially in the connected home and office. Amazon is extending its reach by building on its dominant Cloud IoT platform, its Dash Button strategy, recently announced Replenishment Services, the Echo/Alexa voice recognition control platform, the 6-7 strategic...
Deploying applications in hybrid cloud environments is hard work. Your team spends most of the time maintaining your infrastructure, configuring dev/test and production environments, and deploying applications across environments – which can be both time consuming and error prone. But what if you could automate provisioning and deployment to deliver error free environments faster? What could you do with your free time?
Up until last year, enterprises that were looking into cloud services usually undertook a long-term pilot with one of the large cloud providers, running test and dev workloads in the cloud. With cloud’s transition to mainstream adoption in 2015, and with enterprises migrating more and more workloads into the cloud and in between public and private environments, the single-provider approach must be revisited. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Yoav Mor, multi-cloud solution evangelist at Cloudy...
Extreme Computing is the ability to leverage highly performant infrastructure and software to accelerate Big Data, machine learning, HPC, and Enterprise applications. High IOPS Storage, low-latency networks, in-memory databases, GPUs and other parallel accelerators are being used to achieve faster results and help businesses make better decisions. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Michael O'Neill, Strategic Business Development at NVIDIA, focused on some of the unique ways extreme computing is...
UpGuard has become a member of the Center for Internet Security (CIS), and will continue to help businesses expand visibility into their cyber risk by providing hardening benchmarks to all customers. By incorporating these benchmarks, UpGuard's CSTAR solution builds on its lead in providing the most complete assessment of both internal and external cyber risk. CIS benchmarks are a widely accepted set of hardening guidelines that have been publicly available for years. Numerous solutions exist t...
Qosmos has announced new milestones in the detection of encrypted traffic and in protocol signature coverage. Qosmos latest software can accurately classify traffic encrypted with SSL/TLS (e.g., Google, Facebook, WhatsApp), P2P traffic (e.g., BitTorrent, MuTorrent, Vuze), and Skype, while preserving the privacy of communication content. These new classification techniques mean that traffic optimization, policy enforcement, and user experience are largely unaffected by encryption. In respect wit...
To leverage Continuous Delivery, enterprises must consider impacts that span functional silos, as well as applications that touch older, slower moving components. Managing the many dependencies can cause slowdowns. See how to achieve continuous delivery in the enterprise.
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
For basic one-to-one voice or video calling solutions, WebRTC has proven to be a very powerful technology. Although WebRTC’s core functionality is to provide secure, real-time p2p media streaming, leveraging native platform features and server-side components brings up new communication capabilities for web and native mobile applications, allowing for advanced multi-user use cases such as video broadcasting, conferencing, and media recording.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Venafi, the Immune System for the Internet™ and the leading provider of Next Generation Trust Protection, will exhibit at @DevOpsSummit at 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Venafi is the Immune System for the Internet™ that protects the foundation of all cybersecurity – cryptographic keys and digital certificates – so they can’t be misused by bad guys in attacks...