Welcome!

News Feed Item

Orezone Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment

OTTAWA, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 01/22/14 -- Orezone Gold Corporation (TSX:ORE) is pleased to announce the results of an independent Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "Study") for its wholly owned Bombore Gold Project in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Base Case financial model yields a robust after tax IRR of 23.9 % to Orezone with a mine plan optimized to deliver better grade in early years, revenues using a $1250 gold price and current costs based on operations in the region. The after tax IRR improves to 37.1 % from revenues at a $1,500 gold price, based on the same mine plan. Orezone expects to complete detailed heap leach ("HL") metallurgical and geotechnical studies in June, update the social and environmental assessments by September and be in a position to complete a full feasibility study and apply for a mining permit before year end.

"The results of the Study are quite compelling and the project benefits from size, location, low reagent consumption, rapid leaching kinetics, low capital requirements and low all-in operating costs," said Ron Little, CEO of Orezone. "Bombore is one of the largest and most advanced undeveloped deposits in the region that is truly multi-phase. Commencing with a HL operation positions the Company to move and grow rapidly with a carbon-in-leach ("CIL") expansion if warranted under better capital market and gold price conditions."

The Study was completed by G Mining Services Inc. of Montreal, Canada ("G Mining") and included Kappes, Cassiday and Associates, and Golder and Associates of Reno, Nevada. The NI 43-101 compliant Study was based on the resource estimate prepared by SRK Consulting ("SRK") of Toronto and reported in Orezone's press release dated April 29, 2013, which includes 139.9 Mt of M&I resources grading 1.01 g/t for 4.6 Moz plus 18.4 Mt Inferred resources grading 1.22 g/t for 0.7 Moz. The HL mineable resource is limited to only the measured and indicated near-surface saprolite and transition resources (average depth of 45 m) which includes 44.7 Mt grading 0.88 g/t for 1.3 Moz. The sulphide resources, although extensive, indicate relatively poor heap leach gold recoveries and can be processed later under a CIL expansion scenario. G Mining did not audit the SRK NI 43-101 resource.

Summary of Base Case Financials:

The Base Case assumptions include revenues using a gold price of $1,250 and current prices for fuel, reagents, labor, mining and other current costs from operations in the region as of Q32013. The financial highlights are as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Case Financials                                                        
Description                                                       Heap Leach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mineral Resource used in Mine Plan (ounces)                        1,271,567
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Grade (g/t)                                                     0.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing Throughput (Mt/yr)                                            5.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Life (years)                                                        8.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual Production (ounces)                                   123,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Production (ounces recovered)                                 1,008,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste to Ore Strip Ratio                                                1.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross Revenue ($M)                                                  $1,256.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Cash Cost ($/oz)                                                 $627
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Cost ($/oz)                                                   $677
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Capital ($M)                                                  $180.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining Capital ($M)                                                $53.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closure Costs ($M)                                                     $10.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orezone (1)                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV after tax (0%) ($M)                                               $246.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV after tax (5%) ($M)                                               $158.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR after tax                                                          23.9%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Government (2)                                                              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (0%) with taxes ($M)                                              $135.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (5%) with taxes ($M)                                              $102.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Represents Orezone's Burkina Faso subsidiary cash flows net of royalties
and local taxes. The Government of Burkina Faso benefits from its 10% free- 
carried shareholding, the gold royalty, corporate tax and withholding taxes.
(2) Government cash flows are underestimated as customs fees and duties on  
imports and indirect taxes built into the delivered fuel price have not been
incorporated. All figures in USD.Exchange Rates: XOF : USD = 485            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Study constitutes a Preliminary Economic Assessment for NI 43-101 purposes, is considered preliminary in nature but does not use inferred resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability.

Mineral Resources used in the Mine Plan

Final pits were designed to account for access ramps and compatible pit slopes, which then produced the following total diluted mineral resource to be used in the mine plan:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Measured Mineral Resource  Indicated Mineral Resource
                      ------------------------------------------------------
               Cut-off   Tonnes  Grade  Contained   Tonnes  Grade  Contained
Category           g/t       Mt    g/t     Ounces       Mt    g/t     Ounces
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
North:                                                                      
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    12.70   0.89    365,500     8.35   0.83    222,500
Transitional      0.32     5.37   0.91    157,500     1.08   1.11     38,000
Sub-total                 18.08   0.90    523,000     9.43   0.86    260,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
South:                                                                      
Laterite/Oxide    0.32     8.33   0.85    227,000     2.81   0.87     78,000
Transitional      0.31     4.30   0.87    120,500     0.70   1.07     24,000
Sub-total                 12.63   0.86    347,500     3.51   0.91    102,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast:                                                                  
Laterite/Oxide    0.34     0.27   1.14     10,000     0.40   0.94     12,000
Transitional      0.33     0.20   1.47      9,500     0.21   0.99      6,500
Sub-total                  0.47   1.28     19,500     0.61   0.96     18,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined:                                                                   
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    21.30   0.88    602,500    11.56   0.84    313,000
Transitional      0.32     9.87   0.91    287,500     1.98   1.08     69,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                     31.17   0.89    890,000    13.54   0.88    381,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
                          Measured + Indicated   
                      ---------------------------
               Cut-off   Tonnes  Grade  Contained
Category           g/t       Mt    g/t     Ounces
-------------------------------------------------
North:                                           
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    21.06   0.87    588,000
Transitional      0.32     6.45   0.94    195,500
Sub-total                 27.50   0.89    783,500
-------------------------------------------------
South:                                           
Laterite/Oxide    0.32    11.13   0.85    305,500
Transitional      0.31     5.01   0.90    144,500
Sub-total                 16.14   0.87    450,100
-------------------------------------------------
Southeast:                                       
Laterite/Oxide    0.34     0.67   1.02     22,000
Transitional      0.33     0.40   1.23     16,000
Sub-total                  1.08   1.10     38,000
-------------------------------------------------
Combined:                                        
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    32.86   0.87    915,000
Transitional      0.32    11.86   0.93    356,500
-------------------------------------------------
Total                     44.71   0.88  1,271,500
-------------------------------------------------
Note: Some categories may not balance due to rounding                       

Estimated Annual Gold Production for Base Case

The HL scenario assumes an average mining rate of 15 M tonnes per year and a rate of ore placement on the leach pad of 5.5 M tonnes per year. Gold production and operating costs for each year are summarized as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Year   -1    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9 Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Prod'n (koz)       3  125  128  131  120  121  123  119  119   19 1,008
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Head Grade (g/t)     0.83 0.94 0.91 0.93 0.85 0.87 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.83  0.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Summary of Operating Costs                                                  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Heap Leach                       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Total Costs          Avg. Cost          Avg. Cost
Category                            $M         $/t milled               $/oz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining                           276.6               6.25                275
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing                       246.3               5.57                245
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Services                 101.8               2.30                101
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transport &                                                                 
 Refining                          2.5               0.06                  3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSR                                3.1               0.07                  3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (C1 Costs)              $630.3 M          $14.25 /t           $627 /oz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties                        $50.3              $1.14                $50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (C2 Costs)              $680.6 M          $15.39 /t           $677 /oz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initial Project Capital Cost Estimates

Initial capital costs were estimated on the basis of Q42013 quotes on equipment and databases for similar projects in West Africa and South America adjusted for inflation.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Capital Area                                                    US$M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infrastructure                                                          11.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power                                                                    5.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water                                                                    4.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining and Support Equipment                                            32.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process Plant                                                           39.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indirects                                                               17.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resettlement                                                             5.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Services                                                        29.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-production                                                          12.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingencies                                                           22.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Capital Costs ($M)                                            $180.0 M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Capital includes a total contingency of $22M based on rates that varied per item.

Sustaining Capital Cost Estimates

Sustaining capital costs were estimated on the basis of Q42013 quotes on equipment and databases for similar projects in West Africa and South America adjusted for inflation. Taxes and freight are included along with contingencies that are varied per item (20% on leach pads).


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Sustaining Capital Area                                         US$M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining and G&A                                                           8.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plant                                                                    0.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leach Pads                                                              31.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resettlement                                                             5.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingencies                                                            7.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                $53.8 M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Project Sensitivities

The project is sensitive to gold price, and to a lesser extent the fuel price, as demonstrated in the following table:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Price (per oz)                    $1000   $1100   $1250   $1400   $1500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Orezone                                                                  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (0%) After tax ($M)                 85.3   151.2   246.6   344.3   399.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (5%) After tax ($M)                 27.1    82.1   158.9   236.5   280.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR After tax                           8.2%   14.9%   23.9%   32.4%   37.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Gov't Burkina Faso                                                       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (0%) After tax ($M)                 46.2    80.6   135.5   188.2   232.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (5%) After tax ($M)                 36.4    60.4   102.3   143.2   178.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full details of the Preliminary Economic Assessment in the form of a NI 43-101 technical report will be filed on SEDAR within the next 45 days.

Development Timetable

Orezone has completed over 400,000 metres of drilling and much of the full feasibility level technical studies required for a CIL and HL operation. In order to finalize a HL full feasibility study by year end additional metallurgical tests are required including but not limited to column and compaction tests. Some geotechnical follow-up on the new HL pad site location is also required. This work is expected to be completed in Q2 2014. Social and environmental studies will continue in parallel in order to prepare an application for a mining permit based on the latest project footprint and design.

Qualified Person

The Preliminary Economic Assessment was prepared by G Mining under the supervision of Rejean Gourde, Richard Taylor of Kappes, Cassiday and Associates, Todd Minard of Golder Associates Inc., and Glen Cole of SRK Consulting Inc. whom are "qualified persons" under the standards set forth in NI 43-101. (All four are independent of Orezone for purposes of NI 43-101.) Dr. Pascal Marquis, Senior Vice President Exploration, and Ron Little, President and CEO, are the Company's designated Qualified Persons for the purposes of the Study. All parties have reviewed and approved their respective content of this press release.

Conference Call

Orezone will be hosting a conference call on Wednesday January 22, 2014 at 11:00 am EST where representatives from senior management and G Mining will discuss the Study and be available to respond to questions from analysts and investors. Those interested in participating in the conference call should dial in at 1-800-743-4304 (Canada, USA) and an operator will direct participants to the call.

About Orezone Gold Corporation

Orezone is a Canadian company with a gold discovery track record of +12 Moz and recent mine development experience in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Company owns a 100% interest in Bombore which is situated 85 km east of the capital city, adjacent to an international highway. Mineral resources are constrained within CIL optimized open pit shells that span 11 km, and include 4.6 Moz of measured and indicated (140 Mt @ 1.01 g/t) and 0.7 Moz of inferred resources (18 Mt @ 1.22 g/t) with an average depth of drilling to only 120 meters. The Company is continuing with various technical studies in order to be in a position to complete a full feasibility study and an application for a mining permit before year end.

Pascal Marquis, SVP Exploration and Ron Little, CEO are Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 have reviewed the information in this release.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information are frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "potential", "possible" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may", "will", "could", or "should" occur. Forward-looking statements in this release include statements regarding, among others; completing detailed HL metallurgical and geotechnical studies for Bombore in June 2014, completing environmental and social studies for Bombore in September 2014, applying for a mining permit and completing a FS at Bombore by the end of 2014, and becoming a mid-tier gold producer.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS are based on certain assumptions, the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These factors include the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological and geotechnical data, fluctuating metal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, the ability of contracted parties (including laboratories and drill companies to provide services as contracted); uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future and other factors. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Comparisons between any resource model or estimates with the subsequent drill results are preliminary in nature and should not be relied upon as potential qualified changes to any future resource updates or estimates.

Readers are advised that National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves and mineral resources be reported separately. Readers should refer to the annual information form of Orezone for the year ended December 31, 2012 and other continuous disclosure documents filed by Orezone since January 1, 2013 available at www.sedar.com, for this detailed information, which is subject to the qualifications and notes set forth therein.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service. In his session at 19th Cloud Exp...
The cloud promises new levels of agility and cost-savings for Big Data, data warehousing and analytics. But it’s challenging to understand all the options – from IaaS and PaaS to newer services like HaaS (Hadoop as a Service) and BDaaS (Big Data as a Service). In her session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Hannah Smalltree, a director at Cazena, provided an educational overview of emerging “as-a-service” options for Big Data in the cloud. This is critical background for IT and data professionals...
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
What happens when the different parts of a vehicle become smarter than the vehicle itself? As we move toward the era of smart everything, hundreds of entities in a vehicle that communicate with each other, the vehicle and external systems create a need for identity orchestration so that all entities work as a conglomerate. Much like an orchestra without a conductor, without the ability to secure, control, and connect the link between a vehicle’s head unit, devices, and systems and to manage the ...
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smar...
"We are an all-flash array storage provider but our focus has been on VM-aware storage specifically for virtualized applications," stated Dhiraj Sehgal of Tintri in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
In an era of historic innovation fueled by unprecedented access to data and technology, the low cost and risk of entering new markets has leveled the playing field for business. Today, any ambitious innovator can easily introduce a new application or product that can reinvent business models and transform the client experience. In their Day 2 Keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Mercer Rowe, IBM Vice President of Strategic Alliances, and Raejeanne Skillern, Intel Vice President of Data Center Group and G...
"We are a modern development application platform and we have a suite of products that allow you to application release automation, we do version control, and we do application life cycle management," explained Flint Brenton, CEO of CollabNet, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Information technology is an industry that has always experienced change, and the dramatic change sweeping across the industry today could not be truthfully described as the first time we've seen such widespread change impacting customer investments. However, the rate of the change, and the potential outcomes from today's digital transformation has the distinct potential to separate the industry into two camps: Organizations that see the change coming, embrace it, and successful leverage it; and...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
Keeping pace with advancements in software delivery processes and tooling is taxing even for the most proficient organizations. Point tools, platforms, open source and the increasing adoption of private and public cloud services requires strong engineering rigor – all in the face of developer demands to use the tools of choice. As Agile has settled in as a mainstream practice, now DevOps has emerged as the next wave to improve software delivery speed and output. To make DevOps work, organization...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with 20th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry p...