Welcome!

News Feed Item

Orezone Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment

OTTAWA, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 01/22/14 -- Orezone Gold Corporation (TSX: ORE) is pleased to announce the results of an independent Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "Study") for its wholly owned Bombore Gold Project in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Base Case financial model yields a robust after tax IRR of 23.9 % to Orezone with a mine plan optimized to deliver better grade in early years, revenues using a $1250 gold price and current costs based on operations in the region. The after tax IRR improves to 37.1 % from revenues at a $1,500 gold price, based on the same mine plan. Orezone expects to complete detailed heap leach ("HL") metallurgical and geotechnical studies in June, update the social and environmental assessments by September and be in a position to complete a full feasibility study and apply for a mining permit before year end.

"The results of the Study are quite compelling and the project benefits from size, location, low reagent consumption, rapid leaching kinetics, low capital requirements and low all-in operating costs," said Ron Little, CEO of Orezone. "Bombore is one of the largest and most advanced undeveloped deposits in the region that is truly multi-phase. Commencing with a HL operation positions the Company to move and grow rapidly with a carbon-in-leach ("CIL") expansion if warranted under better capital market and gold price conditions."

The Study was completed by G Mining Services Inc. of Montreal, Canada ("G Mining") and included Kappes, Cassiday and Associates, and Golder and Associates of Reno, Nevada. The NI 43-101 compliant Study was based on the resource estimate prepared by SRK Consulting ("SRK") of Toronto and reported in Orezone's press release dated April 29, 2013, which includes 139.9 Mt of M&I resources grading 1.01 g/t for 4.6 Moz plus 18.4 Mt Inferred resources grading 1.22 g/t for 0.7 Moz. The HL mineable resource is limited to only the measured and indicated near-surface saprolite and transition resources (average depth of 45 m) which includes 44.7 Mt grading 0.88 g/t for 1.3 Moz. The sulphide resources, although extensive, indicate relatively poor heap leach gold recoveries and can be processed later under a CIL expansion scenario. G Mining did not audit the SRK NI 43-101 resource.

Summary of Base Case Financials:

The Base Case assumptions include revenues using a gold price of $1,250 and current prices for fuel, reagents, labor, mining and other current costs from operations in the region as of Q32013. The financial highlights are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Case Financials
Description                                                       Heap Leach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mineral Resource used in Mine Plan (ounces)                        1,271,567
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Grade (g/t)                                                     0.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing Throughput (Mt/yr)                                            5.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Life (years)                                                        8.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual Production (ounces)                                   123,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Production (ounces recovered)                                 1,008,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste to Ore Strip Ratio                                                1.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross Revenue ($M)                                                  $1,256.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Cash Cost ($/oz)                                                 $627
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Cost ($/oz)                                                   $677
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Capital ($M)                                                  $180.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining Capital ($M)                                                $53.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closure Costs ($M)                                                     $10.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orezone (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV after tax (0%) ($M)                                               $246.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV after tax (5%) ($M)                                               $158.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR after tax                                                          23.9%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Government (2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (0%) with taxes ($M)                                              $135.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (5%) with taxes ($M)                                              $102.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Represents Orezone's Burkina Faso subsidiary cash flows net of royalties
and local taxes. The Government of Burkina Faso benefits from its 10% free-
carried shareholding, the gold royalty, corporate tax and withholding taxes.
(2) Government cash flows are underestimated as customs fees and duties on
imports and indirect taxes built into the delivered fuel price have not been
incorporated. All figures in USD.Exchange Rates: XOF : USD = 485
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Study constitutes a Preliminary Economic Assessment for NI 43-101 purposes, is considered preliminary in nature but does not use inferred resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability.

Mineral Resources used in the Mine Plan

Final pits were designed to account for access ramps and compatible pit slopes, which then produced the following total diluted mineral resource to be used in the mine plan:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Measured Mineral Resource  Indicated Mineral Resource
                      ------------------------------------------------------
               Cut-off   Tonnes  Grade  Contained   Tonnes  Grade  Contained
Category           g/t       Mt    g/t     Ounces       Mt    g/t     Ounces
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
North:
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    12.70   0.89    365,500     8.35   0.83    222,500
Transitional      0.32     5.37   0.91    157,500     1.08   1.11     38,000
Sub-total                 18.08   0.90    523,000     9.43   0.86    260,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
South:
Laterite/Oxide    0.32     8.33   0.85    227,000     2.81   0.87     78,000
Transitional      0.31     4.30   0.87    120,500     0.70   1.07     24,000
Sub-total                 12.63   0.86    347,500     3.51   0.91    102,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast:
Laterite/Oxide    0.34     0.27   1.14     10,000     0.40   0.94     12,000
Transitional      0.33     0.20   1.47      9,500     0.21   0.99      6,500
Sub-total                  0.47   1.28     19,500     0.61   0.96     18,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined:
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    21.30   0.88    602,500    11.56   0.84    313,000
Transitional      0.32     9.87   0.91    287,500     1.98   1.08     69,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                     31.17   0.89    890,000    13.54   0.88    381,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
                          Measured + Indicated
                      ---------------------------
               Cut-off   Tonnes  Grade  Contained
Category           g/t       Mt    g/t     Ounces
-------------------------------------------------
North:
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    21.06   0.87    588,000
Transitional      0.32     6.45   0.94    195,500
Sub-total                 27.50   0.89    783,500
-------------------------------------------------
South:
Laterite/Oxide    0.32    11.13   0.85    305,500
Transitional      0.31     5.01   0.90    144,500
Sub-total                 16.14   0.87    450,100
-------------------------------------------------
Southeast:
Laterite/Oxide    0.34     0.67   1.02     22,000
Transitional      0.33     0.40   1.23     16,000
Sub-total                  1.08   1.10     38,000
-------------------------------------------------
Combined:
Laterite/Oxide    0.33    32.86   0.87    915,000
Transitional      0.32    11.86   0.93    356,500
-------------------------------------------------
Total                     44.71   0.88  1,271,500
-------------------------------------------------
Note: Some categories may not balance due to rounding

Estimated Annual Gold Production for Base Case

The HL scenario assumes an average mining rate of 15 M tonnes per year and a rate of ore placement on the leach pad of 5.5 M tonnes per year. Gold production and operating costs for each year are summarized as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Year   -1    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9 Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Prod'n (koz)       3  125  128  131  120  121  123  119  119   19 1,008
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Head Grade (g/t)     0.83 0.94 0.91 0.93 0.85 0.87 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.83  0.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of Operating Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Heap Leach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Total Costs          Avg. Cost          Avg. Cost
Category                            $M         $/t milled               $/oz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining                           276.6               6.25                275
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing                       246.3               5.57                245
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Services                 101.8               2.30                101
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transport &
 Refining                          2.5               0.06                  3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSR                                3.1               0.07                  3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (C1 Costs)              $630.3 M          $14.25 /t           $627 /oz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties                        $50.3              $1.14                $50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (C2 Costs)              $680.6 M          $15.39 /t           $677 /oz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initial Project Capital Cost Estimates

Initial capital costs were estimated on the basis of Q42013 quotes on equipment and databases for similar projects in West Africa and South America adjusted for inflation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Capital Area                                                    US$M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infrastructure                                                          11.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power                                                                    5.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water                                                                    4.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining and Support Equipment                                            32.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process Plant                                                           39.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indirects                                                               17.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resettlement                                                             5.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Services                                                        29.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-production                                                          12.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingencies                                                           22.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Capital Costs ($M)                                            $180.0 M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Capital includes a total contingency of $22M based on rates that varied per item.

Sustaining Capital Cost Estimates

Sustaining capital costs were estimated on the basis of Q42013 quotes on equipment and databases for similar projects in West Africa and South America adjusted for inflation. Taxes and freight are included along with contingencies that are varied per item (20% on leach pads).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Sustaining Capital Area                                         US$M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining and G&A                                                           8.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plant                                                                    0.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leach Pads                                                              31.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resettlement                                                             5.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingencies                                                            7.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                $53.8 M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Project Sensitivities

The project is sensitive to gold price, and to a lesser extent the fuel price, as demonstrated in the following table:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Price (per oz)                    $1000   $1100   $1250   $1400   $1500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Orezone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (0%) After tax ($M)                 85.3   151.2   246.6   344.3   399.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (5%) After tax ($M)                 27.1    82.1   158.9   236.5   280.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR After tax                           8.2%   14.9%   23.9%   32.4%   37.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Gov't Burkina Faso
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (0%) After tax ($M)                 46.2    80.6   135.5   188.2   232.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPV (5%) After tax ($M)                 36.4    60.4   102.3   143.2   178.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full details of the Preliminary Economic Assessment in the form of a NI 43-101 technical report will be filed on SEDAR within the next 45 days.

Development Timetable

Orezone has completed over 400,000 metres of drilling and much of the full feasibility level technical studies required for a CIL and HL operation. In order to finalize a HL full feasibility study by year end additional metallurgical tests are required including but not limited to column and compaction tests. Some geotechnical follow-up on the new HL pad site location is also required. This work is expected to be completed in Q2 2014. Social and environmental studies will continue in parallel in order to prepare an application for a mining permit based on the latest project footprint and design.

Qualified Person

The Preliminary Economic Assessment was prepared by G Mining under the supervision of Rejean Gourde, Richard Taylor of Kappes, Cassiday and Associates, Todd Minard of Golder Associates Inc., and Glen Cole of SRK Consulting Inc. whom are "qualified persons" under the standards set forth in NI 43-101. (All four are independent of Orezone for purposes of NI 43-101.) Dr. Pascal Marquis, Senior Vice President Exploration, and Ron Little, President and CEO, are the Company's designated Qualified Persons for the purposes of the Study. All parties have reviewed and approved their respective content of this press release.

Conference Call

Orezone will be hosting a conference call on Wednesday January 22, 2014 at 11:00 am EST where representatives from senior management and G Mining will discuss the Study and be available to respond to questions from analysts and investors. Those interested in participating in the conference call should dial in at 1-800-743-4304 (Canada, USA) and an operator will direct participants to the call.

About Orezone Gold Corporation

Orezone is a Canadian company with a gold discovery track record of +12 Moz and recent mine development experience in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Company owns a 100% interest in Bombore which is situated 85 km east of the capital city, adjacent to an international highway. Mineral resources are constrained within CIL optimized open pit shells that span 11 km, and include 4.6 Moz of measured and indicated (140 Mt @ 1.01 g/t) and 0.7 Moz of inferred resources (18 Mt @ 1.22 g/t) with an average depth of drilling to only 120 meters. The Company is continuing with various technical studies in order to be in a position to complete a full feasibility study and an application for a mining permit before year end.

Pascal Marquis, SVP Exploration and Ron Little, CEO are Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 have reviewed the information in this release.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information are frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "potential", "possible" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may", "will", "could", or "should" occur. Forward-looking statements in this release include statements regarding, among others; completing detailed HL metallurgical and geotechnical studies for Bombore in June 2014, completing environmental and social studies for Bombore in September 2014, applying for a mining permit and completing a FS at Bombore by the end of 2014, and becoming a mid-tier gold producer.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS are based on certain assumptions, the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These factors include the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological and geotechnical data, fluctuating metal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, the ability of contracted parties (including laboratories and drill companies to provide services as contracted); uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future and other factors. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Comparisons between any resource model or estimates with the subsequent drill results are preliminary in nature and should not be relied upon as potential qualified changes to any future resource updates or estimates.

Readers are advised that National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves and mineral resources be reported separately. Readers should refer to the annual information form of Orezone for the year ended December 31, 2012 and other continuous disclosure documents filed by Orezone since January 1, 2013 available at www.sedar.com, for this detailed information, which is subject to the qualifications and notes set forth therein.

Contacts:
Orezone Gold Corporation
Ron Little
CEO
(613) 241-3699 or Toll Free: (888) 673-0663
[email protected]

Orezone Gold Corporation
Pascal Marquis
S.V.P. Exploration
(613) 241-3699 or Toll Free: (888) 673-0663
[email protected]
www.orezone.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"Our strategy is to focus on the hyperscale providers - AWS, Azure, and Google. Over the last year we saw that a lot of developers need to learn how to do their job in the cloud and we see this DevOps movement that we are catering to with our content," stated Alessandro Fasan, Head of Global Sales at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Enterprises are moving to the cloud faster than most of us in security expected. CIOs are going from 0 to 100 in cloud adoption and leaving security teams in the dust. Once cloud is part of an enterprise stack, it’s unclear who has responsibility for the protection of applications, services, and data. When cloud breaches occur, whether active compromise or a publicly accessible database, the blame must fall on both service providers and users. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben Johnson, C...
21st International Cloud Expo, taking place October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud strategy. Me...
Many organizations adopt DevOps to reduce cycle times and deliver software faster; some take on DevOps to drive higher quality and better end-user experience; others look to DevOps for a clearer line-of-sight to customers to drive better business impacts. In truth, these three foundations go together. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 21st Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, industry experts will discuss how leading organizations build application success from all...
SYS-CON Events announced today that mruby Forum will exhibit at the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. mruby is the lightweight implementation of the Ruby language. We introduce mruby and the mruby IoT framework that enhances development productivity. For more information, visit http://forum.mruby.org/.
Cloud-based disaster recovery is critical to any production environment and is a high priority for many enterprise organizations today. Nearly 40% of organizations have had to execute their BCDR plan due to a service disruption in the past two years. Zerto on IBM Cloud offer VMware and Microsoft customers simple, automated recovery of on-premise VMware and Microsoft workloads to IBM Cloud data centers.
Elon Musk is among the notable industry figures who worries about the power of AI to destroy rather than help society. Mark Zuckerberg, on the other hand, embraces all that is going on. AI is most powerful when deployed across the vast networks being built for Internets of Things in the manufacturing, transportation and logistics, retail, healthcare, government and other sectors. Is AI transforming IoT for the good or the bad? Do we need to worry about its potential destructive power? Or will we...
Why Federal cloud? What is in Federal Clouds and integrations? This session will identify the process and the FedRAMP initiative. But is it sufficient? What is the remedy for keeping abreast of cutting-edge technology? In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rasananda Behera will examine the proposed solutions: Private or public or hybrid cloud Responsible governing bodies How can we accomplish?
Today traditional IT approaches leverage well-architected compute/networking domains to control what applications can access what data, and how. DevOps includes rapid application development/deployment leveraging concepts like containerization, third-party sourced applications and databases. Such applications need access to production data for its test and iteration cycles. Data Security? That sounds like a roadblock to DevOps vs. protecting the crown jewels to those in IT.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Cedexis will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Cedexis is the leader in data-driven enterprise global traffic management. Whether optimizing traffic through datacenters, clouds, CDNs, or any combination, Cedexis solutions drive quality and cost-effectiveness.
The last two years has seen discussions about cloud computing evolve from the public / private / hybrid split to the reality that most enterprises will be creating a complex, multi-cloud strategy. Companies are wary of committing all of their resources to a single cloud, and instead are choosing to spread the risk – and the benefits – of cloud computing across multiple providers and internal infrastructures, as they follow their business needs. Will this approach be successful? How large is the ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that B2Cloud will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. B2Cloud specializes in IoT devices for preventive and predictive maintenance in any kind of equipment retrieving data like Energy consumption, working time, temperature, humidity, pressure, etc.
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Greg Gorman is the Director, IoT Developer Ecosystem, Watson IoT, will provide a short tutorial on Node-RED, a Node.js-based programming tool for wiring together hardware devices, APIs and online services in new and interesting ways. It provides a browser-based editor that makes it easy to wire together flows using a wide range of nodes in the palette that can be deployed to its runtime in a single-click. There is a large library of contributed nodes that help so...
IBM helps FinTechs and financial services companies build and monetize cognitive-enabled financial services apps quickly and at scale. Hosted on IBM Bluemix, IBM’s platform builds in customer insights, regulatory compliance analytics and security to help reduce development time and testing. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Lennart Frantzell, a Developer Advocate with IBM, will discuss how these tools simplify the time-consuming tasks of selection, mapping and data integration, allowing devel...
What is the best strategy for selecting the right offshore company for your business? In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, will discuss the things to look for - positive and negative - in evaluating your options. He will also discuss how to maximize productivity with your offshore developers. Before you start your search, clearly understand your business needs and how that impacts software choices.