Welcome!

News Feed Item

Ford Credit Earns Full Year 2013 Pre-Tax Profit of $1.8 Billion; Net Income of $1.5 Billion*

DEARBORN, Mich., Jan. 28, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Ford Motor Credit Company reported a pre-tax profit of $1.8 billion in 2013, compared with $1.7 billion a year earlier.  The improvement was more than explained by higher volume, primarily in North America, driven by an increase in leasing reflecting changes in Ford's marketing programs, as well as higher non-consumer finance receivables due to higher dealer stocks.  Partial offsets were higher credit losses due to lower credit loss reserve reductions in all geographic segments and unfavorable residual performance related to lower than expected auction values in North America.  Ford Credit's net income was $1.5 billion in 2013, compared with $1.2 billion in the previous year.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, Ford Credit's pre-tax profit was $368 million, a decrease of $46 million from a year earlier.  The decrease primarily reflects unfavorable residual performance related to lower auction values and lower financing margin, both in North America, as well as credit loss reserve changes; higher volume was a partial offset.  Ford Credit reported fourth quarter net income of $568 million, an increase of $300 million from a year earlier.  The increase is primarily explained by a reduction in its tax liability resulting from favorable one-time tax items recorded in the quarter.

"We're pleased with our team's 2013 performance," Ford Credit Chairman and CEO Bernard Silverstone said.  "The team delivered solid results in all the key measures of our business.  We remain focused on continuous improvement and providing ongoing support to Ford, our dealers and our customers in 2014."

On Dec. 31, 2013, Ford Credit's total net receivables were $100 billion, compared with $89 billion at year-end 2012.**  Managed receivables were $103 billion on Dec. 31, 2013, up from $92 billion on Dec. 31, 2012.***

On Dec. 31, 2013, managed leverage was 8.5:1, compared with 8.3:1 on Dec. 31, 2012.  Ford Credit distributed $445 million to its parent in 2013.

For 2014, Ford Credit expects full year pre-tax profit to be about equal to 2013.  Ford Credit also expects managed receivables at year-end of about $110 billion, managed leverage to continue in the range of 8:1 to 9:1, and distributions to its parent of about $250 million.

# # #

About Ford Motor Credit Company
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC has provided dealer and customer financing to support the sale of Ford Motor Company products since 1959.  Ford Credit is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford.  For more information, visit www.fordcredit.com or www.lincolnafs.com.

— — — — —
*   The financial results discussed herein are presented on a preliminary basis; final data will be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
**  For additional information, refer to subnote (c) in the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures to GAAP section of the Appendix.
*** For additional information, refer to subnote (d) in the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures to GAAP section of the Appendix.

Risk Factors

Statements included or incorporated by reference herein may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, forecasts, and assumptions by our management and involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated, including, without limitation:

  • Decline in industry sales volume, particularly in the United States or Europe, due to financial crisis, recession, geopolitical events, or other factors; 
  • Decline in Ford's market share or failure to achieve growth;
  • Lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of Ford's new or existing products;
  • Market shift away from sales of larger, more profitable vehicles beyond Ford's current planning assumption, particularly in the United States; 
  • An increase in or continued volatility of fuel prices, or reduced availability of fuel; 
  • Continued or increased price competition resulting from industry excess capacity, currency fluctuations, or other factors; 
  • Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates;
  • Adverse effects resulting from economic, geopolitical, or other events; 
  • Economic distress of suppliers that may require Ford to provide substantial financial support or take other measures to ensure supplies of components or materials and could increase costs, affect liquidity, or cause production constraints or disruptions; 
  • Work stoppages at Ford or supplier facilities or other limitations on production (whether as a result of labor disputes, natural or man-made disasters, tight credit markets or other financial distress, production constraints or difficulties, or other factors); 
  • Single-source supply of components or materials; 
  • Labor or other constraints on Ford's ability to maintain competitive cost structure; 
  • Substantial pension and postretirement health care and life insurance liabilities impairing our liquidity or financial condition; 
  • Worse-than-assumed economic and demographic experience for postretirement benefit plans (e.g., discount rates or investment returns); 
  • Restriction on use of tax attributes from tax law "ownership change;"  
  • The discovery of defects in vehicles resulting in delays in new model launches, recall campaigns, or increased warranty costs; 
  • Increased safety, emissions, fuel economy, or other regulations resulting in higher costs, cash expenditures, and/or sales restrictions; 
  • Unusual or significant litigation, governmental investigations, or adverse publicity arising out of alleged defects in products, perceived environmental impacts, or otherwise; 
  • A change in requirements under long-term supply arrangements committing Ford to purchase minimum or fixed quantities of certain parts, or to pay a minimum amount to the seller ("take-or-pay" contracts); 
  • Adverse effects on results from a decrease in or cessation or clawback of government incentives related to investments; 
  • Inherent limitations of internal controls impacting financial statements and safeguarding of assets; 
  • Cybersecurity risks to operational systems, security systems, or infrastructure owned by Ford, Ford Credit, or a third-party vendor or supplier;  
  • Failure of financial institutions to fulfill commitments under committed credit and liquidity facilities; 
  • Inability of Ford Credit to access debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts, due to credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors; 
  • Higher-than-expected credit losses, lower-than-anticipated residual values, or higher-than-expected return volumes for leased vehicles; 
  • Increased competition from banks or other financial institutions seeking to increase their share of financing Ford vehicles; and 
  • New or increased credit, consumer, or data protection or other regulations resulting in higher costs and/or additional financing restrictions.

We cannot be certain that any expectation, forecast, or assumption made in preparing forward-looking statements will prove accurate, or that any projection will be realized.  It is to be expected that there may be differences between projected and actual results.  Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of their initial issuance, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.  For additional discussion, see "Item 1A, Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

 

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

PRELIMINARY


CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

For the Periods Ended December 31, 2012 and 2013

(in millions)



Fourth Quarter


Full Year


2012


2013


2012


2013


(unaudited)


(unaudited)

Financing revenue








Operating leases

$

728


$

949


$

2,689


$

3,409

Retail Financing

729


706


2,980


2,785

Dealer Financing

352


396


1,423


1,519

Other

23


19


97


92

Total financing revenue

1,832


2,070


7,189


7,805

Depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases

(484)


(734)


(1,775)


(2,397)

Interest expense

(709)


(674)


(3,027)


(2,730)

Net financing margin

639


662


2,387


2,678

Other revenue








Insurance premiums earned

30


32


105


119

Other income, net

79


54


286


258

Total financing margin and other revenue

748


748


2,778


3,055

Expenses








Operating expenses

273


311


1,004


1,090

Provision for credit losses

40


65


7


146

Insurance expenses

21


4


70


63

Total expenses

334


380


1,081


1,299

Income before income taxes

414


368


1,697


1,756

Provision for income taxes

146


(200)


483


277

Net income

$

268


$

568


$

1,214


$

1,479

__________

Certain prior period amounts in our Consolidated Income Statement were reclassified to conform to current year presentation.




CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Periods Ended December 31, 2012 and 2013

(in millions)



Fourth Quarter


Full Year


2012


2013


2012


2013


(unaudited)


(unaudited)

Net income

$

268


$

568


$

1,214


$

1,479

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax








Foreign currency translation

2


(24)


143


(86)

Total other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

2


(24)


143


(86)

Comprehensive income

$

270


$

544


$

1,357


$

1,393




FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

PRELIMINARY


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(in millions)




December 31,
2012


December 31,
2013



(unaudited)

ASSETS





Cash and cash equivalents


$

9,189


$

9,424

Marketable securities


2,106


1,943

Finance receivables, net


75,063


81,636

Net investment in operating leases


13,553


18,277

Notes and accounts receivable from affiliated companies


1,173


1,077

Derivative financial instruments


1,256


585

Other assets


2,256


2,666

Total assets


$

104,596


$

115,608






LIABILITIES





Accounts payable





Customer deposits, dealer reserves, and other


$

1,072


$

1,445

Affiliated companies


234


211

Total accounts payable


1,306


1,656

Debt


89,258


98,693

Deferred income taxes


1,669


1,627

Derivative financial instruments


400


506

Other liabilities and deferred income


2,310


2,522

Total liabilities


94,943


105,004






SHAREHOLDER'S INTEREST





Shareholder's interest


5,274


5,217

Accumulated other comprehensive income


743


717

Retained earnings


3,636


4,670

Total shareholder's interest


9,653


10,604

Total liabilities and shareholder's interest


$

104,596


$

115,608

__________

Certain prior period amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheet were reclassified to conform to current year presentation.


The following table includes assets to be used to settle the liabilities of the consolidated variable interest entities ("VIEs"). These assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated balance sheet above.




December 31,
2012


December 31,
2013



(unaudited)

ASSETS





Cash and cash equivalents


$

2,877


$

4,198

Finance receivables, net


47,190


45,796

Net investment in operating leases


6,308


8,116

Derivative financial instruments


4


5






LIABILITIES





Debt


$

40,245


$

40,728

Derivative financial instruments


134


88




FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

APPENDIX


In evaluating Ford Credit's financial performance, Ford Credit management uses financial measures based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), as well as financial measures that include adjustments from GAAP.


RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP:


Net Finance Receivables and Operating Leases


December 31,
2012


December 31,
2013

Receivables (a)


(in billions)

Net Receivables





Finance Receivables – North America Segment





Consumer





   Retail financing


$

39.5


$

40.9

Non-Consumer





   Dealer financing (b)


19.5


22.1

   Other


1.1


1.0

      Total finance receivables -- North America Segment


60.1


64.0

Finance Receivables – International Segment





Consumer





   Retail financing


9.0


10.8

Non-Consumer





   Dealer financing (b)


7.5


8.3

   Other


0.4


0.4

      Total finance receivables -- International Segment


16.9


19.5

Unearned interest supplements


(1.5)


(1.5)

Allowance for credit losses


(0.4)


(0.4)

      Finance receivables, net


75.1


81.6

Net investment in operating leases (c)


13.6


18.3

      Total net receivables


$

88.7


$

99.9






Managed receivables





Total net receivables


$

88.7


$

99.9

Unearned interest supplements and residual support


2.6


3.1

Allowance for credit losses


0.4


0.4

Other, primarily accumulated supplemental depreciation



   Total managed receivables (d)


$

91.7


$

103.4



Managed Leverage Calculation


December 31,
2012


December 31,
2013



(in billions)

Total debt (e)


$

89.3


$

98.7

Adjustments for cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (f)


(10.9)


(10.8)

Adjustments for derivative accounting (g)


(0.8)


(0.2)

Total adjusted debt


$

77.6


$

87.7






Equity (h)


$

9.7


$

10.6

Adjustments for derivative accounting (g)


(0.3)


(0.3)

Total adjusted equity


$

9.4


$

10.3






Managed leverage (to 1) = Total adjusted debt / Total adjusted equity


8.3


8.5

Memo:  Financial statement leverage (to 1) = Total debt / Equity


9.2


9.3


__________

(a)

Includes finance receivables (retail and wholesale) sold for legal purposes and net investment in operating leases included in securitization transactions that do not satisfy the requirements for accounting sale treatment. These receivables and operating leases are reported on Ford Credit's balance sheet and are available only for payment of the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions; they are not available to pay the other obligations of Ford Credit or the claims of Ford Credit's other creditors.

(b)

Dealer financing primarily includes wholesale loans to dealers to finance the purchase of vehicle inventory.

(c)

Beginning in the fourth quarter, Ford Credit changed its accounting method to include unearned interest supplements and residual support in Net investment

in operating leases. These amounts are amortized to Depreciation on vehicles subject to operating leases. The prior period was revised to conform to current

year presentation. There is no change to profit before income tax or net income.

(d)

The prior period was revised to conform to current year presentation.

(e)

Includes debt reported on Ford Credit's balance sheet that is issued in securitization transactions and payable only out of collections on the underlying securitized assets and related enhancements. Ford Credit holds the right to receive the excess cash flows not needed to pay the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions.

(f)

Excludes marketable securities related to insurance activities.

(g)

Primarily related to market valuation adjustments to derivatives due to movements in interest rates. Adjustments to debt are related to designated fair value hedges and adjustments to equity are related to retained earnings.

(h)

Shareholder's interest reported on Ford Credit's balance sheet.

 

 

SOURCE Ford Motor Credit Company

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Between 2005 and 2020, data volumes will grow by a factor of 300 – enough data to stack CDs from the earth to the moon 162 times. This has come to be known as the ‘big data’ phenomenon. Unfortunately, traditional approaches to handling, storing and analyzing data aren’t adequate at this scale: they’re too costly, slow and physically cumbersome to keep up. Fortunately, in response a new breed of technology has emerged that is cheaper, faster and more scalable. Yet, in meeting these new needs they...
The cloud promises new levels of agility and cost-savings for Big Data, data warehousing and analytics. But it’s challenging to understand all the options – from IaaS and PaaS to newer services like HaaS (Hadoop as a Service) and BDaaS (Big Data as a Service). In her session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Hannah Smalltree, a director at Cazena, provided an educational overview of emerging “as-a-service” options for Big Data in the cloud. This is critical background for IT and data professionals...
"Once customers get a year into their IoT deployments, they start to realize that they may have been shortsighted in the ways they built out their deployment and the key thing I see a lot of people looking at is - how can I take equipment data, pull it back in an IoT solution and show it in a dashboard," stated Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
@DevOpsSummit taking place June 6-8, 2017 at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers is now open.
Fact is, enterprises have significant legacy voice infrastructure that’s costly to replace with pure IP solutions. How can we bring this analog infrastructure into our shiny new cloud applications? There are proven methods to bind both legacy voice applications and traditional PSTN audio into cloud-based applications and services at a carrier scale. Some of the most successful implementations leverage WebRTC, WebSockets, SIP and other open source technologies. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Da...
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
"IoT is going to be a huge industry with a lot of value for end users, for industries, for consumers, for manufacturers. How can we use cloud to effectively manage IoT applications," stated Ian Khan, Innovation & Marketing Manager at Solgeniakhela, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Information technology is an industry that has always experienced change, and the dramatic change sweeping across the industry today could not be truthfully described as the first time we've seen such widespread change impacting customer investments. However, the rate of the change, and the potential outcomes from today's digital transformation has the distinct potential to separate the industry into two camps: Organizations that see the change coming, embrace it, and successful leverage it; and...