Welcome!

News Feed Item

Bank of the James Reports Fourth Quarter, Full Year 2013 Financial Results

Record 2013 Earnings Reflect Loan Growth, Expense Management, Strong Asset Quality

LYNCHBURG, VA -- (Marketwired) -- 01/28/14 -- Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BOTJ), the parent company of Bank of the James, a full-service commercial and retail bank serving the Greater Lynchburg MSA, commonly known as "Region 2000" and other markets in Central Virginia, today announced unaudited results for the three months and 12 months ended December 31, 2013.

Performance Highlights

  • Net income for the three months ended December 31, 2013 was $663,000 or $0.20 per diluted share, compared with $747,000 or $0.22 per diluted share for the three months ended December 31, 2012.
  • Net income for the 12 months ended December 31, 2013 was $3.06 million or $0.91 per diluted share, up 44% compared with $2.13 million or $0.64 per diluted share for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012.
  • Net interest income after provision for loan losses was $3.89 million in fourth quarter 2013 compared with $3.50 million in fourth quarter 2012. For the 12 months of 2013, net interest income after loan loss provision increased to $15.45 million from $13.45 million for the 12 months of 2012. Both 2013 periods reflected lower year-over-year provisions for loan losses.
  • Noninterest income from fees, service charges and commissions, including fees from the bank's expanded line of treasury management services for commercial customers, grew in 2013 to $1.35 million compared with $1.23 million in 2012.
  • Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses, rose to $339.99 million at December 31, 2013 compared with $319.92 million at December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting growth in commercial real estate and construction lending and selectively retained purchase mortgage originations.
  • The bank's focus on continued prudent credit and risk management practices was reflected in a 52% reduction in nonaccruing loans, resulting in a decline in the ratio of nonaccruing loans to total loans to 0.89% at December 31, 2013 compared with 1.95% at December 31, 2012.
  • All key asset quality ratios improved year-over-year, including a nonperforming assets to total assets ratio of 1.04% at year-end 2013 compared with 1.92% at year-end 2012.
  • Expanding its market reach in 2013, the bank established loan production offices in Charlottesville and Roanoke, Virginia.
  • For the 12 months of 2013, return on average assets (ROAA) and return on average equity (ROAE) increased year- over-year to 0.71% and 10.13%, respectively, compared with 0.50% and 7.76%, respectively, for the 12 months of 2012.
  • Book value per share was $8.85 at December 31, 2013 compared with $8.83 per share at December 31, 2012.

Robert R. Chapman III, President and CEO, commented: "Our financial performance in 2013 reflects the accomplishments of our entire team to deliver growth, combined with asset quality ratios that meet or exceed rigorous goals for balance sheet strength. Earnings in 2013 reflect meaningful year-over-year growth and balance sheet improvement, and were the highest in our company's history. Key measures of shareholder value, including ROAA, ROAE, book value and total stockholders' equity, demonstrated year-over-year increases.

"The year presented numerous opportunities and challenges that called for nimble response. Most financial institutions, including Bank of the James, felt the combined impact of the residential refinancing mortgage slowdown, commercial loan pay downs, and a low interest rate environment for much of the year, followed by interest rate uncertainty and volatility in the latter half of the year.

"We met these challenges head-on with disciplined interest expense management, operating expense control, and by building our purchase mortgage business and adding new commercial loans. We were particularly gratified by our commercial banking performance. During the year, we added 42 new business clients with loan relationships greater than $200,000 that generated $50.4 million in loan commitments. We also emphasized expanding commercial banking relationships, which generated new deposits and increased use of our full suite of fee-based commercial banking products and electronic treasury management services. Fees from these services increased tenfold year-over-year. Our mortgage division focused on replacing refinancings with purchase mortgages, which now comprise more than 70% of the division's total mortgage originations.

"As we enter 2014, we believe the bank is well positioned to grow in our Region 2000 market and generate business through our new Charlottesville and Roanoke offices. We are also implementing an increased effort on calling on customers and potential customers in Appomattox where the bank has purchased a site for future expansion. We intend to apply the disciplined principles of credit and risk management that have enabled us to maintain high quality in our loan portfolio."

Fourth Quarter 2013 Income Statement Highlights
Net income for the three months ended December 31, 2013 was $663,000 or $0.20 per diluted share, compared with $747,000 or $0.22 per diluted share for the three months ended December 31, 2012. Net income in fourth quarter 2012 included a $263,000 gain on the sale of securities, compared with a $51,000 gain on the sale of securities in the fourth quarter 2013.

For the three months ended December 31, 2013, total interest income was $4.75 million compared with $4.66 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, primarily reflecting modest growth in income from loans. Net interest income after provision for loan losses was $3.89 million in fourth quarter 2013 compared with $3.50 million in fourth quarter 2012. The bank reduced its provision for loan losses to $250,000 in fourth quarter 2013 compared with $513,000 in fourth quarter 2012.

Interest expense declined to $607,000 in fourth quarter 2013 compared with $651,000 in fourth quarter 2012. Despite continuing pressure on margins, the bank's net interest margin expanded to 4.14% in fourth quarter 2013 compared with 4.10% in fourth quarter 2012.

J. Todd Scruggs, CFO, commented: "During a period when the banking industry has battled net interest margin declines, we have been able to offer competitive rates and also deliver value to customers that extends beyond mere pricing considerations. Our loan portfolio also reflects sensitivity to potential interest rate increases, providing the opportunity to respond to prevailing rates. We anticipate being able to maintain net interest margin in the 4%-plus range, with upside potential if interest rates increase."

Noninterest income in fourth quarter 2013 was $840,000 compared with $1.05 million in fourth quarter 2012, partially reflecting a decline in mortgage fee income as refinancing activity slowed, and a decline in gains on securities sales. Income from fees, service charges and commissions in fourth quarter 2013 increased to $371,000 compared with $319,000 in fourth quarter 2012, primarily reflecting income from commercial treasury management services.

Full Year 2013 Income Statement Highlights
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2013, net income was $3.06 million or $0.91 per diluted share compared with $2.13 million or $0.64 per diluted share for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012.

Net interest income after provision for loan losses was $15.45 million in 2013, a 15% increase compared with $13.45 million in 2012. The company's provision for loan losses was $540,000 in 2013 compared with $2.29 million in 2012, reflecting significant asset quality improvement year-over-year. Total interest expense declined to $2.44 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2013 compared with $3.02 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012.

Noninterest income for the 12 months ended December 31, 2013 was $3.48 million compared with $3.62 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012. Mortgage fee income was comparable year-over-year as mortgage activity slowed in the second half of 2013. Income from service charges, fees and commissions increased to $1.35 million in 2013 compared with $1.23 million in 2012, partially reflecting significant growth in fees from commercial treasury management services.

Noninterest expense was $14.83 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2013, compared with $14.39 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012. The 2013 total reflected an increase in compensation expenses, which included the addition of personnel in the company's Roanoke and Charlottesville offices and occupancy costs related to the new offices. Expenses related to owned real estate declined to $506,000 in 2013 compared with $798,000 in 2012 as the company continued to reduce its portfolio of foreclosed and OREO properties. It is anticipated that OREO expenses will continue to decline in 2014.

Balance Sheet Highlights and Outlook
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses, were $339.99 million at December 31, 2013 compared with $319.92 million at December 31, 2012. The loan loss allowance in 2013 was $5.19 million compared with $5.54 million in 2012.

"In addition to increased commercial real estate and construction lending activity, we added what we believe to be quality 1-4 family loans to our portfolio," Chapman noted. "Modest upward interest rate trends made it more attractive to selectively retain mortgage loans. Commercial lending added diversity to the bank's total loan portfolio. Continued balance in our portfolio is a key goal in 2014."

Total deposits at December 31, 2013 were $387.40 million compared with $399.02 million at December 31, 2012. Year-end 2012 totals partially reflected a temporary increase to professional settlement accounts related to end-of-the-year real estate and business closings. Total assets were $434.51 million at December 31, 2013 compared with $441.38 million at December 31, 2012, partially reflecting a 31% year-over-year decline in OREO. At December 31, 2013, OREO declined to $1.45 million compared with $2.11 million at December 31, 2012, reflecting steady disposition of owned properties and few assets being added to OREO.

The bank's balance sheet demonstrated continued year-over-year improvement. Total nonperforming loans declined 52% to $3.07 million compared with $6.35 million at December 31, 2012. This lowered the company's ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans to 0.89% at December 31, 2013 compared with 1.95% at December 31, 2012. Total nonperforming assets were $4.52 million at December 31, 2013, down 46.6% from $8.46 million at December 31, 2012.

With sufficient reserves for loan losses and a decline in problem credits, the company's allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 169% at December 31, 2013 compared with 87% at December 31, 2012. The bank's "Texas Ratio" (NPAs + Troubled Debt Restructurings: Capital + Loan Loss Reserve), a measurement of asset quality, was 11.3% at December 31, 2013.

Continued improvement in asset quality and overall bank performance contributed to a return on average assets of 0.71% in 2013, up from 0.50% in 2012, and a return on average equity of 10.13% in 2013 compared with 7.76% in the 2012. Total stockholders' equity increased to $29.77 million at December 31, 2013 compared with $29.61 million at December 31, 2012.

The bank remained "well capitalized" by accepted regulatory standards, with an approximate tier 1 to average total assets ratio of 9.11%, an approximate tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 11.93% and an approximate total risk-based capital ratio of 13.18%.

About the Company
Bank of the James, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc., serves the greater Lynchburg, Virginia MSA, often referred to as Region 2000, and other markets in Central Virginia. The bank operates nine full service locations, two loan production offices, and an investment services division in downtown Lynchburg. The company is celebrating its 15th anniversary this year. Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. common stock is listed under the symbol "BOTJ" on the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "plan" and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Bank of the James Financial Group (the "Company") undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to competition, general economic conditions, potential changes in interest rates, and changes in the value of real estate securing loans made by Bank of the James (the "Bank"), a subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and previously filed by the Bank (as predecessor of the Company) with the Federal Reserve Board.

FINANCIAL TABLES FOLLOW

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(000's) except ratios and percent data
unaudited



                  Three      Three               Year       Year
                 months     months                to         to
                 ending     ending               date       date
                 Dec 31,    Dec 31,             Dec 31,    Dec 31,
Selected Data:    2013       2012     Change     2013       2012     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest
 income        $    4,751 $    4,659    1.97% $   18,428 $   18,753   -1.73%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest
 expense              607        651   -6.76%      2,439      3,016  -19.13%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest
 income             4,144      4,008    3.39%     15,989     15,737    1.60%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for
 loan losses          250        513  -51.27%        540      2,289  -76.41%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noninterest
 income               840      1,052  -20.15%      3,478      3,618   -3.87%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noninterest
 expense            3,807      3,518    8.21%     14,578     14,144    3.07%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amortization
 of tax credit
 investment           247        247    0.00%        247        247    0.00%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes           17         35  -51.43%      1,042        543   91.90%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income            663        747  -11.24%      3,060      2,132   43.53%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
 average
 shares
 outstanding    3,356,926  3,345,573    0.34%  3,353,784  3,343,210    0.32%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic net
 income per
 share         $     0.20 $     0.22 $ (0.02) $     0.91 $     0.64 $  0.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fully diluted
 net income
 per share     $     0.20 $     0.22 $ (0.02) $     0.91 $     0.64 $  0.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Balance Sheet
 at period       Dec 31,    Dec 31,             Dec 31,    Dec 31,
 end:             2013       2012     Change     2012       2011     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans, net     $  339,994 $  319,922    6.27% $  319,922 $  318,754    0.37%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans held for
 sale               1,921        904  112.50%        904        434  108.29%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
 securities        49,628     53,369   -7.01%     53,369     56,471   -5.49%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deposits    387,398    399,015   -2.91%    399,015    374,234    6.62%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders'
 equity            29,772     29,613    0.54%     29,613     26,805   10.48%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets      434,511    441,381   -1.56%    441,381    427,436    3.26%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares
 outstanding    3,364,874  3,352,725  12,149   3,352,725  3,342,418  10,307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book value per
 share         $     8.85 $     8.83 $  0.02  $     8.83 $     8.02 $  0.81
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                       Three     Three              Year      Year
                       months    months              to        to
                       ending    ending             date      date
                      Dec 31,   Dec 31,           Dec 31,   Dec 31,
Daily averages:         2013      2012   Change     2013      2012   Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans, net           $ 333,415 $ 319,714   4.29% $ 327,652 $ 317,198   3.30%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans held for sale        770     1,109 -30.57%       883     1,109 -20.38%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total securities        53,649    51,231   4.72%    51,370    57,353 -10.43%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deposits         393,852   390,340   0.90%   390,094   384,802   1.38%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders' equity    31,412    28,189  11.43%    30,204    27,474   9.94%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest earning
 assets                399,784   390,849   2.29%   394,551   392,855   0.43%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest bearing
 liabilities           337,207   336,040   0.35%   335,185   341,846  -1.95%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets           439,394   430,578   2.05%   433,164   429,897   0.76%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                    Three     Three               Year      Year
                   months    months                to        to
                   ending    ending               date      date
                   Dec 31,   Dec 31,             Dec 31,   Dec 31,
Financial Ratios:   2013      2012     Change     2013      2012     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on average
 assets               0.60%     0.69%    (0.09)     0.71%     0.50%     0.21
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on average
 equity               8.37%    10.51%    (2.14)    10.13%     7.76%     2.37
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest
 margin               4.14%     4.10%     0.04      4.08%     4.03%     0.05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efficiency ratio     76.38%    69.53%     6.85     74.89%    73.08%     1.81
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average equity to
 average assets       7.15%     6.55%     0.60      6.97%     6.39%     0.58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                          Three    Three             Year     Year
                          months   months             to       to
                          ending   ending            date     date
Allowance for loan       Dec 31,  Dec 31,          Dec 31,  Dec 31,
 losses:                   2013     2012   Change    2013     2012   Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning balance        $ 4,983  $ 5,693  -12.47% $ 5,535  $ 5,612   -1.37%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for losses         250      513  -51.27%     540    2,289  -76.41%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge-offs                 (135)    (749) -81.98%  (1,105)  (2,599) -57.48%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recoveries                    88       78   12.82%     216      233   -7.30%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ending balance             5,186    5,535   -6.31%   5,186    5,535   -6.31%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                             Dec 31, Dec 31,         Dec 31, Dec 31,
Nonperforming assets:          2013    2012  Change    2012    2011  Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total nonperforming loans    $ 3,066 $ 6,346 -51.69% $ 6,346 $10,376 -38.84%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other real estate owned        1,451   2,112 -31.30%   2,112   3,253 -35.08%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total nonperforming assets     4,517   8,458 -46.59%   8,458  13,629 -37.94%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troubled debt restructurings
 - (performing portion)          564     572  -1.40%     572     783 -26.95%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                               Dec     Dec             Dec     Dec
                               31,     31,             31,     31,
Asset quality ratios:         2013    2012   Change   2012    2011   Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonperforming loans to total
 loans                         0.89%   1.95%  (1.06)   1.95%   3.20%  (1.25)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance for loan losses to
 total loans                   1.50%   1.70%  (0.20)   1.70%   1.73%  (0.03)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance for loan losses to
 nonperforming loans         169.15%  87.22%  81.93   87.22%  54.09%  33.13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Add to Digg Bookmark with del.icio.us Add to Newsvine

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
You think you know what’s in your data. But do you? Most organizations are now aware of the business intelligence represented by their data. Data science stands to take this to a level you never thought of – literally. The techniques of data science, when used with the capabilities of Big Data technologies, can make connections you had not yet imagined, helping you discover new insights and ask new questions of your data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sarbjit Sarkaria, data science team lead ...
The IoT has the potential to create a renaissance of manufacturing in the US and elsewhere. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Florent Solt, CTO and chief architect of Netvibes, will discuss how the expected exponential increase in the amount of data that will be processed, transported, stored, and accessed means there will be a huge demand for smart technologies to deliver it. Florent Solt is the CTO and chief architect of Netvibes. Prior to joining Netvibes in 2007, he co-founded Rift Technol...
If there is anything we have learned by now, is that every business paves their own unique path for releasing software- every pipeline, implementation and practices are a bit different, and DevOps comes in all shapes and sizes. Software delivery practices are often comprised of set of several complementing (or even competing) methodologies – such as leveraging Agile, DevOps and even a mix of ITIL, to create the combination that’s most suitable for your organization and that maximize your busines...
Struggling to keep up with increasing application demand? Learn how Platform as a Service (PaaS) can streamline application development processes and make resource management easy.
New Relic, Inc. has announced a set of new features across the New Relic Software Analytics Cloud that offer IT operations teams increased visibility, and the ability to diagnose and resolve performance problems quickly. The new features further IT operations teams’ ability to leverage data and analytics, as well as drive collaboration and a common, shared understanding between teams. Software teams are under pressure to resolve performance issues quickly and improve availability, as the comple...
The proper isolation of resources is essential for multi-tenant environments. The traditional approach to isolate resources is, however, rather heavyweight. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Igor Drobiazko, co-founder of elastic.io, will draw upon their own experience with operating a Docker container-based infrastructure on a large scale and present a lightweight solution for resource isolation using microservices. He will also discuss the implementation of microservices in data and applicat...
Join IBM June 8 at 18th Cloud Expo at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn how to innovate like a startup and scale for the enterprise. You need to deliver quality applications faster and cheaper, attract and retain customers with an engaging experience across devices, and seamlessly integrate your enterprise systems. And you can't take 12 months to do it.
See storage differently! Storage performance problems have only gotten worse and harder to solve as applications have become largely virtualized and moved to a cloud-based infrastructure. Storage performance in a virtualized environment is not just about IOPS, it is about how well that potential performance is guaranteed to individual VMs for these apps as the number of VMs keep going up real time. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, in product and marketing at Tintri, will discu...
Machine Learning helps make complex systems more efficient. By applying advanced Machine Learning techniques such as Cognitive Fingerprinting, wind project operators can utilize these tools to learn from collected data, detect regular patterns, and optimize their own operations. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Stuart Gillen, Director of Business Development at SparkCognition, will discuss how research has demonstrated the value of Machine Learning in delivering next generation analytics to im...
This is not a small hotel event. It is also not a big vendor party where politicians and entertainers are more important than real content. This is Cloud Expo, the world's longest-running conference and exhibition focused on Cloud Computing and all that it entails. If you want serious presentations and valuable insight about Cloud Computing for three straight days, then register now for Cloud Expo.
As you respond to increasing requests for new analytics, you need fast and flexible technology in your arsenal so that you can deploy the right workload to the right platform for the need at hand. Do you need self-service and fast time to value? Do you have data and application control and privacy needs, along with strict SLAs to meet? IBM dashDB™ is data warehouse technology powered by in-memory computing and in-database analytics that are designed for fast results, scalability and more.
SYS-CON Events announced today that SoftLayer, an IBM Company, has been named “Gold Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York, New York. SoftLayer, an IBM Company, provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. SoftLayer’s customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.
So, you bought into the current machine learning craze and went on to collect millions/billions of records from this promising new data source. Now, what do you do with them? Too often, the abundance of data quickly turns into an abundance of problems. How do you extract that "magic essence" from your data without falling into the common pitfalls? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Natalia Ponomareva, Software Engineer at Google, will provide tips on how to be successful in large scale machine lear...
Up until last year, enterprises that were looking into cloud services usually undertook a long-term pilot with one of the large cloud providers, running test and dev workloads in the cloud. With cloud’s transition to mainstream adoption in 2015, and with enterprises migrating more and more workloads into the cloud and in between public and private environments, the single-provider approach must be revisited. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Yoav Mor, multi-cloud solution evangelist at Cloudy...
IoT device adoption is growing at staggering rates, and with it comes opportunity for developers to meet consumer demand for an ever more connected world. Wireless communication is the key part of the encompassing components of any IoT device. Wireless connectivity enhances the device utility at the expense of ease of use and deployment challenges. Since connectivity is fundamental for IoT device development, engineers must understand how to overcome the hurdles inherent in incorporating multipl...