Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

The US Men's Toiletries Market: What Consumers Use and Why?

LONDON, Jan. 29, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com just published a new market research report:

The US Men's Toiletries Market: What Consumers Use and Why?

Product Synopsis

This report provides the results for the Men's Toiletries market in the US from Canadean's unique, highly detailed study of consumers' Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) consumption habits, and forms part of an overall series covering all CPG product markets. Its coverage includes, but is not limited to, consumption behaviors, the extent to which consumer trends influence their consumption, the value of the market these trends influence, and brand and private label choices as well as retailer choices. Much of this information can also be analyzed by specific consumer groups, providing hard and fast data on consumers and markets at the product category level.

Introduction and Landscape

Why was the report written?
Marketers in the Men's Toiletries market face a major challenge. Understanding market size and segmentation is valuable, but the key to effective targeting is knowing just how valuable specific consumer groups are, and being able to quantify the impact of consumer trends. This data report solves these problems by providing survey-based data on consumer trends and consumer groups, and market data that shows the exact size of consumer groups, how much of the Men's Toiletries market they account for, and which consumer trends drive their behavior.

What is the current market landscape and what is changing?
As consumer confidence increases proportionally to economic recovery, consumer trends will be directly affected. Since the global financial crisis of 2008–2009 the retail market has been characterized by an increase in the amount of discounted and own-brand products. While Men's Disposable Razors and Blades may be deemed essential items, Pre-shave Cosmetics, Post-shave Cosmetics, and Aftershaves and Colognes may not, and therefore consumption patterns have been affected. As economic and market recovery continues over 2012, consumption patterns will record a positive trend in both the Medium and Heavy frequency bands and the amount of Non-users should decrease.

What are the key drivers behind recent market changes?
Consumers' uptake of products and the influence of consumer trends are fundamental causes of change in markets – making knowing what these trends are and the extent of their influence crucial. The survey-based data provided in this report examines over 20 consumer trends that affect the market and examines the share of consumption across 26 consumer groups. This data provides a detailed insight into exactly who the consumer is and just how much impact the latest consumer trends are having.

What makes this report unique and essential to read?
The data provided is unique in the market as it tracks consumer behavior through to its actual value impact on a product market. This provides readers with a unique data analysis of the market, allowing marketing tactics and strategy to be updated in line with the very latest consumer behaviors.

Key Features and Benefits

Consumer data, based upon proprietary surveys and then consumer group tracking and modeling for the following specific categories: Aftershaves and Colognes, Men's Disposable Razors and Blades, Post-shave Cosmetics, and Pre-shave Cosmetics.

Detailed consumer segmentation covering over 26 consumer groups, 20 consumer trends, and consumption frequency for each product category.

Consumer penetration for brands and private labels, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.

Unique retailer choice data at the product category level, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.

Key Market Issues

While overall consumption of Pre-shave Cosmetics tends to decline as consumers get older, consumption frequency increases, with growing numbers of Heavy users. However, the number of Heavy users remains relatively low, indicating that suppliers need to develop strategies to increase users' consumption frequency.

Almost a quarter of Pre-Mid-Lifers are Heavy frequency consumers of Post-shave Cosmetics and approximately a third are Medium frequency consumers. This indicates that Post-shave Cosmetics play a habitual role in this age group's grooming routine.

While similar levels of Older Young Adults and Pre-Mid-Lifers consume Aftershaves and Colognes, Heavy frequency consumption is higher among Pre-Mid-Lifers. One reason for this is their greater disposable income.

Key Highlights

Market valuation reveals that the US men's toiletries market is dominated by Disposable Razors and Blades, which account for 70% of the market by value. This product category is followed by Aftershaves and Colognes and Pre-shave Cosmetics.

Brand data analysis reveals that, in volume terms, private labels have less than a 10% share of the men's toiletries market in the US. Private label presence is highest for Post-shave Cosmetics and lowest for Aftershaves and Colognes.

Increasing interest in grooming among men is the most important trend in the US Aftershaves and Colognes market. This bodes well for the market, which should increase in size, though consumers may begin demanding a wider breadth of products, threatening the market shares of established brands.

1 Introduction
1.1 What is this Report About?
1.2 Definitions
1.2.1 Consumer Trends
1.2.2 Consumer Groups
1.2.3 End Consumers
1.2.4 Volume Units and Aggregations
1.2.5 Population Profiles (for interpretation of tables and charts)
2 Methodology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Initial data are based on a large scale, international program of online consumer surveys
2.3 Demographic groups tracking provides time series data
3 Consumer Segmentation, Group Value and Trend Influence
3.1 Cohort Groups and Men's Toiletries Market Value
3.1.1 Age Groups
3.1.2 Gender Groups
3.1.3 Location Groups
3.1.4 Education Achieved Groups
3.1.5 Wealth Groups
3.1.6 Busy Lives Groups
3.2 Cohort Groups and Market Value by Category
3.2.1 Aftershaves and Colognes
3.2.2 Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
3.2.3 Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
3.2.4 Pre-shave Cosmetics
3.3 Behavioral Trends and Market Value
3.3.1 Aftershaves and Colognes
3.3.2 Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
3.3.3 Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
3.3.4 Pre-shave Cosmetics
4 Consumption Analysis
4.1 Consumption Frequencies by Age and Gender
4.1.1 Aftershaves and Colognes
4.1.2 Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
4.1.3 Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
4.1.4 Pre-shave Cosmetics
4.2 Consumer Profiles by Product Category
4.2.1 Aftershaves and Colognes
4.2.2 Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
4.2.3 Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
4.2.4 Pre-shave Cosmetics
5 Brand vs. Private Label Uptake
5.1 Brand vs. Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.1.1 By Category
5.2 Men's Toiletries Brand Choice and Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.2.1 Aftershaves and Colognes
5.2.2 Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
5.2.3 Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
5.2.4 Pre-shave Cosmetics
6 The Share of Consumers Influenced by Trends
6.1 Trend Drivers of Consumers' Product Choices
6.1.1 Overall Men's Toiletries
6.1.2 Aftershaves and Colognes
6.1.3 Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
6.1.4 Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
6.1.5 Pre-shave Cosmetics
7 Consumption Impact: Market Valuation
7.1 Men's Toiletries Value Impact of Consumer Consumption Behavior
7.1.1 Market Value by Category
7.1.2 Market Volume by Category
7.2 Men's Toiletries Value Analysis by Category
7.2.1 Market Value by Category
7.2.2 Expenditure per Capita by Category
7.2.3 Expenditure per Household by Category
7.3 Men's Toiletries Volume Impact of Consumer Behavior Trends
7.3.1 Market Volume by Category
7.3.2 Consumption per Capita by Category
7.3.3 Consumption Per Household by Category
8 Retailer Choice and Category Share
8.1 Retailer Volume Share by Category
8.1.1 Retail Share by Volume - Aftershaves and Colognes
8.1.2 Retail Share by Volume - Men's Disposable Razors and Blades
8.1.3 Retail Share by Volume - Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's
8.1.4 Retail Share by Volume - Pre-shave Cosmetics
8.2 Profiles of End-Consumers of Men's Toiletries, by Retailer Used
8.2.1 Costco
8.2.2 Kroger
8.2.3 Publix
8.2.4 Safeway
8.2.5 Wal-Mart
8.2.6 Other
9 Appendix
9.1 About Canadean
9.2 Disclaimer

List of Tables

Table 1: Volume Units for the Men's Toiletries Market
Table 2: United States Survey Respondent profile (weighted), 2012
Table 3: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Table 4: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Table 5: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Table 6: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Table 7: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Table 8: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Table 9: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 10: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 11: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 12: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 13: United States Total Aftershaves and Colognes Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 14: United States Total Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 15: United States Total Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 16: United States Total Pre-shave Cosmetics Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 17: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 18: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 19: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 20: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 21: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 22: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 23: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 24: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 25: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 26: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 27: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 28: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 29: United States Men's Toiletries Private Label Consumer Penetration (% Consumers Using), by Category, 2012
Table 30: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 31: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 32: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 33: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 34: United States, Overall Men's Toiletries: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 35: United States, Aftershaves and Colognes: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 36: United States, Men's Disposable Razors and Blades: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 37: United States, Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 38: United States, Pre-shave Cosmetics: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 39: United States Men's Toiletries Market Value (US Dollar million), by Category, 2012
Table 40: United States Men's Toiletries Market Volume by Category, 2012
Table 41: United States Men's Toiletries Market Share (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Table 42: United States Men's Toiletries Expenditure Per Capita (US Dollar), by Category, 2012
Table 43: United States Men's Toiletries Expenditure Per Household (US Dollar), by Category
Table 44: United States Men's Toiletries Market Volume Share (Ltrs m Units m) by Category, 2012
Table 45: United States Men's Toiletries Consumption Per Capita by Category, 2012
Table 46: United States Men's Toiletries Consumption Per Household by Category, 2012
Table 47: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 48: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Units m), 2012
Table 49: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 50: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 51: United States: Profile of Men's Toiletries Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Costco (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 52: United States: Profile of Men's Toiletries Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Kroger (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 53: United States: Profile of Men's Toiletries Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Publix (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 54: United States: Profile of Men's Toiletries Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Safeway (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 55: United States: Profile of Men's Toiletries Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Wal-Mart (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 56: United States: Profile of Men's Toiletries Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Other (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012

List of Figures

Figure 1: Consumer Trends Report Methodology
Figure 2: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Figure 3: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Figure 4: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Figure 5: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Figure 6: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Figure 7: United States Men's Toiletries Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Figure 8: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 9: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 10: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 11: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 12: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 13: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 14: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 15: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 16: United States Men's Toiletries Market Share (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Figure 17: United States Men's Toiletries Expenditure Per Capita (US$), by Category, 2012
Figure 18: United States Men's Toiletries Expenditure Per Household (US$), by Category
Figure 19: United States Aftershaves and Colognes Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Figure 20: United States Men's Disposable Razors and Blades Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Units m), 2012
Figure 21: United States Post-Shave Cosmetics - Men's Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Figure 22: United States Pre-shave Cosmetics Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012

Companies Mentioned

Costco, Kroger, Publix, Safeway, Walmart.

Read the full report:
The US Men's Toiletries Market: What Consumers Use and Why?
http://www.reportbuyer.com/consumer_goods_retail/cosmetics_grooming/us_men_s_toiletries_market_consumers_use_why.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Male_Grooming_Products

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]  
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
Chuck Piluso presented a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. Prior to Secure Infrastructure and Services, Mr. Piluso founded North American Telecommunication Corporation, a facilities-based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier licensed by the Public Service Commission in 10 states, serving as the company's chairman and president from 1997 to 2000. Between 1990 and 1997, Mr. Piluso served as chairman & founder of International Te...
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner, Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., discussed the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and conducte...
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Arch...
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...
Malicious agents are moving faster than the speed of business. Even more worrisome, most companies are relying on legacy approaches to security that are no longer capable of meeting current threats. In the modern cloud, threat diversity is rapidly expanding, necessitating more sophisticated security protocols than those used in the past or in desktop environments. Yet companies are falling for cloud security myths that were truths at one time but have evolved out of existence.
Digital Transformation is the ultimate goal of cloud computing and related initiatives. The phrase is certainly not a precise one, and as subject to hand-waving and distortion as any high-falutin' terminology in the world of information technology. Yet it is an excellent choice of words to describe what enterprise IT—and by extension, organizations in general—should be working to achieve. Digital Transformation means: handling all the data types being found and created in the organizat...
Public Cloud IaaS started its life in the developer and startup communities and has grown rapidly to a $20B+ industry, but it still pales in comparison to how much is spent worldwide on IT: $3.6 trillion. In fact, there are 8.6 million data centers worldwide, the reality is many small and medium sized business have server closets and colocation footprints filled with servers and storage gear. While on-premise environment virtualization may have peaked at 75%, the Public Cloud has lagged in adop...