Welcome!

News Feed Item

The US Make-up Market: What Consumers Use and Why?


 

 

LONDON, Jan. 30, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com just published a new market research report:

The US Make-up Market: What Consumers Use and Why?


Product Synopsis

This report provides the results for the Make-up market in the US from Canadean's unique, highly detailed study of consumers' Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) consumption habits, and forms part of an overall series covering all CPG product markets. Its coverage includes, but is not limited to, consumption behaviors, the extent to which consumer trends influence their consumption, the value of the market these trends influence, and brand and private label choices as well as retailer choices. Much of this information can also be analyzed by specific consumer groups, providing hard and fast data on consumers and markets at the product category level.

Introduction and Landscape

Why was the report written?
Marketers in the Make-up market face a major challenge. Understanding market size and segmentation is valuable, but the key to effective targeting is knowing just how valuable specific consumer groups are, and being able to quantify the impact of consumer trends. This data report solves these problems by providing survey-based data on consumer trends and consumer groups, and market data that shows the exact size of consumer groups, how much of the Make-up market they account for, and which consumer trends drive their behavior.

What is the current market landscape and what is changing?
As consumer confidence increases proportionally to economic recovery, consumer trends will be directly affected. Since the global financial crisis of 2008–2009 the retail market has been characterized by an increase in the amount of discounted and own-brand products. Eye make-up, face make-up, lip make-up, and nail make-up are not considered essential items and therefore consumption patterns have been comparatively affected. As economic and market recovery continues over 2012, consumption patterns will record a positive trend in both the Medium and Heavy frequency bands and the amount of Non-users should decrease.

What are the key drivers behind recent market changes?
Consumers' uptake of products and the influence of consumer trends are fundamental causes of change in markets – making knowing what these trends are and the extent of their influence crucial. The survey-based data provided in this report examines over 20 consumer trends that affect the market and examines the share of consumption across 26 consumer groups. This data provides a detailed insight into exactly who the consumer is and just how much impact the latest consumer trends are having.

What makes this report unique and essential to read?
The data provided is unique in the market as it tracks consumer behavior through to its actual value impact on a product market. This provides readers with a unique data analysis of the market, allowing marketing tactics and strategy to be updated in line with the very latest consumer behaviors.


Key Features and Benefits

Consumer data, based upon proprietary surveys and then consumer group tracking and modeling for the following specific categories: Eye Make-up, Face Make-up, Lip Make-up, and Nail Make-up

Detailed consumer segmentation covering over 26 consumer groups, 20 consumer trends, and consumption frequency for each product category.

Consumer penetration for brands and private labels, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.

Unique retailer choice data at the product category level, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.


Key Market Issues

Analysis of the Make-up market in the US by age reveals that Older Consumers account for the largest share of consumption by value. This is a result of the large size of the age group, their high consumption frequency in categories such as Face Make-up and Lip Make-up and their relatively high disposable income.

The Affluent wealth group is the largest in the US Make-up market by value, followed by the Moderate Income wealth group. This indicates that there is strong potential for premium and aspirational products in the market.

Heavy consumption of Lip Make-up tends to increase with age, including one-fifth of Older Consumers in the US. While Heavy frequency consumption is common in older age groups, there are still significant numbers of Medium and Light users, indicating that Lip Make-up suppliers should develop strategies to increase these users' consumption frequency.

Key Highlights

Consumer survey results reveal that better value for money, individualism, and indulgence are key trends driving consumers' choices of Make-up products. These highlight common traits in Make-up products, such as luxury and identity, while also highlighting the weak state of the US economy. The importance of the Better value for money trend shows that consumers believe Make-up is a product category where they can control their spending by trading down or reducing their consumption frequency.

Analysis of the US Make-up market by the amount of time people have spare reveals that some of the busiest consumers account for the largest market shares by value. The Time Poor and Time Pressed consumer groups account for the majority of the US Make-up market.

Private label penetration is low in the US Make-up market, accounting for 2-7%. This is despite a mature and concentrated retail environment, which tends to result in successful private label programs. As such, retailers are expected to increase their investment in these areas in order to grow their market share.
1 Introduction
1.1 What is this Report About?
1.2 Definitions
1.2.1 Consumer Trends
1.2.2 Consumer Groups
1.2.3 End Consumers
1.2.4 Volume Units and Aggregations
1.2.5 Population Profiles (for interpretation of tables and charts)
2 Methodology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Initial data are based on a large scale, international program of online consumer surveys
2.3 Demographic groups tracking provides time series data
3 Consumer Segmentation, Group Value and Trend Influence
3.1 Cohort Groups and Make-up Market Value
3.1.1 Age Groups
3.1.2 Gender Groups
3.1.3 Location Groups
3.1.4 Education Achieved Groups
3.1.5 Wealth Groups
3.1.6 Busy Lives Groups
3.2 Cohort Groups and Market Value by Category
3.2.1 Eye Make-up
3.2.2 Face Make-up
3.2.3 Lip Make-up
3.2.4 Nail Make-up
3.3 Behavioral Trends and Market Value
3.3.1 Eye Make-up
3.3.2 Face Make-up
3.3.3 Lip Make-up
3.3.4 Nail Make-up
4 Consumption Analysis
4.1 Consumption Frequencies by Age and Gender
4.1.1 Eye Make-up
4.1.2 Face Make-up
4.1.3 Lip Make-up
4.1.4 Nail Make-up
4.2 Consumer Profiles by Product Category
4.2.1 Eye Make-up
4.2.2 Face Make-up
4.2.3 Lip Make-up
4.2.4 Nail Make-up
5 Brand vs. Private Label Uptake
5.1 Brand vs. Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.1.1 By Category
5.2 Make-up Brand Choice and Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.2.1 Eye Make-up
5.2.2 Face Make-up
5.2.3 Lip Make-up
5.2.4 Nail Make-up
6 The Share of Consumers Influenced by Trends
6.1 Trend Drivers of Consumers' Product Choices
6.1.1 Overall Make-up
6.1.2 Eye Make-up
6.1.3 Face Make-up
6.1.4 Lip Make-up
6.1.5 Nail Make-up
7 Consumption Impact: Market Valuation
7.1 Make-up Value Impact of Consumer Consumption Behavior
7.1.1 Market Value by Category
7.1.2 Market Volume by Category
7.2 Make-up Value Analysis by Category
7.2.1 Market Value by Category
7.2.2 Expenditure per Capita by Category
7.2.3 Expenditure per Household by Category
7.3 Make-up Volume Impact of Consumer Behavior Trends
7.3.1 Market Volume by Category
7.3.2 Consumption per Capita by Category
7.3.3 Consumption Per Household by Category
8 Retailer Choice and Category Share
8.1 Retailer Volume Share by Category
8.1.1 Retail Share by Volume - Eye Make-up
8.1.2 Retail Share by Volume - Face Make-up
8.1.3 Retail Share by Volume - Lip Make-up
8.1.4 Retail Share by Volume - Nail Make-up
8.2 Levels of Retailer Switching in the Last 6 Months
8.2.1 Wal-Mart
8.2.2 Other
9 Appendix
9.1 About Canadean
9.2 Disclaimer


List of Tables

Table 1: Volume Units for the Make-up Market
Table 2: United States Survey Respondent profile (weighted), 2012
Table 3: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Table 4: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Table 5: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Table 6: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Table 7: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Table 8: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Table 9: United States Eye Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 10: United States Face Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 11: United States Lip Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 12: United States Nail Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 13: United States Total Eye Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 14: United States Total Face Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 15: United States Total Lip Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 16: United States Total Nail Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 17: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 18: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 19: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 20: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 21: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 22: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 23: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 24: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 25: United States Eye Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 26: United States Face Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 27: United States Lip Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 28: United States Nail Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 29: United States Make-up Private Label Consumer Penetration (% Consumers Using), by Category, 2012
Table 30: United States Eye Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 31: United States Face Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 32: United States Lip Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 33: United States Nail Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 34: United States, Overall Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 35: United States, Eye Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 36: United States, Face Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 37: United States, Lip Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 38: United States, Nail Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 39: United States Make-up Market Value (US Dollar million), by Category, 2012
Table 40: United States Make-up Market Volume by Category, 2012
Table 41: United States Make-up Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Table 42: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Capita (US Dollar), by Category, 2012
Table 43: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Household (US Dollar), by Category
Table 44: United States Make-up Market Volume (Kg m or Ltrs m) by Category, 2012
Table 45: United States Make-up Consumption Per Capita by Category, 2012
Table 46: United States Make-up Consumption Per Household by Category, 2012
Table 47: United States Eye Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 48: United States Face Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 49: United States Lip Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 50: United States Nail Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 51: United States: Profile of Make-up Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Wal-Mart (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 52: United States: Profile of Make-up Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Other (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012


List of Figures

Figure 1: Consumer Trends Report Methodology
Figure 2: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Figure 3: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Figure 4: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Figure 5: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Figure 6: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Figure 7: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Figure 8: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 9: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 10: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 11: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 12: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 13: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 14: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 15: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 16: United States Make-up Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Figure 17: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Capita (US$), by Category, 2012
Figure 18: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Household (US$), by Category
Figure 19: United States Eye Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Figure 20: United States Face Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Figure 21: United States Lip Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Figure 22: United States Nail Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012

Companies Mentioned

Walmart


Read the full report:
The US Make-up Market: What Consumers Use and Why?
http://www.reportbuyer.com/consumer_goods_retail/cosmetics_grooming/make...

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

 

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Isomorphic Software will exhibit at DevOps Summit at 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Isomorphic Software provides the SmartClient HTML5/AJAX platform, the most advanced technology for building rich, cutting-edge enterprise web applications for desktop and mobile. SmartClient combines the productivity and performance of traditional desktop software with the simp...
With so much going on in this space you could be forgiven for thinking you were always working with yesterday’s technologies. So much change, so quickly. What do you do if you have to build a solution from the ground up that is expected to live in the field for at least 5-10 years? This is the challenge we faced when we looked to refresh our existing 10-year-old custom hardware stack to measure the fullness of trash cans and compactors.
Extreme Computing is the ability to leverage highly performant infrastructure and software to accelerate Big Data, machine learning, HPC, and Enterprise applications. High IOPS Storage, low-latency networks, in-memory databases, GPUs and other parallel accelerators are being used to achieve faster results and help businesses make better decisions. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Michael O'Neill, Strategic Business Development at NVIDIA, focused on some of the unique ways extreme computing is...
The emerging Internet of Everything creates tremendous new opportunities for customer engagement and business model innovation. However, enterprises must overcome a number of critical challenges to bring these new solutions to market. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Michael Martin, CTO/CIO at nfrastructure, outlined these key challenges and recommended approaches for overcoming them to achieve speed and agility in the design, development and implementation of Internet of Everything solutions wi...
Cloud computing is being adopted in one form or another by 94% of enterprises today. Tens of billions of new devices are being connected to The Internet of Things. And Big Data is driving this bus. An exponential increase is expected in the amount of information being processed, managed, analyzed, and acted upon by enterprise IT. This amazing is not part of some distant future - it is happening today. One report shows a 650% increase in enterprise data by 2020. Other estimates are even higher....
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
The 19th International Cloud Expo has announced that its Call for Papers is open. Cloud Expo, to be held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, brings together Cloud Computing, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, Digital Transformation, Microservices and WebRTC to one location. With cloud computing driving a higher percentage of enterprise IT budgets every year, it becomes increasingly important to plant your flag in this fast-expanding business opportuni...
Identity is in everything and customers are looking to their providers to ensure the security of their identities, transactions and data. With the increased reliance on cloud-based services, service providers must build security and trust into their offerings, adding value to customers and improving the user experience. Making identity, security and privacy easy for customers provides a unique advantage over the competition.
Qosmos has announced new milestones in the detection of encrypted traffic and in protocol signature coverage. Qosmos latest software can accurately classify traffic encrypted with SSL/TLS (e.g., Google, Facebook, WhatsApp), P2P traffic (e.g., BitTorrent, MuTorrent, Vuze), and Skype, while preserving the privacy of communication content. These new classification techniques mean that traffic optimization, policy enforcement, and user experience are largely unaffected by encryption. In respect wit...
Fact: storage performance problems have only gotten more complicated, as applications not only have become largely virtualized, but also have moved to cloud-based infrastructures. Storage performance in virtualized environments isn’t just about IOPS anymore. Instead, you need to guarantee performance for individual VMs, helping applications maintain performance as the number of VMs continues to go up in real time. In his session at Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, Product and Marketing at Tintri, wil...
19th Cloud Expo, taking place November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud strategy. Meanwhile, 94% of enterpri...
Enterprises have forever faced challenges surrounding the sharing of their intellectual property. Emerging cloud adoption has made it more compelling for enterprises to digitize their content, making them available over a wide variety of devices across the Internet. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Santosh Ahuja, Director of Architecture at Impiger Technologies, will introduce various mechanisms provided by cloud service providers today to manage and share digital content in a secure manner....
Smart Cities are here to stay, but for their promise to be delivered, the data they produce must not be put in new siloes. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mathias Herberts, Co-founder and CTO of Cityzen Data, will deep dive into best practices that will ensure a successful smart city journey.
SYS-CON Events announced today that 910Telecom will exhibit at the 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Housed in the classic Denver Gas & Electric Building, 910 15th St., 910Telecom is a carrier-neutral telecom hotel located in the heart of Denver. Adjacent to CenturyLink, AT&T, and Denver Main, 910Telecom offers connectivity to all major carriers, Internet service providers, Internet backbones and ...
To leverage Continuous Delivery, enterprises must consider impacts that span functional silos, as well as applications that touch older, slower moving components. Managing the many dependencies can cause slowdowns. See how to achieve continuous delivery in the enterprise.