Welcome!

News Feed Item

The US Make-up Market: What Consumers Use and Why?


 

 

LONDON, Jan. 30, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com just published a new market research report:

The US Make-up Market: What Consumers Use and Why?


Product Synopsis

This report provides the results for the Make-up market in the US from Canadean's unique, highly detailed study of consumers' Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) consumption habits, and forms part of an overall series covering all CPG product markets. Its coverage includes, but is not limited to, consumption behaviors, the extent to which consumer trends influence their consumption, the value of the market these trends influence, and brand and private label choices as well as retailer choices. Much of this information can also be analyzed by specific consumer groups, providing hard and fast data on consumers and markets at the product category level.

Introduction and Landscape

Why was the report written?
Marketers in the Make-up market face a major challenge. Understanding market size and segmentation is valuable, but the key to effective targeting is knowing just how valuable specific consumer groups are, and being able to quantify the impact of consumer trends. This data report solves these problems by providing survey-based data on consumer trends and consumer groups, and market data that shows the exact size of consumer groups, how much of the Make-up market they account for, and which consumer trends drive their behavior.

What is the current market landscape and what is changing?
As consumer confidence increases proportionally to economic recovery, consumer trends will be directly affected. Since the global financial crisis of 2008–2009 the retail market has been characterized by an increase in the amount of discounted and own-brand products. Eye make-up, face make-up, lip make-up, and nail make-up are not considered essential items and therefore consumption patterns have been comparatively affected. As economic and market recovery continues over 2012, consumption patterns will record a positive trend in both the Medium and Heavy frequency bands and the amount of Non-users should decrease.

What are the key drivers behind recent market changes?
Consumers' uptake of products and the influence of consumer trends are fundamental causes of change in markets – making knowing what these trends are and the extent of their influence crucial. The survey-based data provided in this report examines over 20 consumer trends that affect the market and examines the share of consumption across 26 consumer groups. This data provides a detailed insight into exactly who the consumer is and just how much impact the latest consumer trends are having.

What makes this report unique and essential to read?
The data provided is unique in the market as it tracks consumer behavior through to its actual value impact on a product market. This provides readers with a unique data analysis of the market, allowing marketing tactics and strategy to be updated in line with the very latest consumer behaviors.


Key Features and Benefits

Consumer data, based upon proprietary surveys and then consumer group tracking and modeling for the following specific categories: Eye Make-up, Face Make-up, Lip Make-up, and Nail Make-up

Detailed consumer segmentation covering over 26 consumer groups, 20 consumer trends, and consumption frequency for each product category.

Consumer penetration for brands and private labels, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.

Unique retailer choice data at the product category level, based upon the original survey and then subsequent consumer tracking and modeling.


Key Market Issues

Analysis of the Make-up market in the US by age reveals that Older Consumers account for the largest share of consumption by value. This is a result of the large size of the age group, their high consumption frequency in categories such as Face Make-up and Lip Make-up and their relatively high disposable income.

The Affluent wealth group is the largest in the US Make-up market by value, followed by the Moderate Income wealth group. This indicates that there is strong potential for premium and aspirational products in the market.

Heavy consumption of Lip Make-up tends to increase with age, including one-fifth of Older Consumers in the US. While Heavy frequency consumption is common in older age groups, there are still significant numbers of Medium and Light users, indicating that Lip Make-up suppliers should develop strategies to increase these users' consumption frequency.

Key Highlights

Consumer survey results reveal that better value for money, individualism, and indulgence are key trends driving consumers' choices of Make-up products. These highlight common traits in Make-up products, such as luxury and identity, while also highlighting the weak state of the US economy. The importance of the Better value for money trend shows that consumers believe Make-up is a product category where they can control their spending by trading down or reducing their consumption frequency.

Analysis of the US Make-up market by the amount of time people have spare reveals that some of the busiest consumers account for the largest market shares by value. The Time Poor and Time Pressed consumer groups account for the majority of the US Make-up market.

Private label penetration is low in the US Make-up market, accounting for 2-7%. This is despite a mature and concentrated retail environment, which tends to result in successful private label programs. As such, retailers are expected to increase their investment in these areas in order to grow their market share.
1 Introduction
1.1 What is this Report About?
1.2 Definitions
1.2.1 Consumer Trends
1.2.2 Consumer Groups
1.2.3 End Consumers
1.2.4 Volume Units and Aggregations
1.2.5 Population Profiles (for interpretation of tables and charts)
2 Methodology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Initial data are based on a large scale, international program of online consumer surveys
2.3 Demographic groups tracking provides time series data
3 Consumer Segmentation, Group Value and Trend Influence
3.1 Cohort Groups and Make-up Market Value
3.1.1 Age Groups
3.1.2 Gender Groups
3.1.3 Location Groups
3.1.4 Education Achieved Groups
3.1.5 Wealth Groups
3.1.6 Busy Lives Groups
3.2 Cohort Groups and Market Value by Category
3.2.1 Eye Make-up
3.2.2 Face Make-up
3.2.3 Lip Make-up
3.2.4 Nail Make-up
3.3 Behavioral Trends and Market Value
3.3.1 Eye Make-up
3.3.2 Face Make-up
3.3.3 Lip Make-up
3.3.4 Nail Make-up
4 Consumption Analysis
4.1 Consumption Frequencies by Age and Gender
4.1.1 Eye Make-up
4.1.2 Face Make-up
4.1.3 Lip Make-up
4.1.4 Nail Make-up
4.2 Consumer Profiles by Product Category
4.2.1 Eye Make-up
4.2.2 Face Make-up
4.2.3 Lip Make-up
4.2.4 Nail Make-up
5 Brand vs. Private Label Uptake
5.1 Brand vs. Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.1.1 By Category
5.2 Make-up Brand Choice and Private Label Consumer Penetration
5.2.1 Eye Make-up
5.2.2 Face Make-up
5.2.3 Lip Make-up
5.2.4 Nail Make-up
6 The Share of Consumers Influenced by Trends
6.1 Trend Drivers of Consumers' Product Choices
6.1.1 Overall Make-up
6.1.2 Eye Make-up
6.1.3 Face Make-up
6.1.4 Lip Make-up
6.1.5 Nail Make-up
7 Consumption Impact: Market Valuation
7.1 Make-up Value Impact of Consumer Consumption Behavior
7.1.1 Market Value by Category
7.1.2 Market Volume by Category
7.2 Make-up Value Analysis by Category
7.2.1 Market Value by Category
7.2.2 Expenditure per Capita by Category
7.2.3 Expenditure per Household by Category
7.3 Make-up Volume Impact of Consumer Behavior Trends
7.3.1 Market Volume by Category
7.3.2 Consumption per Capita by Category
7.3.3 Consumption Per Household by Category
8 Retailer Choice and Category Share
8.1 Retailer Volume Share by Category
8.1.1 Retail Share by Volume - Eye Make-up
8.1.2 Retail Share by Volume - Face Make-up
8.1.3 Retail Share by Volume - Lip Make-up
8.1.4 Retail Share by Volume - Nail Make-up
8.2 Levels of Retailer Switching in the Last 6 Months
8.2.1 Wal-Mart
8.2.2 Other
9 Appendix
9.1 About Canadean
9.2 Disclaimer


List of Tables

Table 1: Volume Units for the Make-up Market
Table 2: United States Survey Respondent profile (weighted), 2012
Table 3: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Table 4: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Table 5: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Table 6: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Table 7: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Table 8: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Table 9: United States Eye Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 10: United States Face Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 11: United States Lip Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 12: United States Nail Make-up Consumer Group Share (% market value), 2012
Table 13: United States Total Eye Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 14: United States Total Face Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 15: United States Total Lip Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 16: United States Total Nail Make-up Value (US Dollar millions) and Value Share Influenced by Behavioral Trends, 2012
Table 17: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 18: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 19: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 20: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 21: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 22: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 23: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group, by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 24: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Table 25: United States Eye Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 26: United States Face Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 27: United States Lip Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 28: United States Nail Make-up Consumer Profiles (% consumers by sub-group), 2012
Table 29: United States Make-up Private Label Consumer Penetration (% Consumers Using), by Category, 2012
Table 30: United States Eye Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 31: United States Face Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 32: United States Lip Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 33: United States Nail Make-up Consumer Penetration of Survey-tracked Brands and Private Label (% Consumers Using), 2012
Table 34: United States, Overall Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 35: United States, Eye Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 36: United States, Face Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 37: United States, Lip Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 38: United States, Nail Make-up: Percentage of Consumers Stating that Specific Trends Influence Their Consumption, 2012
Table 39: United States Make-up Market Value (US Dollar million), by Category, 2012
Table 40: United States Make-up Market Volume by Category, 2012
Table 41: United States Make-up Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Table 42: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Capita (US Dollar), by Category, 2012
Table 43: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Household (US Dollar), by Category
Table 44: United States Make-up Market Volume (Kg m or Ltrs m) by Category, 2012
Table 45: United States Make-up Consumption Per Capita by Category, 2012
Table 46: United States Make-up Consumption Per Household by Category, 2012
Table 47: United States Eye Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 48: United States Face Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Table 49: United States Lip Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 50: United States Nail Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Table 51: United States: Profile of Make-up Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Wal-Mart (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012
Table 52: United States: Profile of Make-up Consumers Whose Goods Mainly Come From Other (% by Subgroup, as tracked by the Survey), 2012


List of Figures

Figure 1: Consumer Trends Report Methodology
Figure 2: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Age Groups, 2012
Figure 3: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Gender, 2012
Figure 4: United States Make-up Value Share (%), by Urban and Rural Dwellers, 2012
Figure 5: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Education Level Achieved Groups, 2012
Figure 6: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Wealth Groups, 2012
Figure 7: United States Make-up Value Share (%) by Busy Lives Groups, 2012
Figure 8: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 9: United States Eye Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 10: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 11: United States Face Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 12: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 13: United States Lip Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 14: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Age Group by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 15: United States Nail Make-up Consumption Frequency Analysis (% by Gender by Consumption Group), 2012
Figure 16: United States Make-up Market Value (US$ million), by Category, 2012
Figure 17: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Capita (US$), by Category, 2012
Figure 18: United States Make-up Expenditure Per Household (US$), by Category
Figure 19: United States Eye Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Figure 20: United States Face Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Kg m), 2012
Figure 21: United States Lip Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012
Figure 22: United States Nail Make-up Survey-tracked Retailer Shares by Volume (Ltrs m), 2012

Companies Mentioned

Walmart


Read the full report:
The US Make-up Market: What Consumers Use and Why?
http://www.reportbuyer.com/consumer_goods_retail/cosmetics_grooming/make...

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

 

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
As you move to the cloud, your network should be efficient, secure, and easy to manage. An enterprise adopting a hybrid or public cloud needs systems and tools that provide: Agility: ability to deliver applications and services faster, even in complex hybrid environments Easier manageability: enable reliable connectivity with complete oversight as the data center network evolves Greater efficiency: eliminate wasted effort while reducing errors and optimize asset utilization Security: imple...
High-velocity engineering teams are applying not only continuous delivery processes, but also lessons in experimentation from established leaders like Amazon, Netflix, and Facebook. These companies have made experimentation a foundation for their release processes, allowing them to try out major feature releases and redesigns within smaller groups before making them broadly available. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Lucas, Senior Staff Engineer at Optimizely, will discuss how by using...
In this strange new world where more and more power is drawn from business technology, companies are effectively straddling two paths on the road to innovation and transformation into digital enterprises. The first path is the heritage trail – with “legacy” technology forming the background. Here, extant technologies are transformed by core IT teams to provide more API-driven approaches. Legacy systems can restrict companies that are transitioning into digital enterprises. To truly become a lead...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
The session is centered around the tracing of systems on cloud using technologies like ebpf. The goal is to talk about what this technology is all about and what purpose it serves. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Shashank Jain, Development Architect at SAP, will touch upon concepts of observability in the cloud and also some of the challenges we have. Generally most cloud-based monitoring tools capture details at a very granular level. To troubleshoot problems this might not be good enough.
SYS-CON Events announced today that CAST Software will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 - Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. CAST was founded more than 25 years ago to make the invisible visible. Built around the idea that even the best analytics on the market still leave blind spots for technical teams looking to deliver better software and prevent outages, CAST provides the software intelligence that matter ...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Daiya Industry will exhibit at the Japanese Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Ruby Development Inc. builds new services in short period of time and provides a continuous support of those services based on Ruby on Rails. For more information, please visit https://github.com/RubyDevInc.
When it comes to cloud computing, the ability to turn massive amounts of compute cores on and off on demand sounds attractive to IT staff, who need to manage peaks and valleys in user activity. With cloud bursting, the majority of the data can stay on premises while tapping into compute from public cloud providers, reducing risk and minimizing need to move large files. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Scott Jeschonek, Director of Product Management at Avere Systems, discussed the IT and busine...
As businesses evolve, they need technology that is simple to help them succeed today and flexible enough to help them build for tomorrow. Chrome is fit for the workplace of the future — providing a secure, consistent user experience across a range of devices that can be used anywhere. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, will take a look at various options as to how ChromeOS can be leveraged to interact with people on the devices, and formats th...
First generation hyperconverged solutions have taken the data center by storm, rapidly proliferating in pockets everywhere to provide further consolidation of floor space and workloads. These first generation solutions are not without challenges, however. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Wes Talbert, a Principal Architect and results-driven enterprise sales leader at NetApp, will discuss how the HCI solution of tomorrow will integrate with the public cloud to deliver a quality hybrid cloud e...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Yuasa System will exhibit at the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Yuasa System is introducing a multi-purpose endurance testing system for flexible displays, OLED devices, flexible substrates, flat cables, and films in smartphones, wearables, automobiles, and healthcare.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable? Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, will answer these questions and demonstrate techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances ...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Taica will exhibit at the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Taica manufacturers Alpha-GEL brand silicone components and materials, which maintain outstanding performance over a wide temperature range -40C to +200C. For more information, visit http://www.taica.co.jp/english/.