Welcome!

News Feed Item

Arlington Asset Investment Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Financial Results

Non-GAAP core operating income of $0.97 per share (diluted) for the fourth quarter 2013(1) or $4.15 per share (diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2013

ARLINGTON, Va., Feb. 3, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Arlington Asset Investment Corp. (NYSE: AI) (the "Company") today reported non-GAAP core operating income of $16.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, or $0.97 per share (diluted).  A reconciliation of non-GAAP core operating income to GAAP net income appears at the end of this press release.  On a GAAP basis, the Company reported net income of $40.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, or $2.36 per share (diluted), compared to net income of $3.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, or $0.18 per share (diluted), and net income of $167.1 million, or $12.56 per share (diluted), for the quarter ended December 31, 2012(4)

"2013 was a strong year for Arlington.  With the majority of our capital invested in floating rate private-label mortgage-backed securities, low leverage and substantial hedges, the Company distinguished itself by preserving book value per share through the year, recording $4.15 per share of core operating income for an 18% return on equity, and producing a 44% total shareholder return," said J. Rock Tonkel, Jr., the Company's President and Chief Operating Officer.  "We believe that the Company is similarly well positioned for 2014.  Our private-label mortgage-backed securities portfolio adjusts with increasing interest rates and has continued to appreciate with the recovery in the U.S. housing sector while we believe our agency mortgage-backed securities are well hedged.  As an internally managed company, our expense ratio to capital is lower from a year ago and can decline further as we grow, boosting return on equity.   The Company continues to generate attractive cash returns and produce dividends which will be protected by the Company's flexible and tax-advantaged C corporation structure for several more years."   

Fourth Quarter Highlights

Net interest income for the fourth quarter was $20.2 million, including non-cash accretion on private-label mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") of $1.7 million required under GAAP.  The three-month constant prepayment rate ("CPR") for the Company's agency-backed MBS as of December 31, 2013 was 6.27%.  The Company's debt to equity ratio at December 31, 2013 was approximately 3 to 1.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company's agency-backed MBS portfolio consisted of $1.5 billion in face value with a cost basis of $1.6 billion and a fair value of $1.6 billion.  As of December 31, 2013, all of the Company's agency-backed MBS were fixed-rate 30-year MBS specifically selected for their prepayment protections with a weighted average coupon of 4.08%, a weighted average cost of 107.53, a weighted average market price of 103.53, and had a weighted average cost of repo funding of 39 basis points.  On a mark-to-market basis, the Company had an average of $1.0 billion in Eurodollar futures associated with the agency-backed MBS portfolio starting in March 2015 and ending in December 2018 with a rate of 2.26% and an equivalent funding cost over the next five years of approximately 1.74%.  The Company also had $610 million in notional 10-year interest rate swap futures with a marked rate of approximately 3.19% resulting in a combined hedged notional amount of approximately $1.6 billion.  The Company added approximately $130 million in face value to its agency-backed MBS portfolio in January 2014. 

As of December 31, 2013, the Company's private-label MBS portfolio consisted of $485.9 million in face value with an amortized cost basis of $278.7 million and a fair value of $341.3 million.  The following table presents certain statistics of our private-label MBS portfolio as of or for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 (dollars in millions):

 


Total Private-Label MBS



Fair market value

$341.3

Fair market value (as a % of face value)

70.2%

Quarterly cash yield (as a % of average fair market value, excluding GAAP non-cash accretion)

6.4%



Quarterly unlevered yield (GAAP, as a % of amortized cost)

10.2%

Quarterly unlevered cash yield (as a % of average amortized cost excluding GAAP non-cash accretion)

7.9%

Average cost (as a % of face value)

53.8%

Weighted average coupon

3.3%



Face value

$485.9

Amortized cost

$278.7

Purchase discount

$207.2



60+ days delinquent

15.8%

Credit enhancement

0.3%

Severity (3-month)

37.3%

Constant prepayment rate (3-month)

14.2%

 

Dividend

The Company's Board of Directors approved a $0.875 dividend for the fourth quarter of 2013.  The dividend was paid on January 31, 2014 to shareholders of record as of December 31, 2013.  This represented a 14% annualized dividend yield based on the Class A common stock closing price on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) of $25.01 on February 3, 2014. 

(1) Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to the financial results reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as consistently applied in the United States (GAAP), the Company has disclosed non-GAAP core operating income for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 in this press release. This non-GAAP measurement is used by management to analyze and assess the Company's operating results and dividends. Management believes that this non-GAAP measurement assists investors in understanding the impact of these non-core items and non-cash expenses on the performance of the Company and provides additional clarity around the Company's forward earnings capacity and trend.

A limitation of utilizing this non-GAAP measure is that the GAAP accounting effects of these events do in fact reflect the underlying financial results of the Company's business and these effects should not be ignored in evaluating and analyzing the Company's financial results. Therefore, management believes net income on a GAAP basis and core operating income on a non-GAAP basis should be considered together.

In determining core operating income, the Company excluded certain legacy litigation expenses and the following non-cash expenses: (i) compensation costs associated with stock-based awards, (ii) accretion of MBS purchase discounts adjusted for contractual interest and principal repayments in excess of proportionate invested capital, (iii) unrealized mark-to-market adjustments on the trading MBS and hedge instruments, (iv) other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized, (v) non-cash income tax provisions, and (vi) benefit from the reversal of previously accrued federal and state tax liability and accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial results to non-GAAP measurements for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

GAAP net income

$39,997

Adjustments


    Legacy litigation expenses(a)

510

    Stock compensation

879

    Non-cash interest income related to purchase discount accretion(b)

(1,651)

    Net unrealized mark-to-market loss on trading MBS and

       hedge instruments                                                                        

13,591

    Other-than-temporary impairment charges

84

    Release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and non-cash

       income tax provisions and benefit, net

(24,520)

    Benefit from the reversal of tax liability and accrued interest related to

      uncertain tax position

(12,467)

       Non-GAAP core operating income

$16,423

Non-GAAP core operating income per share (diluted)

$0.97



(a) 

Legacy litigation expenses relate to legal matters pertaining to events related to business activities the Company completed or exited in or prior to 2009 — primarily debt extinguishment, sub-prime mortgage origination and securitization and broker/dealer operations.

(b) 

Non-cash interest income related to purchase discount accretion represents interest income recognized in excess of cash receipts related to contractual interest income and principal repayments in excess of proportionate invested capital.

 

(2)  Based on the annualized fourth quarter 2013 dividend and the Class A common stock closing price on the NYSE of $25.01 on February 3, 2014.

(3)  The Company's dividends are eligible for the 23.8% federal income tax rate on qualified dividend income, whereas dividends paid by a REIT are generally subject to the higher 43.4% tax rate on ordinary income.  To provide the same return after payment of federal income tax as the Company, a REIT would be required to pay dividends providing a 19% yield.

(4)  Net income and earnings per share (diluted) for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 reflect revisions to the federal income tax rate for deferred tax assets. The revision decreased net income by $8.7 million from $175.8 million to $167.1 million and earnings per share (diluted) by $0.65 per share from $13.21 to $12.56

About the Company

Arlington Asset Investment Corp. (NYSE: AI) is a principal investment firm that currently invests primarily in mortgage-related and other assets.  The Company is headquartered in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.  For more information, please visit www.arlingtonasset.com.

Statements concerning future performance, portfolio hedging, market conditions, cash returns and earnings, dividends, book value, cost burden on capital expense ratio, and any other guidance on present or future periods, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of factors, risks and uncertainties that might cause actual results to differ materially from stated expectations or current circumstances.  These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, increased costs of borrowing, decreased interest spreads, changes in political and monetary policies, changes in default rates, changes in the constant prepayment rate for the Company's MBS, changes in our operating efficiency, changes in the Company's returns, changes in the use of the Company's tax benefits, maintenance of the Company's low leverage posture, changes in the agency-backed MBS asset yield, changes in the Company's monetization of net operating loss carry-forwards, changes in the Company's ability to generate consistent cash earnings and dividends, preservation and utilization of our net operating loss and net capital loss carry-forwards, impacts of changes to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury, availability of opportunities that meet or exceed our risk adjusted return expectations, ability and willingness to make future dividends, ability to generate sufficient cash through retained earnings to satisfy capital needs, changes in and the effects on the Company of mortgage prepayment speeds, ability to realize book value growth through reflation of private-label MBS, and general economic, political, regulatory and market conditions.  These and other material risks are described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, and any other documents filed by the Company with the SEC from time to time, which are available from the Company and from the SEC, and you should read and understand these risks when evaluating any forward-looking statement.

 

Financial data follows

 

 

 

ARLINGTON ASSET INVESTMENT CORP.








CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS








(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended


Twelve Months Ended

(Unaudited)

December 31,


December 31,



2013


2012


2013


2012

INTEREST INCOME

$                    22,551


$                    19,241


$                    87,019


$                    64,154










INTEREST EXPENSE








  Interest on short-term debt

1,838


1,664


6,899


4,475

  Interest on long-term debt

553


119


1,630


490

    Total interest expense

2,391


1,783


8,529


4,965

    Net interest income

20,160


17,458


78,490


59,189










OTHER (LOSS) GAIN, NET








  Investment (loss) gain, net

(11,863)


809


(47,745)


(10,723)

  Other loss

(4)


(4)


(15)


(15)

    Total other (loss) gain, net

(11,867)


805


(47,760)


(10,738)

    Operating income before other expenses

8,293


18,263


30,730


48,451










OTHER EXPENSES








  Compensation and benefits

3,161


2,759


11,195


10,339

  Professional services

588


781


2,561


4,118

  Business development 

38


25


145


136

  Occupancy and equipment 

99


112


427


467

  Communications 

49


48


191


202

  Other operating expenses 

930


833


2,072


2,184

    Total other expenses

4,865


4,558


16,591


17,446










Income before income taxes

3,428


13,705


14,139


31,005










Income tax benefit

(36,569)


(153,402)


(35,322)


(152,131)










Net income

$                    39,997


$                  167,107(1)


$                    49,461


$                  183,136(1)



















Basic earnings per share

$                        2.40


$                      12.64(1)


$                        3.09


$                      17.95(1)










Diluted earnings per share

$                        2.36


$                      12.56(1)


$                        3.06


$                      17.88(1)










Weighted average shares outstanding - basic (in thousands)

16,671


13,220


15,990


10,205

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted (in thousands)

16,949


13,304


16,189


10,242

 


ARLINGTON ASSET INVESTMENT CORP.





CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS





(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)





(Unaudited)

















 ASSETS 



December 31, 2013


December 31, 2012







 Cash and cash equivalents 


$                             48,628


$                             35,837

 Receivables 





   Interest 



5,173


4,869

   Sold securities receivable 


-


26,773

   Other  



212


644

 Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value 





   Available-for-sale 


341,346


199,156

   Trading 



1,576,452


1,556,440

 Other investments 


2,065


2,347

 Derivative assets, at fair value 


8,424


-

 Deferred tax assets, net 


165,851


154,418

 Deposits 



45,504


85,652

 Prepaid expenses and other assets 


1,311


159

   Total assets 


$                        2,194,966


$                        2,066,295













 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 











 Liabilities: 





 Repurchase agreements 


$                        1,547,630


$                        1,497,191

 Interest payable 


774


582

 Accrued compensation and benefits 


5,584


1,542

 Dividend payable 


14,630


-

 Derivative liabilities, at fair value 


33,129


76,850

 Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 


1,391


17,837

 Long-term debt 


40,000


15,000

   Total liabilities 


1,643,138


1,609,002













 Equity: 






 Common stock 


166


132

 Additional paid-in capital 


1,727,398


1,638,061

 Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes 


53,996


39,812

 Accumulated deficit 


(1,229,732)


(1,220,712)

   Total equity    


551,828


457,293







   Total liabilities and equity 


$                        2,194,966


$                        2,066,295













 Book Value per Share 


$                                33.10


$                             34.65(1)







 Shares Outstanding (in thousands) 


16,671


13,198


(1)

Net income and earnings per share for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2012 reflect revisions to the federal income tax rate for deferred tax assets. The revision decreased net income by $8.7 million for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2012. The earnings per share, basic and diluted, also decreased by $0.66 and $0.65 for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and $0.85 per share for the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively. The book value per share as of December 31, 2012 decreased by $0.59 per share.

 

SOURCE Arlington Asset Investment Corp.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
WebRTC is great technology to build your own communication tools. It will be even more exciting experience it with advanced devices, such as a 360 Camera, 360 microphone, and a depth sensor camera. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Masashi Ganeko, a manager at INFOCOM Corporation, will introduce two experimental projects from his team and what they learned from them. "Shotoku Tamago" uses the robot audition software HARK to track speakers in 360 video of a remote party. "Virtual Teleport" uses a...
Any startup has to have a clear go –to-market strategy from the beginning. Similarly, any data science project has to have a go to production strategy from its first days, so it could go beyond proof-of-concept. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in production would result in hundreds of training pipelines and machine learning models that are continuously revised by teams of data scientists and seamlessly connected with web applications for tenants and users.
When shopping for a new data processing platform for IoT solutions, many development teams want to be able to test-drive options before making a choice. Yet when evaluating an IoT solution, it’s simply not feasible to do so at scale with physical devices. Building a sensor simulator is the next best choice; however, generating a realistic simulation at very high TPS with ease of configurability is a formidable challenge. When dealing with multiple application or transport protocols, you would be...
IT organizations are moving to the cloud in hopes to approve efficiency, increase agility and save money. Migrating workloads might seem like a simple task, but what many businesses don’t realize is that application migration criteria differs across organizations, making it difficult for architects to arrive at an accurate TCO number. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Joe Kinsella, CTO of CloudHealth Technologies, will offer a systematic approach to understanding the TCO of a cloud application...
"With Digital Experience Monitoring what used to be a simple visit to a web page has exploded into app on phones, data from social media feeds, competitive benchmarking - these are all components that are only available because of some type of digital asset," explained Leo Vasiliou, Director of Web Performance Engineering at Catchpoint Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Secure Channels, a cybersecurity firm, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Secure Channels, Inc. offers several products and solutions to its many clients, helping them protect critical data from being compromised and access to computer networks from the unauthorized. The company develops comprehensive data encryption security strategie...
SYS-CON Events announced today that App2Cloud will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct. 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. App2Cloud is an online Platform, specializing in migrating legacy applications to any Cloud Providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud).
The goal of Continuous Testing is to shift testing left to find defects earlier and release software faster. This can be achieved by integrating a set of open source functional and performance testing tools in the early stages of your software delivery lifecycle. There is one process that binds all application delivery stages together into one well-orchestrated machine: Continuous Testing. Continuous Testing is the conveyer belt between the Software Factory and production stages. Artifacts are m...
WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web communications world. The 6th WebRTC Summit continues our tradition of delivering the latest and greatest presentations within the world of WebRTC. Topics include voice calling, video chat, P2P file sharing, and use cases that have already leveraged the power and convenience of WebRTC.
Cloud resources, although available in abundance, are inherently volatile. For transactional computing, like ERP and most enterprise software, this is a challenge as transactional integrity and data fidelity is paramount – making it a challenge to create cloud native applications while relying on RDBMS. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Claus Jepsen, Chief Architect and Head of Innovation Labs at Unit4, will explore that in order to create distributed and scalable solutions ensuring high availa...
For financial firms, the cloud is going to increasingly become a crucial part of dealing with customers over the next five years and beyond, particularly with the growing use and acceptance of virtual currencies. There are new data storage paradigms on the horizon that will deliver secure solutions for storing and moving sensitive financial data around the world without touching terrestrial networks. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Cliff Beek, President of Cloud Constellation Corporation, d...
Internet-of-Things discussions can end up either going down the consumer gadget rabbit hole or focused on the sort of data logging that industrial manufacturers have been doing forever. However, in fact, companies today are already using IoT data both to optimize their operational technology and to improve the experience of customer interactions in novel ways. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Gordon Haff, Red Hat Technology Evangelist, shared examples from a wide range of industries – including en...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Kelly Looney, director of DevOps consulting for Skytap, showed how an incremental approach to introducing containers into complex, distributed applications results in modernization with less risk and more reward. He also shared the story of how Skytap used Docker to get out of the business of managing infrastructure, and into the business of delivering innovation and business value. Attendees learned how up-front planning allows for a clean sep...
Most companies are adopting or evaluating container technology - Docker in particular - to speed up application deployment, drive down cost, ease management and make application delivery more flexible overall. As with most new architectures, this dream takes a lot of work to become a reality. Even when you do get your application componentized enough and packaged properly, there are still challenges for DevOps teams to making the shift to continuous delivery and achieving that reduction in cost ...