Welcome!

News Feed Item

Hillenbrand First-Quarter Revenue Increased 26% to $385 Million

-- Process Equipment Group revenue increased 58% to $242 million

BATESVILLE, Ind., Feb. 4, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Hillenbrand, Inc. (NYSE: HI) reported results today for the first quarter ended December 31, 2013. Revenue was $385 million, representing 26% growth over the prior year. The Process Equipment Group reported revenue of $242 million, a 58% increase due primarily to the acquisition of Coperion in December 2012, and order backlog of $611 million, a 1% increase from September 30, 2013. Batesville revenue was $143 million, a 6% decrease driven by a lower number of North American burials.

"We continue to be encouraged by order activity throughout the Process Equipment Group, with backlog once again at a record-high level. Given our visibility into backlog, we expect mid-single-digit revenue growth for this group for the year," said Joe A. Raver, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hillenbrand. "Batesville delivered a solid performance this quarter, with improved margins despite reduced volume. We expect a similar volume decrease in the second quarter, as pneumonia and influenza are expected to have less of an impact on the number of deaths this year than they did last year."

Hillenbrand reports results on a GAAP and adjusted basis. Adjusted measures are reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measures at the end of this release. Net income increased 42% to $20 million ($0.32 per diluted share) primarily due to lower Coperion acquisition-related costs. On an adjusted basis, net income decreased 15% to $22 million ($0.34 per diluted share) driven primarily by lower revenue at Batesville. Adjusted EBITDA increased 4% to $53 million and operating cash flow was up $26 million to $46 million.

"Our growth strategy has transformed Hillenbrand into a global diversified industrial company," said Raver. "We have made substantial investments over the past three years and believe we are well-positioned to deliver long-term growth and value for our shareholders."

Conference Call Information

Date/Time:

8:00 a.m. EST, Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Dial-In for U.S. and Canada:

1-877-853-5642

Dial-In for International:

+1-253-237-1134

Conference call ID number:

50525720

Webcast link:

http://ir.hillenbrand.com (archived through Wednesday, March 5, 2014)



Replay - Conference Call

Date/Time:                       

Available until midnight EST, Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Dial-In for U.S. and Canada:

1-855-859-2056

Dial-In for International:

+1-404-537-3406

Conference call ID number:

50525720

Hillenbrand's interim financial statements on Form 10-Q are expected to be filed jointly with this release and will be available on the Company's website (www.Hillenbrand.com).

In addition to the financial measures prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP), this earnings release also contains non-GAAP operating performance measures. These non-GAAP measures are referred to as "adjusted" and exclude expenses associated with backlog amortization, inventory step-up, business acquisitions and integration, restructuring, and antitrust litigation. The related income tax for all of these items is also excluded. This non-GAAP information is provided as a supplement, not as a substitute for, or as superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

An important non-GAAP measure Hillenbrand uses is adjusted earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation, and amortization ("adjusted EBITDA"). As previously discussed, a part of Hillenbrand's strategy is to selectively acquire companies that we believe can benefit from our core competencies to spur faster and more profitable growth. Given that strategy, it is a natural consequence to incur related expenses, such as amortization from acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense from debt-funded acquisitions. Accordingly, we use adjusted EBITDA, among other measures, to monitor business performance.

Hillenbrand uses this non-GAAP information internally to make operating decisions and believes it is helpful to investors because it allows more meaningful period-to-period comparisons of ongoing operating results. The information can also be used to perform trend analysis and to better identify operating trends that may otherwise be masked or distorted by these types of items. Finally, Hillenbrand believes this information provides a higher degree of transparency.

See below for a reconciliation from GAAP operating performance measures to the relevant non-GAAP (adjusted) performance measures. 

Hillenbrand (www.Hillenbrand.com) is a global diversified industrial company that makes and sells premium business-to-business products and services for a wide variety of industries. We pursue profitable growth and meaningful dividends for our shareholders by leveraging our leading brands, robust cash generation capabilities, and strong core competencies. HI-INC-F

 


Consolidated Statements of Income
(in millions, except per share data)








Three Months Ended




December 31,




2013



2012











Net revenue


$

384.9



$

305.2


Cost of goods sold



253.9




194.7


       Gross profit



131.0




110.5


Operating expenses



94.0




86.4


       Operating profit



37.0




24.1


Interest expense



6.3




4.5


Other income (expense), net



(0.1)




0.9


       Income before income taxes



30.6




20.5


Income tax expense



9.0




5.9


      Consolidated net income



21.6




14.6


Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests



1.3




0.3


     Net income1


$

20.3



$

14.3











Net income1 per share of common stock:









Basic earnings per share


$

0.32



$

0.23


Diluted earnings per share


$

0.32



$

0.23


Weighted-average shares outstanding — basic



63.1




62.4


Weighted-average shares outstanding — diluted



63.7




62.6











Cash dividends per share


$

0.1975



$

0.1950











1Net income attributable to Hillenbrand









 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(in millions)






Three Months Ended

December 31,




2013



2012


Net cash provided by operating activities


$

45.9



$

19.7


Net cash used in investing activities



(6.2)




(418.6)


Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities



(19.3)




480.0


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents



(0.8)




0.8


Net cash flow



19.6




81.9











Cash and cash equivalents:









At beginning of period



42.7




20.2


At end of period


$

62.3



$

102.1











 



Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
(in millions, except per share data)




Three Months Ended December 31,



2013


2012



GAAP


Adjustments


Adjusted


GAAP


Adjustments


Adjusted

Cost of goods sold


$

253.9


$

(0.1) (a)


$

253.8


$

194.7


$

(3.0) (d)


$

191.7

Operating expenses



94.0



(2.1) (b)



91.9



86.4



(13.6) (e)



72.8

Other income

(expense), net



(0.1)





(0.1)



0.9



 

(0.9) (f)



Income tax expense



9.0



0.6 (c)



9.6



5.9



4.2 (c)



10.1

Net income1



20.3



1.6



21.9



14.3



11.5



25.8

Diluted EPS



0.32



0.02



0.34



0.23



0.18



0.41




















Ratios:



















Gross margin



34.0%



0.1%



34.1%



36.2%



1.0%



37.2%

Operating expenses

as a % of revenue



24.4%



(0.5)%



23.9%



28.3%



(4.4)%



23.9%


Both GAAP and adjusted results for the three months ended December 31, 2013, include an adjustment to operating expenses to correct errors related to the accounting for sales commissions at Coperion in fiscal 2013.  The adjustment reduced operating expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 by $2.0, which should have been recorded in fiscal 2013.





1 Net income attributable to Hillenbrand





P = Process Equipment Group; B = Batesville; C = Corporate


(a) Restructuring ($0.1 B)


(b) Business acquisition and integration costs ($0.7 P, $1.2 C), restructuring ($0.2 P)


(c) Tax effect of adjustments


(d) Inventory step up ($2.6 P), restructuring ($0.1 P, $0.3 B)


(e) Business acquisition and integration costs ($9.0 C), backlog amortization ($4.2 P), restructuring ($0.2 C),

antitrust litigation ($0.1 B), other ($0.1 B)


(f) Acquisition-related foreign currency transactions ($0.8 C), other ($0.1 B)

























 





Three Months Ended

December 31,






2013



2012


Net income of consolidated and affiliated









subsidiaries


$

21.6



$

14.6


Interest income



(0.2)




(0.1)


Interest expense



6.3




4.5


Income tax expense



9.0




5.9


Depreciation and amortization



14.3




15.0


EBITDA


$

51.0



$

39.9


Business acquisition and integration



1.9




8.2


Inventory step-up






2.6


Restructuring



0.3




0.6


Antitrust litigation






0.1


EBITDA – adjusted


$

53.2



$

51.4











 

Throughout this release, we make a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. As the words imply, forward-looking statements are statements about the future, as contrasted with historical information. Our forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and current expectations of future events that we believe are reasonable, but by their very nature they are subject to a wide range of risks. If our assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks and uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from Hillenbrand's expectations and projections.

Words that could indicate that we are making forward-looking statements include the following:

intend

believe

plan

expect

may

goal

would

become

pursue

estimate

will

forecast

continue

could

targeted

encourage

promise

improve

progress

potential

should

This is not an exhaustive list. Our intent is to provide examples of how readers might identify forward-looking statements. The absence of any of these words, however, does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking.

Here is the key point: Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in any forward-looking statements. Any number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, could cause our performance to differ significantly from what is described in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Hillenbrand, or any companies we may acquire; risks that an acquisition disrupts current operations or poses potential difficulties in employee retention or otherwise affects financial or operating results; the ability to recognize the benefits of an acquisition, including potential synergies and cost savings or the failure of an acquired company to achieve its plans and objectives generally; global market and economic conditions, including those related to the credit markets; volatility of our investment portfolio; adverse foreign currency fluctuations; ongoing involvement in claims, lawsuits and governmental proceedings related to operations; labor disruptions; the dependence of our business units on relationships with several large providers; increased costs or unavailability of raw materials; continued fluctuations in mortality rates and increased cremations; competition from nontraditional sources in the death care industry; cyclical demand for industrial capital goods; and certain tax-related matters. For a more in-depth discussion of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in forward-looking statements, see the discussions under the heading "Risk Factors" in Part II, Item 1A of Hillenbrand's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2014. The company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information.

SOURCE Hillenbrand, Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
Join us at Cloud Expo June 6-8 to find out how to securely connect your cloud app to any cloud or on-premises data source – without complex firewall changes. More users are demanding access to on-premises data from their cloud applications. It’s no longer a “nice-to-have” but an important differentiator that drives competitive advantages. It’s the new “must have” in the hybrid era. Users want capabilities that give them a unified view of the data to get closer to customers and grow business. The...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...