Welcome!

News Feed Item

West Kirkland Files Hasbrouck and Three Hills Technical Report on SEDAR

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 02/24/14 -- West Kirkland Mining Inc. (TSX VENTURE: WKM) ("West Kirkland" or the "Company") has filed on SEDAR a National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") compliant technical report on the Hasbrouck and Three Hills properties, Nevada (the "Report"). The Report was filed on SEDAR February 24, 2014 following the Company's news release also on February 24, 2014 announcing a new mineral resource estimate on the Project, which includes both the Hasbrouck and Three Hills deposits.

The Report, titled "Technical Report for the Hasbrouck Project, Esmeralda County, Nevada, USA", is dated effective February 21, 2014. It was prepared in conformance with NI 43-101 by Mr. Scott E. Wilson, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist, who is WKM's Independent Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. He has supervised the preparation of the information that forms the basis of the written disclosure in the news release dated February 24, 2014.

Hasbrouck and Three Hills Deposits Resource Statement (February 21, 2014)


                     HASBROUCK (0.005 opt AuEq Cutoff)
                             Tons                       Gold  Silver   AuEq
                             (000   Gold Silver   AuEq  (000    (000   (000
Category                     tons)   opt    opt    opt    oz)     oz)    oz)
  Measured                 14,686  0.014  0.307  0.019   206   4,509    285
  Indicated                55,002  0.011  0.248  0.015   605  13,640    844
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured & Indicated       69,688  0.012  0.260  0.016   811  18,149  1,128
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                   58,921  0.007  0.189  0.010   412  11,136    607
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq calculated AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14)

                     THREE HILLS (0.005 opt Au Cutoff)
                             Tons                       Gold  Silver   AuEq
                             (000   Gold Silver   AuEq  (000    (000   (000
Category                     tons)   opt    opt    opt    oz)     oz)    oz)
  Measured                  1,091  0.023    N/A    N/A    25       0     25
  Indicated                 7,413  0.017    N/A    N/A   126       0    126
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured & Indicated        8,504  0.018    N/A    N/A   151       0    151
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                   11,002  0.014                 154           154
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
AuEq calculated AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14)

              HASBROUCK & THREE HILLS (0.005 opt AuEq Cutoff)
                             Tons                       Gold  Silver   AuEq
                             (000   Gold Silver   AuEq  (000    (000   (000
Category                     tons)   opt    opt    opt    oz)     oz)    oz)
  Measured                 15,777  0.015  0.286  0.020   231   4,509    310
  Indicated                62,415  0.012  0.219  0.016   731  13,640    970
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured & Indicated       78,192  0.012  0.232  0.016   962  18,149  1,279
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                   69,923  0.008  0.159  0.011   566  11,136    761
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq calculated AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14)

Notes:

1.  CIM definitions are followed for classification of Mineral Resources.
2.  Mineral Resources are estimated using a gold price of US$1,200 per
    ounce and a silver price of US$21 per ounce.
3.  Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
4.  The Mineral Resources have been prepared by Scott E. Wilson in
    conformity with CIM "Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral
    Reserves Best Practices" guidelines and are reported in accordance with
    the Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101. Mineral resources are
    not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
    There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will
    be converted into mineral reserve.

The technical report is consistent in all material respects with the Mineral Resource announced in the February 24, 2014 news release. A copy of the report can be found at www.sedar.com and on the Company's website.

Reconciliation to the Previous Mineral Resource Estimate Announced January 27, 2014

The mineral resource estimate disclosed above considers data not considered at the time of the original mineral resource estimate announced by the Company on January 27, 2014. Specifically, at Three Hills an additional 25 holes were used in the mineral resource calculation. Mr. Wilson also completed an analysis of the Hasbrouck database resulting in an updated mineral resource estimate for the Hasbrouck Deposit. At Three Hills the new estimate contains 8,504,000 measured and indicated tons grading 0.018 opt Au with 11,002,000 inferred tons grading 0.014 opt Au using a 0.005 opt Au cutoff. The previously announced estimate contained an indicated 5,736,000 tons 0.023 opt Au and 10,600 inferred tons grading 0.015 opt Au using a 0.01 opt Au cutoff. At Hasbrouck the updated resource contains 69,688,000 measured and indicated tons grading 0.012 opt Au and 0.260 opt Ag with 58,921,000 inferred tons grading 0.007 opt Au and 0.189 opt Ag using a 0.005 opt AuEq cutoff. The previously announced estimate contained 128,608,000 inferred tons grading 0.009 opt Au and 0.228 opt Ag using a 0.005 opt AuEq cutoff. Both estimates used the same formula for calculating AuEq, AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14) The February 21, 2014 resource estimate supersedes all previous estimates.

The Mineral Resources have been prepared by Scott E. Wilson in conformity with generally accepted CIM "Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices" guidelines and are reported in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource estimate will be converted into mineral reserves.

Qualified Persons

Mr. Scott E. Wilson, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist, is WKM's Independent Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. He has recently visited the Properties and has read and approved the technical information in this news release. Mr. Wilson has reviewed and verified the data disclosed in this news release to be in conformity with generally accepted CIM "Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices" guidelines and in accordance with NI 43-101.

Michael G. Allen, Vice President of Exploration for WKM, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, has reviewed the information contained in this news release. He is the non-independent qualified person for this new release and has verified the data.

About West Kirkland Mining

WKM was formed in 2010 to focus on gold exploration along major trends in North America. The Company has consolidated significant mineral rights positions within the Long Canyon Trend of Nevada/Utah. The founders and Board members of WKM have successful experience in gold discovery, mine development and mine operations in Nevada and other gold producing jurisdictions in North America.

For further information, please see the Company's website at www.wkmining.com.

Disclaimer for Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains forward-looking information or forward-looking statements (collectively "forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such information includes, without limitation, information regarding proposed exploration activities. Although the Company believes that such information is reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking information is typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking information provided by the Company is not a guarantee of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking information as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, the state of the financial markets for the Company's equity securities, the state of the market for gold or other minerals that may be produced generally, recent market volatility; variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that may be located, the Company's ability to obtain any necessary permits, consents or authorizations required for its activities, to raise the necessary capital or to be fully able to implement its business strategies and other risks associated with the exploration and development of mineral properties. The reader is referred to the Company's public filings for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects which may be accessed through the Company's profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st Int\ernational Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive advantage. By offering a suite of proven hosting and management services, Enzu wants companies to focus on the core of their ...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
"Tintri focuses on the Ops side of the DevOps, which basically is pushing more and more of the accessibility of the infrastructure to the developers and trying to get behind the scenes," explained Dhiraj Sehgal of Tintri in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Automation is enabling enterprises to design, deploy, and manage more complex, hybrid cloud environments. Yet the people who manage these environments must be trained in and understanding these environments better than ever before. A new era of analytics and cognitive computing is adding intelligence, but also more complexity, to these cloud environments. How smart is your cloud? How smart should it be? In this power panel at 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, paneli...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...