Welcome!

News Feed Item

West Kirkland Files Hasbrouck and Three Hills Technical Report on SEDAR

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 02/24/14 -- West Kirkland Mining Inc. (TSX VENTURE: WKM) ("West Kirkland" or the "Company") has filed on SEDAR a National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") compliant technical report on the Hasbrouck and Three Hills properties, Nevada (the "Report"). The Report was filed on SEDAR February 24, 2014 following the Company's news release also on February 24, 2014 announcing a new mineral resource estimate on the Project, which includes both the Hasbrouck and Three Hills deposits.

The Report, titled "Technical Report for the Hasbrouck Project, Esmeralda County, Nevada, USA", is dated effective February 21, 2014. It was prepared in conformance with NI 43-101 by Mr. Scott E. Wilson, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist, who is WKM's Independent Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. He has supervised the preparation of the information that forms the basis of the written disclosure in the news release dated February 24, 2014.

Hasbrouck and Three Hills Deposits Resource Statement (February 21, 2014)


                     HASBROUCK (0.005 opt AuEq Cutoff)
                             Tons                       Gold  Silver   AuEq
                             (000   Gold Silver   AuEq  (000    (000   (000
Category                     tons)   opt    opt    opt    oz)     oz)    oz)
  Measured                 14,686  0.014  0.307  0.019   206   4,509    285
  Indicated                55,002  0.011  0.248  0.015   605  13,640    844
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured & Indicated       69,688  0.012  0.260  0.016   811  18,149  1,128
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                   58,921  0.007  0.189  0.010   412  11,136    607
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq calculated AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14)

                     THREE HILLS (0.005 opt Au Cutoff)
                             Tons                       Gold  Silver   AuEq
                             (000   Gold Silver   AuEq  (000    (000   (000
Category                     tons)   opt    opt    opt    oz)     oz)    oz)
  Measured                  1,091  0.023    N/A    N/A    25       0     25
  Indicated                 7,413  0.017    N/A    N/A   126       0    126
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured & Indicated        8,504  0.018    N/A    N/A   151       0    151
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                   11,002  0.014                 154           154
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
AuEq calculated AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14)

              HASBROUCK & THREE HILLS (0.005 opt AuEq Cutoff)
                             Tons                       Gold  Silver   AuEq
                             (000   Gold Silver   AuEq  (000    (000   (000
Category                     tons)   opt    opt    opt    oz)     oz)    oz)
  Measured                 15,777  0.015  0.286  0.020   231   4,509    310
  Indicated                62,415  0.012  0.219  0.016   731  13,640    970
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured & Indicated       78,192  0.012  0.232  0.016   962  18,149  1,279
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred                   69,923  0.008  0.159  0.011   566  11,136    761
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AuEq calculated AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14)

Notes:

1.  CIM definitions are followed for classification of Mineral Resources.
2.  Mineral Resources are estimated using a gold price of US$1,200 per
    ounce and a silver price of US$21 per ounce.
3.  Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.
4.  The Mineral Resources have been prepared by Scott E. Wilson in
    conformity with CIM "Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral
    Reserves Best Practices" guidelines and are reported in accordance with
    the Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101. Mineral resources are
    not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
    There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will
    be converted into mineral reserve.

The technical report is consistent in all material respects with the Mineral Resource announced in the February 24, 2014 news release. A copy of the report can be found at www.sedar.com and on the Company's website.

Reconciliation to the Previous Mineral Resource Estimate Announced January 27, 2014

The mineral resource estimate disclosed above considers data not considered at the time of the original mineral resource estimate announced by the Company on January 27, 2014. Specifically, at Three Hills an additional 25 holes were used in the mineral resource calculation. Mr. Wilson also completed an analysis of the Hasbrouck database resulting in an updated mineral resource estimate for the Hasbrouck Deposit. At Three Hills the new estimate contains 8,504,000 measured and indicated tons grading 0.018 opt Au with 11,002,000 inferred tons grading 0.014 opt Au using a 0.005 opt Au cutoff. The previously announced estimate contained an indicated 5,736,000 tons 0.023 opt Au and 10,600 inferred tons grading 0.015 opt Au using a 0.01 opt Au cutoff. At Hasbrouck the updated resource contains 69,688,000 measured and indicated tons grading 0.012 opt Au and 0.260 opt Ag with 58,921,000 inferred tons grading 0.007 opt Au and 0.189 opt Ag using a 0.005 opt AuEq cutoff. The previously announced estimate contained 128,608,000 inferred tons grading 0.009 opt Au and 0.228 opt Ag using a 0.005 opt AuEq cutoff. Both estimates used the same formula for calculating AuEq, AuEq = Au + (Ag/57.14) The February 21, 2014 resource estimate supersedes all previous estimates.

The Mineral Resources have been prepared by Scott E. Wilson in conformity with generally accepted CIM "Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices" guidelines and are reported in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource estimate will be converted into mineral reserves.

Qualified Persons

Mr. Scott E. Wilson, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist, is WKM's Independent Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. He has recently visited the Properties and has read and approved the technical information in this news release. Mr. Wilson has reviewed and verified the data disclosed in this news release to be in conformity with generally accepted CIM "Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices" guidelines and in accordance with NI 43-101.

Michael G. Allen, Vice President of Exploration for WKM, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, has reviewed the information contained in this news release. He is the non-independent qualified person for this new release and has verified the data.

About West Kirkland Mining

WKM was formed in 2010 to focus on gold exploration along major trends in North America. The Company has consolidated significant mineral rights positions within the Long Canyon Trend of Nevada/Utah. The founders and Board members of WKM have successful experience in gold discovery, mine development and mine operations in Nevada and other gold producing jurisdictions in North America.

For further information, please see the Company's website at www.wkmining.com.

Disclaimer for Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains forward-looking information or forward-looking statements (collectively "forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such information includes, without limitation, information regarding proposed exploration activities. Although the Company believes that such information is reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking information is typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking information provided by the Company is not a guarantee of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking information as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, the state of the financial markets for the Company's equity securities, the state of the market for gold or other minerals that may be produced generally, recent market volatility; variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that may be located, the Company's ability to obtain any necessary permits, consents or authorizations required for its activities, to raise the necessary capital or to be fully able to implement its business strategies and other risks associated with the exploration and development of mineral properties. The reader is referred to the Company's public filings for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects which may be accessed through the Company's profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Information technology is an industry that has always experienced change, and the dramatic change sweeping across the industry today could not be truthfully described as the first time we've seen such widespread change impacting customer investments. However, the rate of the change, and the potential outcomes from today's digital transformation has the distinct potential to separate the industry into two camps: Organizations that see the change coming, embrace it, and successful leverage it; and...
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service. In his session at 19th Cloud Exp...
Fact: storage performance problems have only gotten more complicated, as applications not only have become largely virtualized, but also have moved to cloud-based infrastructures. Storage performance in virtualized environments isn’t just about IOPS anymore. Instead, you need to guarantee performance for individual VMs, helping applications maintain performance as the number of VMs continues to go up in real time. In his session at Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, Product and Marketing at Tintri, sha...
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to simplify and streamline our lives by automating routine tasks that distract us from our goals. This promise is based on the ubiquitous deployment of smart, connected devices that link everything from industrial control systems to automobiles to refrigerators. Unfortunately, comparatively few of the devices currently deployed have been developed with an eye toward security, and as the DDoS attacks of late October 2016 have demonstrated, this oversight can ...
Extracting business value from Internet of Things (IoT) data doesn’t happen overnight. There are several requirements that must be satisfied, including IoT device enablement, data analysis, real-time detection of complex events and automated orchestration of actions. Unfortunately, too many companies fall short in achieving their business goals by implementing incomplete solutions or not focusing on tangible use cases. In his general session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products...
Regulatory requirements exist to promote the controlled sharing of information, while protecting the privacy and/or security of the information. Regulations for each type of information have their own set of rules, policies, and guidelines. Cloud Service Providers (CSP) are faced with increasing demand for services at decreasing prices. Demonstrating and maintaining compliance with regulations is a nontrivial task and doing so against numerous sets of regulatory requirements can be daunting task...
Machine Learning helps make complex systems more efficient. By applying advanced Machine Learning techniques such as Cognitive Fingerprinting, wind project operators can utilize these tools to learn from collected data, detect regular patterns, and optimize their own operations. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Stuart Gillen, Director of Business Development at SparkCognition, discussed how research has demonstrated the value of Machine Learning in delivering next generation analytics to impr...
Join Impiger for their featured webinar: ‘Cloud Computing: A Roadmap to Modern Software Delivery’ on November 10, 2016, at 12:00 pm CST. Very few companies have not experienced some impact to their IT delivery due to the evolution of cloud computing. This webinar is not about deciding whether you should entertain moving some or all of your IT to the cloud, but rather, a detailed look under the hood to help IT professionals understand how cloud adoption has evolved and what trends will impact th...
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smar...
20th Cloud Expo, taking place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud strategy.