Welcome!

News Feed Item

B2Gold Corp. Announces Positive Results from the Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Gramalote Project in Colombia

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/13/14 -- B2Gold Corp. (TSX:BTO)(NYSE MKT:BTG)(NAMIBIAN:B2G) ("B2Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce positive results from the Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for the Gramalote gold project in Colombia. The Gramalote property is a 51% AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. ("AngloGold Ashanti") and 49% B2Gold joint venture with AngloGold Ashanti as the project manager. Gramalote is located 230 kilometers ("km") northwest of Bogota and 80 km northeast of Medellin in central Colombia.

Highlights of the Gramalote Preliminary Economic Assessment on a 100% basis

--  Open pit gold mine with an initial life of mine ("LOM") of 14 years
    based on Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources.  
--  Average annual gold production LOM of 317,500 ounces at US$664 direct
    cash cost per ounce. 
--  Average annual gold production of 373,300 ounces per year for the first
    5 years of production. 
--  LOM gold production of 4.445 million ounces. 
--  Average LOM total operating costs (including sustaining capital) of $736
    per ounce of gold 
--  Annual processing rate of 16 million tonnes per year. 
--  Average LOM gold recovery of 95% from conventional milling, flotation
    and cyanide leach of the flotation concentrate. 
--  Estimated pre-production capital cost of $1,176 million. 
--  LOM pre-tax net cash flow of $1,521 million, and after tax net cash flow
    of $990 million at a gold price of $1,351 per ounce. 
--  Net present value ("NPV") pre-tax of $714 million and after-tax of $398
    million at a 5.06% discount rate and gold price of $1,351 per ounce
    generating an after-tax internal rate of return ("IRR") of 11.5%. 
--  Project payback of 4.8 years.

Project Size Trade-off study

A trade-off study was completed to determine the optimum throughput rate for the Gramalote project. Throughput rates between 10 million and 24 million tonnes per year were evaluated at gold prices of $1,100 per ounce, $1,300 per ounce and $1,500 per ounce utilizing Inferred Mineral Resources. The results of this study indicate that 16.0 million tonnes per year provides the best project economics and allows for the use of conventional dual pinion drive grinding mills.

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these Mineral Resources will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Mineral Resources

The Company is pleased to announce AngloGold Ashanti has completed a new Joint Ore Reserves Committee and National Instrument 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource estimate for Gramalote Central Zone, Monjas West and Trinidad. The new mineral resource estimate was utilized in the preparation of the PEA.

Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources at Gramalote Central and Monjas West at a 0.15 gram per tonne ("g/t") gold cut-off, within a US$1,600 per ounce gold optimized Whittle pit consists of 132.7 million tonnes grading 0.63 g/t gold for a total of 2.69 million troy ounces of gold. The Gramalote Central, Monjas West and Trinidad Inferred Mineral Resource is 239.7 million tonnes grading 0.44 g/t gold for a total of 3.36 million troy ounces of gold using similar parameters as the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource.

The following table outlines the updated Gramalote Mineral Resource estimate ona 100% basis using a 0.15 g/t gold cut-off grade and within a US$1,600 per ounce gold optimized Whittle pit:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Contained Metal
Category                                Tonnes  Gold Grade  Gold Troy Ounces
                                     (millions)      (g/t)        (millions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured and Indicated Gramalote                                            
 Central                                128.072       0.63             2.608
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated Monjas West                     4.665       0.55             0.083
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Measured and Indicated                                                
 Gramalote Central and Monjas West(2)   132.737    0.63(1)             2.691
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Gramalote Central              126.946       0.43             1,739
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Trinidad                        89.220       0.41             1.180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Monjas West                     23,527       0.59             0.446
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Inferred(2)                       239.694    0.44(1)             3.364
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  Differences in tonnage, ounces and grades due to rounding 
2.  Mineral resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have a
    demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty which may be
    attached to Inferred Mineral Resources, it cannot be assumed that all or
    any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to an
    Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource as a result of continued
    exploration.

B2Gold published in 2012 a National Instrument 43-101 compliant Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource at Gramalote Central of 97.1 million tonnes grading 0.81 g/t gold for a total of 2.5 million troy ounces of gold at a 0.25 g/t gold cut-off and within a US$1,600 per ounce gold optimized Whittle pit. The Gramalote Central and Trinidad Inferred Mineral Resource was 95.7 million tonnes grading 0.44 g/t gold for a total of 1.36 million troy ounces of gold using similar parameters as the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource (see press release dated April 24, 2012).

The new Gramalote Central Mineral Resource estimate is supported by 63,902 metres of diamond drilling in 176 drill holes completed in 2007 to 2013 and 441 metres of sampling from an underground tunnel. The Monjas West Mineral Resource is supported by 18,094 metres of diamond drilling in 46 drill holes and a total of 10,572 metres of diamond drilling in 30 holes drilled was used in the Trinidad Mineral Resource estimation. Average drill hole spacing used in the Mineral Resource was 25 metres x 25 metres for Measured, 50 metres x 50 metres for Indicated and 100 metres x 100 metres for Inferred.

The Gramalote resource was prepared by AngloGold Ashanti and AMEC carried out an independent audit of the low grade zone at Gramalote Central in June 2013. AngloGold Ashanti monitored the quality assurance and quality control ("QA/QC") program of the data they collected in 2010 to 2013.

The Qualified Person (under National Instrument 43-101) for AngloGold Ashanti's resource estimate is Vaughan Chamberlain, FAusIMM, Senior Vice President, Geology and Metallurgy, AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. The drilling program at the Gramalote property is reviewed and the results approved by Tom Garagan, B2Gold's Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101. The Gramalote drill program utilizes extensive QA/QC (quality assurance and quality control) protocols for assaying and core sample handling that consist of the systematic insertion of blanks, standards and duplicates as well as using a secondary laboratory for regular check assaying. Core samples are cut with a diamond saw with one-half of the core placed in sealed bags and shipped directly to ALS Chemex Labs in Bogota, Colombia for sample preparation with the pulps subsequently sent to ALS Chemex Labs in Lima, Peru for gold fire assay and ICP analyses.

Summary of Base Case Results

The base case assumptions included revenues using a gold price of $1,351 per ounce and current prices for fuel, reagents, labor, power and other consumables. The key results on a 100% basis are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mineral Resources used in the Mine Plan                                     
Measured and Indicated Resources (112.4Mt at 0.70g/t totaling               
 2.553Moz)                                                                  
Inferred Mineral Resources (124.9Mt) at 0.53g/t Au, totaling                
 2.115Moz)                                                                  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contained gold ounces processed (Mozs)                                   4.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Recovery (%)                                                        95%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold ounces produced (Mozs)                                            4.445
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual gold production (ounces)                              317,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste material mined (Mt)                                              587.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste to Ore strip ratio                                                 2.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction Capital ($M)                                              1,176
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining Capital ($M)                                                104.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross gold revenue ($M)                                                6,003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (pre-tax) ($M)                                              1,521
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (after tax) ($M)                                            990.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Present Value @5.06% (pre-tax) ($M)                                713.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Present Value @5.06% (after tax) ($M)                              397.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR (after tax) (%)                                                    11.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Life (years)                                                       14.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payback (years)                                                          4.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Direct Cost (mining, processing & G&A) ($/oz-Au)                     664
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Cash Cost (direct cost + royalties, selling costs & silver              
 credits) ($/oz-Au)                                                      693
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Operating Cost (cash cost + severance pay, closure costs,               
 environmental compensation & sustaining capital) ($/oz-Au)              736
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Total Cost (operating costs + implementation capital) ($/oz-Au)    1,024
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average LOM mining cost ($/t mined)                                     1.39
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average LOM processing cost ($/t processed)                             6.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual G&A costs ($M)                                                   23.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The PEA is subject to a number of assumptions, including among others, that an environmental impact assessment will be completed within the required timeline, all required permits will be obtained in a timely manner, the Gramalote project will have the support of the local government and community, the regulatory environment will remain consistent and no material increase will have occurred to the estimated costs. A full list of the relevant assumptions will be set out in the PEA.

Project Sensitivities

Gramalote is a large, low grade, low cost project and is therefore very sensitive to the gold price. A table reflecting these sensitivities is shown below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Gold Price  After Tax NPV  After Tax NPV  After Tax IRR
Sensitivity           ($/oz-Au)       @0% ($M)    @5.06% ($M)            (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+15%                      1,544        1,545.0          756.2          16.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+10%                      1,479        1,360.0          636.7          14.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+5%                       1,415        1,175.0          517.3          13.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Case                 1,351          990.0          397.7          11.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-5%                       1,286          805.2          277.7           9.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-10%                      1,222          620.3          157.7           7.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-15%                      1,158          435.6           36.9           5.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next Steps

At current gold price levels, the Gramalote Project economics are positive but at this time do not move the project to the top of the Company's priority list for continued development towards a Feasibility Study. The Gramalote project joint venture partners have agreed on a work program for 2014 that advances the Environmental Impact Study so it can be formally submitted to the Colombian regulators by the second quarter of 2014, which is key to advancing the Gramalote project permitting process. Focus will also be given on addressing other project risk issues such as infill drilling of Inferred Mineral Resources, social programs, environmental monitoring and government relations. Gramalote owns two diamond drills and will utilize those two machines to target 8,000 to 10,000 meters of infill drilling in 2014. At this time, a final budget for 2014 has not been agreed on but this should be finalized within the next month.

The project will be reviewed again in the 4th quarter of 2014 to determine if moving to a Feasibility Study is warranted at that time.

ON BEHALF OF B2GOLD CORP.

Clive T. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer

For more information on B2Gold please visit the Company web site at www.b2gold.com.

The Toronto Stock Exchange neither approves nor disapproves the information contained in this News Release.

This press release includes certain "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" (collectively, "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation, including projections of future financial and operational performance and statements regarding development, production and other activities on the Company's properties. All statements in this press release that address events or developments that we expect to occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, although not always, identified by words such as "expect", "plan", "anticipate", "project", "target", "potential", "schedule", "forecast", "budget", "estimate", "intend" or "believe" and similar expressions or their negative connotations, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could", "should" or "might" occur.

All such forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made. Forward-looking statements necessarily involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond B2Gold's control, including risks associated with the uncertainty of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; volatility of metal prices; risks of exploration, development and mining; financing risks; ability to obtain any necessary permits, consents or authorizations required for its activities; adequate infrastructure, energy and other inputs; shortages or cost increases in necessary equipment, supplies and labour; regulatory, political and country risks; reliance upon third parties; reliance upon joint venture partners; litigation; as well as other factors identified in B2Gold's filings with Canadian securities regulators and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which may be viewed at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the Company's forward looking statements. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do, what benefits B2Gold will derive therefrom. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company's forward looking statements reflect current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date hereof and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions should change other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Readers Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources

Information concerning the properties and operations discussed in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" used in this news release are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101 under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by the CIM Council on December 11, 2005. While the terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve calculation is made. As such, certain information contained in this news release concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An "Inferred Mineral Resource" has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Resources will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. Readers are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" exists, or is economically or legally mineable. In addition, the definitions of "Proven Mineral Reserves" and "Probable Mineral Reserves" under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Contacts:
B2Gold Corp.
Ian MacLean
Vice President, Investor Relations
604-681-8371

B2Gold Corp.
Shaun Johnson
Associate, Investor Relations
604-681-8371
www.b2gold.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that NetApp has been named “Bronze Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. NetApp is the data authority for hybrid cloud. NetApp provides a full range of hybrid cloud data services that simplify management of applications and data across cloud and on-premises environments to accelerate digital transformation. Together with their partners, NetApp emp...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Avere Systems, a leading provider of enterprise storage for the hybrid cloud, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 - Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Avere delivers a more modern architectural approach to storage that doesn't require the overprovisioning of storage capacity to achieve performance, overspending on expensive storage media for inactive data or the overbui...
The session is centered around the tracing of systems on cloud using technologies like ebpf. The goal is to talk about what this technology is all about and what purpose it serves. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Shashank Jain, Development Architect at SAP, will touch upon concepts of observability in the cloud and also some of the challenges we have. Generally most cloud-based monitoring tools capture details at a very granular level. To troubleshoot problems this might not be good enough.
Data scientists must access high-performance computing resources across a wide-area network. To achieve cloud-based HPC visualization, researchers must transfer datasets and visualization results efficiently. HPC clusters now compute GPU-accelerated visualization in the cloud cluster. To efficiently display results remotely, a high-performance, low-latency protocol transfers the display from the cluster to a remote desktop. Further, tools to easily mount remote datasets and efficiently transfer...
The dynamic nature of the cloud means that change is a constant when it comes to modern cloud-based infrastructure. Delivering modern applications to end users, therefore, is a constantly shifting challenge. Delivery automation helps IT Ops teams ensure that apps are providing an optimal end user experience over hybrid-cloud and multi-cloud environments, no matter what the current state of the infrastructure is. To employ a delivery automation strategy that reflects your business rules, making r...
Most technology leaders, contemporary and from the hardware era, are reshaping their businesses to do software. They hope to capture value from emerging technologies such as IoT, SDN, and AI. Ultimately, irrespective of the vertical, it is about deriving value from independent software applications participating in an ecosystem as one comprehensive solution. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Kausik Sridhar, founder and CTO of Pulzze Systems, will discuss how given the magnitude of today's applicati...
Smart cities have the potential to change our lives at so many levels for citizens: less pollution, reduced parking obstacles, better health, education and more energy savings. Real-time data streaming and the Internet of Things (IoT) possess the power to turn this vision into a reality. However, most organizations today are building their data infrastructure to focus solely on addressing immediate business needs vs. a platform capable of quickly adapting emerging technologies to address future ...
In a recent survey, Sumo Logic surveyed 1,500 customers who employ cloud services such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). According to the survey, a quarter of the respondents have already deployed Docker containers and nearly as many (23 percent) are employing the AWS Lambda serverless computing framework. It’s clear: serverless is here to stay. The adoption does come with some needed changes, within both application development and operations. Tha...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, will lead you through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He'll look at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering ...
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...
We all know that end users experience the Internet primarily with mobile devices. From an app development perspective, we know that successfully responding to the needs of mobile customers depends on rapid DevOps – failing fast, in short, until the right solution evolves in your customers' relationship to your business. Whether you’re decomposing an SOA monolith, or developing a new application cloud natively, it’s not a question of using microservices – not doing so will be a path to eventual b...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Taica will exhibit at the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. TAZMO technology and development capabilities in the semiconductor and LCD-related manufacturing fields are among the best worldwide. For more information, visit https://www.tazmo.co.jp/en/.
SYS-CON Events announced today that TidalScale will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. TidalScale is the leading provider of Software-Defined Servers that bring flexibility to modern data centers by right-sizing servers on the fly to fit any data set or workload. TidalScale’s award-winning inverse hypervisor technology combines multiple commodity servers (including their ass...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Avere Systems, a leading provider of hybrid cloud enablement solutions, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Avere Systems was created by file systems experts determined to reinvent storage by changing the way enterprises thought about and bought storage resources. With decades of experience behind the company’s founders, Avere got its ...