Welcome!

News Feed Item

B2Gold Corp. Announces Positive Results from the Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Gramalote Project in Colombia

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/13/14 -- B2Gold Corp. (TSX:BTO)(NYSE MKT:BTG)(NAMIBIAN:B2G) ("B2Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce positive results from the Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for the Gramalote gold project in Colombia. The Gramalote property is a 51% AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. ("AngloGold Ashanti") and 49% B2Gold joint venture with AngloGold Ashanti as the project manager. Gramalote is located 230 kilometers ("km") northwest of Bogota and 80 km northeast of Medellin in central Colombia.

Highlights of the Gramalote Preliminary Economic Assessment on a 100% basis


--  Open pit gold mine with an initial life of mine ("LOM") of 14 years
    based on Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources.  
--  Average annual gold production LOM of 317,500 ounces at US$664 direct
    cash cost per ounce. 
--  Average annual gold production of 373,300 ounces per year for the first
    5 years of production. 
--  LOM gold production of 4.445 million ounces. 
--  Average LOM total operating costs (including sustaining capital) of $736
    per ounce of gold 
--  Annual processing rate of 16 million tonnes per year. 
--  Average LOM gold recovery of 95% from conventional milling, flotation
    and cyanide leach of the flotation concentrate. 
--  Estimated pre-production capital cost of $1,176 million. 
--  LOM pre-tax net cash flow of $1,521 million, and after tax net cash flow
    of $990 million at a gold price of $1,351 per ounce. 
--  Net present value ("NPV") pre-tax of $714 million and after-tax of $398
    million at a 5.06% discount rate and gold price of $1,351 per ounce
    generating an after-tax internal rate of return ("IRR") of 11.5%. 
--  Project payback of 4.8 years.

Project Size Trade-off study

A trade-off study was completed to determine the optimum throughput rate for the Gramalote project. Throughput rates between 10 million and 24 million tonnes per year were evaluated at gold prices of $1,100 per ounce, $1,300 per ounce and $1,500 per ounce utilizing Inferred Mineral Resources. The results of this study indicate that 16.0 million tonnes per year provides the best project economics and allows for the use of conventional dual pinion drive grinding mills.

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these Mineral Resources will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Mineral Resources

The Company is pleased to announce AngloGold Ashanti has completed a new Joint Ore Reserves Committee and National Instrument 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource estimate for Gramalote Central Zone, Monjas West and Trinidad. The new mineral resource estimate was utilized in the preparation of the PEA.

Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources at Gramalote Central and Monjas West at a 0.15 gram per tonne ("g/t") gold cut-off, within a US$1,600 per ounce gold optimized Whittle pit consists of 132.7 million tonnes grading 0.63 g/t gold for a total of 2.69 million troy ounces of gold. The Gramalote Central, Monjas West and Trinidad Inferred Mineral Resource is 239.7 million tonnes grading 0.44 g/t gold for a total of 3.36 million troy ounces of gold using similar parameters as the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource.

The following table outlines the updated Gramalote Mineral Resource estimate ona 100% basis using a 0.15 g/t gold cut-off grade and within a US$1,600 per ounce gold optimized Whittle pit:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Contained Metal
Category                                Tonnes  Gold Grade  Gold Troy Ounces
                                     (millions)      (g/t)        (millions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured and Indicated Gramalote                                            
 Central                                128.072       0.63             2.608
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated Monjas West                     4.665       0.55             0.083
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Measured and Indicated                                                
 Gramalote Central and Monjas West(2)   132.737    0.63(1)             2.691
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Gramalote Central              126.946       0.43             1,739
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Trinidad                        89.220       0.41             1.180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Monjas West                     23,527       0.59             0.446
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Inferred(2)                       239.694    0.44(1)             3.364
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  Differences in tonnage, ounces and grades due to rounding 
2.  Mineral resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have a
    demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty which may be
    attached to Inferred Mineral Resources, it cannot be assumed that all or
    any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to an
    Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource as a result of continued
    exploration.

B2Gold published in 2012 a National Instrument 43-101 compliant Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource at Gramalote Central of 97.1 million tonnes grading 0.81 g/t gold for a total of 2.5 million troy ounces of gold at a 0.25 g/t gold cut-off and within a US$1,600 per ounce gold optimized Whittle pit. The Gramalote Central and Trinidad Inferred Mineral Resource was 95.7 million tonnes grading 0.44 g/t gold for a total of 1.36 million troy ounces of gold using similar parameters as the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource (see press release dated April 24, 2012).

The new Gramalote Central Mineral Resource estimate is supported by 63,902 metres of diamond drilling in 176 drill holes completed in 2007 to 2013 and 441 metres of sampling from an underground tunnel. The Monjas West Mineral Resource is supported by 18,094 metres of diamond drilling in 46 drill holes and a total of 10,572 metres of diamond drilling in 30 holes drilled was used in the Trinidad Mineral Resource estimation. Average drill hole spacing used in the Mineral Resource was 25 metres x 25 metres for Measured, 50 metres x 50 metres for Indicated and 100 metres x 100 metres for Inferred.

The Gramalote resource was prepared by AngloGold Ashanti and AMEC carried out an independent audit of the low grade zone at Gramalote Central in June 2013. AngloGold Ashanti monitored the quality assurance and quality control ("QA/QC") program of the data they collected in 2010 to 2013.

The Qualified Person (under National Instrument 43-101) for AngloGold Ashanti's resource estimate is Vaughan Chamberlain, FAusIMM, Senior Vice President, Geology and Metallurgy, AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. The drilling program at the Gramalote property is reviewed and the results approved by Tom Garagan, B2Gold's Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101. The Gramalote drill program utilizes extensive QA/QC (quality assurance and quality control) protocols for assaying and core sample handling that consist of the systematic insertion of blanks, standards and duplicates as well as using a secondary laboratory for regular check assaying. Core samples are cut with a diamond saw with one-half of the core placed in sealed bags and shipped directly to ALS Chemex Labs in Bogota, Colombia for sample preparation with the pulps subsequently sent to ALS Chemex Labs in Lima, Peru for gold fire assay and ICP analyses.

Summary of Base Case Results

The base case assumptions included revenues using a gold price of $1,351 per ounce and current prices for fuel, reagents, labor, power and other consumables. The key results on a 100% basis are as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mineral Resources used in the Mine Plan                                     
Measured and Indicated Resources (112.4Mt at 0.70g/t totaling               
 2.553Moz)                                                                  
Inferred Mineral Resources (124.9Mt) at 0.53g/t Au, totaling                
 2.115Moz)                                                                  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contained gold ounces processed (Mozs)                                   4.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold Recovery (%)                                                        95%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold ounces produced (Mozs)                                            4.445
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual gold production (ounces)                              317,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste material mined (Mt)                                              587.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste to Ore strip ratio                                                 2.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction Capital ($M)                                              1,176
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining Capital ($M)                                                104.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross gold revenue ($M)                                                6,003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (pre-tax) ($M)                                              1,521
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (after tax) ($M)                                            990.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Present Value @5.06% (pre-tax) ($M)                                713.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Present Value @5.06% (after tax) ($M)                              397.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRR (after tax) (%)                                                    11.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Life (years)                                                       14.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payback (years)                                                          4.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Direct Cost (mining, processing & G&A) ($/oz-Au)                     664
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Cash Cost (direct cost + royalties, selling costs & silver              
 credits) ($/oz-Au)                                                      693
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Operating Cost (cash cost + severance pay, closure costs,               
 environmental compensation & sustaining capital) ($/oz-Au)              736
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOM Total Cost (operating costs + implementation capital) ($/oz-Au)    1,024
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average LOM mining cost ($/t mined)                                     1.39
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average LOM processing cost ($/t processed)                             6.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual G&A costs ($M)                                                   23.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The PEA is subject to a number of assumptions, including among others, that an environmental impact assessment will be completed within the required timeline, all required permits will be obtained in a timely manner, the Gramalote project will have the support of the local government and community, the regulatory environment will remain consistent and no material increase will have occurred to the estimated costs. A full list of the relevant assumptions will be set out in the PEA.

Project Sensitivities

Gramalote is a large, low grade, low cost project and is therefore very sensitive to the gold price. A table reflecting these sensitivities is shown below.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Gold Price  After Tax NPV  After Tax NPV  After Tax IRR
Sensitivity           ($/oz-Au)       @0% ($M)    @5.06% ($M)            (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+15%                      1,544        1,545.0          756.2          16.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+10%                      1,479        1,360.0          636.7          14.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+5%                       1,415        1,175.0          517.3          13.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Case                 1,351          990.0          397.7          11.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-5%                       1,286          805.2          277.7           9.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-10%                      1,222          620.3          157.7           7.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-15%                      1,158          435.6           36.9           5.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next Steps

At current gold price levels, the Gramalote Project economics are positive but at this time do not move the project to the top of the Company's priority list for continued development towards a Feasibility Study. The Gramalote project joint venture partners have agreed on a work program for 2014 that advances the Environmental Impact Study so it can be formally submitted to the Colombian regulators by the second quarter of 2014, which is key to advancing the Gramalote project permitting process. Focus will also be given on addressing other project risk issues such as infill drilling of Inferred Mineral Resources, social programs, environmental monitoring and government relations. Gramalote owns two diamond drills and will utilize those two machines to target 8,000 to 10,000 meters of infill drilling in 2014. At this time, a final budget for 2014 has not been agreed on but this should be finalized within the next month.

The project will be reviewed again in the 4th quarter of 2014 to determine if moving to a Feasibility Study is warranted at that time.

ON BEHALF OF B2GOLD CORP.

Clive T. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer

For more information on B2Gold please visit the Company web site at www.b2gold.com.

The Toronto Stock Exchange neither approves nor disapproves the information contained in this News Release.

This press release includes certain "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" (collectively, "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation, including projections of future financial and operational performance and statements regarding development, production and other activities on the Company's properties. All statements in this press release that address events or developments that we expect to occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, although not always, identified by words such as "expect", "plan", "anticipate", "project", "target", "potential", "schedule", "forecast", "budget", "estimate", "intend" or "believe" and similar expressions or their negative connotations, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could", "should" or "might" occur.

All such forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made. Forward-looking statements necessarily involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond B2Gold's control, including risks associated with the uncertainty of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; volatility of metal prices; risks of exploration, development and mining; financing risks; ability to obtain any necessary permits, consents or authorizations required for its activities; adequate infrastructure, energy and other inputs; shortages or cost increases in necessary equipment, supplies and labour; regulatory, political and country risks; reliance upon third parties; reliance upon joint venture partners; litigation; as well as other factors identified in B2Gold's filings with Canadian securities regulators and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which may be viewed at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the Company's forward looking statements. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do, what benefits B2Gold will derive therefrom. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company's forward looking statements reflect current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date hereof and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions should change other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Readers Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources

Information concerning the properties and operations discussed in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" used in this news release are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101 under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by the CIM Council on December 11, 2005. While the terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve calculation is made. As such, certain information contained in this news release concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An "Inferred Mineral Resource" has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Resources will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. Readers are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" exists, or is economically or legally mineable. In addition, the definitions of "Proven Mineral Reserves" and "Probable Mineral Reserves" under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Contacts:
B2Gold Corp.
Ian MacLean
Vice President, Investor Relations
604-681-8371

B2Gold Corp.
Shaun Johnson
Associate, Investor Relations
604-681-8371
www.b2gold.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Multiple data types are pouring into IoT deployments. Data is coming in small packages as well as enormous files and data streams of many sizes. Widespread use of mobile devices adds to the total. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists looked at the tools and environments that are being put to use in IoT deployments, as well as the team skills a modern enterprise IT shop needs to keep things running, get a handle on all this data, and deliver...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
"We are a monitoring company. We work with Salesforce, BBC, and quite a few other big logos. We basically provide monitoring for them, structure for their cloud services and we fit into the DevOps world" explained David Gildeh, Co-founder and CEO of Outlyer, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...