Welcome!

Article

Performance Comparison Testing of Hive, esProc, and Impala Part 1

Three data computing languages

Performance comparison within Hive, Impala and esProc in grouping

summarizing, and join computing.

Hardware environment

PC count: 4
CPU: Intel Core i5 2500 (4 cores)
RAM: 16G
HDD: 2T/7200 rpm
Ethernet adapter: 1000 M

Software environment

OS: CentOS6. 4
JDK: 1. 6
Hadoop/hdfs 2. 2. 0

Test Result

Hive  0. 11. 0
esProc 3. 1
Impala 1. 2. 0

Data sampling

1. Restart PC before every test
2. Print the start time in the log before executing task
3. Print the end time in the log after executing task
4. Subtract the starting time from the ending time as the reference result
5. Repeat the step 1-4 for three times, and get the average value of the reference result as the final result of the test of this round

Test scenario

In order to ensure the test data is typical and comparable, the three products must go through the same computing. The Hive or Impala is designed for the data warehouse, providing the SQL-like syntax as the only available syntax. By comparison, esProc is designed as the complex procedural computing script, but not the data warehouse. In other words, esProc does not provide the SQL -style syntax directly, and esProc script can achieve the result of SQL computing by simulating in a more convenient style. So, the test computation this time is the SQL-style grouping, summarizing, and join operations.

In this test report, we use the HDFS and Hive incorporated in CDH5.0beta, while not the Hadoop that issued separately. This is because the Hadoop deployment and setup is rather complex, and the testing environment can frequently go wrong. But it is comparatively easy for CDH. esProc is easy to setup with an installation package of dozens MBs.

esProc supports both HDFS and the much faster operations on local disks, while Hive or Impala only supports HDFS. In order to test the extreme performances of these three solutions, esProc use the local disk for test, and split the data into several files and distribute them on several machines in advance, while Hive or Impala uses HDFS.

Grouping and Summarizing Test for Narrow Table

Data sample:
Table name: p_narrow
Col. count: 11
Row count: 500 million rows
Space occupied if saving as text: 120. 6G.
Data structure: personid int,name string,sex int,cityid int,birthday int,degree int,col1 string,col2 int,col3 int,col4 int,col5 string
Test case:
1.1 col. to group & 1 col. to summarize
Hive: select personid%10000, sum(col3) from p_narrow group by personid%10000
esProc: The codes fall into 3 parts. They are respectively: Program of summary machine, main program for node machine, and subprogram for node machine.

 

 


Impala: select personid%10000, sum(col3) from p_narrow group by personid%10000

2. 1 col. to group & 4 col. to summarize

Hive: select personid%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p_narrow group by personid%10
esProc: The program for summary machine in cell A4 is changed to:
=A3. groups(personid: personid;count(cul1count): cul1count,max(cul2count): cul2count,sum(cul3sum): cul3sum,count(cul5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A5 is:
=A4. [email protected](personid: [email protected](personid: cu1count,max(col2count): cul2count,sum(col3sum): cul3sum,count(col5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A1 is:
=cursor. groups(personid%10000: personid; count(col1count): co1count, max(col2count): col2count, sum(col3sum): col3sum,count(col5): col5count)
Impala: select personid%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p_narrow group by personid%10

3. 4 col. to group & 1 col. to summarize

Hive: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10 from p_narrow group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10
esProc: The program for summary machine in cell A4 is changed to:
=A3. groups(personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; sum(cul3sum): cul3sum)
The main program for node machine in cell A5 is changed to:
=A4. [email protected](personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; sum(col3sum): cul3sum)
The main program for node machine in cell A1 is changed to:
=cursor. groups(personid%10: personid, cityid%10: cityid, birthdayid%10: birthdayid, col4%10: col4; sum(col3sum): col3sum)
Impala: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10 from p_narrow group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10

4.4 col. to group & 4 col. to summarize

Hive: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p_narrow group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10
esProc: The program for summary machine in cell A4 is changed to:
=A3. groups(personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; count(cul1count): cul1count,max(cul2count): cul2count,sum(cul3sum): cul3sum,count(cul5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A5 is changed to:
=A4. [email protected](personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; count(col1count): cu1count,max(col2count): cul2count,sum(col3sum): cul3sum,count(col5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A1 is changed to:
=cursor. groups(personid%10: personid, cityid%10: cityid, birthdayid%10: birthdayid, col4%10: col4; count(col1count): co1count, max(col2count): col2count, sum(col3sum): col3sum, count(col5): col5count)
Impala: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p_narrow group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10
Test results:

Test results:


Grouping and summarizing test for wide table

Data sample:
Table name: p
Col. count: 106
Row count: 60 million
Space occupied if saving as text: 127. 9G.
Data structure: personid int,name string,sex int,cityid int,birthday int,degree int,col1 int,col2 int,col3 int,col4 int,col5 int,col6 int,col7 int,col8 int,col9 int,col10 int,col11 int,col12 int,col13 int,col14 int,col15 int,col16 int,col17 int,col18 int,col19 int,col20 int,col21 int,col22 int,col23 int,col24 int,col25 int,col26 int,col27 int,col28 int,col29 int,col30 int,col31 int,col32 int,col33 int,col34 int,col35 int,col36 int,col37 int,col38 int,col39 int,col40 int,col41 int,col42 int,col43 int,col44 int,col45 int,col46 int,col47 int,col48 int,col49 int,col50 int,col51 int,col52 int,col53 int,col54 int,col55 int,col56 int,col57 int,col58 int,col59 int,col60 int,col61 int,col62 int,col63 int,col64 int,col65 int,col66 int,col67 int,col68 int,col69 int,col70 int,col71 int,col72 int,col73 int,col74 int,col75 int,col76 int,col77 int,col78 int,col79 int,col80 int,col81 int,col82 int,col83 int,col84 string,col85 string,col86 string,col87 string,col88 string,col89 string,col90 string,col91 string,col92 string,col93 string,col94 string,col95 string,col96 string,col97 string,col98 string,col99 string,col100 string

Test case:
1.1 col. to group & 1 col. to summarize
Hive: select personid%10000, sum(col3) from p group by personid%10000
esProc: The codes can be divided into 3 parts. They are respectively: Program for summary machine, main program for node machine, and subprogram for node machine.

 

 


Impala: select personid%10000, sum(col3) from p group by personid%10000

2.1 col. to group & 4 col. to summarize

Hive: select personid%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p group by personid%10
esProc: The program for summary machine in cell A4 is changed to:
=A3. groups(personid: personid;count(cul1count): cul1count,max(cul2count): cul2count,sum(cul3sum): cul3sum,count(cul5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A5 is changed to:
=A4. [email protected](personid: personid;count(col1count): cu1count,max(col2count): cul2count,sum(col3sum): cul3sum,count(col5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A1 is changed to:
=cursor. groups(personid%10000: personid; count(col1count): co1count, max(col2count): col2count, sum(col3sum): col3sum,count(col5): col5count)
Impala: select personid%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p group by personid%10

3.4 col. to group & 1 col. to summarize

Hive: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10 from p group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10
esProc: The program for summary machine in cell A4 is changed to:
=A3. groups(personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; sum(cul3sum): cul3sum)
The main program for node machine in cell A5 is changed to:
=A4. [email protected](personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; sum(col3sum): cul3sum)
The main program for node machine in cell A1 is changed to:
=cursor. groups(personid%10: personid, cityid%10: cityid, birthdayid%10: birthdayid, col4%10: col4; sum(col3sum): col3sum)
Impala: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10 from p group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10

4.4 col. to group & 4 col. to summarize

Hive: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10
esProc: The program for summary machine in cell A4 is changed to:
=A3. groups(personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; count(cul1count): cul1count,max(cul2count): cul2count,sum(cul3sum): cul3sum,count(cul5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A5 is changed to:
=A4. [email protected](personid: personid, cityid: cityid, birthdayid: birthdayid, col4: col4; count(col1count): cu1count,max(col2count): cul2count,sum(col3sum): cul3sum,count(col5): cul5count)
The main program for node machine in cell A1 is changed to:
=cursor. groups(personid%10: personid, cityid%10: cityid, birthdayid%10: birthdayid, col4%10: col4; count(col1count): co1count, max(col2count): col2count, sum(col3sum): col3sum, count(col5): col5count)
Impala: select personid%10, cityid%10, birthdayid%10, col4%10, count(col1), max(col2), sum(col3), count(col5) from p group by personid%10,cityid%10,birthdayid%10,col4%10
Test results:


The performance testing and result comparison regarding the join computing will be discussed in the next article: Performance Comparison Testing of Hive, esProc, and Impala Part 2.

Personal blog: http://www.datakeyword.blogspot.com/
Web: http://www.raqsoft.com/product-esproc

More Stories By Jessica Qiu

Jessica Qiu is the editor of Raqsoft. She provides press releases for data computation and data analytics.

Latest Stories
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of following equation: monolithic to microservices to serverless architecture (FaaS). To keep up with the cut-throat competition, the organisations need to update their technology stack to make software development their differentiating factor. Thus microservices architecture emerged as a potential method to provide development teams with greater flexibility and other advantages, such as the abili...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...