Welcome!

News Feed Item

Pulse Seismic Inc. Reports 2013 Results and Declares Quarterly Dividend

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/17/14 -- Pulse Seismic Inc. (TSX: PSD)(OTCQX: PLSDF) ("Pulse" or "the Company") reports the financial and operating results of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013. The year-end audited financial results were in line with the preliminary unaudited financial results announced in the Company's news release on January 16, 2014. The audited consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and MD&A are being filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and will be available on Pulse's website at www.pulseseismic.com.

Pulse has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per common share. This dividend will be paid on April 11, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 28, 2014. Dividends are designated as an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax purposes. For non-resident shareholders, Pulse's dividends are subject to Canadian withholding tax.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013


--  Seismic data library sales of $27.1 million, a 58 percent decrease from
    the record $64.0 million achieved in 2012;
--  Total seismic revenue (including participation survey revenue) of $40.5
    million compared to $86.4 million in 2012;
--  Cash EBITDA(a) of $19.1 million, a 65 percent decrease from $54.7
    million in 2012, and a 63 percent decrease on a per-share basis from
    $0.87 to $0.32 per share basic and diluted;
--  Shareholder free cash flow(a) of $20.7 million, a 59 percent decrease
    from $50.0 million in 2012, and a 58 percent decrease on a per-share
    basis from $0.80 to $0.34 per share basic and diluted;
--  Funds from operations(b) of $27.8 million ($0.46 per share basic and
    diluted) compared to $74.3 million ($1.19 per share basic and diluted)
    for 2012(i);
--  Pulse completed three 3D participation surveys totalling 1,182 square
    kilometres, with total gross capital expenditures amounting to $58.0
    million. Some of these survey costs were incurred in 2012 when the
    surveys were initiated;
--  Pulse purchased and cancelled, through its normal course issuer bid, a
    total of 2,447,222 common shares (4 percent of the total outstanding at
    December 31, 2012) at a total cost of approximately $8.4 million (at an
    average cost of $3.42 per common share including commissions);
--  Pulse paid four quarterly dividends of $0.02 per common share at a total
    cost of $4.8 million; and
--  At December 31, 2013 Pulse's cash balance was $1.7 million and long-term
    debt(c) was $21.8 million, resulting in a net debt position of $20.1
    million.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013


--  Seismic data library sales of $4.6 million, down 62 percent from $11.9
    million in the same period of 2012;
--  Total seismic revenue consisting of data library sales of $4.6 million
    compared to $27.8 million, including participation survey revenue of
    $15.9 million, for the comparable period in 2012;
--  Cash EBITDA(a) of $3.0 million or $0.05 per share basic and diluted
    compared to $9.7 million or $0.16 per share basic and diluted in the
    fourth quarter of 2012;
--  Shareholder free cash flow(a) of $3.7 million or $0.06 per share basic
    and diluted compared to $7.4 million or $0.12 per share basic and
    diluted in the fourth quarter of 2012;
--  Funds from operations of $2.7 million ($0.05 per share basic and
    diluted) compared to $25.3 million ($0.41 per share basic and diluted)
    for the three months ended December 31, 2012(i).

(i) Funds from operations for the comparative three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2012 reflect a reclassification to conform to the current year's financial statement presentation.


Selected Financial and Operating Information
(thousands of dollars except per share data and number of shares)

                                       Three months                    Year
                                  ended December 31,      ended December 31,
                                   2013        2012        2013        2012
Revenue
  Data library sales            $ 4,565    $ 11,885    $ 27,079    $ 64,040
  Participation surveys               -      15,887      13,429      22,313
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenue                   $ 4,565    $ 27,772    $ 40,508    $ 86,353

Amortization of seismic
 data library                   $ 6,215     $ 6,351    $ 55,619    $ 36,568

Net earnings (loss)            $ (2,572)   $ 13,951   $ (18,834)   $ 27,446
  Per share basic and
   diluted                      $ (0.04)     $ 0.23     $ (0.31)     $ 0.44

Cash EBITDA (a)                 $ 2,962     $ 9,737    $ 19,145    $ 54,692
  Per share basic and
   diluted (a)                   $ 0.05      $ 0.16      $ 0.32      $ 0.87

Shareholder free cash flow
 (a)                            $ 3,655     $ 7,381    $ 20,682    $ 50,046
  Per share basic and
   diluted (a)                   $ 0.06      $ 0.12      $ 0.34      $ 0.80

Funds from operations (b)       $ 2,736    $ 25,333    $ 27,751    $ 74,346
  Per share basic and
   diluted (b)                   $ 0.05      $ 0.41      $ 0.46      $ 1.19

Capital expenditures:
  Participation surveys
   (cost reduction)               $ (67)   $ 27,961    $ 21,265    $ 40,261
  Seismic data purchases
   and related costs                183       1,095         961       1,908
  Property and equipment
   additions (cost
   reduction)                       (41)        577         127         790
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total capital expenditures         $ 75    $ 29,633    $ 22,353    $ 42,959

Weighted average shares
 outstanding:
  Basic                      59,434,027  61,104,706  60,280,876  62,526,761
  Diluted                    59,434,027  61,109,999  60,280,876  62,526,761
Shares outstanding at
 period end                                          59,349,120  61,140,442

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seismic library:
2D in net kilometres                                    339,991     339,991
3D in net square kilometres                              28,284      27,089
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial Position and Ratios
(thousands of dollars except ratio calculations)
                                                          As at December 31,
                                                           2013        2012
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital                                         $ 6,476    $ (1,462)
Working capital ratio                                    3.71:1      0.96:1
Total assets                                           $ 98,017   $ 162,454
Long-term debt (c)                                     $ 21,850    $ 26,688
TTM cash EBITDA (d)                                    $ 19,145    $ 54,692
Shareholders' equity                                   $ 65,962    $ 96,550
Long-term debt to equity
 ratio                                                   0.33:1      0.28:1
Long-term debt to TTM cash
 EBITDA ratio                                            1.14:1      0.49:1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) The Company's continuous disclosure documents provide discussion and analysis of "cash EBITDA", "cash EBITDA per share", "shareholder free cash flow" and "shareholder free cash flow per share". These financial measures do not have standard definitions prescribed by IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. The Company has included these non-GAAP financial measures because management, investors, analysts and others use them as measures of the Company's financial performance. The Company's definition of cash EBITDA is cash available for interest payments, cash taxes if applicable, debt servicing, discretionary capital expenditures and the payment of dividends, and is calculated as earnings (loss) from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less participation survey revenue, plus any non-cash and non-recurring expenses. Cash EBITDA excludes participation survey revenue as these funds are directly used to fund specific participation surveys and this revenue is not available for discretionary capital expenditures. The Company believes cash EBITDA assists investors in comparing Pulse's results on a consistent basis without regard to participation survey revenue and non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary significantly depending on accounting methods or non-operating factors such as historical cost. Cash EBITDA per share is defined as cash EBITDA divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Shareholder free cash flow further refines the calculation of capital available to invest in growing the Company's 2D and 3D seismic data library, to repay debt, to purchase its common shares and to pay dividends by deducting non-discretionary expenditures from cash EBITDA. Non-discretionary expenditures are defined as debt financing costs (net of deferred financing expenses amortized in the current period) and current tax provisions. Shareholder free cash flow per share is defined as shareholder free cash flow divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.

(b) Funds from operations is an additional GAAP measure. Funds from operations is defined as cash provided by operations as prescribed by IFRS, excluding the impact of changes in non-cash working capital. Funds from operations represents the cash that was generated during the period, regardless of the timing of collection of receivables and payment of payables. Funds from operations per share is defined as funds from operations divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.

(c) Long-term debt is defined as total long-term debt, including current portion, net of debt finance cost.

(d) TTM cash EBITDA is defined as the sum of the trailing 12 month's cash EBITDA and is used to provide a comparable annualized measure.

OUTLOOK

Pulse remains financially strong and very well positioned operationally, even though the timing and level of data library sales continue to be unclear. The Company can continue to operate under low revenue levels and still provide returns to shareholders. At the same time, individual data library sales can be very large, and Pulse's annual revenues could increase substantially with no advance indicators. As 2012 demonstrated, Pulse and its shareholders benefit greatly when revenues accelerate, because Pulse can deliver a major increase in revenue with little increase in costs, resulting in an increase in shareholder free cash flow, which provides flexibility and options for capital allocation. Once Pulse is past break-even, profitability has tremendous leverage against revenues.

Overall, Pulse is cautious going into 2014. On a positive note, natural gas pricing is markedly higher than a year ago, having climbed to what could be a sustained level above $4 per GJ, not counting the cold-weather-related price spike in February. In addition, there is better visibility for expansion of takeaway capacity for oil and natural gas out of western Canada. This is offset by the much lower provincial mineral lease auction revenue or land sales in 2013, historically a leading indicator of seismic activity, as well as forecasts for another year of relatively low oil and natural gas well drilling.

Energy services companies generally reported weaker activity in 2013, consistent with Pulse's experience. More recently, some reported a pickup in activity and financial results for the fourth quarter and/or issued considerably stronger outlooks for 2014. Greater drilling and hydraulic fracturing activity for service companies implies higher capital budgets among oil and natural gas producers. While traditional leading indicators are less directly linked to Pulse's seismic data sales than in the past, they are still positive, as are recent reports of asset transactions plus some investment research anticipating a busier year for mergers and acquisitions.

Regarding the longer term, the producing sector and investment community have shown great interest in proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facilities on British Columbia's Pacific Coast. This is a complex story, with many factors remaining uncertain. The gas demand from two or three LNG projects would be enormous, triggering increased upstream activity. A typical, 1.5-billion-cubic-foot-per-day liquefaction facility would take in 12 percent of Canada's current gas production. This is equivalent to the output of the country's largest natural gas producer, or over half the gas currently produced by the entire Montney play. One published research report estimated that providing a dedicated 20-year gas supply for one LNG export facility would require drilling 6,000 Montney wells.

Pulse offers good data coverage over some of the critical LNG supply areas - the Montney and Duvernay in particular - as well as areas likely to experience secondary effects, such as the Alberta Deep Basin. Strong gas demand for LNG could even revive drilling for traditional "dry" gas. Anything that stimulates field activity should be good for Pulse's business. In principle, the same goes for any added takeaway capacity, such as new pipelines or greater oil-by-rail exports. LNG should exert the greatest leverage, however, because the product would go to markets where natural gas has been priced at $12-$18 per GJ for years. Even modest capture of the price differential would be highly beneficial to Canada's gas producers.

So far in 2014, sales have tracked to the Company's modest first quarter budget. Pulse has a record of delivering strong years set amidst weaker years, and its revenues could accelerate at any time. In the meantime, Pulse will practise prudent cost and capital management and remain focused on generating returns for shareholders.

Q4 2013 CONFERENCE CALL

Pulse will hold a conference call and live audio webcast on Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 11:00 am MT (1:00 pm ET) where Neal Coleman, President & CEO and Pamela Wicks, VP Finance & CFO will discuss the Company's fourth quarter and year-end 2013 results. A question-and-answer period will follow an update on the Company's strategies and outlook.

To participate please dial 416-340-8530 or 1-877-440-9745 approximately 10 minutes before the commencement of the call. To listen to the webcast of the conference call please visit the Company's website at www.pulseseismic.com.

An archival recording of the conference call will be available approximately one hour after the completion of the call until March 25, 2014. To access the replay, please dial 1 800-408-3053 or 905-694-9451 and enter the pass code 4144913.

CORPORATE PROFILE

Pulse is a market leader in the acquisition, marketing and licensing of 2D and 3D seismic data to the western Canadian energy sector. Pulse owns the second-largest licensable seismic data library in Canada, currently consisting of approximately 28,300 square kilometres of 3D seismic and 340,000 kilometres of 2D seismic. The library extensively covers the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin where most of Canada's oil and natural gas exploration and development occur.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains information that constitutes "forward-looking information" or "forward-looking statements" (collectively, "forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes, among other things, statements regarding:


--  Pulse remains financially strong and very well positioned operationally,
    even though the timing and level of data library sales continue to be
    unclear;
--  The Company can continue to operate under low revenue levels and still
    provide returns to shareholders;
--  Individual data library sales can be very large, and Pulse's annual
    revenues could increase substantially with no advance indicators;
--  Pulse has a record of delivering strong to record years set amidst
    weaker years, and revenues could accelerate at any time;
--  General economic and industry outlook;
--  Pulse's capital allocation strategy;
--  Pulse's dividend policy;
--  Industry activity levels and capital spending;
--  Forecast commodity prices;
--  Forecast oil and natural gas drilling activity;
--  Forecast oil and natural gas company capital budgets;
--  Forecast horizontal drilling activity in unconventional oil and natural
    gas plays;
--  Potential future development of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
    facilities and the potential associated effects on gas drilling;
--  Estimated future demand for seismic data;
--  Estimated future seismic data sales;
--  Estimated future demand for participation surveys;
--  Management's expectations on the sufficiency of Pulse's capital
    resources;
--  Pulse's business and growth strategy; and
--  Other expectations, beliefs, plans, goals, objectives, assumptions,
    information and statements about possible future events, conditions,
    results and performance.

Often, but not always, forward-looking information uses words or phrases such as: "expects", "does not expect" or "is expected", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", "plans" or "does not plan", "estimates" or "estimated", "projects" or "projected", "forecasts" or "forecasted", "believes" or "does not believe", "intends" or "does not intend", "likely" or "unlikely", "possible", "probable", "scheduled", "positioned", "goal", "objective", "hopes", "optimistic" or states that certain actions, events or results "should", "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based upon current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to vary and in some instances to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information.

The material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to:


--  oil and natural gas prices;
--  seismic industry cycles and seasonality;
--  the demand for seismic data and participation surveys;
--  the pricing of data library license sales;
--  relicensing (change of control) fees and partner copy sales;
--  the level of pre-funding of participation surveys, and the ability of
    the Company to make subsequent data library sales from such
    participation surveys;
--  the ability of the Company to complete participation surveys on time and
    within budget;
--  environment, health and safety risks;
--  the effect of seasonality and weather conditions on participation
    surveys;
--  federal and provincial government laws and regulation, including
    taxation, royalty rates, environment and safety;
--  competition;
--  dependence upon qualified seismic field contractors;
--  dependence upon key management, operations and marketing personnel;
--  loss of seismic data;
--  protection of Intellectual Property; and
--  the introduction of new products.

The foregoing list of risks is not exhaustive. Additional information on these risks and other factors which could affect the Company's operations or financial results are included in the Risk Factors section of the Company's MD&A for the most recent calendar year and interim periods. Forward-looking information is based upon the assumptions, expectations, estimates and opinions of the Company's management at the time the information is presented.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to simplify and streamline our lives by automating routine tasks that distract us from our goals. This promise is based on the ubiquitous deployment of smart, connected devices that link everything from industrial control systems to automobiles to refrigerators. Unfortunately, comparatively few of the devices currently deployed have been developed with an eye toward security, and as the DDoS attacks of late October 2016 have demonstrated, this oversight can ...
"We're a cybersecurity firm that specializes in engineering security solutions both at the software and hardware level. Security cannot be an after-the-fact afterthought, which is what it's become," stated Richard Blech, Chief Executive Officer at Secure Channels, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
What happens when the different parts of a vehicle become smarter than the vehicle itself? As we move toward the era of smart everything, hundreds of entities in a vehicle that communicate with each other, the vehicle and external systems create a need for identity orchestration so that all entities work as a conglomerate. Much like an orchestra without a conductor, without the ability to secure, control, and connect the link between a vehicle’s head unit, devices, and systems and to manage the ...
"Once customers get a year into their IoT deployments, they start to realize that they may have been shortsighted in the ways they built out their deployment and the key thing I see a lot of people looking at is - how can I take equipment data, pull it back in an IoT solution and show it in a dashboard," stated Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
In his session at Cloud Expo, Robert Cohen, an economist and senior fellow at the Economic Strategy Institute, provideed economic scenarios that describe how the rapid adoption of software-defined everything including cloud services, SDDC and open networking will change GDP, industry growth, productivity and jobs. This session also included a drill down for several industries such as finance, social media, cloud service providers and pharmaceuticals.
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Data is the fuel that drives the machine learning algorithmic engines and ultimately provides the business value. In his session at Cloud Expo, Ed Featherston, a director and senior enterprise architect at Collaborative Consulting, discussed the key considerations around quality, volume, timeliness, and pedigree that must be dealt with in order to properly fuel that engine.
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Enterprise IT has been in the era of Hybrid Cloud for some time now. But it seems most conversations about Hybrid are focused on integrating AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google ECM into existing on-premises systems. Where is all the Private Cloud? What do technology providers need to do to make their offerings more compelling? How should enterprise IT executives and buyers define their focus, needs, and roadmap, and communicate that clearly to the providers?
SYS-CON Events announced today that Dataloop.IO, an innovator in cloud IT-monitoring whose products help organizations save time and money, has been named “Bronze Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Dataloop.IO is an emerging software company on the cutting edge of major IT-infrastructure trends including cloud computing and microservices. The company, founded in the UK but now based in San Fran...
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
Join Impiger for their featured webinar: ‘Cloud Computing: A Roadmap to Modern Software Delivery’ on November 10, 2016, at 12:00 pm CST. Very few companies have not experienced some impact to their IT delivery due to the evolution of cloud computing. This webinar is not about deciding whether you should entertain moving some or all of your IT to the cloud, but rather, a detailed look under the hood to help IT professionals understand how cloud adoption has evolved and what trends will impact th...
"We are the public cloud providers. We are currently providing 50% of the resources they need for doing e-commerce business in China and we are hosting about 60% of mobile gaming in China," explained Yi Zheng, CPO and VP of Engineering at CDS Global Cloud, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Businesses and business units of all sizes can benefit from cloud computing, but many don't want the cost, performance and security concerns of public cloud nor the complexity of building their own private clouds. Today, some cloud vendors are using artificial intelligence (AI) to simplify cloud deployment and management. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Ajay Gulati, Co-founder and CEO of ZeroStack, will discuss how AI can simplify cloud operations. He will cover the following topics: why clou...