Click here to close now.


News Feed Item

Crocodile Gold Reports Revenue of Over $300 Million and Operating Cash Flow of $67 Million in 2013

TORONTO, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 03/19/14 -- Crocodile Gold Corp. (TSX: CRK)(TSX: CRK.DB)(TSX: CRK.WT)(OTCQX: CROCF)(FRANKFURT: XGC) ("Crocodile Gold" or the "Company") today announces its annual financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2013. All figures are in U.S. dollars, unless stated otherwise.

2013 Financial Highlights

--  Crocodile Gold generated over $300M in revenue in 2013 with production
    of 210,696 ounces of gold from its three operating mines, a 35% increase
    in production over 2012.
--  Operating cash costs(1) have decreased to $1,027 per ounce in 2013, down
    from $1,167 per ounce in 2012, as a result of sustainable ounce
    production at Cosmo, productivity gains at Fosterville and cost
    reductions across all operations.
--  The Company generated $67.5M in cash flow from operations in 2013
    despite a challenging gold price environment, an increase of $8.6M over
    2012 due to strong production and lower operating cash costs.
--  The Company finished the year in a strong financial position with a cash
    balance of $27.6M and working capital of $15.3M. The Company also raised
    an additional C$18.0M in cash through a private placement that closed in
    February 2014.
--  In March 2014, the Company settled its remaining outstanding credit
    facility with Credit Suisse, to further strengthen the Company's
    financial position.

Commenting on these results, Rodney D. Lamond, President and CEO of Crocodile Gold, said: "2013 has been a very strong year for the Company and this is demonstrated in our positive year-end financial results. We have focused on sustainable mine plans that generate positive cash flows, which has positively affected our production levels at the Fosterville and Cosmo Gold Mines and enabled the Stawell Gold Mine to extend its production plan into 2014. The Company will continue to focus on sustainability and making value driven investments as we continue to move through the current gold market. I continue to be impressed with the commitment and dedication of the team and look forward to a strong 2014."

2013 Annual and Fourth Quarter Financial Results

                             Q4 2013     YTD 2013       Q4 2012 YTD 2012(2)
Revenue ($)               73,277,197  300,825,156   101,770,213 255,930,383
Cost of operations        70,149,129  295,756,866    89,359,577 236,312,594
Mine operating income
 (loss)($)                 3,128,068    5,068,290    12,410,636  19,617,789
Net income (loss)($)     (23,304,791) (92,766,331)   43,306,415 (40,206,794)
Net income (loss) per
 share ($/share)               (0.06)       (0.23)         0.11       (0.10)
Cash from operating
 activities ($)           20,532,491   67,462,666    39,334,568  58,831,314
Gold ounces produced          58,276      210,696        62,147     155,523
Gold ounces sold              57,503      212,723        59,541     153,227
Average realized gold
 price ($)                     1,273        1,407         1,704       1,665
Average quoted gold
 price ($)                     1,275        1,410         1,719       1,669
Cash cost per ounce sold
 ($)(1)                          963        1,027         1,000       1,167
All In sustaining Cash
 Costs($)(1)                   1,257        1,386         1,320       1,680
(1) Refer to non-IFRS measures below
(2) Crocodile Gold acquired, and accounted for, the Fosterville and Stawell
Gold Mines with effect from May 5, 2012

2013 Financial Summary

Crocodile Gold produced 210,696 ounces of gold in 2013, up significantly over 2012 with the declaration of commercial production from the Cosmo Gold Mine on March 1, 2013 and the inclusion of the Fosterville and Stawell Gold Mines for a full year of operation. This resulted in total revenues of $300,825,156 in 2013.

Operating cash costs continued to improve throughout 2013 and annualized average costs were $1,027 per ounce, down from $1,167 per ounce in 2012. While the Company's realized gold price decreased to $1,407 per ounce, Crocodile Gold was able to generated $67,462,666 of cash from operations in 2013 due to strong production and reduced operating costs.

Crocodile Gold is focused on value accretive, sustainable capital expenditures and invested $68,156,086 into the operations in 2013. This investment included $26,662,443 for development at Cosmo as it ramp-up operations and $35,801,212 for Fosterville to sustain production into future years. The Company also invested $5,114,252 at Stawell, which largely related to the permitting process of the Big Hill Project. The Company continues to optimize the use of its equipment fleet and fixed assets. This includes relocating equipment from Stawell to Fosterville and Cosmo as the former's underground operations wind-down.

The Company's net loss for 2013 was $92,766,331 or $0.23 per share, compared to a net loss of $40,206,794 or $0.10 a share in 2012. The 2013 net loss was impacted by a non-cash impairment charge of $177,125,774 as a result of the lower gold price environment. This was offset by a corresponding gain of $19,886,069 from the revaluation of the contingent consideration, and the gain from the close-out of the gold swap agreements with Credit Suisse.

Current Financial Position

Crocodile Gold ended the year with a cash balance of $27,591,430 and working capital of $15,309,480, a significant improvement from the working capital deficiency of $14,490,087 at December 31, 2012. The Company has subsequently raised a further C$18.0M on February 27, 2014 through a private placement offering.

In April of 2013, the Company moved to close out its gold swap agreements and used the proceeds to significantly reduce its outstanding credit facility with Credit Suisse from A$70.0M to $11.4M. The Company is now pleased to announce that in March 2014 it fully settled the remaining outstanding credit facility.

Fourth Quarter 2013 Summary

Crocodile Gold achieved strong operational results across all three mine operations and reported quarterly gold production of 58,267 ounces. Cosmo produced a record 21,915 ounces and Fosterville continued to demonstrate productivity improvements with record quarterly underground tonnes mined. Stawell continues to exceed expectations, producing 10,322 ounces and extending the underground mine life into 2014.

Revenue for Q4 2013 was $73,277,197, down from $101,770,213 in the corresponding period of 2012 as a result of a significantly lower average realized gold price despite similar ounces being sold each period. Revenue has also decreased approximately 6% from the third quarter of 2013, again driven by the lower average realized gold price. The operating cash cost per ounce of gold sold in the fourth quarter was $963 per ounce, compared to $1,000 per ounce sold in the corresponding quarter of 2012, due to the Company's continued focus on increased productivity and cost reduction initiatives. Cash generated from operations in Q4 2013 was $20,532,491, down from Q4 2012 due to the impact of the significantly lower gold price.

The Company used $15,007,542 for investing activities during Q4 2013, which included $13,555,400 for underground development and mineral resource definition at Cosmo and Fosterville and the advancement of Big Hill at Stawell, as well as $1,493,158 for the purchase of plant and equipment.

The Company posted a net loss of $23,304,791 or $0.06 per share in the fourth quarter, compared to net income in Q4 2012 of $43,306,415 or $0.11 per share. The Q4 2013 net loss was impacted by an impairment charge of $25,499,499, while the fourth quarter in the previous year was impacted by gains on the revaluation of the gold swap agreements and the contingent consideration.

Operational Guidance for 2014

Building on the achievement of its 2013 production target, Crocodile Gold has established production guidance for 2014 of 200,000 - 210,000 ounces of gold. The Company expects to achieve its guidance based on the following estimated production for each operation:

- Cosmo Gold Mine          75,000 - 80,000
- Fosterville Gold Mine    95,000 - 100,000
- Stawell Gold Mine        approx. 30,000

The Company has provided expanded commentary on each site's production profile for 2014 in the Management Discussion and Analysis also filed today.

Annual average operating cash costs in 2013 were $1,027 per ounce, down from $1,167 per ounce in 2012. Annual average operating cash costs for 2014 are projected to be between US$900 - US$950 per ounce. The Company has also adopted an all-in sustaining cost ("AISC") performance measure to reflect all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from current operations. The Company has provided historical AISC results below and in its Annual Management Discussion and Analysis, and will incorporate this measure in further detail as part of its reporting going forward. Refer to discussion of non-IFRS measures below.

Corporate Update

Effective March 12, 2014, the Company is pleased to announce that Mr. Rodney Lamond, President and CEO of the Company, has joined the Board of Directors and Mr. Robert Getz has been appointed as non-executive Chair. Mr. Getz has been a director of the Company since February 2012.

About Crocodile Gold

Crocodile Gold is a Canadian gold mining and exploration company with three operating mines in Australia, in the State of Victoria and the Northern Territory. The Company has a combined land package in excess of 4,000 sq. km. The objective of Crocodile Gold is to continue production from its three operating mines, Cosmo, Stawell and Fosterville, while also exploring and developing the Company's resources to ensure sustainable production in the future.

For additional information, please visit our website or follow us on Twitter @crocgold_crk or on Facebook at CrocodileGoldCorp.

Qualified Person

F. W. Nielsen P.Geo, Technical Consultant to Crocodile Gold is a "qualified person" as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical information and data included in this press release.

Cautionary Notes

Non-IFRS Measures

Crocodile Gold believes that investors use certain indicators to assess gold mining companies. The indicators are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

"Cash cost per ounce" is a non-IFRS performance measure that could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency and effectiveness at the operations. It is determined by dividing the operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation allocated to operating expenses and net of silver revenue, by the number of ounces of gold sold. There are variations in the method of computation of "cash cost per ounce" as determined by the Company compared with other mining companies. The following is a reconciliation of the cash cost per ounce of gold sold, to the reported operating expenses for the following periods:

Effective December 31, 2013, the Company has adopted an all-in sustaining cost ("AISC") performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from current operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's definition confirms to the AISC definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. The World Gold Council is a non-regulatory, non-profit organization established in 1987 whose members include global senior mining companies. The Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

The Company defines AISC as the sum of operating cash costs (per above), sustaining capital (capital required to maintain current operations at existing levels), capital lease repayments, corporate general and administrative expenses, in-mine exploration expenses and rehabilitation accretion and amortization related to current operations. AISC excludes capital expenditure related to projects to mine expansion, exploration and evaluation related to growth projects, rehabilitation accretion and amortization not related to current operations, financing costs, debt repayments, share-based compensation not related to operations, and taxes.

The operating cash costs per ounce and all-in sustaining cost per ounce are reconciled to the consolidated statement of operations as follows:

                                Q4 2013    YTD 2013     Q4 2012 YTD 2012(i)
Operating expense per the
 consolidated statement of
 operations, including
 royalties                   55,495,066 218,900,282  59,730,840 179,522,657
By-product silver sales
 credit                         (96,701)   (410,501)   (203,302)   (500,033)
Share-based payments charged
 to operations                        -           -           -    (240,861)
Operating Cash Costs         55,398,365 218,489,781  59,527,538 178,781,762
Share-based payments charged
 to operations                        -           -           -     240,861
Sustaining mine development
 (1)                         12,410,542  56,110,221   9,280,946  33,235,119
Sustaining capital
 expenditures, including
 capital lease payments       2,319,145  10,059,838   7,073,414  23,197,348
General and administration
 costs                        1,286,318   6,301,291   1,380,101  18,699,122
Rehabilitation - accretion
 and amortization (operating
 sites)                         883,342   2,757,672   1,714,566   1,575,900
In-mine exploration expense       7,434   1,125,620     710,486   1,671,339
All-in Sustaining Cash Costs 72,305,146 294,844,424  78,622,803 257,401,452
Gold ounces sold                 57,503     212,723      59,541     153,227
Operating Cash cost per ounce       963       1,027       1,000       1,167
All-in sustaining cash cost
 per ounce                        1,257       1,386       1,320       1,680

(1) Sustaining mine development are defined as those expenditures which do not increase annual gold production at a mine operation and exclude expenditures for growth projects and mine development to commercial production. Total sustaining capital for the quarters ending and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is calculated as follows:

Expenditure on mine
 development per
the statement of cash
 flows                    13,555,400  67,577,906    24,488,604   97,400,740
Less: Cosmo development
 before commercial
 production                        -  (6,353,689)  (15,207,658) (64,165,621)
Less: Big Hill Project
 Development costs        (1,114,858) (5,113,996)            -            -
                          12,410,542  56,110,221     9,280,946   33,235,119

Forward Looking Information

Certain information set forth in this press release contains "forward-looking statements", and "forward-looking information under applicable securities laws. Except for statements of historical fact, certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements, which include the Company's expectations for future performance based on current drill results and past production, expected gold prices, and mineral resource estimates, and are based on Crocodile Gold's current internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs, which may prove to be incorrect. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as "expects" "anticipates", "believes", "projects", "plans", and similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause Crocodile Gold's actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: liabilities inherent in mine development and production; geological, mining and processing technical problems; Crocodile Gold's inability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits and regulatory approvals required in connection with mining and mineral processing operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations; various events that could disrupt operations and/or the transportation of mineral products, including labour stoppages and severe weather conditions; the demand for and availability of rail, port and other transportation services; the ability to secure adequate financing and management's ability to anticipate and manage the foregoing factors and risks. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Crocodile Gold undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change except as required by applicable securities laws. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
There are so many tools and techniques for data analytics that even for a data scientist the choices, possible systems, and even the types of data can be daunting. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Chris Harrold, Global CTO for Big Data Solutions for EMC Corporation, will show how to perform a simple, but meaningful analysis of social sentiment data using freely available tools that take only minutes to download and install. Participants will get the download information, scripts, and complete en...
Today’s connected world is moving from devices towards things, what this means is that by using increasingly low cost sensors embedded in devices we can create many new use cases. These span across use cases in cities, vehicles, home, offices, factories, retail environments, worksites, health, logistics, and health. These use cases rely on ubiquitous connectivity and generate massive amounts of data at scale. These technologies enable new business opportunities, ways to optimize and automate, al...
IT data is typically silo'd by the various tools in place. Unifying all the log, metric and event data in one analytics platform stops finger pointing and provides the end-to-end correlation. Logs, metrics and custom event data can be joined to tell the holistic story of your software and operations. For example, users can correlate code deploys to system performance to application error codes.
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. Migration to cloud shifts computing resources from your data center, which can yield significant advantages provided that the cloud vendor an offer enterprise-grade quality for your application.
Overgrown applications have given way to modular applications, driven by the need to break larger problems into smaller problems. Similarly large monolithic development processes have been forced to be broken into smaller agile development cycles. Looking at trends in software development, microservices architectures meet the same demands. Additional benefits of microservices architectures are compartmentalization and a limited impact of service failure versus a complete software malfunction....
Manufacturing has widely adopted standardized and automated processes to create designs, build them, and maintain them through their life cycle. However, many modern manufacturing systems go beyond mechanized workflows to introduce empowered workers, flexible collaboration, and rapid iteration. Such behaviors also characterize open source software development and are at the heart of DevOps culture, processes, and tooling.
Containers are revolutionizing the way we deploy and maintain our infrastructures, but monitoring and troubleshooting in a containerized environment can still be painful and impractical. Understanding even basic resource usage is difficult - let alone tracking network connections or malicious activity. In his session at DevOps Summit, Gianluca Borello, Sr. Software Engineer at Sysdig, will cover the current state of the art for container monitoring and visibility, including pros / cons and li...
In their session at DevOps Summit, Asaf Yigal, co-founder and the VP of Product at, and Tomer Levy, co-founder and CEO of, will explore the entire process that they have undergone – through research, benchmarking, implementation, optimization, and customer success – in developing a processing engine that can handle petabytes of data. They will also discuss the requirements of such an engine in terms of scalability, resilience, security, and availability along with how the archi...
In his session at DevOps Summit, Bryan Cantrill, CTO at Joyent, will demonstrate a third path: containers on multi-tenant bare metal that maximizes performance, security, and networking connectivity.
Any Ops team trying to support a company in today’s cloud-connected world knows that a new way of thinking is required – one just as dramatic than the shift from Ops to DevOps. The diversity of modern operations requires teams to focus their impact on breadth vs. depth. In his session at DevOps Summit, Adam Serediuk, Director of Operations at xMatters, Inc., will discuss the strategic requirements of evolving from Ops to DevOps, and why modern Operations has begun leveraging the “NoOps” approa...
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
Between the compelling mockups and specs produced by analysts, and resulting applications built by developers, there exists a gulf where projects fail, costs spiral, and applications disappoint. Methodologies like Agile attempt to address this with intensified communication, with partial success but many limitations. In his session at DevOps Summit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, will present a revolutionary model enabled by new technologies. Learn how busine...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data...
DevOps has often been described in terms of CAMS: Culture, Automation, Measuring, Sharing. While we’ve seen a lot of focus on the “A” and even on the “M”, there are very few examples of why the “C" is equally important in the DevOps equation. In her session at @DevOps Summit, Lori MacVittie, of F5 Networks, will explore HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 along with Microservices to illustrate why a collaborative culture between Dev, Ops, and the Network is critical to ensuring success.
The buzz continues for cloud, data analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT) and their collective impact across all industries. But a new conversation is emerging - how do companies use industry disruption and technology enablers to lead in markets undergoing change, uncertainty and ambiguity? Organizations of all sizes need to evolve and transform, often under massive pressure, as industry lines blur and merge and traditional business models are assaulted and turned upside down. In this new da...