Welcome!

News Feed Item

Epsilon Energy Ltd. Announces Full Year 2013 Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 03/20/14 -- Epsilon Energy Ltd. ("Epsilon") (TSX:EPS) today reported its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year ended December 31, 2013. Highlights for the year include:


--  Increased exit rate from 40 MMcf/d to 47 MMcf/d; 
    
--  Increased total estimated proved and probable reserves by 10% from 168
    Bcf (per NI 51-101) at the 2012 year end less 2013 production of 13Bcf
    (Net 155Bcf) compared to 172 Bcf (per NI 51-101) as of December 31,
    2013; 
    
--  Reduced operating costs 4% from $.91 per Mcf in 2012 to $0.87 per Mcf in
    2013; 
    
--  Increased Net Cash Flows from operations from $28.6 MM in 2012 to $32.2
    MM in 2013; 
    
--  Reduced Normalized Overhead from $3.6 MM/yr to less than $1.9 MM/yr; 
    
--  Engineering study indicates greater than 50% increase in reserve
    potential, or 42 Bcf more than currently booked for Lower Marcellus
    undeveloped locations utilizing Short Stage Length (SSL) completions; 
    
--  Agreed to Canadian Asset Sales; 
    
--  Initiated Compression at the Auburn Facility and exited 2013 at capacity
    of 330 MMcf/d; 
    
--  Secured $20 MM line of credit with only $9 MM drawn 

We are pleased with the progress that has been made within the company on a number of fronts. First, as discussed in prior press releases, our operating cost structure has been substantially reduced. We anticipate that the company's G&A costs will be less than $1.9 MM in 2014, versus a normalized (before extraordinary items) $3.6 MM in 2013. Second, we have devoted significant efforts to the evaluation of the company's proven reserves and reserve potential. Our operating partner is now implementing a new design on the Lower Marcellus completions which should materially enhance recovery from all of our PUD locations. Accordingly, we anticipate that the company's true reserve potential for its Lower Marcellus assets will become more apparent in 2014 and should meaningfully exceed our current bookings assuming gas prices remain constructive. Additionally, we believe that there is significant untapped potential from the Upper Marcellus as we have one well currently producing from this interval and offset operators are producing several more in adjacent areas. Third, we are encouraged by the growth potential in our Midstream Asset. We are currently in discussions with our operating partners to meaningfully expand the system capacity from current levels of 330 MMcf/d to 550 MMcf/d, in response to demand for incremental gathering and compression services in our operating area. Based on current expressions of interest from third parties, we anticipate throughput volumes to grow meaningfully through 2014 and 2015. If these volumes become committed to our system we would add compression during 2014 and expand the current system capacity. The sale of our Canadian assets would largely complete the restructuring initiatives undertaken by the current Management and Board of Epsilon to focus the company's efforts on its core Pennsylvania assets. We now have a significantly streamlined and aligned management team and Board of Directors focused on maximizing the value of our Midstream and Upstream Marcellus Shale assets. Further, the company is now in a very solid financial position with ample liquidity to fund its operations going forward and to further support the share buyback program started in 2013.


                                    Quarter Ended            Year Ended     
                                     December 31,           December 31,    
                                    2013          2012       2013       2012
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------
                                                                            
Natural gas sales ($000)       $  10,022  $     12,068  $  37,651  $  32,887
  Volume (Mmcf)                    3,838         4,284     13,062     13,925
  Avg. Price ($/Mcf)           $    2.61  $       2.82  $    2.88  $    2.36
  Exit Rate (Mmcf/day)              46.8          39.7       46.8       39.7
                                                                            
Oil sales ($000)               $     380  $        147  $   1,231  $     962
  Volume (MBbl)                        5             2         15         12
  Avg. Price ($/Bbl)           $   76.00  $      73.07  $   82.08  $   81.32
                                                                            
Midstream revenue ($000)       $   2,242  $      2,288  $   7,632  $   9,228
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------
                                                                            
Total revenue                  $  12,644  $     14,503  $  46,514  $  43,077
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------

In 2013, revenues increased 8% compared to 2012. The increase in revenues was driven by an increase in natural gas prices year-over-year. However, during 2013 realized prices were negatively impacted by a differential to NYMEX that averaged ($0.71) for the year. Exiting 2013, Epsilon had four wells that were drilled and completed waiting on tie-in to the gathering lines. These wells were brought online during February of 2014.

Proved and probable reserves as of December 31, 2013 increased to 172 Bcf, a 10% increase over the 168 Bcf (less 13 Bcf of 2013 production) of proved and probable reserves reported as of December 31, 2012. The 10% increase in proved reserves was based upon an evaluation performed by Epsilon's independent reserve engineering firm, DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The five (5) year average prices utilized to value the Company's estimated proved natural gas reserves at December 31, 2013 were $4.40 per Mcf, compared to $4.04 per Mcf for natural gas at December 31, 2012.

The increase in reserves was driven by successful drilling results, favorable production rates and better than anticipated decline rates in the Marcellus. Based upon production results in 2013, proved and probable EUR's for Lower Marcellus producing wells averaged 8.2 Bcf per gross well with a median of 7.6 Bcf per gross well. The reserve estimates did not include any proved undeveloped or probable locations for the Upper Marcellus, Purcell Limestone or Utica Shale which are being drilled and tested by various operators in the region.

The gas gathering system generated $8 million in revenue during 2013 exiting the year at a rate of 303 Mmcf/day. The midstream system began operating in September 2011 and construction of the compression facility was completed in July 2012 which allowed the system to reach compression capacity of 330 Mmcf/day with pipeline gathering capacity of 550 Mmcf/day.


                                                   Years ended December 31, 
                                       Notes           2013            2012 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
Revenues:                                                                   
  Oil & gas revenue                         $    38,881,902  $   33,848,783 
  Gas gathering & compression revenue             7,632,463       9,228,001 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
    Total revenue                                46,514,365      43,076,784 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
Operating costs and expenses:                                               
  Project operating costs                        11,400,285      12,608,814 
  Depletion, depreciation, amortization                                     
   and decomissioning accretion          6       16,991,304      23,712,504 
  Impairment expense (recovery)        5 & 6     13,312,358      (2,834,810)
  Stock based compensation expense                                          
   (recovery)                                      (121,392)        682,252 
  General and administrative                      7,189,389       2,930,057 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
    Total operating costs and expenses           48,771,944      37,098,817 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
Operating income (loss)                          (2,257,579)      5,977,967 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
Other income and expense:                                                   
  Interest income                                    13,864          95,552 
  Finance expense                                (4,444,897)     (3,613,487)
  Realized gain on commodity contracts   13       1,533,906         410,091 
  Net change in unrealized gain (loss)                                      
   on commodity contracts                13      (3,558,053)      1,988,065 
  Other income                                        1,842             194 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
    Net other income (expense)                   (6,453,338)     (1,119,585)
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
Income tax recovery - current            9                -               - 
Income tax expense - deferred            9        4,811,364       8,988,046 
                                            ---------------- ---------------
NET LOSS                                    $   (13,522,281) $   (4,129,664)
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                                                            
                                                                            
Net loss per share, basic                   $         (0.27)         ($0.08)
Net loss per share, diluted                 $         (0.27)         ($0.08)
Weighted average number of shares                                           
 outstanding, basic                              50,258,559      49,848,772 
Weighted average number of shares                                           
 outstanding, diluted                            50,350,417      50,037,086 

The Company generated a net loss of $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to net loss of $4 million in 2012. During 2013 Epsilon recorded impairments of $13 million on Canadian and US (New York) properties while in 2012 Epsilon had a net impairment recovery of $3 million. Epsilon also recorded a $3.5 million change in unrealized loss on commodity contracts while in 2012, a $2 million gain was recorded. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes these items, increased to $29.5 million from $28 million in 2012.

The term Adjusted EBITDA consists of net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income or cash flow measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Epsilon has included Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental disclosure because its management believes that EBITDA provides useful information regarding our ability to service debt and to fund capital expenditures and provides investors a helpful measure for comparing its operating performance with the performance of other companies that have different financing and capital structures or tax rates. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, which is the most directly comparable measure of financial performance calculated under generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                Years ended December 31,    
                                                       2013            2012 
                                             --------------- ---------------
                                             --------------- ---------------
                                                                            
Net income (loss)                            $      (13,522) $       (4,130)
Add Back:                                                                   
  Net interest expense                                4,431           3,517 
  Deferred income tax (recovery) provision            4,811           8,988 
  Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and                                
   accretion                                         16,991          23,713 
  Stock based compensation expense (recovery)          (121)            682 
  Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on                                   
   commodity co                                       3,558          (1,988)
  Impairment expense (recovery)                      13,312          (2,835)
  Other income                                           (2)              - 
                                             --------------- ---------------
Adjusted EBITDA                              $       29,458  $       27,947 
                                             --------------- ---------------
                                             --------------- ---------------

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this news release constitute forward looking statements. The use of any of the words "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", 'may", "will", "project", "should", 'believe", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumption but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and the forward-looking statements included in this news release should not be unduly relied upon.

Special note for news distribution in the United States

The securities described in the news release have not been registered under the United Stated Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the "1933 Act") or state securities laws. Any holder of these securities, by purchasing such securities, agrees for the benefit of Epsilon Energy Ltd. (the "Corporation") that such securities may not be offered, sold, or otherwise transferred only (A) to the Corporation or its affiliates; (B) outside the United States in accordance with applicable state laws and either (1) Rule 144(as) under the 1933 Act or (2) Rule 144 under the 1933 Act, if applicable.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
"We are a monitoring company. We work with Salesforce, BBC, and quite a few other big logos. We basically provide monitoring for them, structure for their cloud services and we fit into the DevOps world" explained David Gildeh, Co-founder and CEO of Outlyer, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
In the world of DevOps there are ‘known good practices’ – aka ‘patterns’ – and ‘known bad practices’ – aka ‘anti-patterns.' Many of these patterns and anti-patterns have been developed from real world experience, especially by the early adopters of DevOps theory; but many are more feasible in theory than in practice, especially for more recent entrants to the DevOps scene. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists discussed...
After more than five years of DevOps, definitions are evolving, boundaries are expanding, ‘unicorns’ are no longer rare, enterprises are on board, and pundits are moving on. Can we now look at an evolution of DevOps? Should we? Is the foundation of DevOps ‘done’, or is there still too much left to do? What is mature, and what is still missing? What does the next 5 years of DevOps look like? In this Power Panel at DevOps Summit, moderated by DevOps Summit Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists loo...