Welcome!

News Feed Item

Epsilon Energy Ltd. Announces Full Year 2013 Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 03/20/14 -- Epsilon Energy Ltd. ("Epsilon") (TSX: EPS) today reported its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year ended December 31, 2013. Highlights for the year include:


--  Increased exit rate from 40 MMcf/d to 47 MMcf/d;

--  Increased total estimated proved and probable reserves by 10% from 168
    Bcf (per NI 51-101) at the 2012 year end less 2013 production of 13Bcf
    (Net 155Bcf) compared to 172 Bcf (per NI 51-101) as of December 31,
    2013;

--  Reduced operating costs 4% from $.91 per Mcf in 2012 to $0.87 per Mcf in
    2013;

--  Increased Net Cash Flows from operations from $28.6 MM in 2012 to $32.2
    MM in 2013;

--  Reduced Normalized Overhead from $3.6 MM/yr to less than $1.9 MM/yr;

--  Engineering study indicates greater than 50% increase in reserve
    potential, or 42 Bcf more than currently booked for Lower Marcellus
    undeveloped locations utilizing Short Stage Length (SSL) completions;

--  Agreed to Canadian Asset Sales;

--  Initiated Compression at the Auburn Facility and exited 2013 at capacity
    of 330 MMcf/d;

--  Secured $20 MM line of credit with only $9 MM drawn

We are pleased with the progress that has been made within the company on a number of fronts. First, as discussed in prior press releases, our operating cost structure has been substantially reduced. We anticipate that the company's G&A costs will be less than $1.9 MM in 2014, versus a normalized (before extraordinary items) $3.6 MM in 2013. Second, we have devoted significant efforts to the evaluation of the company's proven reserves and reserve potential. Our operating partner is now implementing a new design on the Lower Marcellus completions which should materially enhance recovery from all of our PUD locations. Accordingly, we anticipate that the company's true reserve potential for its Lower Marcellus assets will become more apparent in 2014 and should meaningfully exceed our current bookings assuming gas prices remain constructive. Additionally, we believe that there is significant untapped potential from the Upper Marcellus as we have one well currently producing from this interval and offset operators are producing several more in adjacent areas. Third, we are encouraged by the growth potential in our Midstream Asset. We are currently in discussions with our operating partners to meaningfully expand the system capacity from current levels of 330 MMcf/d to 550 MMcf/d, in response to demand for incremental gathering and compression services in our operating area. Based on current expressions of interest from third parties, we anticipate throughput volumes to grow meaningfully through 2014 and 2015. If these volumes become committed to our system we would add compression during 2014 and expand the current system capacity. The sale of our Canadian assets would largely complete the restructuring initiatives undertaken by the current Management and Board of Epsilon to focus the company's efforts on its core Pennsylvania assets. We now have a significantly streamlined and aligned management team and Board of Directors focused on maximizing the value of our Midstream and Upstream Marcellus Shale assets. Further, the company is now in a very solid financial position with ample liquidity to fund its operations going forward and to further support the share buyback program started in 2013.


                                    Quarter Ended            Year Ended
                                     December 31,           December 31,
                                    2013          2012       2013       2012
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------

Natural gas sales ($000)       $  10,022  $     12,068  $  37,651  $  32,887
  Volume (Mmcf)                    3,838         4,284     13,062     13,925
  Avg. Price ($/Mcf)           $    2.61  $       2.82  $    2.88  $    2.36
  Exit Rate (Mmcf/day)              46.8          39.7       46.8       39.7

Oil sales ($000)               $     380  $        147  $   1,231  $     962
  Volume (MBbl)                        5             2         15         12
  Avg. Price ($/Bbl)           $   76.00  $      73.07  $   82.08  $   81.32

Midstream revenue ($000)       $   2,242  $      2,288  $   7,632  $   9,228
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------

Total revenue                  $  12,644  $     14,503  $  46,514  $  43,077
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------
                               ---------  ------------  ---------  ---------

In 2013, revenues increased 8% compared to 2012. The increase in revenues was driven by an increase in natural gas prices year-over-year. However, during 2013 realized prices were negatively impacted by a differential to NYMEX that averaged ($0.71) for the year. Exiting 2013, Epsilon had four wells that were drilled and completed waiting on tie-in to the gathering lines. These wells were brought online during February of 2014.

Proved and probable reserves as of December 31, 2013 increased to 172 Bcf, a 10% increase over the 168 Bcf (less 13 Bcf of 2013 production) of proved and probable reserves reported as of December 31, 2012. The 10% increase in proved reserves was based upon an evaluation performed by Epsilon's independent reserve engineering firm, DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The five (5) year average prices utilized to value the Company's estimated proved natural gas reserves at December 31, 2013 were $4.40 per Mcf, compared to $4.04 per Mcf for natural gas at December 31, 2012.

The increase in reserves was driven by successful drilling results, favorable production rates and better than anticipated decline rates in the Marcellus. Based upon production results in 2013, proved and probable EUR's for Lower Marcellus producing wells averaged 8.2 Bcf per gross well with a median of 7.6 Bcf per gross well. The reserve estimates did not include any proved undeveloped or probable locations for the Upper Marcellus, Purcell Limestone or Utica Shale which are being drilled and tested by various operators in the region.

The gas gathering system generated $8 million in revenue during 2013 exiting the year at a rate of 303 Mmcf/day. The midstream system began operating in September 2011 and construction of the compression facility was completed in July 2012 which allowed the system to reach compression capacity of 330 Mmcf/day with pipeline gathering capacity of 550 Mmcf/day.


                                                   Years ended December 31,
                                       Notes           2013            2012
                                            ---------------- ---------------

Revenues:
  Oil & gas revenue                         $    38,881,902  $   33,848,783
  Gas gathering & compression revenue             7,632,463       9,228,001
                                            ---------------- ---------------

    Total revenue                                46,514,365      43,076,784
                                            ---------------- ---------------

Operating costs and expenses:
  Project operating costs                        11,400,285      12,608,814
  Depletion, depreciation, amortization
   and decomissioning accretion          6       16,991,304      23,712,504
  Impairment expense (recovery)        5 & 6     13,312,358      (2,834,810)
  Stock based compensation expense
   (recovery)                                      (121,392)        682,252
  General and administrative                      7,189,389       2,930,057
                                            ---------------- ---------------

    Total operating costs and expenses           48,771,944      37,098,817
                                            ---------------- ---------------

Operating income (loss)                          (2,257,579)      5,977,967
                                            ---------------- ---------------

Other income and expense:
  Interest income                                    13,864          95,552
  Finance expense                                (4,444,897)     (3,613,487)
  Realized gain on commodity contracts   13       1,533,906         410,091
  Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
   on commodity contracts                13      (3,558,053)      1,988,065
  Other income                                        1,842             194
                                            ---------------- ---------------

    Net other income (expense)                   (6,453,338)     (1,119,585)
                                            ---------------- ---------------

Income tax recovery - current            9                -               -
Income tax expense - deferred            9        4,811,364       8,988,046
                                            ---------------- ---------------
NET LOSS                                    $   (13,522,281) $   (4,129,664)
                                            ---------------- ---------------
                                            ---------------- ---------------


Net loss per share, basic                   $         (0.27)         ($0.08)
Net loss per share, diluted                 $         (0.27)         ($0.08)
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding, basic                              50,258,559      49,848,772
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding, diluted                            50,350,417      50,037,086

The Company generated a net loss of $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to net loss of $4 million in 2012. During 2013 Epsilon recorded impairments of $13 million on Canadian and US (New York) properties while in 2012 Epsilon had a net impairment recovery of $3 million. Epsilon also recorded a $3.5 million change in unrealized loss on commodity contracts while in 2012, a $2 million gain was recorded. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes these items, increased to $29.5 million from $28 million in 2012.

The term Adjusted EBITDA consists of net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income or cash flow measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Epsilon has included Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental disclosure because its management believes that EBITDA provides useful information regarding our ability to service debt and to fund capital expenditures and provides investors a helpful measure for comparing its operating performance with the performance of other companies that have different financing and capital structures or tax rates. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, which is the most directly comparable measure of financial performance calculated under generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                Years ended December 31,
                                                       2013            2012
                                             --------------- ---------------
                                             --------------- ---------------

Net income (loss)                            $      (13,522) $       (4,130)
Add Back:
  Net interest expense                                4,431           3,517
  Deferred income tax (recovery) provision            4,811           8,988
  Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and
   accretion                                         16,991          23,713
  Stock based compensation expense (recovery)          (121)            682
  Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on
   commodity co                                       3,558          (1,988)
  Impairment expense (recovery)                      13,312          (2,835)
  Other income                                           (2)              -
                                             --------------- ---------------
Adjusted EBITDA                              $       29,458  $       27,947
                                             --------------- ---------------
                                             --------------- ---------------

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this news release constitute forward looking statements. The use of any of the words "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", 'may", "will", "project", "should", 'believe", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumption but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and the forward-looking statements included in this news release should not be unduly relied upon.

Special note for news distribution in the United States

The securities described in the news release have not been registered under the United Stated Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the "1933 Act") or state securities laws. Any holder of these securities, by purchasing such securities, agrees for the benefit of Epsilon Energy Ltd. (the "Corporation") that such securities may not be offered, sold, or otherwise transferred only (A) to the Corporation or its affiliates; (B) outside the United States in accordance with applicable state laws and either (1) Rule 144(as) under the 1933 Act or (2) Rule 144 under the 1933 Act, if applicable.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
@ThingsExpo has been named the ‘Top WebRTC Influencer' by iTrend. iTrend processes millions of conversations, tweets, interactions, news articles, press releases, blog posts - and extract meaning form them and analyzes mobile and desktop software platforms used to communicate, various metadata (such as geo location), and automation tools. In overall placement, @ThingsExpo ranked as the number one ‘WebRTC Influencer' followed by @DevOpsSummit at 55th.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, John Jelinek IV, a web developer at Linux Academy, will discuss why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive ad...
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...
The speed of software changes in growing and large scale rapid-paced DevOps environments presents a challenge for continuous testing. Many organizations struggle to get this right. Practices that work for small scale continuous testing may not be sufficient as the requirements grow. In his session at DevOps Summit, Marc Hornbeek, Sr. Solutions Architect of DevOps continuous test solutions at Spirent Communications, explained the best practices of continuous testing at high scale, which is rele...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a client-oriented software development company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software company that develops and delivers turn-key mobile apps, websites, web services, and complex softw...
DevOps tends to focus on the relationship between Dev and Ops, putting an emphasis on the ops and application infrastructure. But that’s changing with microservices architectures. In her session at DevOps Summit, Lori MacVittie, Evangelist for F5 Networks, will focus on how microservices are changing the underlying architectures needed to scale, secure and deliver applications based on highly distributed (micro) services and why that means an expansion into “the network” for DevOps.
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
Using new techniques of information modeling, indexing, and processing, new cloud-based systems can support cloud-based workloads previously not possible for high-throughput insurance, banking, and case-based applications. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, John Newton, CTO, Founder and Chairman of Alfresco, described how to scale cloud-based content management repositories to store, manage, and retrieve billions of documents and related information with fast and linear scalability. He addres...
Hardware virtualization and cloud computing allowed us to increase resource utilization and increase our flexibility to respond to business demand. Docker Containers are the next quantum leap - Are they?! Databases always represented an additional set of challenges unique to running workloads requiring a maximum of I/O, network, CPU resources combined with data locality.
Due of the rise of Hadoop, many enterprises are now deploying their first small clusters of 10 to 20 servers. At this small scale, the complexity of operating the cluster looks and feels like general data center servers. It is not until the clusters scale, as they inevitably do, when the pain caused by the exponential complexity becomes apparent. We've seen this problem occur time and time again. In his session at Big Data Expo, Greg Bruno, Vice President of Engineering and co-founder of StackIQ...
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
Security, data privacy, reliability, and regulatory compliance are critical factors when evaluating whether to move business applications from in-house, client-hosted environments to a cloud platform. Quality assurance plays a vital role in ensuring that the appropriate level of risk assessment, verification, and validation takes place to ensure business continuity during the migration to a new cloud platform.
"Tintri was started in 2008 with the express purpose of building a storage appliance that is ideal for virtualized environments. We support a lot of different hypervisor platforms from VMware to OpenStack to Hyper-V," explained Dan Florea, Director of Product Management at Tintri, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...