Welcome!

News Feed Item

Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market 2014-2018

LONDON, March 24, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com just published a new market research report:

Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market 2014-2018

TechNavio's analysts forecast the Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market to grow at a CAGR of 6.56 percent over the period 2013-2018. One of the key factors contributing to this market growth is the need to develop high quality products. The Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market has also been witnessing the integration of vacuum heat treatment process in production lines. However, the high initial investment costs could pose a challenge to the growth of this market.
TechNavio's report, the Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market 2014-2018, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers Americas, APAC and EMEA region; it also covers the Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market market landscape and its growth prospects in the coming years. The report also includes a discussion of the key vendors operating in this market.

Key vendors dominating this space include ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH, ECM Technologies, Ipsen International Holding GmbH and Seco/Warwick SA

Other vendors mentioned in the report are Centorr Vacuum Industries, Consarc Engineering Ltd., Fours Industries BMI, G-M Enterprises, PVA TePla AG, Solar Manufacturing Inc.,TAV Vacuum Furnaces spa, Thermal Technology LLC, T-M Vacuum Products Inc., Sojitz JECT Corp., Ulvac Inc., Vac Aero International Inc.

Key questions answered in this report:

What will the market size be in 2018 and what will be the growth rate?
What are key market trends?
What is driving this market?
What are the challenges to market growth?
Who are the key vendors in this market space?
What are the market opportunities and threats faced by key vendors?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of these key vendors?
You can request one free hour of our analyst's time when you purchase this market report. Details provided within the report.

Methodology

Research methodology is based on extensive primary and secondary research. Primary research includes in-depth interviews with industry experts, vendors, resellers and customers. Secondary research includes Technavio Platform, industry publications, company reports, news articles, analyst reports, trade associations and the data published by Government agencies.
01. Executive Summary
02. List of Abbreviations
03. Scope of the Report
03.1 Market Overview
03.2 Product Offerings
04. Market Research Methodology
04.1 Market Research Process
04.2 Research Methodology
05. Introduction
06. Market Landscape
06.1 Market Size and Forecast
06.2 Vacuum Heat Treatment Process
06.2.1 Annealing
06.2.2 Hardening and Quenching
06.2.3 Tempering
06.2.4 Brazing
06.2.5 Case Hardening or Carburizing
06.3 Five Forces Analysis
07. Market Segmentation by End-users
07.1 Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Aerospace Sector
07.1.1 Market Size and Forecast
07.2 Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Automotive Sector
07.2.1 Market Size and Forecast
07.3 Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Industrial Sector
07.3.1 Market Size and Forecast
07.4 Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Commercial Sector
07.4.1 Market Size and Forecast
08. Geographical Segmentation
08.1 Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the APAC Region
08.1.1 Market Size and Forecast
08.2 Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the Americas
08.2.1 Market Size and Forecast
08.3 Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the EMEA Region
08.3.1 Market Size and Forecast
09. Key Leading Countries
09.1 Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the US
09.1.1 Market Size and Forecast
09.2 Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Japan
09.2.1 Market Size and Forecast
09.3 Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in China
09.3.1 Market Size and Forecast
10. Buying Criteria
11. Market Growth Drivers
12. Drivers and their Impact
13. Market Challenges
14. Impact of Drivers and Challenges
15. Market Trends
16. Trends and their Impact
17. Vendor Landscape
17.1 Competitive Scenario
17.1.1 Key News
17.1.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
17.2 Market Share Analysis 2012
17.3 Other Prominent Vendors
18. Key Vendor Analysis
18.1 ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH
18.1.1 Business Overview
18.1.2 Key Information
18.1.3 SWOT Analysis
18.2 ECM Technologies
18.2.1 Business Overview
18.2.2 Key Information
18.2.3 SWOT Analysis
18.3 Ipsen International Holding GmbH
18.3.1 Business Overview
18.3.2 Key Information
18.3.3 SWOT Analysis
18.4 Seco/Warwick SA
18.4.1 Business Overview
18.4.2 Key Information
18.4.3 SWOT Analysis
19. Other Reports in this Series

List of Exhibits

Exhibit 1: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by End-user Segmentation 2013
Exhibit 2: Market Research Methodology
Exhibit 3: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 4: Vacuum Heat Treatment Process
Exhibit 5: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by End-user Segmentation 2013
Exhibit 6: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Aerospace Sector 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 7: Global General and Business Aviation Aircraft Manufactured 2011-2012 (US$ billion)
Exhibit 8: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Automotive Sector 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 9: Production of Cars by Key Leading Countries 2010-2013
Exhibit 10: Production of Commercial Vehicles by Key Leading Countries 2010-2013
Exhibit 11: Global Auto Component Market 2012-2016 (US$ billion)
Exhibit 12: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Industrial Sector 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 13: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Commercial Sector 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 14: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by End-user Segmentation 2013-2018
Exhibit 15: The Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by Geographical Segmentation 2013
Exhibit 16: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by Geographical Segmentation 2018
Exhibit 17: Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the APAC Region 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 18: Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the Americas 2013-3018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 19: Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the EMEA Region 2013-3018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 20: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by Geographical Segmentation 2013-3018
Exhibit 21: Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in the US 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 22: Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in Japan 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 23: Vacuum Heat Treatment Market in China 2013-2018 (US$ million)
Exhibit 24: Benefits of Vacuum Heat Treatment Over Convectional Heat Treatment
Exhibit 25: Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market by Vendor Segmentation 2013
Exhibit 26: Business Segmentation of ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH
Exhibit 27: Business Segmentation of ECM Technologies
Exhibit 28: Business Segmentation of Ipsen International Holding GmbH
Exhibit 29: Business Segmentation of Seco/Warwick SA

Companies Mentioned

ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH, ECM Technologies, Ipsen International Holding GmbH, Seco/Warwick SA, Centorr Vacuum Industries, Consarc Engineering Ltd., Fours Industries BMI, G-M Enterprises, PVA TePla AG, Solar Manufacturing Inc.,TAV Vacuum Furnaces spa, Thermal Technology LLC, T-M Vacuum Products Inc., Sojitz JECT Corp., Ulvac Inc., Vac Aero International Inc.

Read the full report:
Global Vacuum Heat Treatment Market 2014-2018
http://www.reportbuyer.com/computing_electronics/electrical_products/global_vacuum_heat_treatment_market.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Marketing

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]  
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
One of the hottest areas in cloud right now is DRaaS and related offerings. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Dale Levesque, Disaster Recovery Product Manager with Windstream's Cloud and Data Center Marketing team, will discuss the benefits of the cloud model, which far outweigh the traditional approach, and how enterprises need to ensure that their needs are properly being met.
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
Up until last year, enterprises that were looking into cloud services usually undertook a long-term pilot with one of the large cloud providers, running test and dev workloads in the cloud. With cloud’s transition to mainstream adoption in 2015, and with enterprises migrating more and more workloads into the cloud and in between public and private environments, the single-provider approach must be revisited. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Yoav Mor, multi-cloud solution evangelist at Cloudy...
When you focus on a journey from up-close, you look at your own technical and cultural history and how you changed it for the benefit of the customer. This was our starting point: too many integration issues, 13 SWP days and very long cycles. It was evident that in this fast-paced industry we could no longer afford this reality. We needed something that would take us beyond reducing the development lifecycles, CI and Agile methodologies. We made a fundamental difference, even changed our culture...
The proper isolation of resources is essential for multi-tenant environments. The traditional approach to isolate resources is, however, rather heavyweight. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Igor Drobiazko, co-founder of elastic.io, drew upon his own experience with operating a Docker container-based infrastructure on a large scale and present a lightweight solution for resource isolation using microservices. He also discussed the implementation of microservices in data and application integrat...
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...
In his General Session at DevOps Summit, Asaf Yigal, Co-Founder & VP of Product at Logz.io, will explore the value of Kibana 4 for log analysis and will give a real live, hands-on tutorial on how to set up Kibana 4 and get the most out of Apache log files. He will examine three use cases: IT operations, business intelligence, and security and compliance. This is a hands-on session that will require participants to bring their own laptops, and we will provide the rest.
IoT is at the core or many Digital Transformation initiatives with the goal of re-inventing a company's business model. We all agree that collecting relevant IoT data will result in massive amounts of data needing to be stored. However, with the rapid development of IoT devices and ongoing business model transformation, we are not able to predict the volume and growth of IoT data. And with the lack of IoT history, traditional methods of IT and infrastructure planning based on the past do not app...
"LinearHub provides smart video conferencing, which is the Roundee service, and we archive all the video conferences and we also provide the transcript," stated Sunghyuk Kim, CEO of LinearHub, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"We're bringing out a new application monitoring system to the DevOps space. It manages large enterprise applications that are distributed throughout a node in many enterprises and we manage them as one collective," explained Kevin Barnes, President of eCube Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with 20th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry p...
@DevOpsSummit at Cloud taking place June 6-8, 2017, at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long developm...
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.