Welcome!

News Feed Item

Cub Energy Inc.: Announces Year-End Financial and Operational Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 03/27/14 -- Cub Energy Inc. ("Cub" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:KUB), a Black Sea region-focused upstream oil and gas company, reports its audited financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2013.

In 2013, Cub achieved several key accomplishments including record production volumes and revenue and operational success on the Company's 100% working interest Rusko-Komarovske ("RK") licence. Additionally, the fourth quarter of 2013 was the Company's seventh consecutive quarter of production growth.

Operational Highlights


--  Production averaged 1,542 boe/d (95% natural gas) for the year ended
    December 31, 2013 for an increase of 27% over 1,210 boe/d in 2012; 
--  Exit rate of 2,070 boe/d for the year ended December 31, 2013 for an
    increase of 35% over 1,531 boe/d in 2012; 
--  Current production of approximately 1,800 boe/d; 
--  Achieved average natural gas prices of $11.26/Mcf and condensate price
    of $87.90/bbl for the year ended December 31, 2013; 
--  A shallow pool gas discovery was made on the RK licence with the RK-22
    well in western Ukraine which was tied-in and brought on production in
    late 2013; 
--  A new pool gas discovery was made on the Makeevskoye licence in eastern
    Ukraine in the Serpukhovian Zone with the M-16 well and was tied-in and
    on production in 2013; 
--  Tested gas on a new reservoir on the Olgovskoye licence in eastern
    Ukraine with the O-15 well, which was also tied in and brought on
    production in 2013. This deeper pool discovery has the potential for
    offset development; 
--  Krutogorovskoye licence in eastern Ukraine was successfully converted to
    20-year production licence; and 
--  The expansion of the Makeevskoye and Olgovskoye production and
    processing facility was completed in 2013. Gas began flowing on March 6,
    2014 resulting in increased capacity to 68 MMcf/d from the previous 30
    MMcf/d and it's expected to take 30 to 60 days to become fully
    operational. 

Financial Highlights


--  Netback of $40.15/Boe or $6.69/Mcfe for the fourth quarter 2013 and
    netback of $41.02/Boe or $6.84/Mcfe for the year ended December 31,
    2013; 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by KUB-Gas for the year ended December
    31, 2013 increased 18% to $117.7 million (2012 - $99.6 million) of which
    the Company's 30% share was $35.3 million (2012 - $29.9 million); 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by the Company, outside of KUB-Gas, for
    the year ended December 31, 2013 increased 94% to $3.3 million (2012 -
    $1.7 million). The 2012 period represented nine months of production; 
--  The total pro-rata revenue from hydrocarbon sales, a non-IFRS measure
    combining the Company's revenue and 30% of the allocated KUB-Gas
    revenue, totaled $38.6 million (2012 - $31.5 million) for the year ended
    December 31, 2013; 
--  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received $9.8
    million (2012 - $Nil) in the form of dividends from KUB-Gas representing
    the distribution of excess cash flow; 
--  Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $3.0 million or $0.01
    per share which was impacted by a $5.2 million impairment charge on the
    Turkish licences (2012 - net income of $2.3 million or $0.01 per share).
    Excluding the $5.2 million impairment charge, the net income for the
    year ended December 31, 2013 would have been $2.2 million; 
--  The Company's unsecured line of credit with Pelicourt Limited was
    increased to $5.0 million and remained undrawn at December 31, 2013.
    Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company drew down
    $1.0 million; and 
--  Capital expenditures of $8.9 million (2012 $2.0 million) for the year
    ended December 31, 2013 and the pro-rata capital expenditures, a non-
    IFRS measure combining the Company's capital expenditures and 30% of the
    allocated KUB-Gas capital expenditures, totaled $17.9 million (2012 -
    $12.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                        Three Months Three Months         Year         Year 
                               Ended        Ended        Ended        Ended 
(in thousands of US     December 31, December 31, December 31, December 30, 
 dollars)                       2013         2012         2013         2012 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and natural                                                       
 gas revenue                     745          606        3,250        1,666 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata petroleum and                                                      
 natural gas revenue(1)        9,761        8,805       38,575       31,542 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net profit (loss)             (5,304)        (136)      (3,013)       2,290 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) per                                                         
 share - basic and                                                          
 diluted                       (0.02)        0.00        (0.01)        0.01 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds generated from                                                        
 (used in) operations(2)         857       (1,611)       2,474       (3,931)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata funds generated                                                    
 from operations               2,111        2,692        9,814       12,187 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures (3)       2,789          304        8,851        1,843 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata capital                                                            
 expenditures                  4,900        4,738       17,861       12,627 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($/boe)       40.15        47.60        41.02        51.39 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($Mcfe)        6.69         7.93         6.84         8.57 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
                                    December 31,   December 31,
                                            2013           2012
---------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital                              942          9,577
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents                  1,617         10,116
---------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term debt                                 -              -
---------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:


1.  Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas revenue is a non-IFRS measure that
    adds the Company's petroleum and natural gas revenue earned in the
    respective periods to the Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas
    petroleum and natural gas sales that the Company has an economic
    interest in. 
2.  Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure and is defined as cash flow
    from operating activities, excluding changes in non-cash working
    capital. 
3.  Pro-rata funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure that adds the
    Company's funds from operations in the respective periods to the
    Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas funds from operations that the
    Company has an economic interest in. The KUB-Gas funds from operations
    is calculated as the income from equity investment less the KUB-Gas
    depletion and depreciation. 
4.  Capital expenditures includes the purchase of property, plant and
    equipment and the purchase of exploration and evaluation assets. Pro-
    rata capital expenditures is a non-IFRS measure that adds the Company's
    capital expenditures in the respective periods to the Company's 30%
    equity share of the KUB-Gas capital expenditures that the Company has an
    economic interest in.

Mikhail Afendikov, Chief Executive Officer of Cub Energy, commented, "We successfully drilled, completed and tied-in the RK-22 well, which was our first well drilled in western Ukraine and is 100% owned and operated by Cub. Cub will be devoting significant capital to develop its 100% owned assets in western Ukraine with at least four drilling operations planned. At KUB-Gas in eastern Ukraine, we had a new gas pool discovery in the Serpukhovian zone along with our successful development drilling, workover and fracture stimulation programs. We continue to create shareholder value with our production growth in eastern and western Ukraine."

Outlook

In 2014, the Company will continue its drilling operations on the RK-21 well on its 100% owned Tysagaz assets in western Ukraine with further plans to drill the RK-23 and RK-24 development wells and re-enter the RK-1 well.

Operations expected in the remainder of 2014 for KUB-Gas in eastern Ukraine include the drilling of four wells, five fracture stimulations and a workover of the O-6 well and construction of pipeline to tie-in wells as needed. The Makeevskoye and Olgovskoye production and processing facilities became operational in March 2014 and increased the facilities processing capability to approximately 68 MMcf/d from 30 MMcf/d.

To date, the unrest in Ukraine has had limited impact on the Company's operations; however, the final resolution and the effects of the political and economic crisis are difficult to predict and could negatively affect the Company's results and financial position. With the uncertainty of gas prices in Ukraine created by the unrest between Russia and Ukraine, it is possible that the programs could get constrained.

Supporting Documents

Cub's complete quarterly reporting package, including the audited annual financial statements, associated Management's Discussion and Analysis and the 2013 Annual Information Form, have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and posted on the Company's website at www.cubenergyinc.com. All currency references in this press release are in US dollars except as otherwise indicated.

About Cub Energy Inc.

Cub Energy Inc. (TSX VENTURE:KUB) is an upstream oil and gas company, with a proven track record of exploration and production cost efficiency in the Black Sea region. The Company's strategy is to implement western technology and capital, combined with local expertise and ownership, to increase value in its undeveloped land base, creating and further building a portfolio of producing oil and gas assets within a high pricing environment.

For further information please contact us or visit our website: www.cubenergyinc.com

Oil and Gas Equivalents

A barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") or units of natural gas equivalents ("Mcfe") is calculated using the conversion factor of 6 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl (barrel) or an Mcfe conversion of 1bbl: 6 Mcf is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

Reader Advisory

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Cub believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable; however there can be no assurance those expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: general economic and political conditions in Ukraine and globally; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the prices of natural gas; governmental regulation of the natural gas industry, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or delayed; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for natural gas; liabilities inherent in natural gas operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel and supplies; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling, processing and transportation problems; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the natural gas industry; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; and other factors. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the forward-looking information contained in this news release. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
The goal of Continuous Testing is to shift testing left to find defects earlier and release software faster. This can be achieved by integrating a set of open source functional and performance testing tools in the early stages of your software delivery lifecycle. There is one process that binds all application delivery stages together into one well-orchestrated machine: Continuous Testing. Continuous Testing is the conveyer belt between the Software Factory and production stages. Artifacts are m...
WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web communications world. The 6th WebRTC Summit continues our tradition of delivering the latest and greatest presentations within the world of WebRTC. Topics include voice calling, video chat, P2P file sharing, and use cases that have already leveraged the power and convenience of WebRTC.
Cloud resources, although available in abundance, are inherently volatile. For transactional computing, like ERP and most enterprise software, this is a challenge as transactional integrity and data fidelity is paramount – making it a challenge to create cloud native applications while relying on RDBMS. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Claus Jepsen, Chief Architect and Head of Innovation Labs at Unit4, will explore that in order to create distributed and scalable solutions ensuring high availa...
For financial firms, the cloud is going to increasingly become a crucial part of dealing with customers over the next five years and beyond, particularly with the growing use and acceptance of virtual currencies. There are new data storage paradigms on the horizon that will deliver secure solutions for storing and moving sensitive financial data around the world without touching terrestrial networks. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Cliff Beek, President of Cloud Constellation Corporation, d...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Internet-of-Things discussions can end up either going down the consumer gadget rabbit hole or focused on the sort of data logging that industrial manufacturers have been doing forever. However, in fact, companies today are already using IoT data both to optimize their operational technology and to improve the experience of customer interactions in novel ways. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Gordon Haff, Red Hat Technology Evangelist, shared examples from a wide range of industries – including en...
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Kelly Looney, director of DevOps consulting for Skytap, showed how an incremental approach to introducing containers into complex, distributed applications results in modernization with less risk and more reward. He also shared the story of how Skytap used Docker to get out of the business of managing infrastructure, and into the business of delivering innovation and business value. Attendees learned how up-front planning allows for a clean sep...
Most companies are adopting or evaluating container technology - Docker in particular - to speed up application deployment, drive down cost, ease management and make application delivery more flexible overall. As with most new architectures, this dream takes a lot of work to become a reality. Even when you do get your application componentized enough and packaged properly, there are still challenges for DevOps teams to making the shift to continuous delivery and achieving that reduction in cost ...
Detecting internal user threats in the Big Data eco-system is challenging and cumbersome. Many organizations monitor internal usage of the Big Data eco-system using a set of alerts. This is not a scalable process given the increase in the number of alerts with the accelerating growth in data volume and user base. Organizations are increasingly leveraging machine learning to monitor only those data elements that are sensitive and critical, autonomously establish monitoring policies, and to detect...
Enterprise architects are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies as they seek to utilize existing data center assets, leverage the advantages of cloud computing and avoid cloud vendor lock-in. This requires a globally aware traffic management strategy that can monitor infrastructure health across data centers and end-user experience globally, while responding to control changes and system specification at the speed of today’s DevOps teams. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Gray, Chie...
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. Jack Norris reviews best practices to show how companies develop, deploy, and dynamically update these applications and how this data-first...
Intelligent Automation is now one of the key business imperatives for CIOs and CISOs impacting all areas of business today. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Boeggeman, VP Alliances & Partnerships at Ayehu, will talk about how business value is created and delivered through intelligent automation to today’s enterprises. The open ecosystem platform approach toward Intelligent Automation that Ayehu delivers to the market is core to enabling the creation of the self-driving enterprise.
"At the keynote this morning we spoke about the value proposition of Nutanix, of having a DevOps culture and a mindset, and the business outcomes of achieving agility and scale, which everybody here is trying to accomplish," noted Mark Lavi, DevOps Solution Architect at Nutanix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
"We're here to tell the world about our cloud-scale infrastructure that we have at Juniper combined with the world-class security that we put into the cloud," explained Lisa Guess, VP of Systems Engineering at Juniper Networks, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Historically, some banking activities such as trading have been relying heavily on analytics and cutting edge algorithmic tools. The coming of age of powerful data analytics solutions combined with the development of intelligent algorithms have created new opportunities for financial institutions. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Sebastien Meunier, Head of Digital for North America at Chappuis Halder & Co., discussed how these tools can be leveraged to develop a lasting competitive advantage ...