Welcome!

News Feed Item

Cub Energy Inc.: Announces Year-End Financial and Operational Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 03/27/14 -- Cub Energy Inc. ("Cub" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:KUB), a Black Sea region-focused upstream oil and gas company, reports its audited financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2013.

In 2013, Cub achieved several key accomplishments including record production volumes and revenue and operational success on the Company's 100% working interest Rusko-Komarovske ("RK") licence. Additionally, the fourth quarter of 2013 was the Company's seventh consecutive quarter of production growth.

Operational Highlights


--  Production averaged 1,542 boe/d (95% natural gas) for the year ended
    December 31, 2013 for an increase of 27% over 1,210 boe/d in 2012; 
--  Exit rate of 2,070 boe/d for the year ended December 31, 2013 for an
    increase of 35% over 1,531 boe/d in 2012; 
--  Current production of approximately 1,800 boe/d; 
--  Achieved average natural gas prices of $11.26/Mcf and condensate price
    of $87.90/bbl for the year ended December 31, 2013; 
--  A shallow pool gas discovery was made on the RK licence with the RK-22
    well in western Ukraine which was tied-in and brought on production in
    late 2013; 
--  A new pool gas discovery was made on the Makeevskoye licence in eastern
    Ukraine in the Serpukhovian Zone with the M-16 well and was tied-in and
    on production in 2013; 
--  Tested gas on a new reservoir on the Olgovskoye licence in eastern
    Ukraine with the O-15 well, which was also tied in and brought on
    production in 2013. This deeper pool discovery has the potential for
    offset development; 
--  Krutogorovskoye licence in eastern Ukraine was successfully converted to
    20-year production licence; and 
--  The expansion of the Makeevskoye and Olgovskoye production and
    processing facility was completed in 2013. Gas began flowing on March 6,
    2014 resulting in increased capacity to 68 MMcf/d from the previous 30
    MMcf/d and it's expected to take 30 to 60 days to become fully
    operational. 

Financial Highlights


--  Netback of $40.15/Boe or $6.69/Mcfe for the fourth quarter 2013 and
    netback of $41.02/Boe or $6.84/Mcfe for the year ended December 31,
    2013; 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by KUB-Gas for the year ended December
    31, 2013 increased 18% to $117.7 million (2012 - $99.6 million) of which
    the Company's 30% share was $35.3 million (2012 - $29.9 million); 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by the Company, outside of KUB-Gas, for
    the year ended December 31, 2013 increased 94% to $3.3 million (2012 -
    $1.7 million). The 2012 period represented nine months of production; 
--  The total pro-rata revenue from hydrocarbon sales, a non-IFRS measure
    combining the Company's revenue and 30% of the allocated KUB-Gas
    revenue, totaled $38.6 million (2012 - $31.5 million) for the year ended
    December 31, 2013; 
--  During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received $9.8
    million (2012 - $Nil) in the form of dividends from KUB-Gas representing
    the distribution of excess cash flow; 
--  Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $3.0 million or $0.01
    per share which was impacted by a $5.2 million impairment charge on the
    Turkish licences (2012 - net income of $2.3 million or $0.01 per share).
    Excluding the $5.2 million impairment charge, the net income for the
    year ended December 31, 2013 would have been $2.2 million; 
--  The Company's unsecured line of credit with Pelicourt Limited was
    increased to $5.0 million and remained undrawn at December 31, 2013.
    Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company drew down
    $1.0 million; and 
--  Capital expenditures of $8.9 million (2012 $2.0 million) for the year
    ended December 31, 2013 and the pro-rata capital expenditures, a non-
    IFRS measure combining the Company's capital expenditures and 30% of the
    allocated KUB-Gas capital expenditures, totaled $17.9 million (2012 -
    $12.6 million) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                        Three Months Three Months         Year         Year 
                               Ended        Ended        Ended        Ended 
(in thousands of US     December 31, December 31, December 31, December 30, 
 dollars)                       2013         2012         2013         2012 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and natural                                                       
 gas revenue                     745          606        3,250        1,666 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata petroleum and                                                      
 natural gas revenue(1)        9,761        8,805       38,575       31,542 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net profit (loss)             (5,304)        (136)      (3,013)       2,290 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) per                                                         
 share - basic and                                                          
 diluted                       (0.02)        0.00        (0.01)        0.01 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds generated from                                                        
 (used in) operations(2)         857       (1,611)       2,474       (3,931)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata funds generated                                                    
 from operations               2,111        2,692        9,814       12,187 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures (3)       2,789          304        8,851        1,843 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata capital                                                            
 expenditures                  4,900        4,738       17,861       12,627 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($/boe)       40.15        47.60        41.02        51.39 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($Mcfe)        6.69         7.93         6.84         8.57 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
                                    December 31,   December 31,
                                            2013           2012
---------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital                              942          9,577
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents                  1,617         10,116
---------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term debt                                 -              -
---------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:


1.  Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas revenue is a non-IFRS measure that
    adds the Company's petroleum and natural gas revenue earned in the
    respective periods to the Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas
    petroleum and natural gas sales that the Company has an economic
    interest in. 
2.  Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure and is defined as cash flow
    from operating activities, excluding changes in non-cash working
    capital. 
3.  Pro-rata funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure that adds the
    Company's funds from operations in the respective periods to the
    Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas funds from operations that the
    Company has an economic interest in. The KUB-Gas funds from operations
    is calculated as the income from equity investment less the KUB-Gas
    depletion and depreciation. 
4.  Capital expenditures includes the purchase of property, plant and
    equipment and the purchase of exploration and evaluation assets. Pro-
    rata capital expenditures is a non-IFRS measure that adds the Company's
    capital expenditures in the respective periods to the Company's 30%
    equity share of the KUB-Gas capital expenditures that the Company has an
    economic interest in.

Mikhail Afendikov, Chief Executive Officer of Cub Energy, commented, "We successfully drilled, completed and tied-in the RK-22 well, which was our first well drilled in western Ukraine and is 100% owned and operated by Cub. Cub will be devoting significant capital to develop its 100% owned assets in western Ukraine with at least four drilling operations planned. At KUB-Gas in eastern Ukraine, we had a new gas pool discovery in the Serpukhovian zone along with our successful development drilling, workover and fracture stimulation programs. We continue to create shareholder value with our production growth in eastern and western Ukraine."

Outlook

In 2014, the Company will continue its drilling operations on the RK-21 well on its 100% owned Tysagaz assets in western Ukraine with further plans to drill the RK-23 and RK-24 development wells and re-enter the RK-1 well.

Operations expected in the remainder of 2014 for KUB-Gas in eastern Ukraine include the drilling of four wells, five fracture stimulations and a workover of the O-6 well and construction of pipeline to tie-in wells as needed. The Makeevskoye and Olgovskoye production and processing facilities became operational in March 2014 and increased the facilities processing capability to approximately 68 MMcf/d from 30 MMcf/d.

To date, the unrest in Ukraine has had limited impact on the Company's operations; however, the final resolution and the effects of the political and economic crisis are difficult to predict and could negatively affect the Company's results and financial position. With the uncertainty of gas prices in Ukraine created by the unrest between Russia and Ukraine, it is possible that the programs could get constrained.

Supporting Documents

Cub's complete quarterly reporting package, including the audited annual financial statements, associated Management's Discussion and Analysis and the 2013 Annual Information Form, have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and posted on the Company's website at www.cubenergyinc.com. All currency references in this press release are in US dollars except as otherwise indicated.

About Cub Energy Inc.

Cub Energy Inc. (TSX VENTURE:KUB) is an upstream oil and gas company, with a proven track record of exploration and production cost efficiency in the Black Sea region. The Company's strategy is to implement western technology and capital, combined with local expertise and ownership, to increase value in its undeveloped land base, creating and further building a portfolio of producing oil and gas assets within a high pricing environment.

For further information please contact us or visit our website: www.cubenergyinc.com

Oil and Gas Equivalents

A barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") or units of natural gas equivalents ("Mcfe") is calculated using the conversion factor of 6 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl (barrel) or an Mcfe conversion of 1bbl: 6 Mcf is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

Reader Advisory

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Cub believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable; however there can be no assurance those expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: general economic and political conditions in Ukraine and globally; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the prices of natural gas; governmental regulation of the natural gas industry, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or delayed; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for natural gas; liabilities inherent in natural gas operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel and supplies; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling, processing and transportation problems; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the natural gas industry; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; and other factors. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the forward-looking information contained in this news release. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st Int\ernational Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive advantage. By offering a suite of proven hosting and management services, Enzu wants companies to focus on the core of their ...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
"Tintri focuses on the Ops side of the DevOps, which basically is pushing more and more of the accessibility of the infrastructure to the developers and trying to get behind the scenes," explained Dhiraj Sehgal of Tintri in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Automation is enabling enterprises to design, deploy, and manage more complex, hybrid cloud environments. Yet the people who manage these environments must be trained in and understanding these environments better than ever before. A new era of analytics and cognitive computing is adding intelligence, but also more complexity, to these cloud environments. How smart is your cloud? How smart should it be? In this power panel at 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, paneli...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...