Click here to close now.


News Feed Item

Terra Energy Announces 2013 Year-End Reserves Evaluation and Related Metrics

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/27/14 -- Terra Energy Corp. ("Terra" or the "Company") (TSX:TT) is pleased to announce the results of its year-end reserves evaluation, as prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. ("GLJ") as at December 31, 2013 (the "GLJ Report"). This evaluation was performed in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 51-101, Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities ("NI 51-101"). In addition, the Company would like to announce the results of its independent valuation of undeveloped lands, as prepared by Seaton-Jordan & Associates Ltd. ("Seaton-Jordan").


As a result of efforts to reduce debt and strengthen the balance sheet, Terra sold properties during calendar 2013 representing approximately 10,068 mboe of proved and probable reserves ("2P reserves"), or approximately 38% of the Company's December 31, 2012 2P reserves as estimated by GLJ. Total net debt has been reduced in the Company from the level of approximately $77MM at December 31, 2012 to approximately $21MM at year-end 2013. Furthermore, as a result of serious capital constraints during 2013, the Company expended an amount of only $2.3MM of capital throughout the entire year. As a result of the Company's efforts in creating efficiencies, seeking out cost savings and further geotechnical work, the total 2P reserves estimate at year-end decreased by less than the amount of 2P reserves that the Company sold.

The following are reserves evaluation highlights for year-end 2013, comparing results as at December 31, 2013 and those as at December 31, 2012:

--  Total proved and probable reserves decreased 9,211 mboes or 35% from
    26,571mboe to 17,360 mboe, after having sold approximately 10,068 mboe
    or 38% of opening 2P reserves and after having produced 1,404 mboe
    during the year 

--  Net Present Value (before tax) of total proved and probable reserves
    (NPV 10%) decreased from $183.4 million as at December 31,2012 by only
    4% to $ 175.6 million as at December 31, 2013 

--  Total proved reserves decreased 12 % from 13,258 mboe to 11,698 mboe

--  Reserve life index calculated at year-end 2013 is 9.1 years on total
    proved reserves and 13.5 years on total proved and probable reserves,
    using average daily production from the 4th quarter 2013 of 3,518 boe/d

--  NAV per share as at December 31, 2013 is estimated at approximately
    $1.85 basic, and $1.81 diluted

Oil and Gas Reserves

The following tables summarize certain information contained in the GLJ reserves report effective December 31, 2013. Detailed reserves information as required under NI 51-101 will be included in Terra's Annual Information Form which will be filed on SEDAR prior to March 30, 2014. Oil equivalent amounts have been calculated using a conversion rate of 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil.

Reconciliation Summary                                                      
                                     Proved        Probable    Total Proved 
                                                              plus Probable 
Opening Balance - Dec 31, 2012       13,258          13,313          26,571 
 Dispositions during year            (2,312)         (7,756)        (10,068)
Adjusted Reserves Base               10,946           5,557          16,503 
 Technical revisions                  1,544            (525)          1,019 
 Drilling Extensions                    271             557             828 
 Infill Drilling                        133              59             192 
 Improved Recovery                      244             113             357 
 Economic Factors                       (37)            (98)           (135)
 Current Year Production             (1,404)              -          (1,404)
Closing Balance - Dec 31, 2013       11,697           5,663          17,360 
Summary of Reserves by Category                                                      
                                                 December 31, 2013                   
and Costs                                                                            
                                                Natural                      % Change
Reserves                      Total       Oil       Gas   Liquids     Total     Total
Category                     (mboe)    (mbbl)    (mmcf)   (mmbls)    (mboe)    (mboe)
Proved Producing              8,442       862    37,090       738     7,781       -8%
Proved Non-Producing          4,816       843    16,603       306     3,917      -19%
Total Proved                 13,258     1,705    53,693     1,044    11,698      -12%
Total Probable               13,313     1,316    23,722       392     5,663      -58%
Total Proved + Probable      26,571     3,021    77,415     1,437    17,360      -35%

The estimated future net revenues are presented before deducting future estimated site restoration costs and are reduced for future abandonment costs and estimated future capital for future development associated with non-producing, undeveloped and probable additional reserves.

Summary of Net Present Values of Future Net Revenue ($000's) Discounted     
 Before Income Taxes                                                        
Forecast Prices          December 31, 2012 December 31, 2013    % Change    
Reserves Category              0%      10%       0%      10%      0%     10%
Proved Producing          117,173   75,639  128,708   84,713     10%     12%
Proved Non-Producing       68,614   33,172   61,749   39,620    -10%     19%
Total Proved              185,787  108,811  190,457  124,332      3%     14%
Total Probable            217,703   74,618  108,231   51,290    -50%    -31%
Total Proved + Probable   403,490  183,429  298,688  175,622    -26%     -4%

The forecast prices used in the GLJ reserves report were GLJ's forecast prices as at January 1, 2014 as presented below.

AECO (CDN$/mmBtu)                                                   
                Dec 31, 2012        Dec 31, 2013        % Difference
Year              Evaluation          Evaluation      Year over Year
2014                   $3.83               $4.03                5.2%
2015                   $4.28               $4.26               -0.5%
2016                   $4.72               $4.50               -4.7%
2017                   $4.95               $4.74               -4.2%
2018                   $5.22               $4.97               -4.8%
WTI (US$/BBL)                                                       
2014                  $92.50              $97.50                5.4%
2015                  $95.00              $97.50                2.6%
2016                  $97.50              $97.50                 N/C
2017                  $97.50              $97.50                 N/C
2018                  $97.50              $97.50                 N/C
(1)Inflation is accounted for at 2.0% per year                              

Land Valuation

Terra's gross undeveloped land holdings decreased from 641,584 gross acres (527,954 net) as at December 31, 2012 to 462,693 gross acres (311,921 net) as at December 31, 2013, representing a decrease of 28% (41% net). The decrease was largely attributable to undeveloped land expiring and being sold by the Company.

Below is a summary of the Company's undeveloped land holdings, broken down by province:

Province               December 31, 2013             December 31, 2012      
                          Gross            Net          Gross            Net
                        Acreage        Acreage        Acreage        Acreage
Alberta                 206,191        159,764        374,727        333,408
British Columbia        256,095        152,117        266,533        194,546
Saskatchewan                406             40            325            GOR
Totals                  462,693        311,921        641,585        527,954
Province            Undeveloped Land Values          % Change
                           2013           2012               
Alberta             $12,453,639    $18,243,575       (31.73%)
British Columbia    $20,909,598    $43,198,979       (51.60%)
Saskatchewan            $15,403           $644          2292%
Totals              $33,378,640    $61,443,198               

The undeveloped land holdings of the Company were evaluated as at December 31, 2013 by Seaton-Jordan. The value of Terra's net undeveloped land holdings is estimated to be approximately $33.3 million as at December 31, 2013. This valuation represents a decrease of 46% compared to last year's valuation of undeveloped land as prepared by Seaton-Jordan.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

Terra's NAV per share as at December 31, 2013 is calculated as follows:

As at December 31                                                 
($000's)                                    2012             2013 
P+P Reserves (NPV 10%)           $       183,430  $       175,622 
Undeveloped Land (1)             $        61,443  $        33,379 
Net Debt                         $       (77,247) $       (20,982)
Net Asset Value                  $       167,626  $       188,019 
Shares Outstanding                       101,663          101,663 
Basic NAV per Share              $          1.65  $          1.85 
Option and Warrant Value         $         7,271  $         4,316 
Option and Warrant Shares                  6,378            4,795 
Diluted Net Asset Value          $       174,897  $       192,335 
Diluted Shares Outstanding               108,041          106,458 
Fully Diluted NAV per Share      $          1.62  $          1.81 
(1) Based on December 31, 2012 and 2013 Seaton-Jordan reports               

Terra Energy Corp. is a junior oil and gas company engaged in the exploration for, and the development and production of, natural gas and oil in Western Canada. Terra's Common Shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "TT".

Reader Advisory

All amounts in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified.

Information Regarding Disclosure in Oil and Gas Reserves and Operational Information

A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6mcf/bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalence is based upon an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency for the individual products at the wellhead. Such disclosure of boe's may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. Additionally, given the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalent of 6:1, utilizing a conversion ratio of 6:1 may be misleading as an indication of value.

In accordance with Canadian practice, production volumes are reported on a company gross basis, before deduction of Crown and other royalties, unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise specified, all reserve volumes in this media release and all information derived there from are based on "company interest reserves" using forecast prices and costs. "Company interest reserves" consist of "company gross reserves" (as defined in National Instrument 51-101 adopted by the Canadian Securities Regulators ("NI 51-101") plus Terra's royalty interests in reserves. "Company interest reserves" are not a measure defined in NI 51-01 and does not have a standardized meaning under NI 51-101. Accordingly our Company interest reserves may not be comparable to reserves presented or disclosed by other issuers. Our oil and gas reserves statement for the year ended December 31, 2010, which will include complete disclosure of our oil and gas reserves and other oil and gas information in accordance with NI 51-101, will be contained within our Annual Information Form which will be available on our SEDAR profile at In relation to the disclosure of estimates in the operations update discussion, such estimates for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation.

In relation to the disclosure of net asset value ("NAV"), the NAV table shows what is normally referred to as a "produce-out" NAV calculation under which the current value of the Company's reserves would be produced at forecast future prices and costs and do not necessarily represent a "going concern" value of the Company. The value is a snapshot in time and is based on various assumptions including commodity prices and foreign exchange rates that vary over time. The future net revenues estimated by GLJ do not represent the fair market value of the reserves, nor should it be assumed that Terra's internally estimated value of its undeveloped land holdings represent the fair market value of the lands.

Forward Looking Statements

All forward looking statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature constitute forward looking statements, and the words "may", "will", "should", "could", "expect", "plan", "intend", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "propose", "predict", "potential", "continue", or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology are generally intended to identify forward looking statements. Although Terra believes that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, our forward-looking statements have been based on expectations, factors and assumptions concerning future events which may prove to be inaccurate and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company's control, including, without limitation: volatility in the market prices for oil and natural gas; liabilities inherent in oil and natural gas operations; uncertainties associated with estimating oil and natural gas reserves; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling and processing problems; fluctuations in foreign exchange or interest rates; health, safety and environmental risks; stock market volatility; global economic events or conditions; and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. We caution that the forgoing list of risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive.

Terra's actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and accordingly, no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur. As such, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, as no assurance can be provided as to future results, levels of activity or achievements. The risks, uncertainties, material assumptions and other factors that could affect actual results are discussed in further detail in our Annual Information Form and other documents available at

The reader is cautioned that historical results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are made as of the date of this document and, except as required by applicable law, Terra does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

The Company and its management believe that the financial outlook information contained herein has been prepared on a reasonable basis, reflecting the best estimates and judgements, and represent, to the best of management's knowledge and opinion, the Company's expected expenditures and results of operations. However, because this information is highly subjective and subject to numerous risks, including the risks discussed herein and in Terra's Annual Information Form and Management's Discussion and Analysis, it should not be relied on as necessarily indicative of future results. Except as required by applicable law, Terra undertakes no obligation to update any financial outlook information.

Terra Energy Corp.
Bud Love
Vice President of Finance, & Chief Financial Officer
403.264.7189 (FAX)

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Achim Weiss is Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of ProfitBricks. In 1995, he broke off his studies to co-found the web hosting company "Schlund+Partner." The company "Schlund+Partner" later became the 1&1 web hosting product line. From 1995 to 2008, he was the technical director for several important projects: the largest web hosting platform in the world, the second largest DSL platform, a video on-demand delivery network, the largest eMail backend in Europe, and a universal billing syste...
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi's VP Business Development and Engineering, will explore the IoT cloud-based platform technologies driv...
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. Migration to cloud shifts computing resources from your data center, which can yield significant advantages provided that the cloud vendor an offer enterprise-grade quality for your application.
Docker is hot. However, as Docker container use spreads into more mature production pipelines, there can be issues about control of Docker images to ensure they are production-ready. Is a promotion-based model appropriate to control and track the flow of Docker images from development to production? In his session at DevOps Summit, Fred Simon, Co-founder and Chief Architect of JFrog, will demonstrate how to implement a promotion model for Docker images using a binary repository, and then show h...
In his session at DevOps Summit, Bryan Cantrill, CTO at Joyent, will demonstrate a third path: containers on multi-tenant bare metal that maximizes performance, security, and networking connectivity.
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and Containers together help companies to achieve their business goals faster and more effectively.
The buzz continues for cloud, data analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT) and their collective impact across all industries. But a new conversation is emerging - how do companies use industry disruption and technology enablers to lead in markets undergoing change, uncertainty and ambiguity? Organizations of all sizes need to evolve and transform, often under massive pressure, as industry lines blur and merge and traditional business models are assaulted and turned upside down. In this new da...
WebRTC converts the entire network into a ubiquitous communications cloud thereby connecting anytime, anywhere through any point. In his session at WebRTC Summit,, Mark Castleman, EIR at Bell Labs and Head of Future X Labs, will discuss how the transformational nature of communications is achieved through the democratizing force of WebRTC. WebRTC is doing for voice what HTML did for web content.
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome,” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
The IoT is upon us, but today’s databases, built on 30-year-old math, require multiple platforms to create a single solution. Data demands of the IoT require Big Data systems that can handle ingest, transactions and analytics concurrently adapting to varied situations as they occur, with speed at scale. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Chad Jones, chief strategy officer at Deep Information Sciences, will look differently at IoT data so enterprises can fully leverage their IoT potential. He’ll sha...
In today's digital world, change is the one constant. Disruptive innovations like cloud, mobility, social media, and the Internet of Things have reshaped the market and set new standards in customer expectations. To remain competitive, businesses must tap the potential of emerging technologies and markets through the rapid release of new products and services. However, the rigid and siloed structures of traditional IT platforms and processes are slowing them down – resulting in lengthy delivery ...
The modern software development landscape consists of best practices and tools that allow teams to deliver software in a near-continuous manner. By adopting a culture of automation, measurement and sharing, the time to ship code has been greatly reduced, allowing for shorter release cycles and quicker feedback from customers and users. Still, with all of these tools and methods, how can teams stay on top of what is taking place across their infrastructure and codebase? Hopping between services a...
As a CIO, are your direct reports IT managers or are they IT leaders? The hard truth is that many IT managers have risen through the ranks based on their technical skills, not their leadership ability. Many are unable to effectively engage and inspire, creating forward momentum in the direction of desired change. Renowned for its approach to leadership and emphasis on their people, organizations increasingly look to our military for insight into these challenges.
DevOps and Continuous Delivery software provider XebiaLabs has announced it has been selected to join the Amazon Web Services (AWS) DevOps Competency partner program. The program is designed to highlight software vendors like XebiaLabs who have demonstrated technical expertise and proven customer success in DevOps and specialized solution areas like Continuous Delivery. DevOps Competency Partners provide solutions to, or have deep experience working with AWS users and other businesses to help t...