Welcome!

News Feed Item

Terra Energy Announces 2013 Year-End Reserves Evaluation and Related Metrics

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/27/14 -- Terra Energy Corp. ("Terra" or the "Company") (TSX: TT) is pleased to announce the results of its year-end reserves evaluation, as prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. ("GLJ") as at December 31, 2013 (the "GLJ Report"). This evaluation was performed in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 51-101, Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities ("NI 51-101"). In addition, the Company would like to announce the results of its independent valuation of undeveloped lands, as prepared by Seaton-Jordan & Associates Ltd. ("Seaton-Jordan").

Highlights

As a result of efforts to reduce debt and strengthen the balance sheet, Terra sold properties during calendar 2013 representing approximately 10,068 mboe of proved and probable reserves ("2P reserves"), or approximately 38% of the Company's December 31, 2012 2P reserves as estimated by GLJ. Total net debt has been reduced in the Company from the level of approximately $77MM at December 31, 2012 to approximately $21MM at year-end 2013. Furthermore, as a result of serious capital constraints during 2013, the Company expended an amount of only $2.3MM of capital throughout the entire year. As a result of the Company's efforts in creating efficiencies, seeking out cost savings and further geotechnical work, the total 2P reserves estimate at year-end decreased by less than the amount of 2P reserves that the Company sold.

The following are reserves evaluation highlights for year-end 2013, comparing results as at December 31, 2013 and those as at December 31, 2012:

--  Total proved and probable reserves decreased 9,211 mboes or 35% from
    26,571mboe to 17,360 mboe, after having sold approximately 10,068 mboe
    or 38% of opening 2P reserves and after having produced 1,404 mboe
    during the year

--  Net Present Value (before tax) of total proved and probable reserves
    (NPV 10%) decreased from $183.4 million as at December 31,2012 by only
    4% to $ 175.6 million as at December 31, 2013

--  Total proved reserves decreased 12 % from 13,258 mboe to 11,698 mboe

--  Reserve life index calculated at year-end 2013 is 9.1 years on total
    proved reserves and 13.5 years on total proved and probable reserves,
    using average daily production from the 4th quarter 2013 of 3,518 boe/d

--  NAV per share as at December 31, 2013 is estimated at approximately
    $1.85 basic, and $1.81 diluted

Oil and Gas Reserves

The following tables summarize certain information contained in the GLJ reserves report effective December 31, 2013. Detailed reserves information as required under NI 51-101 will be included in Terra's Annual Information Form which will be filed on SEDAR prior to March 30, 2014. Oil equivalent amounts have been calculated using a conversion rate of 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil.

Reconciliation Summary
                                                        Oil
                                                 Equivalent
                                                     (Mboe)
                                     Proved        Probable    Total Proved
                                                              plus Probable

Opening Balance - Dec 31, 2012       13,258          13,313          26,571
 Dispositions during year            (2,312)         (7,756)        (10,068)
                                  -----------------------------------------
Adjusted Reserves Base               10,946           5,557          16,503
 Technical revisions                  1,544            (525)          1,019
 Drilling Extensions                    271             557             828
 Infill Drilling                        133              59             192
 Improved Recovery                      244             113             357
 Economic Factors                       (37)            (98)           (135)
 Current Year Production             (1,404)              -          (1,404)
                                  -----------------------------------------
Closing Balance - Dec 31, 2013       11,697           5,663          17,360
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  -----------------------------------------

Summary of Reserves by Category

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           December
                                31,
                               2012
                                                 December 31, 2013
Forecast
Prices
and Costs
                                                Natural                      % Change
Reserves                      Total       Oil       Gas   Liquids     Total     Total
Category                     (mboe)    (mbbl)    (mmcf)   (mmbls)    (mboe)    (mboe)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proved Producing              8,442       862    37,090       738     7,781       -8%
Proved Non-Producing          4,816       843    16,603       306     3,917      -19%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Proved                 13,258     1,705    53,693     1,044    11,698      -12%
Total Probable               13,313     1,316    23,722       392     5,663      -58%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Proved + Probable      26,571     3,021    77,415     1,437    17,360      -35%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The estimated future net revenues are presented before deducting future estimated site restoration costs and are reduced for future abandonment costs and estimated future capital for future development associated with non-producing, undeveloped and probable additional reserves.

Summary of Net Present Values of Future Net Revenue ($000's) Discounted
 Before Income Taxes

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forecast Prices          December 31, 2012 December 31, 2013    % Change
Reserves Category              0%      10%       0%      10%      0%     10%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proved Producing          117,173   75,639  128,708   84,713     10%     12%
Proved Non-Producing       68,614   33,172   61,749   39,620    -10%     19%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Proved              185,787  108,811  190,457  124,332      3%     14%
Total Probable            217,703   74,618  108,231   51,290    -50%    -31%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Proved + Probable   403,490  183,429  298,688  175,622    -26%     -4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The forecast prices used in the GLJ reserves report were GLJ's forecast prices as at January 1, 2014 as presented below.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
AECO (CDN$/mmBtu)
                Dec 31, 2012        Dec 31, 2013        % Difference
Year              Evaluation          Evaluation      Year over Year
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2014                   $3.83               $4.03                5.2%
2015                   $4.28               $4.26               -0.5%
2016                   $4.72               $4.50               -4.7%
2017                   $4.95               $4.74               -4.2%
2018                   $5.22               $4.97               -4.8%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
WTI (US$/BBL)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

2014                  $92.50              $97.50                5.4%
2015                  $95.00              $97.50                2.6%
2016                  $97.50              $97.50                 N/C
2017                  $97.50              $97.50                 N/C
2018                  $97.50              $97.50                 N/C
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(1)Inflation is accounted for at 2.0% per year

Land Valuation

Terra's gross undeveloped land holdings decreased from 641,584 gross acres (527,954 net) as at December 31, 2012 to 462,693 gross acres (311,921 net) as at December 31, 2013, representing a decrease of 28% (41% net). The decrease was largely attributable to undeveloped land expiring and being sold by the Company.

Below is a summary of the Company's undeveloped land holdings, broken down by province:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Province               December 31, 2013             December 31, 2012
                          Gross            Net          Gross            Net
                        Acreage        Acreage        Acreage        Acreage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alberta                 206,191        159,764        374,727        333,408
British Columbia        256,095        152,117        266,533        194,546
Saskatchewan                406             40            325            GOR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals                  462,693        311,921        641,585        527,954
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------
Province            Undeveloped Land Values          % Change
                           2013           2012
-------------------------------------------------------------
Alberta             $12,453,639    $18,243,575       (31.73%)
British Columbia    $20,909,598    $43,198,979       (51.60%)
Saskatchewan            $15,403           $644          2292%
-------------------------------------------------------------
Totals              $33,378,640    $61,443,198
-------------------------------------------------------------

The undeveloped land holdings of the Company were evaluated as at December 31, 2013 by Seaton-Jordan. The value of Terra's net undeveloped land holdings is estimated to be approximately $33.3 million as at December 31, 2013. This valuation represents a decrease of 46% compared to last year's valuation of undeveloped land as prepared by Seaton-Jordan.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

Terra's NAV per share as at December 31, 2013 is calculated as follows:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
As at December 31
($000's)                                    2012             2013
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P+P Reserves (NPV 10%)           $       183,430  $       175,622
Undeveloped Land (1)             $        61,443  $        33,379
Net Debt                         $       (77,247) $       (20,982)
                                ---------------------------------

Net Asset Value                  $       167,626  $       188,019
                                ---------------------------------

Shares Outstanding                       101,663          101,663
Basic NAV per Share              $          1.65  $          1.85
                                ---------------------------------

Option and Warrant Value         $         7,271  $         4,316
Option and Warrant Shares                  6,378            4,795

Diluted Net Asset Value          $       174,897  $       192,335
Diluted Shares Outstanding               108,041          106,458

Fully Diluted NAV per Share      $          1.62  $          1.81
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Based on December 31, 2012 and 2013 Seaton-Jordan reports

Terra Energy Corp. is a junior oil and gas company engaged in the exploration for, and the development and production of, natural gas and oil in Western Canada. Terra's Common Shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "TT".

Reader Advisory

All amounts in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified.

Information Regarding Disclosure in Oil and Gas Reserves and Operational Information

A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6mcf/bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalence is based upon an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency for the individual products at the wellhead. Such disclosure of boe's may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. Additionally, given the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalent of 6:1, utilizing a conversion ratio of 6:1 may be misleading as an indication of value.

In accordance with Canadian practice, production volumes are reported on a company gross basis, before deduction of Crown and other royalties, unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise specified, all reserve volumes in this media release and all information derived there from are based on "company interest reserves" using forecast prices and costs. "Company interest reserves" consist of "company gross reserves" (as defined in National Instrument 51-101 adopted by the Canadian Securities Regulators ("NI 51-101") plus Terra's royalty interests in reserves. "Company interest reserves" are not a measure defined in NI 51-01 and does not have a standardized meaning under NI 51-101. Accordingly our Company interest reserves may not be comparable to reserves presented or disclosed by other issuers. Our oil and gas reserves statement for the year ended December 31, 2010, which will include complete disclosure of our oil and gas reserves and other oil and gas information in accordance with NI 51-101, will be contained within our Annual Information Form which will be available on our SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. In relation to the disclosure of estimates in the operations update discussion, such estimates for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation.

In relation to the disclosure of net asset value ("NAV"), the NAV table shows what is normally referred to as a "produce-out" NAV calculation under which the current value of the Company's reserves would be produced at forecast future prices and costs and do not necessarily represent a "going concern" value of the Company. The value is a snapshot in time and is based on various assumptions including commodity prices and foreign exchange rates that vary over time. The future net revenues estimated by GLJ do not represent the fair market value of the reserves, nor should it be assumed that Terra's internally estimated value of its undeveloped land holdings represent the fair market value of the lands.

Forward Looking Statements

All forward looking statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature constitute forward looking statements, and the words "may", "will", "should", "could", "expect", "plan", "intend", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "propose", "predict", "potential", "continue", or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology are generally intended to identify forward looking statements. Although Terra believes that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, our forward-looking statements have been based on expectations, factors and assumptions concerning future events which may prove to be inaccurate and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company's control, including, without limitation: volatility in the market prices for oil and natural gas; liabilities inherent in oil and natural gas operations; uncertainties associated with estimating oil and natural gas reserves; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling and processing problems; fluctuations in foreign exchange or interest rates; health, safety and environmental risks; stock market volatility; global economic events or conditions; and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. We caution that the forgoing list of risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive.

Terra's actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and accordingly, no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur. As such, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, as no assurance can be provided as to future results, levels of activity or achievements. The risks, uncertainties, material assumptions and other factors that could affect actual results are discussed in further detail in our Annual Information Form and other documents available at www.sedar.com.

The reader is cautioned that historical results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are made as of the date of this document and, except as required by applicable law, Terra does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

The Company and its management believe that the financial outlook information contained herein has been prepared on a reasonable basis, reflecting the best estimates and judgements, and represent, to the best of management's knowledge and opinion, the Company's expected expenditures and results of operations. However, because this information is highly subjective and subject to numerous risks, including the risks discussed herein and in Terra's Annual Information Form and Management's Discussion and Analysis, it should not be relied on as necessarily indicative of future results. Except as required by applicable law, Terra undertakes no obligation to update any financial outlook information.

Contacts:
Terra Energy Corp.
Bud Love
Vice President of Finance, & Chief Financial Officer
403.699.7777
403.264.7189 (FAX)

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
With more than 30 Kubernetes solutions in the marketplace, it's tempting to think Kubernetes and the vendor ecosystem has solved the problem of operationalizing containers at scale or of automatically managing the elasticity of the underlying infrastructure that these solutions need to be truly scalable. Far from it. There are at least six major pain points that companies experience when they try to deploy and run Kubernetes in their complex environments. In this presentation, the speaker will d...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
The deluge of IoT sensor data collected from connected devices and the powerful AI required to make that data actionable are giving rise to a hybrid ecosystem in which cloud, on-prem and edge processes become interweaved. Attendees will learn how emerging composable infrastructure solutions deliver the adaptive architecture needed to manage this new data reality. Machine learning algorithms can better anticipate data storms and automate resources to support surges, including fully scalable GPU-c...
When building large, cloud-based applications that operate at a high scale, it's important to maintain a high availability and resilience to failures. In order to do that, you must be tolerant of failures, even in light of failures in other areas of your application. "Fly two mistakes high" is an old adage in the radio control airplane hobby. It means, fly high enough so that if you make a mistake, you can continue flying with room to still make mistakes. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Le...
Machine learning has taken residence at our cities' cores and now we can finally have "smart cities." Cities are a collection of buildings made to provide the structure and safety necessary for people to function, create and survive. Buildings are a pool of ever-changing performance data from large automated systems such as heating and cooling to the people that live and work within them. Through machine learning, buildings can optimize performance, reduce costs, and improve occupant comfort by ...
As Cybric's Chief Technology Officer, Mike D. Kail is responsible for the strategic vision and technical direction of the platform. Prior to founding Cybric, Mike was Yahoo's CIO and SVP of Infrastructure, where he led the IT and Data Center functions for the company. He has more than 24 years of IT Operations experience with a focus on highly-scalable architectures.
The explosion of new web/cloud/IoT-based applications and the data they generate are transforming our world right before our eyes. In this rush to adopt these new technologies, organizations are often ignoring fundamental questions concerning who owns the data and failing to ask for permission to conduct invasive surveillance of their customers. Organizations that are not transparent about how their systems gather data telemetry without offering shared data ownership risk product rejection, regu...
CI/CD is conceptually straightforward, yet often technically intricate to implement since it requires time and opportunities to develop intimate understanding on not only DevOps processes and operations, but likely product integrations with multiple platforms. This session intends to bridge the gap by offering an intense learning experience while witnessing the processes and operations to build from zero to a simple, yet functional CI/CD pipeline integrated with Jenkins, Github, Docker and Azure...
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Dhiraj Sehgal works in Delphix's product and solution organization. His focus has been DevOps, DataOps, private cloud and datacenters customers, technologies and products. He has wealth of experience in cloud focused and virtualized technologies ranging from compute, networking to storage. He has spoken at Cloud Expo for last 3 years now in New York and Santa Clara.
Containers and Kubernetes allow for code portability across on-premise VMs, bare metal, or multiple cloud provider environments. Yet, despite this portability promise, developers may include configuration and application definitions that constrain or even eliminate application portability. In this session we'll describe best practices for "configuration as code" in a Kubernetes environment. We will demonstrate how a properly constructed containerized app can be deployed to both Amazon and Azure ...
Enterprises are striving to become digital businesses for differentiated innovation and customer-centricity. Traditionally, they focused on digitizing processes and paper workflow. To be a disruptor and compete against new players, they need to gain insight into business data and innovate at scale. Cloud and cognitive technologies can help them leverage hidden data in SAP/ERP systems to fuel their businesses to accelerate digital transformation success.
Poor data quality and analytics drive down business value. In fact, Gartner estimated that the average financial impact of poor data quality on organizations is $9.7 million per year. But bad data is much more than a cost center. By eroding trust in information, analytics and the business decisions based on these, it is a serious impediment to digital transformation.
Digital Transformation: Preparing Cloud & IoT Security for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. As automation and artificial intelligence (AI) power solution development and delivery, many businesses need to build backend cloud capabilities. Well-poised organizations, marketing smart devices with AI and BlockChain capabilities prepare to refine compliance and regulatory capabilities in 2018. Volumes of health, financial, technical and privacy data, along with tightening compliance requirements by...
Predicting the future has never been more challenging - not because of the lack of data but because of the flood of ungoverned and risk laden information. Microsoft states that 2.5 exabytes of data are created every day. Expectations and reliance on data are being pushed to the limits, as demands around hybrid options continue to grow.