Click here to close now.


News Feed Item

ThermoEnergy Corporation Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2013 Results

ThermoEnergy Corporation (OTCBB: TMEN), a technologies company engaged in the development and sale of wastewater treatment technologies, today reported revenue of $2.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Mr. James F. Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ThermoEnergy, stated: "2013 was a year of progress for ThermoEnergy. We worked to refocus the Company on its core competency – the manufacture and sale of systems that treat and recover chemicals, metals and nutrients from industrial wastewaters. I am confident this effort led to a number of increased opportunities and proposals throughout the latter half of 2013. Oil and gas is a sustainable market and major focus for the Company’s technology. However, based on the infancy of our offering to this segment, achieving scale is taking longer than expected. Recent field pilots and third-party laboratory tests have substantiated our CAST® technology’s ability to treat produced water from conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon sources and provide a cost-effective solutions for treating and recovering these waters. Additional information on the technology and our successful pilot studies is available on the Company’s website at”

Mr. Wood continued, “We have made significant efforts in managing our costs and continue to seek improvements in operations to improve our margins and reduce our manufacturing lead-times, which currently take anywhere from 16 to 24 weeks to build. Our technology is differentiated from competitive wastewater technologies in that CAST® technology produces a clean distillate. The potential recovery of potable water for agricultural and livestock uses in drought-stressed areas such as West Texas and California’s Central Valley continues to provide opportunities for the Company, and we believe ThermoEnergy’s technologies will become more valuable as global water shortages continue driven by climate changes and population growth.“

Operational and Financial Highlights:

  • Full year revenues of $2.8 million with 96% derived from new business and service opportunities.
  • Commissioned two ARP systems for removal and recovery of concentrated ammonia in wastewater.
  • Booked two additional CAST® systems for recovery of glycol and metal finishing and negotiated the completion and payment of two additional systems previously unfinished. These four systems are expected to ship during the second and third quarters of 2014.
  • Received third party scientific and economic validation supporting the benefits and return on investment generated by the Company’s introduction of CAST® technologies in the oil and gas market.
  • Achieved cost savings of $2.7 million based on efforts undertaken to reduce spending on non-core business activities.
  • Built and delivered UPA’s bench scale unit to demonstrate Pressurized Oxy-Combustion (POXC®) using domestic coals.
  • Expanded the sales and marketing organization to better develop top line opportunities across all industrial markets: oil and gas, glycol, chemical, metal and nutrient recycling.
  • Finalized the NYCDEP contract, resulting in a non-cash gain on contract termination of approximately $4.9 million.
  • Reduced outstanding debt by $1.7 million through the pay down and conversion of $5.7 million in debt during the first half of 2013, offset by a $4 million non-dilutive note in the fourth quarter.

Financial Results for the Three-Month Period Ended December 31, 2013:

For the three-month period ended December 31, 2013 the Company recorded revenue of $191,000 compared to $1,351,000 in the fourth quarter of 2012. Going forward, revenue on orders in backlog will be recognized only when shipped. Revenue in the quarter was derived from service contracts and spare parts orders. Revenue in the fourth quarter of 2012 was derived mainly from our contract with the NYCDEP.

Gross loss for the fourth quarter of 2013 was ($174,000), driven mainly by unabsorbed manufacturing costs.

General and administrative expense for the fourth quarter of 2013 was $757,000, a decrease of $43,000 (5%) compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company was able to recognize its targeted cost reduction efforts and maintain lower legal and financing expenses than the fourth quarter of 2012.

Engineering expense for the fourth quarter of 2013 was $18,000, a decrease of $80,000 (82%) compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. The decrease is attributable to increased utilization of our engineering resources and reduced non-cash stock expense during the period.

Sales and marketing expense for the fourth quarter of 2013 was $466,000, a decrease of $201,000 (30%) compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. The decrease was due to a reduction in non-core international business development efforts and reduced unbillable pre-sale expenses, partially offset by the continued increase in spending on domestic sales and marketing activities.

The Company reported a net loss for the three-month period ended December 31, 2013 of $1.314 million, ($0.01 per basic share), compared to a loss of $1.436 million ($0.01 per basic share) for the same period in 2012.

Financial Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2013:

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company recorded revenue of $2,812,000 compared to revenues of $6,971,000 in 2012. Revenue in 2013 was derived mainly by the Company’s first two projects utilizing its Ammonia Recovery Process (“ARP”) technology and work related to the subcontract with Unity Power Alliance’s DOE Grant. Equipment revenues were supported by continued growth in service revenues from our historic customer base. Revenue in 2012 were derived primarily from our contract with the NYCDEP.

Gross loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 was $501,000 compared to a profit of $173,000 in 2012. The gross loss is attributed to lower margins on the initial ARP project as well as higher unallocated overhead costs during the period. In 2012, the Company benefited from the continued construction of the NYCDEP contract. As reported last quarter, full year margin degradation was impacted by cost overruns of $275,000, which were driven by engineering and product design changes by our joint venture partner on UPA.

General and administrative expense totaled $3,179,000 in 2013, a decrease of $1,572,000 (33%) compared to 2012. The decrease is attributable to significantly lower professional and consulting expenses in 2013 from continuing efforts to reduce our cost structure, as well as significantly lower non-cash stock option expenses.

Engineering expense totaled $454,000 in 2013, which is consistent with spending in 2012. Our engineering team was not as fully utilized throughout the first half of 2013 compared to 2012 due to the cancellation of the NYCDEP contract and the timing of project activity. Engineering costs directly related to our projects are charged to cost of sales. The reduced utilization of our engineering team was offset by lower headcount and non-cash stock option expense in 2013.

Selling expense totaled $1,727,000 in 2013, a decrease of approximately $1.1 million (40%) compared to 2012. This decrease is attributed to a reduction in non-core business development efforts and reduced unbillable pre-sale expenses. These declines were offset by continued expenditures incurred to strengthen the field sales team, trade and promotion activities, and pilot testing of our TurboFrac® technologies in the unconventional oil shale market.

The Company recorded a non-cash gain of $4,878,000 related to the termination of its contract with the NYCDEP in 2013. This gain represents the amount by which our billings to the NYCDEP contract exceeded revenues recognized. We did not record any such gains in 2012.

Additional income of $2,357,000 was earned in 2013 related to the net change in fair value on our derivative instruments compared to $1,637,000 in 2012. Income in both years relates primarily to the passage of time and the decrease in our stock price. The increased income in 2013 is due to an increase in the number of underlying derivative instruments in 2013 compared to 2012.

The Company recorded derivative expense of $567,000 in 2012 related to the initial valuation of derivative liabilities. This expense did not repeat in 2013.

Due to our 50% ownership in UPA, the Company absorbed its proportional share of the costs necessary to complete the cost-sharing arrangement with the Department of Energy. This resulted in a loss of $298,000 in 2013 compared to $8,000 in 2012.

Interest expense was $2,663,000 in 2013 compared to $529,000 in 2012. This increase is due to amortization of debt discounts recognized on our December 2011 Bridge Notes and our November 2012 Bridge Notes in 2013.

The Company had cash on hand at December 31, 2013 of $2.5 million.

Please see the Company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014 for additional details.

About ThermoEnergy

Founded in 1988, ThermoEnergy is a diversified technologies company engaged in the worldwide development, sales and commercialization of patented and/or proprietary municipal and industrial wastewater treatment and power generation technologies. Additional information on the Company and its technologies can be found on its website at


More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi's VP Business Development and Engineering, will explore the IoT cloud-based platform technologies driv...
Docker is hot. However, as Docker container use spreads into more mature production pipelines, there can be issues about control of Docker images to ensure they are production-ready. Is a promotion-based model appropriate to control and track the flow of Docker images from development to production? In his session at DevOps Summit, Fred Simon, Co-founder and Chief Architect of JFrog, will demonstrate how to implement a promotion model for Docker images using a binary repository, and then show h...
SYS-CON Events announced today that IBM Cloud Data Services has been named “Bronze Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 17th Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. IBM Cloud Data Services offers a portfolio of integrated, best-of-breed cloud data services for developers focused on mobile computing and analytics use cases.
As the world moves towards more DevOps and microservices, application deployment to the cloud ought to become a lot simpler. The microservices architecture, which is the basis of many new age distributed systems such as OpenStack, NetFlix and so on, is at the heart of Cloud Foundry - a complete developer-oriented Platform as a Service (PaaS) that is IaaS agnostic and supports vCloud, OpenStack and AWS. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Raghavan "Rags" Srinivas, an Architect/Developer Evangeli...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data...
DevOps is here to stay because it works. Most businesses using this methodology are already realizing a wide range of real, measurable benefits as a result of implementing DevOps, including the breakdown of inter-departmental silos, faster delivery of new features and more stable operating environments. To take advantage of the cloud’s improved speed and flexibility, development and operations teams need to work together more closely and productively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Prashanth...
In their session at DevOps Summit, Asaf Yigal, co-founder and the VP of Product at, and Tomer Levy, co-founder and CEO of, will explore the entire process that they have undergone – through research, benchmarking, implementation, optimization, and customer success – in developing a processing engine that can handle petabytes of data. They will also discuss the requirements of such an engine in terms of scalability, resilience, security, and availability along with how the archi...
DevOps is gaining traction in the federal government – and for good reasons. Heightened user expectations are pushing IT organizations to accelerate application development and support more innovation. At the same time, budgetary constraints require that agencies find ways to decrease the cost of developing, maintaining, and running applications. IT now faces a daunting task: do more and react faster than ever before – all with fewer resources.
DevOps has often been described in terms of CAMS: Culture, Automation, Measuring, Sharing. While we’ve seen a lot of focus on the “A” and even on the “M”, there are very few examples of why the “C" is equally important in the DevOps equation. In her session at @DevOps Summit, Lori MacVittie, of F5 Networks, will explore HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 along with Microservices to illustrate why a collaborative culture between Dev, Ops, and the Network is critical to ensuring success.
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, will review the current landscape of...
Overgrown applications have given way to modular applications, driven by the need to break larger problems into smaller problems. Similarly large monolithic development processes have been forced to be broken into smaller agile development cycles. Looking at trends in software development, microservices architectures meet the same demands. Additional benefits of microservices architectures are compartmentalization and a limited impact of service failure versus a complete software malfunction....
There will be 20 billion IoT devices connected to the Internet soon. What if we could control these devices with our voice, mind, or gestures? What if we could teach these devices how to talk to each other? What if these devices could learn how to interact with us (and each other) to make our lives better? What if Jarvis was real? How can I gain these super powers? In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Chris Matthieu, co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, will show you!
Developing software for the Internet of Things (IoT) comes with its own set of challenges. Security, privacy, and unified standards are a few key issues. In addition, each IoT product is comprised of at least three separate application components: the software embedded in the device, the backend big-data service, and the mobile application for the end user's controls. Each component is developed by a different team, using different technologies and practices, and deployed to a different stack/...
As a company adopts a DevOps approach to software development, what are key things that both the Dev and Ops side of the business must keep in mind to ensure effective continuous delivery? In his session at DevOps Summit, Mark Hydar, Head of DevOps, Ericsson TV Platforms, will share best practices and provide helpful tips for Ops teams to adopt an open line of communication with the development side of the house to ensure success between the two sides.
The last decade was about virtual machines, but the next one is about containers. Containers enable a service to run on any host at any time. Traditional tools are starting to show cracks because they were not designed for this level of application portability. Now is the time to look at new ways to deploy and manage applications at scale. In his session at @DevOpsSummit, Brian “Redbeard” Harrington, a principal architect at CoreOS, will examine how CoreOS helps teams run in production. Attende...