Welcome!

News Feed Item

FY 2013 Financial Results Released By Inrad Optics, Inc.

NORTHVALE, N.J., April 1, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Inrad Optics, Inc. (the "Company") (OTC Bulletin Board: INRD) has released its consolidated financial results for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net sales for the fourth quarter of 2013 were $ 2.7 million compared to $2.8 million and $3.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively.  For the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, net sales were $11.2 million, down 1.5% from $11.4 million, last year, and 14.7% from $13.2 million in 2011.

The Company ended 2013 with bookings of $9.8 million, a decrease from $12.3 million or approximately 20% from 2012. Bookings in the fourth quarter of 2013 were $2.5 million.  The Company ended 2013 with a backlog of $4.4 million compared to $5.9 million at the end of 2012. 

The Company reported a net loss of $(549,000) in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to a net loss of $(659,000) and net income of $142,000 in the fourth quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The fourth quarter 2013 results included $313,000 of accrued and incurred expenses related to the relocation of the Florida operation to the Company's Northvale, New Jersey facility which is currently close to completion.  The Company's 2012 fourth quarter results reflected an income tax provision of $408,000 for a write-off of deferred tax assets compared to an income tax provision for federal and state taxes of $11,000 in 2011.

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the fourth quarter was $(0.05) in 2013 versus $(0.06) in 2012 and $0.01 in 2011, respectively. 

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the Company reported a net loss of $(1,650,000)  and a basic and diluted loss per share of  $(0.14) versus $(1,421,000) and $(0.12)  last year.  This compares with net income of $165,000 and basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.01 for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

Gross profit was $119,000 or 4.4% of sales for the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to $567,000 or 20.4% of sales and $998,000 or 29.5% of sales in the comparable quarters in 2012 and 2011, respectively. 
The Company had a gross profit of $432,000 or 15.9 %, in the fourth quarter of 2013 before restructuring costs of $313,000.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, gross profit was $1.7 million or 14.9% of sales compared to $2.5 million or 21.8% of sales in the 2012.  For the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, gross profit was $3.6 million or 27.0% of sales. Gross margins continue to be negatively impacted by declining sales and the Company's overhead structure which is relatively fixed.  

EBITDA1 for 2013 was $(739,000) versus $2,000 in 2012.  

Net cash used in operating activities was $70,000 for 2013 compared to $208,000 in 2012. 

In 2012, the Company negotiated an equipment loan from Valley National Bank in the amount of $750,000 and paid $500,000 as a deposit on new thin film coating equipment which was delivered in the first quarter of 2013.

The Company ended the 2013 with cash of $2.5 million, down from $3.1 million at the end of 2012.

Amy Eskilson, President and CEO of Inrad Optics stated, "Our 2013 results depict the major internal and external drivers that influenced the business during the year.  Internally, the expenses associated with restructuring in New Jersey in Q2 and Q3, and the accrued expenses related to the Sarasota consolidation effort in Q4 reduced our gross profit.  When combined with a decline in orders from the defense sector, the result was an operating loss of $1.5 million.    With that said, many difficult but formative changes were implemented in 2013 that we believe will bear fruit in the future.  Looking forward, our Q1 bookings are higher than anticipated and our consolidation of the Sarasota metal optics production facility continues to move ahead, on-time and on budget.

The consolidation of our metal optics operations into the New Jersey headquarters will integrate all of our unique resources into one optimized facility.  The Sarasota capabilities combined with the extensive Northvale competencies will offer our customers an enhanced value proposition.  The consolidation is expected to reduce our manufacturing costs and provides a unique opportunity to make significant improvements to our operating results in the second half of 2014."

1 Note Regarding Use of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

The Company defines EBITDA1 as earnings (loss) before non-cash, stock-based compensation, net interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization.  EBITDA is presented herein because we consider these numbers an important measure of the Company's ability to internally fund capital expenditures and service debt.  EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to cash flow as an indicator of the Company's financial performance, or liquidity.  The reader is referred to the Supplemental Financial Data set forth below for a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA. 

The reconciliation follows:



Years ended December 31,


Reconciliation of  EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA to Net Income (Loss)


2013


2012



               (In thousands)

Net (loss) income, as reported


$

(1,650)


$

(1,421)

Income tax provision


--


408

Interest expense, net


186


164

Depreciation and amortization


587


650

Non-cash, stock-based compensation


138


201

EBITDA


$

(739)


$

2











Inrad Optics, Inc. (formerly Photonic Products Group, Inc.) was incorporated in New Jersey in 1973. In January 2012, the Company's Board of Directors and shareholders approved the name change to Inrad Optics, Inc. The Company develops, manufactures and markets products and services for use in photonics industry sectors via three distinct but complimentary product areas -   "Crystals and Devices", "Custom Optics" and "Metal Optics". 

The Company is a vertically integrated organization specializing in crystal-based optical components and devices, custom optical components from both glass and metal, and precision optical and opto-mechanical assemblies.  Manufacturing capabilities include solution and high temperature crystal growth, extensive optical fabrication capabilities, including precision diamond turning and the ability to handle large substrates, optical coatings and in-process metrology expertise.  Inrad Optics' customers include leading corporations in the defense, aerospace, laser systems, process control and metrology sectors of the photonics industry, as well as the U.S. Government, National Laboratories and Universities worldwide.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained in this press release that are not purely historical are forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. These statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes", "expects", "should", "will", "plan", "anticipate", "probably", "targeting" or similar words.  Such forward-looking statements, such as our expectation for revenues, new orders, and improved results involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward looking statements are, but are not limited to, uncertainties in market demand for the company's products or the products of its customers, future actions by competitors, inability to deliver product on time, inability to develop new business, inability to retain key employees or hire new employees, and other factors discussed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The forward looking statements made in this news release are made as of the date hereof and Inrad Optics, Inc. does not assume any obligation to update publicly any forward looking statement.

INRAD OPTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



December 31,


2013


2012

Assets




Current Assets:




Cash and cash equivalents

$

2,451,263


$

3,089,013

Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful

  accounts of $15,000 in 2013 and 2012)

1,236,958


1,557,930

Inventories, net

3,129,855


3,596,646

Other current assets

144,581


158,742

Total Current Assets

6,962,657


8,402,331

Plant and Equipment:




Plant and equipment at cost

15,638,759


15,446,826

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

(13,931,775)


(14,182,712)

Total plant and equipment

1,706,984


1,264,114

Precious Metals

474,960


474,960

Deferred Income Taxes


Goodwill

311,572


311,572

Intangible Assets, net of accumulated amortization

358,760


437,324

Other Assets

33,122


534,838

Total Assets

$

9,848,055


$

11,425,139





Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity




Current Liabilities:




Current portion of long-term notes payable -other

$

156,600


$

150,200

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

967,963


813,705

Customer advances

146,784


297,251

Total Current Liabilities

1,271,347


1,261,156





Related Party Convertible Notes Payable

2,500,000


2,500,000





Long Term Notes Payable, net of current portion

712,868


869,135

Total Liabilities

4,484,215


4,630,291





Commitments








Shareholders' Equity:




    Common stock: $.01 par value; 60,000,000 authorized shares

    12,050,603 issued at December 31, 2013 and 11,881,724

    issued at December 31, 2012

120,508


118,819

Capital in excess of par value

18,293,782


18,076,518

Accumulated deficit

(13,035,500)


(11,385,539)


5,378,790


6,809,798





Less - Common stock in treasury, at cost (4,600 shares)

(14,950)


(14,950)

Total Shareholders' Equity

5,363,840


6,794,848

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

$

9,848,055


$

11,425,139

 

 


INRAD OPTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



Years Ended December 31,


2013


2012


2011

Revenues






Net sales

$

11,235,654


$

11,403,827


$

13,177,194







Cost and expenses






Cost of goods sold

9,247,515


8,913,178


9,614,875

Restructuring costs

312,778



Selling, general and administrative expense

3,172,512


3,339,365


3,255,073


12,732,805


12,252,543


12,869,948







Operating (loss) income

(1,497,151)


(848,716)


307,246







Other income (expense), net






Interest expense, net

(185,770)


(164,117)


(130,497)

Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of plant and equipment

32,960



(1,003)


(152,810)


(164,117)


(131,500)







(Loss) income before income taxes

(1,649,961)


(1,012,833)


175,746







Income tax provision


408,000


11,000







Net (loss) income

$

(1,649,961)


$

(1,420,833)


$

164,746







Net (loss) income per share - basic

$

(0.14)


$

(0.12)


$

0.01







Net (loss) income per share - diluted

$

(0.14)


$

(0.12)


$

0.01







Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

11,975,900


11,825,583


11,658,891







Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted

11,975,900


11,825,583


11,753,669







 

 

INRAD OPTICS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



Years Ended December 31,


2013


2012


2011

Cash flows from operating activities:






 

Net (loss) income

$

(1,649,961)


$

(1,420,833)


$

164,746







Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash

  (used in) operating activities:






Depreciation and amortization

586,636


650,170


835,788

401K common stock contribution

80,922


151,775


129,998

Deferred income taxes


408,000


(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of plant and equipment

(32,960)



1,003

Stock-based compensation expense

138,031


200,562


171,239

Change in inventory reserve

161,311


194,695


55,174







Changes in operating assets and liabilities:






Accounts receivable

320,972


494,957


171,705

Inventories

305,480


(881,821)


(573,818)

Other current assets

14,161


26,556


(66,055)

Other assets

1,716


1,718


10,679

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

154,258


(64,052)


41,567

Customer advances

(150,467)


30,433


(175,169)

Accrued interest on Related Party Convertible Note

  Payable



(1,125,000)

Total adjustments

1,580,060


1,212,993


(522,889)

Net cash (used in) operating activities

(69,901)


(207,840)


(358,143)







Cash flows from investing activities:






Purchase of plant and equipment

(455,982)


(292,603)


(303,999)

Down payment on purchase of equipment


(500,000)


Purchase of precious metals



(317,517)

        Proceeds from disposal of plant and equipment

38,000



6,000

Net cash (used in) investing activities

(417,982)


(792,603)


(615,516)







Cash flows from financing activities:






Net proceeds from issuance of common stock


5,349


18,260

Proceeds from term note payable


750,000


Principal payments of notes payable-other

(149,867)


(66,098)


(9,441)

             Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(149,867)


689,251


8,819







Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(637,750)


(311,192)


(964,840)







Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year

3,089,013


3,400,205


4,365,045







 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year

$

2,451,263


$

3,089,013


$

3,400,205







Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:






Interest paid

$

191,000


$

181,000


$

1,289,000

Income taxes paid

$

2,000


$

12,000


$

18,000










 

SOURCE Inrad Optics, Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Historically, some banking activities such as trading have been relying heavily on analytics and cutting edge algorithmic tools. The coming of age of powerful data analytics solutions combined with the development of intelligent algorithms have created new opportunities for financial institutions. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Sebastien Meunier, Head of Digital for North America at Chappuis Halder & Co., discussed how these tools can be leveraged to develop a lasting competitive advantage ...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Arvind Radhakrishnen discussed how IoT offers new business models in banking and financial services organizations with the capability to revolutionize products, payments, channels, business processes and asset management built on strong architectural foundation. The following topics were covered: How IoT stands to impact various business parameters including customer experience, cost and risk management within BFS organizations.
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Scott Davis, CTO of Embotics, discussed how automation can provide the dynamic management required to cost-effectively deliver microservices and container solutions at scale. He also discussed how flexible automation is the key to effectively bridging and seamlessly coordinating both IT and developer needs for component orchestration across disparate clouds – an increasingly important requirement at today’s multi-cloud enterprise.
Here are the Top 20 Twitter Influencers of the month as determined by the Kcore algorithm, in a range of current topics of interest from #IoT to #DeepLearning. To run a real-time search of a given term in our website and see the current top influencers, click on the topic name. Among the top 20 IoT influencers, ThingsEXPO ranked #14 and CloudEXPO ranked #17.
While the focus and objectives of IoT initiatives are many and diverse, they all share a few common attributes, and one of those is the network. Commonly, that network includes the Internet, over which there isn't any real control for performance and availability. Or is there? The current state of the art for Big Data analytics, as applied to network telemetry, offers new opportunities for improving and assuring operational integrity. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jim Frey, Vice President of S...
Given the popularity of the containers, further investment in the telco/cable industry is needed to transition existing VM-based solutions to containerized cloud native deployments. The networking architecture of the solution isolates the network traffic into different network planes (e.g., management, control, and media). This naturally makes support for multiple interfaces in container orchestration engines an indispensable requirement.
In their session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Michael Berman, VP Engineering at TidalScale, and Ivo Jimenez, Engineer at TidalScale, will describe how automating tests in TidalScale is easy thanks to WaveRunner. They will show how they use WaveRunner, Jenkins, and Docker to have agile delivery of TidalScale. Michael Berman is VP Engineering at TidalScale. TidalScale is developing a scale up compute and resource architecture for customers to perform big data exploration and real time anal...
Your homes and cars can be automated and self-serviced. Why can't your storage? From simply asking questions to analyze and troubleshoot your infrastructure, to provisioning storage with snapshots, recovery and replication, your wildest sci-fi dream has come true. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Dan Florea, Director of Product Management at Tintri, provided a ChatOps demo where you can talk to your storage and manage it from anywhere, through Slack and similar services with...
Containers are rapidly finding their way into enterprise data centers, but change is difficult. How do enterprises transform their architecture with technologies like containers without losing the reliable components of their current solutions? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Tony Campbell, Director, Educational Services at CoreOS, will explore the challenges organizations are facing today as they move to containers and go over how Kubernetes applications can deploy with lega...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
Learn how to solve the problem of keeping files in sync between multiple Docker containers. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Aaron Brongersma, Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Modulus, discussed using rsync, GlusterFS, EBS and Bit Torrent Sync. He broke down the tools that are needed to help create a seamless user experience. In the end, can we have an environment where we can easily move Docker containers, servers, and volumes without impacting our applications? He shared his results so yo...
"This week we're really focusing on scalability, asset preservation and how do you back up to the cloud and in the cloud with object storage, which is really a new way of attacking dealing with your file, your blocked data, where you put it and how you access it," stated Jeff Greenwald, Senior Director of Market Development at HGST, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Enterprise architects are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies as they seek to utilize existing data center assets, leverage the advantages of cloud computing and avoid cloud vendor lock-in. This requires a globally aware traffic management strategy that can monitor infrastructure health across data centers and end-user experience globally, while responding to control changes and system specification at the speed of today’s DevOps teams. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Gray, Chie...