Welcome!

News Feed Item

Prophecy Receives Updated Chandgana Preliminary Economic Assessment

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 04/03/14 -- Prophecy Coal Corp. ("Prophecy" or the "Company") (TSX: PCY)(OTCQX: PRPCF)(FRANKFURT: 1P2) announces that, further to its December 19, 2013 news release clarifying the Company's technical disclosure, the Company has today filed on SEDAR a revised National Instrument 43-101 compliant technical report on its Chandgana Tal coal mining licenses in central Mongolia dated effective November 30, 2012, titled "Technical Report, Coal Resources and Preliminary Economic Assessment, Coal Mine Component, Chandgana Tal Coal Project" (the "PEA"). The PEA examines the economics of coal production from the mining licenses and excludes the Chandgana Khavtgai exploration license. Prophecy's wholly-owned subsidiary Chandgana Coal LLC intends to mine the coal and supply it to the proposed 600MW (150MW x 4) Chandgana mine-mouth power plant (the "Power Plant"), which is planned to be operated by Prophecy's wholly-owned Prophecy Power Generation, LLC. The PEA was prepared by John T Boyd Co., one of the world's largest independent consulting firms exclusively serving the coal, mineral, financial, utility, and power-related industries. The PEA replaces the technical report on the Chandgana Tal Coal Project previously filed by the Company on SEDAR on November 30, 2012 (the "Previous Report") and the information contained in the PEA and this news release represents changes to the Company's pervious disclosure contained in its news releases dated May 10 and November 2, 2012 disclosing the results of the Previous Report which are summarized and reconciled below.

The following information is derived from the PEA, and should be read in the context of and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the PEA. Highlights of the PEA are as follows:

Coal Resources and Mining

The two Chandgana Tal mining licenses contain an estimated 124 million tonnes of coal resources all in the measured category. The average in-place coal gross calorific value is 3,306 kcal/kg. After a short ramp-up period, mine production will be 3.5 million tonnes per year throughout the 30 year life of the mine, in order to meet the demands of the power plant. The mine will be a surface (open pit) mine and is located 2 km from the proposed power plant site. The aggregate coal seam thickness is as great as 50 m and the overburden is relatively thin, making for a low average strip ratio of 0.70:1 over the life of the mine.

The estimated total Run-of-Mine ("ROM") coal product tonnage recovered over the life-of-mine plan and other study results are shown in the table below:

STUDY RESULTS

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Description                             Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         ROM Coal Product (kt)                        103,946
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Waste (kBCM)                             73,122
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Stripping Ratio
                (BCM: t)                                0.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Annual Estimated Production (kt)                    3,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Mine Life (years)                            30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operating Costs

The life of mine average total cash cost of sales is estimated at US $12.71 per tonne, including the fees for a contract miner with owner equipment. The breakdown of the cost is as follows:

UNIT CASH COST OF SALES

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Direct Costs                       Unit Cost (US $ /t)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Labor                                 0.78
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Materials and Supplies                         6.30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Subtotal Direct Costs                         7.08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Contingency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Cash Cost Contingency @ 10%                      0.71
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Indirect Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  General& Administration - Off Site                   0.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Royalties, Emissions Tax, Water Use
           Fee, License Fees                           1.60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Contractor Management, Margin,
               Overhead                                2.57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Subtotal Indirect Costs                        4.92
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Unit Cash Costs of Sales                     12.71
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capital Costs

The initial pre-production capital costs are estimated at US $30.9 Million, including a 10% contingency, are summarized below:

ESTIMATED INITIAL PRE-PRODUCTION CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Area                              Cost (US $mn)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Surface Equipment Capital                       14.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Site infrastructure Capital                       9.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Subtotal                                23.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Capital Contingency @ 10%                     2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Pre-Production Cash Cost                         4.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total Capital Expenditures                       30.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The life of mine estimated capital costs total US $160.2 million.

The independent PEA study reports that the Chandgana Coal project will produce the following after-tax financial results:

--  28% Internal Rate of Return ("IRR").
--  5.3 Years payback on US $30.9 million capital.
--  US $47.8 million net present value ("NPV") at a 10% discount rate.

An after-tax financial model was prepared using an initial mine gate price of US $17.70 per tonne, 30 year mine life and 100% equity financing. The coal price is fully indexed and adjusted annually to account for variable costs such as fuel, parts, and wages. The mine gate price has been determined in reliance on the terms of the coal supply agreement executed June 5, 2013 between the Company's two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Chandgana Coal LLC and Prophecy Power Generation LLC pursuant to which all of the coal mined will be delivered to support the operation of the Power Plant (the "Coal Supply Agreement"). The Coal Supply Agreement is filed and available for review on SEDAR.

The Company cautions that the PEA is preliminary in nature and has a degree of accuracy of plus or minus 35%. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The results of a sensitivity analysis, carried out to evaluate project economics with respect to coal price, NPV, and IRR, are described in the following table.

NET PRESENT VALUE (US $mn)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Base                                          Capital
 Discount Rate %  Case    Coal Price      Operating Cost      Expenditure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         +10%     -10%     -10%     +10%     -10%    +10%
                       (Better) (Worse)  (Better) (Worse)  (Better) (Worse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        8         66.0   99.9     32.1     95.5     36.5     71.1     61.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        10        47.8   74.6     20.9     71.2     24.3     52.1     43.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        12        34.7   56.4     13.0     53.7     15.7     38.5     30.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        15        21.4   37.6     5.0      35.7     7.0      24.6     18.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     IRR (%)       28     37       18       37       19       31       25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reconciliation

The foregoing represents changes to the information previously disclosed by the Company in the Previous Report and its November 2, 2012 announcement disclosing the results of the Previous Report.

The principal changes to the Company's previous disclosure are as follows:

1.  The economic analysis was changed to be performed on an after-tax basis;
2.  Depreciation has been included in the analysis for income tax
    calculation purposes;
3.  Application of corporate income tax has been applied;
4.  An indirect cost for water usage was added;
5.  A direct cost figure in materials and supplies has been revised; and
6.  Revised support for the price of coal at the mine gate coal has been
    provided.

The Previous Report was prepared on a before tax basis. The change to an after-tax basis in the PEA decreased the base financial results including reducing the IRR from 36% to 28%, increased the payback period from 4 to 5.3 years, and decreased the NPV from US $70.5 million to US $47.8 million at a 10% discount rate. The Previous Report was prepared without depreciation. The inclusion of depreciation completed for income tax calculation purposes effected an approximately US $5 million per year positive adjustment to after tax cash flow. The Mongolian income tax is a two tier rate that makes for an approximate US $3 million decrease in net cash flow. Net annual cash flow decreased slightly in the PEA due to an increase in the total indirect costs from US $1.24 to US $1.60 per tonne to account for additional water usage fees determined and applied by the Mongolian government after the Previous Report was prepared. The final revised direct cost of materials and supplies was also decreased resulting in a net decrease in total direct costs from US $6.56 to US $6.30 per tonne. The PEA has also been amended to provide that the US $17.70 per tonne mine gate price has been determined in reliance on the terms of the Coal Supply Agreement. In addition, the PEA contains revised Certificates of Qualified Persons for its authors, has been revised to include cautionary language required by National Instrument 43-101, and reference to a Feasibility Study not supported by the report or filed on SEDAR has been removed.

Conclusion and Opportunity:

The financial evaluation indicates that the project is potentially economically viable given the coal price assumption of US $17.70 per tonne sold at the mine gate directly to the power plant. The coal price is fully indexed and will rise according to rising input costs such as fuel, labor, and parts. Therefore the coal project is expected to provide stable return throughout the life of mine. Furthermore, the mineral resource estimate covers only the Chandgana Tal mining licenses with potential to scale up the Chandgana power plant project and source additional coal supply from Chandgana Coal's nearby Khavtgai Uul coal deposit. An independent study sponsored by Asian Development Bank suggested a Mongolia power supply deficit of 600MW by 2016 and 900MW by 2019. This deficit could be satisfied by a scaled up Chandgana power plant.

The Company cautions that the PEA is preliminary in nature and has a degree of accuracy of plus or minus 35%.

The technical contents of this news release have been prepared under the supervision of by Christopher M. Kravits, P.Geo, General Mining Manager of Prophecy. Mr. Kravits is a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101 with 35 years of US and international relevant coal geology experience. He has been active in Mongolia since 2007.

The financial contents of this news release have been prepared under the supervision of John T Boyd Company and Robert J. Farmer, Lead Qualified Person on the revised PEA. Mr. Farmer is a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101.

About Prophecy Coal

Prophecy Coal Corp. is a Canadian company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange engaged in developing energy projects in Mongolia. The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Prophecy Power Generation LLC is advancing plans for a proposed 600 MW mine-mouth power plant, which has been permitted by the Mongolian government, adjacent to its Chandgana coal deposit. Substantially all of the Company's resources are not mineral reserves, hence they do not have demonstrated economic viability. The Company cautions the Chandgana project is in Mongolia and requires substantial capital to develop.

Further information on Prophecy Coal can be found at www.prophecycoal.com.

PROPHECY COAL CORP.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

JOHN LEE, Executive Chairman

Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this news release, including statements which may contain words such as "expects", "anticipates", "intends", "plans", "believes", "estimates", or similar expressions, and statements related to matters which are not historical facts, are forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements, which reflect management's expectations regarding Prophecy's future growth, results of operations, performance, business prospects and opportunities, are based on certain factors and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These estimates and assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other uncertainties and contingencies, many of which, with respect to future events, are subject to change and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by Prophecy. In making forward-looking statements as may be included in this news release, Prophecy has made several assumptions that it believes are appropriate, including, but not limited to assumptions that: there being no significant disruptions affecting operations, such as due to labour disruptions; currency exchange rates being approximately consistent with current levels; certain price assumptions for coal, prices for and availability of fuel, parts and equipment and other key supplies remain consistent with current levels; production forecasts meeting expectations; the accuracy of Prophecy's current mineral resource estimates; labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with Prophecy's current expectations; and that any additional required financing will be available on reasonable terms. Prophecy cannot assure you that any of these assumptions will prove to be correct.

Numerous factors could cause Prophecy's actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward looking statements, including the following risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in greater detail under the heading "Risk Factors" in Prophecy's most recent Management Discussion and Analysis and Annual Information Form as filed on SEDAR and posted on Prophecy's website: Prophecy's history of net losses and lack of foreseeable cash flow; exploration, development and production risks, including risks related to the development of Prophecy Coal's Ulaan Ovoo coal property; Prophecy Coal not having a history of profitable mineral production; commencing mine development without a feasibility study; the uncertainty of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; the capital and operating costs required to bring Prophecy Coal's projects into production and the resulting economic returns from its projects; foreign operations and political conditions, including the legal and political risks of operating in Mongolia, which is a developing country and being subject to its local laws; the availability and timeliness of various government approvals and licences; the feasibility, funding and development of the Chandgana Power Plant; protecting title to Prophecy Coal's mineral properties; environmental risks; the competitive nature of the mining business; lack of infrastructure; Prophecy Coal's reliance on key personnel; uninsured risks; commodity price fluctuations; reliance on contractors; Prophecy Coal's need for substantial additional funding and the risk of not securing such funding on reasonable terms or at all; foreign exchange risk; anti-corruption legislation; recent global financial conditions; the payment of dividends; and conflicts of interest.

These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue reliance on the Prophecy's forward-looking statements. Prophecy believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this news release and the documents incorporated by reference herein are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. In addition, although Prophecy has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Prophecy undertakes no obligation to release publicly any future revisions to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this news or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as expressly required by law.

Contacts:
Prophecy Coal Corp.
Investor Relations:
Mirza Rahimani
+1.604.563.0699 or +1.888.513.6286
[email protected]
www.prophecycoal.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of following equation: monolithic to microservices to serverless architecture (FaaS). To keep up with the cut-throat competition, the organisations need to update their technology stack to make software development their differentiating factor. Thus microservices architecture emerged as a potential method to provide development teams with greater flexibility and other advantages, such as the abili...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...