Welcome!

News Feed Item

Public Release of Medicare Data Creates More Confusion about the Economics of Freestanding Radiation Therapy Centers, Highlights Need for Payment Reform

- CMS physician payment data do not properly reflect differences in overhead costs for freestanding radiation therapy or differences in site of service costs -

WASHINGTON, April 10, 2014 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Radiation Therapy Alliance (RTA) – a non-profit organization representing leading freestanding radiation therapy centers and equipment manufacturers – today expressed concern that physician payment data released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) fundamentally misrepresent the true economics of freestanding radiation oncology.

The RTA's primary concerns with the CMS physician payment data are as follows:

CMS' data do not properly represent the costs associated with quality cancer care.
Radiation therapy care uses targeted radiation to kill cancer cells with linear accelerators and lead-lined vaults to contain the radiation.  A separate CMS database shows this equipment costs on average more than $3.5 million.  However, Medicare payment data released yesterday for freestanding radiation oncologists combine payments to physicians for their work and payment to their practices for the purchase of this costly equipment necessary to save the lives of cancer patients.  In addition, the cost of services by physicists, dosimetrists, radiation therapists, and others under a radiation oncologist's supervision are included in the CMS data released for freestanding radiation oncologists.  All of these costs are paid independently to hospitals in the case of care provided by a hospital-based radiation oncologist.  Interpretations that the CMS data reflect profits to freestanding radiation oncologists, rather than reimbursement for the purchase of costly equipment and extensive clinical support personnel, is wildly misleading and do not reflect differences in overhead costs for doctors.

A notable exception to many press accounts on the Medicare data release was found in yesterday's Wall Street Journal article, which states, "The figures also don't reflect differences in overhead costs for doctors. While radiation oncology produces among the largest per-doctor payments of any specialty, only about 18% of those payments represent physician work, a smaller share than in other specialties. The remainder was meant to cover the doctors' overhead."[1]

CMS' data do not properly compare hospital and freestanding radiation oncology payments.
As CMS notes but few media reports explain there are additional payments to hospitals not captured in this data. They report, "For services delivered in a [hospital] facility… the data … represents the physician's professional fee and does not include the facility payment. On the other hand, for services delivered in a non-facility setting, such as a physician's office… the [data]… represents the complete payment for the service."  When accounting for all payments, including the purchase of radiation therapy equipment and payments to clinical support personnel, total costs to Medicare for radiation oncology care are typically higher for services performed in a hospital than for the same services in the freestanding setting.  Independent analyses by Avalere Health show hospital-based providers are reimbursed 10 percent more than freestanding providers for the same service

CMS' data exclude data on quality measures.
The data released by CMS yesterday focus solely on payment.  Without proper diagnosis, staging, quality metrics and patient outcome data, the value of services related to costs cannot be determined.

CMS' data exclude other important data.
The data released by CMS do not reflect differences in patient mix, local coverage policies and other factors.  Also, total payments to physicians will vary significantly based on total patients served.

CMS' data misrepresent other similarly situated specialties.
The CMS data are misleading for other specialties as well.  The data for hematologists/medical oncologists and ophthalmologists include payments for pharmaceuticals and for cardiologists include medical equipment and supply costs. The amounts indicated are not physician compensation, rather they are collections that have to cover facility costs, equipment costs, drugs, and clinical staff. 

"At the RTA, we have always supported, and will continue to support, transparency in the delivery of radiation therapy services, whether in quality outcomes or reimbursements rates.  Unfortunately, the recently released Medicare payment information has been presented in a way that is incredibly misleading, as already evidenced by much of the reporting we have seen on the issue," stated RTA spokesperson Dr. Chris Rose, Chief Technology Officer of Vantage Oncology.  "The fact is that Medicare reimbursement for freestanding radiation oncology providers has been reduced by nearly 19 percent over the last decade."

The RTA is continuing to work with Congress and CMS on policies that will provide payment stability for freestanding radiation oncology and replace the fee-for-service payment structure with an episode-based, bundled payment system.  Such an initiative will provide proper incentives for quality care and offer the payment stability necessary to improve outcomes and control costs.

About the Radiation Therapy Alliance

The RTA represents 244 community-based cancer care facilities in 22 states caring for approximately 98,000 patients annually. The RTA was established to provide policymakers and the public with a greater understanding of the value that community-based radiation therapy facilities bring to their patients and of the importance of logical, predictable payment reform to align incentives and ensure patient access to quality cancer care.

[1] Wall Street Journal, "Doctor-Pay Trove Shows Limits of Medicare Billing Data: Figures Don't Capture Complexity of Some Medical Practices," 9 April 2014

SOURCE Radiation Therapy Alliance

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
"When you think about the data center today, there's constant evolution, The evolution of the data center and the needs of the consumer of technology change, and they change constantly," stated Matt Kalmenson, VP of Sales, Service and Cloud Providers at Veeam Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
Continuous testing helps bridge the gap between developing quickly and maintaining high quality products. But to implement continuous testing, CTOs must take a strategic approach to building a testing infrastructure and toolset that empowers their team to move fast. Download our guide to laying the groundwork for a scalable continuous testing strategy.
Let’s face it, embracing new storage technologies, capabilities and upgrading to new hardware often adds complexity and increases costs. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Seth Oxenhorn, Vice President of Business Development & Alliances at FalconStor, discussed how a truly heterogeneous software-defined storage approach can add value to legacy platforms and heterogeneous environments. The result reduces complexity, significantly lowers cost, and provides IT organizations with improved efficienc...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 19th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world and ThingsExpo Silicon Valley Call for Papers is now open.
The IoT is changing the way enterprises conduct business. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how businesses can gain an edge over competitors by empowering consumers to take control through IoT. He cited examples such as a Washington, D.C.-based sports club that leveraged IoT and the cloud to develop a comprehensive booking system. He also highlighted how IoT can revitalize and restore outdated business models, making them profitable ...
StackIQ has announced the release of Stacki 3.2. Stacki is an easy-to-use Linux server provisioning tool. Stacki 3.2 delivers new capabilities that simplify the automation and integration of site-specific requirements. StackIQ is the commercial entity behind this open source bare metal provisioning tool. Since the release of Stacki in June of 2015, the Stacki core team has been focused on making the Community Edition meet the needs of members of the community, adding features and value, while ...
With 15% of enterprises adopting a hybrid IT strategy, you need to set a plan to integrate hybrid cloud throughout your infrastructure. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Steven Dreher, Director of Solutions Architecture at Green House Data, discussed how to plan for shifting resource requirements, overcome challenges, and implement hybrid IT alongside your existing data center assets. Highlights included anticipating workload, cost and resource calculations, integrating services on both sides...
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
Big Data engines are powering a lot of service businesses right now. Data is collected from users from wearable technologies, web behaviors, purchase behavior as well as several arbitrary data points we’d never think of. The demand for faster and bigger engines to crunch and serve up the data to services is growing exponentially. You see a LOT of correlation between “Cloud” and “Big Data” but on Big Data and “Hybrid,” where hybrid hosting is the sanest approach to the Big Data Infrastructure pro...
We all know the latest numbers: Gartner, Inc. forecasts that 6.4 billion connected things will be in use worldwide in 2016, up 30 percent from last year, and will reach 20.8 billion by 2020. We're rapidly approaching a data production of 40 zettabytes a day – more than we can every physically store, and exabytes and yottabytes are just around the corner. For many that’s a good sign, as data has been proven to equal money – IF it’s ingested, integrated, and analyzed fast enough. Without real-ti...
In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Sagi Brody, Chief Technology Officer at Webair Internet Development Inc., and Logan Best, Infrastructure & Network Engineer at Webair, focused on real world deployments of DDoS mitigation strategies in every layer of the network. He gave an overview of methods to prevent these attacks and best practices on how to provide protection in complex cloud platforms. He also outlined what we have found in our experience managing and running thousands of Linux and Unix ...
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Yoseph Reuveni, Director of Software Engineering at Jet.com, will discuss Jet.com's journey into containerizing Microsoft-based technologies like C# and F# into Docker. He will talk about lessons learned and challenges faced, the Mono framework tryout and how they deployed everything into Azure cloud. Yoseph Reuveni is a technology leader with unique experience developing and running high throughput (over 1M tps) distributed systems with extre...
"We are a well-established player in the application life cycle management market and we also have a very strong version control product," stated Flint Brenton, CEO of CollabNet,, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
"Operations is sort of the maturation of cloud utilization and the move to the cloud," explained Steve Anderson, Product Manager for BMC’s Cloud Lifecycle Management, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.