Welcome!

News Feed Item

Minimally Invasive Surgery Market (Surgical Devices, Monitoring & Visualization Devices, and Endoscopy Devices) - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast, 2013 - 2019

LONDON, April 16, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report:

Minimally Invasive Surgery Market (Surgical Devices, Monitoring & Visualization Devices, and Endoscopy Devices) - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast, 2013 - 2019

http://www.reportbuyer.com/pharma_healthcare/medical_devices/minimally_invasive_surgery_market_surgical_devices_monitoring_visualization_devices_endoscopy_devices_global_industry_analysis_size_share_growth_trends_forecast_2013_2019.html

This report studies the global minimally invasive surgery (MIS) market from three perspectives, namely, types of devices used in performing these surgeries, various types of surgeries performed and the major geographic markets. The global market for MIS has been segmented into three main categories of devices that include surgical devices, monitoring and visualization devices, and endoscopy devices. Surgical devices are further classified as ablation devices, electrosurgical devices, and medical robotic systems. Similarly, the monitoring and visualization devices market has also been segmented into MRI equipment, CT scanners, X-ray devices, ultrasound equipment and other (PET and SPECT scanners, and combination devices such as PET/CT, PET/MRI, SPECT/CT, and SPECT/MRI).

The various types of minimally invasive surgeries performed have also been provided in the report. The global market for minimally invasive surgery has been segmented into orthopedic surgery (spinal surgery and joint replacement surgery), cosmetic surgery, breast surgery, vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, gynecological surgery, bariatric surgery, cardiac surgery, gastrointestinal surgery and urological surgery. Geographically, the report segments the global market into four main regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World (RoW). The market sizes and forecasts for the period 2011 to 2019, in terms of revenue (USD million), considering 2012 as the base year, have been provided for each device type, surgery type and geographic region, along with their sub-segments (if any). The report also provides the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR %) during the forecast period 2013 to 2019 for all the aforementioned segments and sub-segments.

The market overview section of the report discusses the market dynamics with respect to market drivers, restraints and opportunities. This section also covers a market attractiveness analysis (by geography) and Porter's five forces analysis for the global minimally invasive surgery market. Market share (%) for the major players operating in this market has also been provided for the year 2012, followed by a list of recommendations for the existing and new players to enter and enhance their market shares and enter the market respectively. The report concludes with the company profiles of key players operating in various segments of the market. Each company profile includes the business overview, financial overview, product portfolio, business strategies and recent developments of the respective company. Some of the prominent players in the minimally invasive surgery market that have been profiled in this report include Intuitive Surgical, Inc., GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, Siemens Healthcare, Medtronic, Inc., Stryker Corporation, Biomet, Inc. and DePuy Synthes, Inc.

The global minimally invasive surgery market has been segmented as below:

Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Product Types

Surgical Devices
Ablation Devices
Radiofrequency Ablation
Microwave Ablation
Cryoablation
Others
Electrosurgical Devices
Medical Robotic Systems

Monitoring & Visualization Devices
X-Ray Devices
Computed Tomography (CT) Scanners
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Equipment
UltrasoundEquipment
Others

Endoscopy Devices

Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Type of Surgery

Orthopedic Surgery
Spinal Surgery
Joint Replacement Surgery
Cosmetic Surgery
Breast Surgery
Vascular Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
Gynecological Surgery
Bariatric Surgery
Cardiac Surgery
Gastrointestinal Surgery
Urological Surgery

Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Geography

North America
Europe
Asia-Pacific
Rest of the World (RoW)

Table of Content

Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Report Description
1.2 Market Segmentation
1.3 Research Methodology

Chapter 2 Executive Summary

Chapter 3 Market Overview
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Drivers
3.2.1 Aging of global population
3.2.1.1 Global Rate of Aging Population
3.2.2 Technological advancements
3.2.3 Rise in prevalence of target diseases such as cancer
3.2.4 Rising demand for minimally invasive procedures
3.2.5 Increase in per capita healthcare expenditure
3.3 Market Restraints
3.3.1 Lack of reimbursement
3.3.2 High cost of minimally invasive surgeries
3.3.3 Excise duty imposed on sale of medical devices in the U.S. market
3.4 Market Opportunities
3.4.1 Large target patient pool and rise in disposable income in emerging economies
3.1 Porters Five Force Analysis for the Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market
3.1.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
3.1.2 Bargaining power of buyers
3.1.3 Threat of substitutes
3.1.4 Threat of new entrants
3.1.5 Competitive rivalry
3.2 Market Attractiveness Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Geography

Chapter 4 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, By Device Type, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
4.1 Overview
4.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.1.2 Comparative Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Device Type, 2012 & 2019 (Value %)
4.2 Surgical Devices
4.2.1 Global Surgical Devices Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.2 Ablation Devices
4.2.2.1 Global Ablation Devices Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.2.2 Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation
4.2.2.2.1 Global Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.2.3 Microwave Ablation
4.2.2.3.1 Global Microwave Ablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.2.4 Cryoablation
4.2.2.4.1 Global Cryoablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.2.5 Others
4.2.2.5.1 Global Other Ablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.3 Electrosurgical Devices
4.2.3.1 Global Electrosurgical Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.2.4 Medical Robotic Systems
4.2.4.1 Global Medical Robotic Systems Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.3 Monitoring and Visualization Devices
4.3.1 Global Monitoring and Visualization Devices Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.3.2 X-ray Devices
4.3.2.1 Global X-Ray Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.3.3 Computed Tomography (CT) Scanners
4.3.3.1 Global CT Scanners Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.3.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scanners
4.3.4.1 Global MRI Scanners Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.3.5 Ultrasound Equipment
4.3.5.1 Global Ultrasound Equipment Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.3.6 Others
4.3.6.1 Global Other Monitoring and Visualization Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
4.4 Endoscopy Devices
4.4.1 Global Endoscopy Devices Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)

Chapter 5 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Type of Surgery, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
5.1 Overview
5.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Type of Surgery, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.1.2 Comparative Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Type of Surgery, 2012 & 2019 (Value %)
5.2 Orthopedic Surgery
5.2.1 Global Orthopedic Surgery Market Revenue, by Type of Surgery, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.2.2 Spinal Surgery
5.2.2.1 Global Spinal Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.2.3 Joint Replacement Surgery
5.2.3.1 Global Joint Replacement Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.3 Cosmetic Surgery
5.3.1 Global Cosmetic Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.4 Breast Surgery
5.4.1 Global Breast Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.5 Vascular Surgery
5.5.1 Global Vascular Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.6 Thoracic Surgery
5.6.1 Global Thoracic Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.7 Gynecological Surgery
5.7.1 Global Gynecological Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.8 Bariatric Surgery
5.8.1 Global Bariatric Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.9 Cardiac Surgery
5.9.1 Global Cardiac Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.10 Gastrointestinal Surgery
5.10.1 Global Gastrointestinal Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
5.11 Urological Surgery
5.11.1 Global Urological Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)

Chapter 6 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, By Geography, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
6.1 Overview
6.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Geography, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
6.1.2 Comparative Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Geography, 2012 & 2019 (Value %)
6.2 North America
6.2.1 North America Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
6.3 Europe
6.3.1 Europe Geriatric Population Statistics (Million), 1991 - 2011
6.3.2 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
6.4 Asia-Pacific
6.4.1 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)
6.5 Rest of the World (RoW)
6.5.1 RoW Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 - 2019 (USD Million)

Chapter 7 Competitive Landscape
7.1 Market Share by Key Players, 2012 (%)

Chapter 8 Recommendations
8.1 Long term contracts with healthcare service providers
8.2 Broadening of distribution network
8.3 Investing in emerging markets
8.4 Product innovation

Chapter 9 Company Profiles
9.1 Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
9.1.1 Company Overview
9.1.2 Financial Overview
9.1.3 Product Portfolio
9.1.4 Business Strategies
9.1.5 Recent Developments
9.2 ArthroCare Corporation
9.2.1 Company Overview
9.2.2 Financial Overview
9.2.3 Product Portfolio
9.2.4 Business Strategies
9.2.5 Recent Developments
9.3 Biomet, Inc.
9.3.1 Company Overview
9.3.2 Financial Overview
9.3.3 Product Portfolio
9.3.4 Business Strategies
9.3.5 Recent Developments
9.4 DePuy Synthes, Inc.
9.4.1 Company Overview
9.4.2 Product Portfolio
9.4.3 Business Strategies
9.4.4 Recent Developments
9.5 GE Healthcare
9.5.1 Company Overview
9.5.2 Financial Overview
9.5.3 Product Portfolio
9.5.4 Business Strategies
9.5.5 Recent Developments
9.6 Given Imaging Ltd.
9.6.1 Company Overview
9.6.2 Financial Overview
9.6.3 Product Portfolio
9.6.4 Business Strategies
9.6.5 Recent Developments
9.7 Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
9.7.1 Company Overview
9.7.2 Financial Overview
9.7.3 Product Portfolio
9.7.4 Business Strategies
9.7.5 Recent Developments
9.8 Medtronic, Inc.
9.8.1 Company Overview
9.8.2 Financial Overview
9.8.3 Product Portfolio
9.8.4 Business Strategies
9.8.5 Recent Developments
9.9 NuVasive, Inc.
9.9.1 Company Overview
9.9.2 Financial Overview
9.9.3 Product Portfolio
9.9.4 Business Strategies
9.9.5 Recent Developments
9.10 Philips Healthcare
9.10.1 Company Overview
9.10.2 Financial Overview
9.10.3 Product Portfolio
9.10.4 Business Strategies
9.10.5 Recent Developments
9.11 Siemens Healthcare
9.11.1 Company Overview
9.11.2 Financial Overview
9.11.3 Product Portfolio
9.11.4 Business Strategies
9.11.5 Recent Developments
9.12 Stryker Corporation
9.12.1 Company Overview
9.12.2 Financial Overview
9.12.3 Product Portfolio
9.12.4 Business Strategies
9.12.5 Recent Developments
9.13 Surgical Innovations Group plc.
9.13.1 Company Overview
9.13.2 Financial Overview
9.13.3 Product Portfolio
9.13.4 Business Strategies
9.13.5 Recent Developments
9.14 Teleflex, Inc.
9.14.1 Company Overview
9.14.2 Financial Overview
9.14.3 Product Portfolio
9.14.4 Business Strategies
9.14.5 Recent Developments
9.15 Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
9.15.1 Company Overview
9.15.2 Financial Overview
9.15.3 Product Portfolio
9.15.4 Business Strategies
9.15.5 Recent Developments

List of Figures

FIG. 1 Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Segmentation
FIG. 2 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Device Type, 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 3 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Surgery Type, 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 4 Global Rate of Aging Population
FIG. 5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market
FIG. 6 Market Attractiveness Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Geography
FIG. 7 Comparative Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Device Type, 2012 & 2019 (Value %)
FIG. 8 Global Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 9 Global Microwave Ablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 10 Global Cryoablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 11 Global Other Ablation Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 12 Global Electrosurgical Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 13 Global Medical Robotic Systems Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 14 Global X-Ray Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 15 Global CT Scanners Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 16 Global MRI Scanners Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 17 Global Ultrasound Equipment Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 18 Global Other Monitoring and Visualization Devices Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 19 Global Endoscopy DevicesMarket Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 20 Comparative Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, by Type of Surgery, 2012 & 2019 (Value %)
FIG. 21 Global Spinal Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 22 Global Joint Replacement Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 23 Global Cosmetic Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 24 Global Breast Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 25 Global Vascular Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 26 Global Thoracic Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 27 Global Gynecological Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 28 Global Bariatric Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 29 Global Cardiac Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 30 Global Gastrointestinal Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 31 Global Urological Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 32 Comparative Analysis: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market, By Geography, 2012 & 2019 (Value %)
FIG. 33 North America Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 34 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 35 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 36 RoW Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
FIG. 37 Market Share by Key Players, 2012 (%)
FIG. 38 Annual Revenue: Abbott Laboratories, Inc., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 39 Annual Revenue: ArthroCare Corporation, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 40 Annual Revenue, Biomet, Inc., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 41 Annual Revenue: GE Healthcare, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 42 Annual Revenue: Given Imaging Ltd., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 43 Annual Revenue: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 44 Annual Revenue: Medtronic Inc., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 45 Annual Revenue: NuVasive, Inc., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 46 Annual Revenue: Philips Healthcare, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million) (Conversion rate: 1 Euro = 1.35 USD)
FIG. 47 Annual Revenue: Siemens Healthcare, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million) (Conversion rate: 1 Euro = 1.35 USD)
FIG. 48 Annual Sales: Stryker Corporation, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 49 Annual Revenue: Surgical Innovations Group plc, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million) Conversion rate: 1 Euro = 1.36 USD
FIG. 50 Annual Revenue: Teleflex Incorporated, 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)
FIG. 51 Annual Revenue: Varian Medical Systems, Inc., 2010 – 2012 (USD Million)

List of Tables

TABLE 1 Market Snapshot: Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market
TABLE 2 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 3 Global Surgical Devices Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 4 Global Ablation Devices Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 5 Global Monitoring and Visualization Devices Market Revenue, by Device Type, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 6 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Type of Surgery, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 7 Global Orthopedic Surgery Market Revenue, by Type of Surgery, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 8 Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Revenue, by Geography, 2011 – 2019 (USD Million)
TABLE 9 Europe Geriatric Population Statistics (Million), 1991 - 2011

Read the full report:
Minimally Invasive Surgery Market (Surgical Devices, Monitoring & Visualization Devices, and Endoscopy Devices) - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast, 2013 - 2019

http://www.reportbuyer.com/pharma_healthcare/medical_devices/minimally_invasive_surgery_market_surgical_devices_monitoring_visualization_devices_endoscopy_devices_global_industry_analysis_size_share_growth_trends_forecast_2013_2019.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]  
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
"Plutora provides release and testing environment capabilities to the enterprise," explained Dalibor Siroky, Director and Co-founder of Plutora, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive ad...
In his session at DevOps Summit, Tapabrata Pal, Director of Enterprise Architecture at Capital One, will tell a story about how Capital One has embraced Agile and DevOps Security practices across the Enterprise – driven by Enterprise Architecture; bringing in Development, Operations and Information Security organizations together. Capital Ones DevOpsSec practice is based upon three "pillars" – Shift-Left, Automate Everything, Dashboard Everything. Within about three years, from 100% waterfall, C...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a client-oriented software development company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software company that develops and delivers turn-key mobile apps, websites, web services, and complex softw...
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Catchpoint Systems, Inc., a provider of innovative web and infrastructure monitoring solutions, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's DevOps Summit at 18th Cloud Expo New York, which will take place June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Catchpoint is a leading Digital Performance Analytics company that provides unparalleled insight into customer-critical services to help consistently deliver an amazing customer experience. Designed ...
Web Real-Time Communication APIs have quickly revolutionized what browsers are capable of. In addition to video and audio streams, we can now bi-directionally send arbitrary data over WebRTC's PeerConnection Data Channels. With the advent of Progressive Web Apps and new hardware APIs such as WebBluetooh and WebUSB, we can finally enable users to stitch together the Internet of Things directly from their browsers while communicating privately and securely in a decentralized way.
While many government agencies have embraced the idea of employing cloud computing as a tool for increasing the efficiency and flexibility of IT, many still struggle with large scale adoption. The challenge is mainly attributed to the federated structure of these agencies as well as the immaturity of brokerage and governance tools and models. Initiatives like FedRAMP are a great first step toward solving many of these challenges but there are a lot of unknowns that are yet to be tackled. In hi...
With the proliferation of both SQL and NoSQL databases, organizations can now target specific fit-for-purpose database tools for their different application needs regarding scalability, ease of use, ACID support, etc. Platform as a Service offerings make this even easier now, enabling developers to roll out their own database infrastructure in minutes with minimal management overhead. However, this same amount of flexibility also comes with the challenges of picking the right tool, on the right ...
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
One of the hottest areas in cloud right now is DRaaS and related offerings. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Dale Levesque, Disaster Recovery Product Manager with Windstream's Cloud and Data Center Marketing team, will discuss the benefits of the cloud model, which far outweigh the traditional approach, and how enterprises need to ensure that their needs are properly being met.
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
Up until last year, enterprises that were looking into cloud services usually undertook a long-term pilot with one of the large cloud providers, running test and dev workloads in the cloud. With cloud’s transition to mainstream adoption in 2015, and with enterprises migrating more and more workloads into the cloud and in between public and private environments, the single-provider approach must be revisited. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Yoav Mor, multi-cloud solution evangelist at Cloudy...