|By David Weinberger||
|April 20, 2014 09:44 AM EDT||
Two percent of Harvard’s library collection circulates every year. A high percentage of the works that are checked out are the same as the books that were checked out last year. This fact can cause reflexive tsk-tsking among librarians. But — with some heavy qualifications to come — this is at it should be. The existence of a Long Tail is not a sign of failure or waste. To see this, consider what it would be like if there were no Long Tail.
Harvard’s 73 libraries have 16 million items [source]. There are 21,000 students and 2,400 faculty [source]. If we guess that half of the library items are available for check-out, which seems conservative, that would mean that 160,000 different items are checked out every year. If there were no Long Tail, then no book would be checked out more than any other. In that case, it would take the Harvard community an even fifty years before anyone would have read the same book as anyone else. And a university community in which across two generations no one has read the same book as anyone else is not a university community.
I know my assumptions are off. For example, I’m not counting books that are read in the library and not checked out. But my point remains: we want our libraries to have nice long tails. Library long tails are where culture is preserved and discovery occurs.
And, having said that, it is perfectly reasonable to work to lower the difference between the Fat Head and the Long Tail, and it is always desirable to help people to find the treasures in the Long Tail. Which means this post is arguing against a straw man: no one actually wants to get rid of the Long Tail. But I prefer to put it that this post argues against a reflex of thought I find within myself and have encountered in others. The Long Tail is a requirement for the development of culture and ideas, and at the same time, we should always help users to bring riches out of the Long Tail
Oct. 24, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 2,589
Oct. 24, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 2,719
Oct. 24, 2016 04:00 PM EDT Reads: 3,705
Oct. 24, 2016 03:45 PM EDT Reads: 1,396
Oct. 24, 2016 03:45 PM EDT Reads: 2,548
Oct. 24, 2016 02:15 PM EDT Reads: 3,988
Oct. 24, 2016 02:15 PM EDT Reads: 3,929
Oct. 24, 2016 02:00 PM EDT Reads: 34,150
Oct. 24, 2016 01:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,448
Oct. 24, 2016 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 845
Oct. 24, 2016 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 871
Oct. 24, 2016 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,004
Oct. 24, 2016 12:45 PM EDT Reads: 4,714
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smar...
Oct. 24, 2016 12:30 PM EDT Reads: 999
Successful transition from traditional IT to cloud computing requires three key ingredients: an IT architecture that allows companies to extend their internal best practices to the cloud, a cost point that allows economies of scale, and automated processes that manage risk exposure and maintain regulatory compliance with industry regulations (FFIEC, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, FISMA). The unique combination of VMware, the IBM Cloud, and Cloud Raxak, a 2016 Gartner Cool Vendor in IT Automation, provides a co...
Oct. 24, 2016 12:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,218