Welcome!

News Feed Item

Chubb Reports First Quarter Net Income per Share of $1.80; Operating Income per Share Is $1.50; Combined Ratio of 93.2% Includes 6.6 Point Impact of Catastrophes

WARREN, N.J., April 24, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- The Chubb Corporation (NYSE: CB) today reported that net income in the first quarter of 2014 was $449 million, compared to $656 million in the first quarter of 2013.  First quarter net income per share was $1.80 in 2014 and $2.48 in 2013.

Operating income, which the company defines as net income excluding after-tax realized investment gains and losses, was $374 million in the first quarter of 2014 and $566 million in the first quarter of 2013.  First quarter operating income per share was $1.50 in 2014 and $2.14 in 2013.

Chubb's results for the first quarter of 2014 were adversely affected by catastrophe losses of $199 million before tax ($0.52 per share after tax) related mostly to severe winter weather in the United States.  In the first quarter of 2013, the adverse impact of catastrophes was $18 million before tax ($0.04 per share after tax).

The first quarter combined loss and expense ratio was 93.2% in 2014 and 84.6% in 2013.  The impact of catastrophes on the first quarter combined ratio was 6.6 percentage points in 2014 and 0.6 points in 2013.  Excluding the impact of catastrophes, the first quarter combined ratio was 86.6% in 2014 and 84.0% in 2013.  The expense ratio for the first quarter was 32.1% in 2014 and 32.3% in 2013. 

Net written premiums for the first quarter of 2014 were $3.1 billion, flat compared to the first quarter of 2013.  Excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, premiums were up approximately 1%.  Premiums were up 3% in the U.S. and down 6% outside the U.S. (down 4% in local currencies).   

Property and casualty investment income after taxes for the first quarter declined 4% to $277 million in 2014 from $288 million in 2013.

Net income for the first quarter of 2014 reflected net realized investment gains of $116 million before tax ($0.30 per share after tax).  Net income for the first quarter of 2013 reflected net realized investment gains of $138 million before tax ($0.34 per share after tax).            

"Chubb produced solid results in the first quarter of 2014," said John D. Finnegan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.  "Results were adversely impacted by several factors, including catastrophe and non-catastrophe losses related to severe winter weather in the United States.  Chubb also suffered an unusually high level of Homeowners fire losses after many quarters with relatively benign loss experience.  Although catastrophe losses alone had an adverse impact of $0.52 per share in the first quarter, we still generated operating income of $1.50 per share and net income of $1.80 per share, reflecting a combined ratio of 86.6% excluding catastrophes," he said.

"We remain encouraged by the mid-to-high-single-digit increases in our rate change metrics that we achieved in all of our business units during the first quarter, while enjoying an overall increase in renewal retention," said Mr. Finnegan.

During the first quarter of 2014, Chubb repurchased approximately 4.7 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $409 million (an average cost per share of $86.73).  As of March 31, 2014, there was $1.2 billion available for share repurchases under the current authorization.

Average diluted shares outstanding for the first quarter were 249.2 million in 2014 and 264.8 million in 2013.

Book value per share was $66.36 at March 31, 2014, compared to $61.79 at March 31, 2013 and $64.83 at December 31, 2013.

First Quarter Operations Review

Chubb Personal Insurance (CPI) net written premiums increased 3% in the first quarter to $1.0 billion.  CPI's combined ratio for the quarter was 101.8%, compared to 87.0% in the first quarter of 2013.  The first quarter impact of catastrophes accounted for 11.2 percentage points of the combined ratio in 2014 and 3.9 points in 2013.  Excluding the impact of catastrophes, CPI's first quarter combined ratio was 90.6% in 2014 and 83.1% in 2013.

Net written premiums for Homeowners increased 4%, and the combined ratio was 104.9%.  The impact of catastrophes in the first quarter accounted for 17.9 percentage points of the Homeowners combined ratio.  Excluding the impact of catastrophes, the combined ratio for Homeowners was 87.0%.  Personal Automobile premiums declined 2%, and the combined ratio was 101.4%.  For Other Personal lines, premiums increased 3% and the combined ratio was 92.4%.

Chubb Commercial Insurance (CCI) net written premiums declined 1% in the first quarter to $1.4 billion.  The combined ratio for the quarter was 88.5% in 2014 and 81.9% in 2013.  The impact of catastrophes on the CCI combined ratio in the first quarter of 2014 was 6.1 percentage points.  The impact of catastrophes in the first quarter of 2013 improved CCI's combined ratio by 1.7 points.  Excluding the impact of catastrophes, CCI's first quarter combined ratio was 82.4% in 2014 and 83.6% in 2013. 

In the United States, average first quarter CCI renewal rates increased 5%, renewal premium retention was 85% and the ratio of new to lost business was 0.9 to 1.

Chubb Specialty Insurance (CSI) net written premiums declined 1% in the first quarter to $624 million.  The combined ratio for CSI was 88.9%, compared to 87.4% in the first quarter of 2013.

Professional Liability (PL) net written premiums grew 1%, and the combined ratio was 84.6%.  In the United States, average first quarter renewal rates for PL increased 7%, renewal premium retention was 85% and the ratio of new to lost business was 0.9 to 1.

Surety net written premiums were down 13%, and the combined ratio was 122.9% driven by one large loss.

Webcast Conference Call to be Held Today at 5 P.M.

Chubb's senior management will discuss the company's first quarter performance with investors and analysts today, April 24th, at 5 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time.  The conference call will be webcast live on the Internet at http://www.chubb.com and archived later in the day for replay.

About Chubb

Since 1882, members of the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies have provided property and casualty insurance products to customers around the globe.  These products are offered through a worldwide network of independent agents and brokers.  The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies is known for financial strength, underwriting and loss-control expertise, tailoring products for the needs of high-net-worth individuals and commercial customers in niche markets and select industry segments, and outstanding claim service.

The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies is the marketing term used to describe several separately incorporated insurance companies under the common ownership of The Chubb Corporation.  The Chubb Corporation is listed on the New York Stock Exchange [NYSE: CB] and, together with its subsidiaries, employs approximately 10,200 people throughout North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and Australia.  For more information regarding The Chubb Corporation, including a listing of the insurers in the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, visit www.chubb.com.            

Chubb's Supplementary Investor Information Report has been posted on its Internet site at http://www.chubb.com.

All financial results in this release and attachments are unaudited.   

 


For further information contact:

Investors:

Glenn A. Montgomery

(908) 903-2365





Media:

Mark E. Greenberg

(908) 903-2682

Definitions of Key Terms

Operating Income
Operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure, is net income excluding after-tax realized investment gains and losses.  Management uses operating income, among other measures, to evaluate its performance because the realization of investment gains and losses in any given period is largely discretionary as to timing and can fluctuate significantly, which could distort the analysis of trends.

Underwriting Income (Loss)
Management evaluates underwriting results separately from investment results.  The underwriting operations consist of four separate business units: personal insurance, commercial insurance, specialty insurance and reinsurance assumed.  Performance of the business units is measured based on statutory underwriting results.  Statutory accounting principles applicable to property and casualty insurance companies differ in certain respects from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).  Under statutory accounting principles, policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses are recognized immediately, not at the time premiums are earned.  Statutory underwriting income (loss) is arrived at by reducing premiums earned by losses and loss expenses incurred and statutory underwriting expenses incurred.

Management uses underwriting results determined in accordance with GAAP, among other measures, to assess the overall performance of the underwriting operations.  To convert statutory underwriting results to a GAAP basis, certain policy acquisition expenses are deferred and amortized over the period in which the related premiums are earned.  Underwriting income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP is defined as premiums earned less losses and loss expenses incurred and GAAP underwriting expenses incurred.

Property and Casualty Investment Income After Income Tax
Management uses property and casualty investment income after income tax, a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate its investment results because it reflects the impact of any change in the proportion of tax exempt investment income to total investment income and is therefore more meaningful for analysis purposes than investment income before income tax.

Book Value per Common Share with Available-for-Sale Fixed Maturities at Amortized Cost: 
Book value per common share represents the portion of consolidated shareholders' equity attributable to one share of common stock outstanding as of the balance sheet date.  Consolidated shareholders' equity includes, as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), the after-tax appreciation or depreciation, including unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses, of the Corporation's available-for-sale fixed maturities, which are carried at fair value.  The appreciation or depreciation of available-for-sale fixed maturities is subject to fluctuation due to changes in interest rates and therefore could distort the analysis of trends.  Management believes that book value per common share with available-for-sale fixed maturities at amortized cost, a non-GAAP financial measure, is an important measure of the underlying equity attributable to one share of common stock.

Combined Loss and Expense Ratio or Combined Ratio
The combined loss and expense ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the key measure of underwriting profitability.  Management uses the combined loss and expense ratio calculated in accordance with statutory accounting principles applicable to property and casualty insurance companies to evaluate the performance of the underwriting operations.  It is the sum of the ratio of losses and loss expenses to premiums earned (loss ratio) plus the ratio of statutory underwriting expenses to premiums written (expense ratio) after reducing both premium amounts by dividends to policyholders.

Net Written Premiums Growth (Decrease) Excluding the Impact of Foreign Currency Translation:
Management uses net written premiums growth (decrease) excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the trends in net written premiums, exclusive of the effect of fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which international business is transacted.  The impact of foreign currency translation is excluded as exchange rates may fluctuate significantly and the effect of fluctuations could distort the analysis of trends.  When excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, management uses the same exchange rate to translate each foreign currency denominated net written premium amount in both periods.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

In the conference call identified above and other communications, we may make statements regarding our results of operations, financial condition and other matters that are "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA).  These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA.  Forward-looking statements frequently can be identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "will," "may," "should," "could," "would," "likely," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "continue," or other similar expressions.  Forward-looking statements are made based upon management's current expectations and beliefs concerning trends and future developments and their potential effects on Chubb.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance.  Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties, which include, among others, those discussed or identified from time to time in Chubb's public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and those associated with:

  • global political, economic and market conditions, particularly in the jurisdictions in which we operate and/or invest, including:
    • changes in credit ratings, interest rates, market credit spreads and the performance of the financial markets;
    • currency fluctuations;
    • the effects of inflation;
    • changes in domestic and foreign laws, regulations and taxes;
    • changes in competition and pricing environments;
    • regional or general changes in asset valuations;
    • the inability to reinsure certain risks economically; and
    • changes in the litigation environment;
  • the effects of the outbreak or escalation of war or hostilities;
  • the occurrence of terrorist attacks, including any nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological events;
  • premium pricing and profitability or growth estimates overall or by lines of business or geographic area, and related expectations with respect to the timing and terms of any required regulatory approvals;
  • adverse changes in loss cost trends;
  • our ability to retain existing business and attract new business at acceptable rates;
  • our expectations with respect to cash flow and investment income and with respect to other income;
  • the adequacy of our loss reserves, including:
    • our expectations relating to reinsurance recoverables;
    • the willingness of parties, including us, to settle disputes;
    • developments in judicial decisions or regulatory or legislative actions relating to coverage and liability, in particular, for asbestos, toxic waste and other mass tort claims;
    • development of new theories of liability;
    • our estimates relating to ultimate asbestos liabilities; and
    • the impact from the bankruptcy protection sought by various asbestos producers and other related businesses;
  • the availability and cost of reinsurance coverage;
  • the occurrence of significant weather-related or other natural or human-made disasters, particularly in locations where we have concentrations of risk or changes to our estimates (or the assessments of rating agencies and other third parties) of our potential exposure to such events;
  • the impact of economic factors on companies on whose behalf we have issued surety bonds, and in particular, on those companies that file for bankruptcy or otherwise experience deterioration in creditworthiness;
  • the effects of disclosures by, and investigations of, companies we insure, particularly with respect to our lines of business that have a longer time span, or tail, between the incidence of a loss and the settlement of the claim;
  • the impact of legislative, regulatory, judicial and similar developments on companies we insure, particularly with respect to our longer tail lines of business;
  • the impact of legislative, regulatory, judicial and similar developments on our business, including those relating to insurance industry reform, terrorism, catastrophes, the financial markets, solvency standards, capital requirements, accounting guidance and taxation;
  • any downgrade in our claims-paying, financial strength or other credit ratings;
  • the ability of our subsidiaries to pay us dividends;
  • our plans to repurchase shares of our common stock, including as a result of changes in:
    • our financial position and financial results;
    • our capital position and/or capital adequacy levels required to maintain our existing ratings from independent rating agencies;
    • our share price;
    • investment opportunities;
    • opportunities to profitably grow our property and casualty insurance business; and
    • corporate and regulatory requirements; and
  • our ability to implement management's strategic plans and initiatives.

Chubb assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking information set forth in this document, which speak as of the date hereof.

 


THE CHUBB CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA

(Unaudited)




Three Months Ended

     March 31     


2014

2013


   (in millions)




PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE



 Underwriting



  Net Premiums Written

$3,062

$3,057

  Increase in Unearned Premiums

(33)

(53)

     Premiums Earned

3,029

3,004

  Losses and Loss Expenses

1,845

1,568

  Operating Costs and Expenses

979

983

  Increase in Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

(13)

(41)

  Dividends to Policyholders

10

9




  Underwriting Income

208

485




 Investments



  Investment Income Before Expenses

351

363

  Investment Expenses

10

12




  Investment Income

341

351




 Other Income (Charges)

(2)

5




Property and Casualty Income

547

841




CORPORATE AND OTHER

(60)

(63)




CONSOLIDATED OPERATING INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

487

778




Federal and Foreign Income Tax

113

212




CONSOLIDATED OPERATING INCOME

374

566




REALIZED INVESTMENT GAINS AFTER INCOME TAX

75

90




CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME

$  449

$  656




PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INVESTMENT INCOME AFTER

 INCOME TAX

 

$  277

 

$  288








 



 Three Months Ended

      March 31     



2014

2013





OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA




 (in millions)




  Average Common and Potentially Dilutive Shares


249.2

264.8

  Actual Common Shares at End of Period


244.5

259.2





DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA




  Operating Income


$1.50

$2.14

  Realized Investment Gains


.30

.34

  Net Income


$1.80

$2.48





  Effect of Catastrophes


$(.52)

$(.04)










Mar. 31

  2014 

  Dec. 31

    2013 

  Mar. 31

    2013 





BOOK VALUE PER COMMON SHARE

$66.36

$64.83

$61.79





BOOK VALUE PER COMMON SHARE,




 with Available-for-Sale Fixed Maturities




 at Amortized Cost

62.39

61.86

55.57

 


PROPERTY AND CASUALTY UNDERWRITING RATIOS

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31




2014

2013




Losses and Loss Expenses to Premiums Earned

61.1%

52.3%

Underwriting Expenses to Premiums Written

32.1

32.3




Combined Loss and Expense Ratio

93.2%

84.6%




Effect of Catastrophes on

 Combined Loss and Expense Ratio

6.6%

0.6%







PROPERTY AND CASUALTY LOSSES AND LOSS EXPENSES COMPONENTS

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31




2014

2013


   (in millions)




Paid Losses and Loss Expenses

$1,794

$1,838

Increase (Decrease) in Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses

51

(270)




Total Losses and Loss Expenses

$1,845

$1,568




 

PROPERTY AND CASUALTY PRODUCT MIX

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31





     Net Premiums Written      

 Combined Loss and


 

2014

 

2013

% Increase

(Decrease)

   Expense Ratios 

  2014      2013


  (in millions)










Personal Insurance






  Automobile

$  173

$  176

(2)%

101.4%

94.0%

  Homeowners

592

570

4

104.9

82.5

  Other

248

241

3

92.4

94.0

      Total Personal

1,013

987

3

101.8

87.0







Commercial Insurance






  Multiple Peril

261

272

(4)

91.8

83.4

  Casualty

446

448

-

89.7

93.2

  Workers' Compensation

310

299

4

84.0

89.0

  Property and Marine

408

421

(3)

89.1

64.7

      Total Commercial

1,425

1,440

(1)

88.5

81.9







Specialty Insurance






  Professional Liability

552

549

1

84.6

92.4

  Surety

72

83

(13)

122.9

50.7

      Total Specialty

624

632

(1)

88.9

87.4







      Total Insurance

3,062

3,059

-

93.2

84.7







Reinsurance Assumed

-

(2)

     *

    *

    *







      Total

$3,062

$3,057

-

93.2

84.6







* The change in net premiums written and the combined loss and expense ratios are no longer presented for the Reinsurance Assumed business since it is in runoff.

SOURCE Chubb Corporation

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
The Jevons Paradox suggests that when technological advances increase efficiency of a resource, it results in an overall increase in consumption. Writing on the increased use of coal as a result of technological improvements, 19th-century economist William Stanley Jevons found that these improvements led to the development of new ways to utilize coal. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Mark Thiele, Chief Strategy Officer for Apcera, compared the Jevons Paradox to modern-day enterprise IT, examin...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that ICC-USA, a computer systems integrator and server manufacturing company focused on developing products and product appliances, will exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO. DXWordEXPO New York 2018, colocated with CloudEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City. ICC is a computer systems integrator and server manufacturing company focused on developing products and product appliances to meet a wide range of ...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Sanjeev Sharma Joins November 11-13, 2018 @DevOpsSummit at @CloudEXPO New York Faculty. Sanjeev Sharma is an internationally known DevOps and Cloud Transformation thought leader, technology executive, and author. Sanjeev's industry experience includes tenures as CTO, Technical Sales leader, and Cloud Architect leader. As an IBM Distinguished Engineer, Sanjeev is recognized at the highest levels of IBM's core of technical leaders.
Headquartered in Plainsboro, NJ, Synametrics Technologies has provided IT professionals and computer systems developers since 1997. Based on the success of their initial product offerings (WinSQL and DeltaCopy), the company continues to create and hone innovative products that help its customers get more from their computer applications, databases and infrastructure. To date, over one million users around the world have chosen Synametrics solutions to help power their accelerated business or per...
One of the biggest challenges with adopting a DevOps mentality is: new applications are easily adapted to cloud-native, microservice-based, or containerized architectures - they can be built for them - but old applications need complex refactoring. On the other hand, these new technologies can require relearning or adapting new, oftentimes more complex, methodologies and tools to be ready for production. In his general session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Chris Brown, Solutions Marketi...
At the keynote this morning we spoke about the value proposition of Nutanix, of having a DevOps culture and a mindset, and the business outcomes of achieving agility and scale, which everybody here is trying to accomplish," noted Mark Lavi, DevOps Solution Architect at Nutanix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Bill Schmarzo, author of "Big Data: Understanding How Data Powers Big Business" and "Big Data MBA: Driving Business Strategies with Data Science," is responsible for setting the strategy and defining the Big Data service offerings and capabilities for EMC Global Services Big Data Practice. As the CTO for the Big Data Practice, he is responsible for working with organizations to help them identify where and how to start their big data journeys. He's written several white papers, is an avid blogge...
HyperConvergence came to market with the objective of being simple, flexible and to help drive down operating expenses. It reduced the footprint by bundling the compute/storage/network into one box. This brought a new set of challenges as the HyperConverged vendors are very focused on their own proprietary building blocks. If you want to scale in a certain way, let's say you identified a need for more storage and want to add a device that is not sold by the HyperConverged vendor, forget about it...
We are seeing a major migration of enterprises applications to the cloud. As cloud and business use of real time applications accelerate, legacy networks are no longer able to architecturally support cloud adoption and deliver the performance and security required by highly distributed enterprises. These outdated solutions have become more costly and complicated to implement, install, manage, and maintain.SD-WAN offers unlimited capabilities for accessing the benefits of the cloud and Internet. ...
Deep learning has been very successful in social sciences and specially areas where there is a lot of data. Trading is another field that can be viewed as social science with a lot of data. With the advent of Deep Learning and Big Data technologies for efficient computation, we are finally able to use the same methods in investment management as we would in face recognition or in making chat-bots. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Gaurav Chakravorty, co-founder and Head of Strategy Development ...
DXWorldEXPO LLC, the producer of the world's most influential technology conferences and trade shows has announced the 22nd International CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO "Early Bird Registration" is now open. Register for Full Conference "Gold Pass" ▸ Here (Expo Hall ▸ Here)
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory?