Welcome!

News Feed Item

Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. Declares Distribution and Reports Earnings for First Quarter 2014

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwired) -- 04/29/14 -- Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP) ("Midcoast Energy Partners" or "the Partnership") today declared a cash distribution of $0.3125 per unit payable May 15, 2014 to unitholders of record on May 8, 2014.

"Our outlook for Midcoast Energy Partners is exciting. We expect to accomplish our first post-IPO drop-down with our sponsor, Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. ("Enbridge Partners"), of additional ownership interests in our jointly owned natural gas business in mid-2014. This is an important catalyst for our planned cash distribution growth in 2014. As it relates to our adjusted earnings for the first quarter, lower than forecasted natural gas and NGL production volumes in our Gathering, Processing and Transportation business detracted from our financial performance. While gathering volumes were impacted by freeze-offs due to extreme weather conditions, our Logistics and Marketing business benefited from strong seasonal demand for natural gas and NGLs. We expect gathering and processing volumes in each of our asset regions to progressively improve throughout 2014 as producers complete wells and accelerate their drilling plans," said Terrance McGill, president for the Partnership.

"As we look forward, construction of our Beckville natural gas processing plant is proceeding on schedule and we are focused on securing additional accretive growth. Our balance sheet and strong liquidity position provide us with the flexibility to fund the anticipated drop-down from Enbridge Partners entirely with existing debt. The future drop-down opportunities from Enbridge Partners, together with our organic growth projects and improving commodity fundamentals position the Partnership to deliver mid-teens annual distribution growth to our unitholders through 2017," noted McGill.

Midcoast Energy Partners reports an adjusted net loss of $0.9 million for the first quarter of 2014, based on adjusted EBITDA of $16.9 million. Lower natural gas volumes on our major natural gas gathering and processing systems and associated lower natural gas liquids (NGLs) production negatively impacted adjusted earnings for the first quarter. Adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA for the period ended March 31, 2014, as reported above, eliminate the impact of non-cash, mark-to-market net gains and losses, among other adjustments. Refer to the Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below for additional details.

COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

The financial results for the period ended March 31, 2014 for Midcoast Energy Partners are presented on a consolidated basis. Our results of operations may not be comparable to our Predecessor's historical results of operations, among other factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as our Predecessor's results of operations historically reflected 100% of the revenues and expenses relating to Midcoast Operating. We currently own a 39% controlling interest in Midcoast Operating. We currently consolidate the results of operations of Midcoast Operating and then record a 61% non-controlling interest deduction for EEP's retained interest in Midcoast Operating.

                                                       Three months ended
                                                            March 31,
                                                    ------------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions except per unit
 amounts)                                               2014       2013 (2)
                                                    -----------  -----------
Operating revenue                                   $   1,646.9  $   1,370.3
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas                                   1,488.7      1,196.1
  Operating and maintenance                                81.7         83.4
  General and administrative                               27.2         24.5
  Depreciation and amortization                            37.0         35.2
                                                    -----------  -----------
Operating income                                           12.3         31.1
Interest expense                                            3.3            -
Other income (expense)                                     (1.3)         0.1
                                                    -----------  -----------
Income before income tax expense                            7.7         31.2
Income tax expense                                          1.0          0.5
                                                    -----------  -----------
Net income                                                  6.7         30.7
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
 interest                                                   6.3            -
                                                    -----------  -----------
Net income attributable to general and limited
 partner ownership interest in Midcoast Energy
 Partners, L.P.                                     $       0.4  $      30.7
                                                    ===========  ===========

                                                    -----------  -----------
Net income attributable to limited partners (1)     $       0.4  $      11.8
                                                    ===========  ===========
Weighted average limited partner units (millions)
 (1)                                                       45.2         26.7
                                                    ===========  ===========
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit
 (dollars) (1)                                      $      0.01  $      0.44
                                                    ===========  ===========


(1)  Represents calculation retrospectively reflecting the affiliate
     capitalization of MEP consisting of 4.1 million MEP Class A common
     units, 22.6 million MEP subordinated units and 0.9 million MEP general
     partner interest units upon the transfer of a controlling ownership,
     including limited partner and general partner interests, in Midcoast
     Operating. The noncontrolling interest reflects the 61% retained by
     EEP.
(2)  For periods prior to November 13, 2013, the financial and operating
     information presented pertain to Midcoast Operating, our predecessor
     for accounting purposes.


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

Following are explanations for significant changes in Midcoast Operating's financial results, comparing the three month period ended March 31, 2014 with the same period of 2013. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).

Midcoast Operating                                    Three months ended
             Adjusted Operating Income                     March 31,
                                                   ------------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)                       2014         2013
                                                   -----------  -----------
Gathering, Processing and Transportation           $      (4.1) $      33.6
Logistics and Marketing                                   12.9         (1.2)
                                                   -----------  -----------
Adjusted operating income                          $       8.8  $      32.4
                                                   -----------  -----------


Gathering, Processing and Transportation - As expected, first quarter adjusted operating results for the Gathering, Processing and Transportation segment were lower than the same period of 2013. The decrease in adjusted operating income was predominantly attributable to lower natural gas throughput and NGL production volumes on our major systems due to reduced dry gas drilling activity in our East Texas region coupled with natural gas wells drilled but not completed. Additionally, volumes were impacted by freeze-offs due to unusually extended cold weather conditions in certain areas of the United States and the previously disclosed and planned for loss of a major customer on our Anadarko system. Lastly, general and administrative expenses were modestly higher than the same quarter last year.

Midcoast Operating                                       Three months ended
  Gathering, Processing and Transportation Throughput        March 31,
                                                       ---------------------
(MMBtu per day)                                           2014       2013
                                                       ---------- ----------
East Texas                                                971,000  1,252,000
Anadarko                                                  824,000    964,000
North Texas                                               272,000    332,000
                                                       ---------- ----------
Total                                                   2,067,000  2,548,000
                                                       ---------- ----------

As discussed in our earnings news release for the three month period ended December 31, 2013, natural gas throughput volumes in our Gathering, Processing and Transportation segment averaged 2,222,000 MMBtu per day.

Logistics and Marketing - First quarter adjusted operating income for the Logistics and Marketing segment was $14.1 million higher than the same period of 2013. Higher adjusted operating income was predominantly due to strong natural gas marketing optimization results attributable to seasonal demand for natural gas deliveries from the Mid-Continent to the Midwest market. Additionally, our NGL marketing business benefited from higher storage margins resulting from the sale of liquids product inventory at higher market prices relative to the cost of the product inventory in storage.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2014 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Midcoast Energy Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 30, 2014. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

MEP Events and Presentations:
http://www.midcoastpartners.com/Investor-Relations/Events-and-Presentations/
Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/acs/e259ac3ed4b7bf8d31736af439c90bb5

The audio portion of the live presentation will be accessible by telephone at (866) 318-8620 (Passcode: 68652373) and can be replayed until May 14, 2014 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 59190019). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

Midcoast Energy Partners                              Three months ended
                 Adjusted Earnings                         March 31,
                                                   ------------------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions except per unit
 amounts)                                              2014       2013(1)
                                                   -----------  -----------
Net income (loss) attributable to general and
 limited partner ownership interests in Midcoast
 Energy Partners, L.P.                             $       0.4  $      30.7
Noncash derivative fair value (gains) losses
  -Gathering, Processing and Transportation               (0.1)        (1.4)
  -Logistics and Marketing                                (1.7)         2.9
Make-up rights adjustment                                  0.8            -
Option premium amortization                               (0.3)        (0.2)
                                                   -----------  -----------
Adjusted net income                                $      (0.9) $      32.0
                                                   ===========  ===========

Adjusted net (loss) income attributable to limited
 partners (2)                                      $      (0.9) $      12.3
                                                   ===========  ===========
Weighted average units (millions) (2)                     45.2         26.7
                                                   ===========  ===========
Adjusted net (loss) income per limited partner
 unit (dollars) (2)                                $     (0.02) $      0.46
                                                   ===========  ===========


(1)  Results for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 represents
     financial results of Midcoast Operating, L.P. ("Midcoast Operating"),
     our predecessor for accounting purposes.
(2)  Represents calculation retrospectively reflecting the affiliate
     capitalization of MEP consisting of 4.1 million MEP Class A common
     units, 22.6 million MEP subordinated units and 0.9 million MEP general
     partner interest units, upon the transfer of a controlling ownership,
     including limited partner and general partner interests in Midcoast
     Operating. The noncontrolling interest reflects the 61% retained by
     EEP.



Midcoast Operating                                    Three months ended
     Gathering, Processing and Transportation              March 31,
                                                   ------------------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions)                       2014         2013
                                                   -----------  -----------
Operating (loss) income                            $      (4.9) $      35.2
Noncash derivative fair value gains                       (0.3)        (1.4)
Make-up rights adjustment                                  2.1            -
Option premium amortization                               (1.0)        (0.2)
                                                   -----------  -----------
Adjusted operating (loss) income                   $      (4.1) $      33.6
                                                   -----------  -----------

Midcoast Operating                                    Three months ended
              Logistics and Marketing                      March 31,
                                                   ------------------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions)                       2014         2013
                                                   -----------  -----------
Operating income (loss)                            $      17.2  $      (4.1)
Noncash derivative fair value (gains) losses              (4.3)         2.9
                                                   -----------  -----------
Adjusted operating income (loss)                   $      12.9  $      (1.2)
                                                   -----------  -----------


Midcoast Energy Partners

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles.

                                                             Three months
Midcoast Energy Partners                                         ended
                      Adjusted EBITDA                          March 31,
                                                           ----------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions)                                 2014
                                                           ----------------
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities           $          213.8
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of cash
 acquired                                                            (170.8)
Income tax expense                                                      1.0
Interest expense                                                        3.3
Option premium amortization                                            (1.0)
Other                                                                  (1.0)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to EEP retained interest                 (28.4)
                                                           ----------------
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MEP                        $           16.9
                                                           ================


About Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P.

Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP) is a limited partnership formed by Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P ("Enbridge Partners") to serve as Enbridge Partners' primary vehicle for owning and growing its natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) midstream business in the United States. Our assets consist of a 39 percent controlling interest in Midcoast Operating, L.P., a Texas limited partnership that owns a network of natural gas and NGL gathering and transportation systems, natural gas processing and treating facilities and NGL fractionation facilities primarily located in Texas and Oklahoma. Midcoast Operating also owns and operates natural gas, condensate and NGL logistics and marketing assets that primarily support its gathering, processing and transportation business. Through our ownership of Midcoast Operating's general partner, we control, manage and operate these systems.

Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: EEP) owns 100 percent of Midcoast Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Midcoast Energy Partners and holds an approximate 54 percent interest in Midcoast Energy Partners. Enbridge Partners owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and, through Midcoast Energy Partners, natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest pipeline transporter of growing oil production from western Canada and the North Dakota Bakken formation. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Forward Looking Statements
This news release includes forward-looking statements, which are statements that frequently use words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "target," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond the ability of Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. ("MEP") to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for, and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and natural gas liquids, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) MEP's ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline and gathering systems, as well as other processing and treating plants; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at MEP's facilities or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which MEP transports products or to whom MEP sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to MEP's rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which MEP is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Forward-looking statements regarding "drop-down" growth opportunities are further qualified by the fact that Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. is under no obligation to offer to sell MEP additional interests in Midcoast Operating, and MEP is under no obligation to buy any such additional interests. As a result, MEP does not know when or if it will purchase any such additional interests.

The Partnership's forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties pertaining to operating performance, regulatory parameters, project approval and support, weather, economic conditions, interest rates and commodity prices, including but not limited to those discussed more extensively in our filings with the U.S. securities regulators. The impact of any one risk, uncertainty or factor on any particular forward looking statement is not determinable with certainty as these are independent and our future course of action depends on management's assessment of all information available at the relevant time. Except to the extent required by law, we assume no obligation to publically update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition to the risks listed above, other risks include those detailed from time to time in MEP's Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, reports, including, without limitation, in MEP's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and, and any subsequently filed annual, quarterly or current reports, which filings are available to the public at the SEC's website (www.sec.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Sanjay Lad
Investment Community
Toll-free: (855) MEP-7222 or (866) 637-7222
E-mail: [email protected]

Terri Larson, APR
Media
Telephone: (877) 496-8142
E-mail: [email protected]

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and how fast. The key is to adopt and deploy an intelligent application strategy while simultaneously preparing to scale that intelligence. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sangeeta Chakraborty, Chief Customer Officer at Ayasdi, provided a tactical framework to become a truly intelligent enterprise, including how to identify the right applications for AI, how to build a Center of Excellence to oper...
Sometimes I write a blog just to formulate and organize a point of view, and I think it’s time that I pull together the bounty of excellent information about Machine Learning. This is a topic with which business leaders must become comfortable, especially tomorrow’s business leaders (tip for my next semester University of San Francisco business students!). Machine learning is a key capability that will help organizations drive optimization and monetization opportunities, and there have been some...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.