Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Pulse Seismic Inc. Reports Q1 2014 Results and Declares Quarterly Dividend

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/01/14 -- Pulse Seismic Inc. ("Pulse" or "the Company") (TSX: PSD)(OTCQX: PLSDF) reports the financial and operating results of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and MD&A will be filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and will be available on Pulse's website (www.pulseseismic.com).

Pulse has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per common share. This dividend will be paid on June 20, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 6, 2014. Dividends are designated as an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax purposes. For non-resident shareholders, Pulse's dividends are subject to Canadian withholding tax.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

Pulse's key performance metrics which include cash EBITDA(a), shareholder free cash flow(a), funds from operations(b) and net earnings all declined in the three month period ending March 31, 2014 compared to the prior year. The Company experienced lower data library sales for the quarter and did not have participation surveys in progress.


--  Total seismic revenue of $5.5 million, consisted only of data library
    sales, compared to $26.9 million during the three months ended March 31,
    2013, which included $13.1 million participation survey revenue;

--  Cash EBITDA of $3.8 million, a 67 percent decrease from $11.3 million in
    the comparable period in 2013, and a 68 percent decrease on a per-share
    basis from $0.19 to $0.06 per share basic and diluted;

--  Shareholder free cash flow of $3.6 million, a 66 percent decrease from
    $10.4 million in the comparable period in 2013, and a 65 percent
    decrease on a per-share basis from $0.17 to $0.06 per share basic and
    diluted;

--  Funds from operations of $3.6 million ($0.06 per share basic and
    diluted) compared to $20.7 million ($0.34 per share basic and diluted)
    for the three months ended March 31, 2013;

--  Net loss of $1.8 million ($0.03 per share basic and diluted) compared to
    net earnings of $2.5 million ($0.04 per share basic and diluted);

--  Pulse purchased and cancelled, through its normal course issuer bid, a
    total of 35,000 common shares at a total cost of approximately $117,000
    (at an average cost of $3.34 per common share including commissions);
    and

--  At March 31, 2014 Pulse's cash balance was $787,000 and long-term
    debt(c) was $18.3 million, resulting in a net debt(d) position of $17.5
    million at March 31, 2014. This was an improvement of $6.5 million from
    a net debt position of $24.0 million at March 31, 2013.

Selected Financial and Operating Information
(thousands of dollars except per share data and number of shares)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Three months ended
                                            March 31,             Year ended
                                            2014          2013  December 31,
                                                   (unaudited)          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue
Data library sales                       $ 5,506      $ 13,864      $ 27,079
Participation surveys                          -        13,068        13,429
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenue                            $ 5,506      $ 26,932      $ 40,508

Amortization of seismic data
 library                                 $ 5,832      $ 20,027      $ 55,619

Net earnings (loss)                    $ (1,820)       $ 2,541    $ (18,834)
  Per share basic and diluted           $ (0.03)        $ 0.04      $ (0.31)

Cash EBITDA (a)                          $ 3,763      $ 11,341      $ 19,145
  Per share basic and diluted (a)         $ 0.06        $ 0.19        $ 0.32

Shareholder free cash flow (a)           $ 3,550      $ 10,371      $ 20,682
  Per share basic and diluted (a)         $ 0.06        $ 0.17        $ 0.34

Funds from operations (b)                $ 3,611      $ 20,707      $ 27,751
  Per share basic and diluted (b)         $ 0.06        $ 0.34        $ 0.46

Capital expenditures
  Participation surveys                      $ -      $ 20,700      $ 21,265
  Seismic data purchases and
   related costs                             183           298           961
  Property and equipment additions            14            74           127
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total capital expenditures                 $ 197      $ 21,072      $ 22,353

Weighted average shares
 outstanding:
  Basic                               59,346,453    60,958,068    60,280,876
  Diluted                             59,346,453    60,998,114    60,280,876
Shares outstanding at period end      59,314,120    60,927,170    59,349,120
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seismic library
  2D in kilometres                       339,991       339,991       339,991
  3D in square kilometres                 28,284        27,642        28,284


Financial Position and Ratios
(thousands of dollars except ratio calculations)
                                       March 31,     March 31,  December 31,
                                            2014          2013          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital                          $ 4,832      $ 11,440       $ 6,476
Working capital ratio                     2.32:1        1.85:1        3.71:1
Total assets                            $ 91,927     $ 148,546      $ 98,017
Long-term debt (c)                      $ 18,279      $ 25,707      $ 21,850
TTM cash EBITDA (e)                     $ 11,567      $ 34,032      $ 19,145
Shareholders' equity                    $ 62,880      $ 97,318      $ 65,962
Long-term debt to equity ratio            0.29:1        0.26:1        0.33:1
Long-term debt to TTM cash EBITDA
 ratio                                    1.58:1        0.76:1        1.14:1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) The Company's continuous disclosure documents provide discussion and analysis of "cash EBITDA", "cash EBITDA per share", "shareholder free cash flow" and "shareholder free cash flow per share". These financial measures do not have standard definitions prescribed by IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. The Company has included these non-GAAP financial measures because management, investors, analysts and others use them as measures of the Company's financial performance. The Company's definition of cash EBITDA is cash available for interest payments, cash taxes if applicable, debt servicing, discretionary capital expenditures and the payment of dividends, and is calculated as earnings (loss) from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less participation survey revenue, plus any non-cash and non-recurring expenses. Cash EBITDA excludes participation survey revenue as these funds are directly used to fund specific participation surveys and this revenue is not available for discretionary capital expenditures. The Company believes cash EBITDA assists investors in comparing Pulse's results on a consistent basis without regard to participation survey revenue and non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary significantly depending on accounting methods or non-operating factors such as historical cost. Cash EBITDA per share is defined as cash EBITDA divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Shareholder free cash flow further refines the calculation of capital available to invest in growing the Company's 2D and 3D seismic data library, to repay debt, to purchase its common shares and to pay dividends by deducting non-discretionary expenditures from cash EBITDA. Non-discretionary expenditures are defined as debt financing costs (net of deferred financing expenses amortized in the current period) and current tax provisions. Shareholder free cash flow per share is defined as shareholder free cash flow divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.

(b) Funds from operations is an additional GAAP measure. Funds from operations is defined as cash provided by operations as prescribed by IFRS, excluding the impact of changes in non-cash working capital. Funds from operations represents the cash that was generated during the period, regardless of the timing of collection of receivables and payment of payables. Funds from operations per share is defined as funds from operations divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Funds from operations for the comparative three months ended March 31, 2013 reflect a reclassification to conform to the current year's financial statement presentation.

(c) Long-term debt is defined as total long-term debt, including current portion, net of debt financing cost.

(d) Net debt is defined as total long-term debt, including current portion, net of debt financing cost less cash.

(e) TTM cash EBITDA is defined as the sum of the trailing 12 month's cash EBITDA and is used to provide a comparable annualized measure.

OUTLOOK

Pulse remains financially strong and well positioned operationally. Although the timing and level of data library sales are unclear, the Company can continue to operate under low revenue levels and still provide returns to shareholders. Individual data library sales can be large, and Pulse's annual revenues could increase substantially at any time. Pulse's profitability has tremendous leverage against revenues.

The Company maintains its cautious outlook for the remainder of 2014. Following relatively weak data library sales in the first quarter, positive indicators of a potential rebound in seismic revenue are:


--  Continued strength in current natural gas prices. Since the initial
    price spike in February, the intra-Alberta price at AEOC has held at
    well above $4 per gigajoule (GJ) and has often been closer to $5 per GJ,
    with a price of $4.84 per GJ on April 29, 2014 compared to $3.74 per GJ
    at the same time last year;
--  Record winter gas storage withdrawals in the United States of almost 3
    trillion cubic feet, the greatest since the commencement of record-
    keeping in 1994-1995, with overall stocks falling to approximately 850
    bcf in early April, more than 1 trillion cubic feet below the five-year
    average for the time of year;
--  Growing momentum in asset transactions. Publicly reported mergers and
    acquisitions and similar capital transactions in the first quarter of
    2014 total nearly $9 billion compared to $750 million in the first
    quarter of 2013; and
--  Growing cash flows among oil and natural gas production companies, and
    reports of strong field activity among service companies, particularly
    hydraulic fracturing providers, implying increasing capital spending
    among oil and natural gas producers.

These positive indicators are offset by continued flat to slightly lower year-over-year drilling activity over the past winter, flat initial forecasts for the year ahead, and by the continuing evolution in the nature of oil and natural gas asset ownership and development cycles in western Canada.

On balance, Pulse is hopeful that the trends noted will lead to greater field capital investment, including on seismic data. In the meantime, Pulse will practise prudent cost and capital management and remain focused on generating returns for shareholders.

CORPORATE UPDATE

Graham Weir will be retiring from the Board of Directors at the Annual General Meeting on May 21, 2014. Mr. Weir has been a director of Pulse since 2002, including Chair of the Board from 2007 to 2012. The Company and the Board of Directors would like to thank Mr. Weir for his extensive contributions and guidance during his 12 years of service and wish him all the best in the future.

CONFERENCE CALL

The Company's next conference call will be held after the release of its year-end 2014 results. Should investors or analysts wish to contact the Company, please feel free to contact Neal Coleman or Pamela Wicks at the information provided below.

CORPORATE PROFILE

Pulse is a market leader in the acquisition, marketing and licensing of 2D and 3D seismic data to the western Canadian energy sector. Pulse owns the second-largest licensable seismic data library in Canada, currently consisting of approximately 28,300 square kilometres of 3D seismic and 340,000 kilometres of 2D seismic. The library extensively covers the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin where most of Canada's oil and natural gas exploration and development occur.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains information that constitutes "forward-looking information" or "forward-looking statements" (collectively, "forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes, among other things, statements regarding:


--  Pulse remains financially strong and well positioned operationally;
--  The Company can continue to operate under low revenue levels and still
    provide returns to shareholders;
--  Individual data library sales can be very large, and Pulse's annual
    revenues could increase substantially at any time;
--  General economic and industry outlook;
--  Pulse's capital allocation strategy;
--  Pulse's dividend policy;
--  Industry activity levels and capital spending;
--  Forecast commodity prices;
--  Forecast growing momentum in asset transactions;
--  Forecast oil and natural gas production companies capital budgets and
    cash flows;
--  Forecast horizontal drilling activity in unconventional oil and natural
    gas plays;
--  Estimated future demand for seismic data;
--  Estimated future seismic data sales;
--  Estimated future demand for participation surveys;
--  Management's expectations on the sufficiency of Pulse's capital
    resources;
--  Pulse's business and growth strategy; and
--  Other expectations, beliefs, plans, goals, objectives, assumptions,
    information and statements about possible future events, conditions,
    results and performance.

Often, but not always, forward-looking information uses words or phrases such as: "expects", "does not expect" or "is expected", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", "plans" or "does not plan", "estimates" or "estimated", "projects" or "projected", "forecasts" or "forecasted", "believes" or "does not believe", "intends" or "does not intend", "likely" or "unlikely", "possible", "probable", "scheduled", "positioned", "goal", "objective", "hopes", "optimistic" or states that certain actions, events or results "should", "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based upon current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to vary and in some instances to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Pulse does not publish specific financial goals or otherwise provide guidance, due to the inherently unclear visibility of seismic revenue.

The material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to:


--  oil and natural gas prices;
--  seismic industry cycles and seasonality;
--  the demand for seismic data and participation surveys;
--  the pricing of data library license sales;
--  relicensing (change of control) fees and partner copy sales;
--  the level of pre-funding of participation surveys, and the ability of
    the Company to make subsequent data library sales from such
    participation surveys;
--  the ability of the Company to complete participation surveys on time and
    within budget;
--  environment, health and safety risks;
--  the effect of seasonality and weather conditions on participation
    surveys;
--  federal and provincial government laws and regulation, including
    taxation, royalty rates, environment and safety;
--  competition;
--  dependence upon qualified seismic field contractors;
--  dependence upon key management, operations and marketing personnel;
--  loss of seismic data;
--  protection of Intellectual Property; and
--  the introduction of new products.

The foregoing list of risks is not exhaustive. Additional information on these risks and other factors which could affect the Company's operations or financial results are included in the Risk Factors section of the Company's MD&A for the most recent calendar year and interim periods. Forward-looking information is based upon the assumptions, expectations, estimates and opinions of the Company's management at the time the information is presented.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
To support developers and operations professionals in their push to implement DevOps principles for their infrastructure environments, ProfitBricks, a provider of cloud infrastructure, is adding support for DevOps tools Ansible and Chef. Ansible is a platform for configuring and managing data center infrastructure that combines multi-node software deployment, ad hoc task execution, and configuration management, and is used by DevOps professionals as they use its playbooks functionality to autom...
SYS-CON Events announced today that IceWarp will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. IceWarp, the leader of cloud and on-premise messaging, delivers secured email, chat, documents, conferencing and collaboration to today's mobile workforce, all in one unified interface
Containers are not new, but renewed commitments to performance, flexibility, and agility have propelled them to the top of the agenda today. By working without the need for virtualization and its overhead, containers are seen as the perfect way to deploy apps and services across multiple clouds. Containers can handle anything from file types to operating systems and services, including microservices. What are microservices? Unlike what the name implies, microservices are not necessarily small,...
ElasticBox, the agile application delivery manager, announced freely available public boxes for the DevOps community. ElasticBox works with enterprises to help them deploy any application to any cloud. Public boxes are curated reference boxes that represent some of the most popular applications and tools for orchestrating deployments at scale. Boxes are an adaptive way to represent reusable infrastructure as components of code. Boxes contain scripts, variables, and metadata to automate proces...
All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo, November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and e...
Skeuomorphism usually means retaining existing design cues in something new that doesn’t actually need them. However, the concept of skeuomorphism can be thought of as relating more broadly to applying existing patterns to new technologies that, in fact, cry out for new approaches. In his session at DevOps Summit, Gordon Haff, Senior Cloud Strategy Marketing and Evangelism Manager at Red Hat, discussed why containers should be paired with new architectural practices such as microservices rathe...
This Enterprise Strategy Group lab validation report of the NEC Express5800/R320 server with Intel® Xeon® processor presents the benefits of 99.999% uptime NEC fault-tolerant servers that lower overall virtualized server total cost of ownership. This report also includes survey data on the significant costs associated with system outages impacting enterprise and web applications. Click Here to Download Report Now!
It’s been proven time and time again that in tech, diversity drives greater innovation, better team productivity and greater profits and market share. So what can we do in our DevOps teams to embrace diversity and help transform the culture of development and operations into a true “DevOps” team? In her session at DevOps Summit, Stefana Muller, Director, Product Management – Continuous Delivery at CA Technologies, answered that question citing examples, showing how to create opportunities for ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that G2G3 will exhibit at SYS-CON's @DevOpsSummit Silicon Valley, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Based on a collective appreciation for user experience, design, and technology, G2G3 is uniquely qualified and motivated to redefine how organizations and people engage in an increasingly digital world.
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome,” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
Whether you like it or not, DevOps is on track for a remarkable alliance with security. The SEC didn’t approve the merger. And your boss hasn’t heard anything about it. Yet, this unruly triumvirate will soon dominate and deliver DevSecOps faster, cheaper, better, and on an unprecedented scale. In his session at DevOps Summit, Frank Bunger, VP of Customer Success at ScriptRock, will discuss how this cathartic moment will propel the DevOps movement from such stuff as dreams are made on to a prac...
The 3rd International WebRTC Summit, to be held Nov. 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, announces that its Call for Papers is now open. Topics include all aspects of improving IT delivery by eliminating waste through automated business models leveraging cloud technologies. WebRTC Summit is co-located with 15th International Cloud Expo, 6th International Big Data Expo, 3rd International DevOps Summit and 2nd Internet of @ThingsExpo. WebRTC (Web-based Real-Time Com...
As more and more data is generated from a variety of connected devices, the need to get insights from this data and predict future behavior and trends is increasingly essential for businesses. Real-time stream processing is needed in a variety of different industries such as Manufacturing, Oil and Gas, Automobile, Finance, Online Retail, Smart Grids, and Healthcare. Azure Stream Analytics is a fully managed distributed stream computation service that provides low latency, scalable processing of ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that DataClear Inc. will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. The DataClear ‘BlackBox’ is the only solution that moves your PC, browsing and data out of the United States and away from prying (and spying) eyes. Its solution automatically builds you a clean, on-demand, virus free, new virtual cloud based PC outside of the United States, and wipes it clean...
In 2014, the market witnessed a massive migration to the cloud as enterprises finally overcame their fears of the cloud’s viability, security, etc. Over the past 18 months, AWS, Google and Microsoft have waged an ongoing battle through a wave of price cuts and new features. For IT executives, sorting through all the noise to make the best cloud investment decisions has become daunting. Enterprises can and are moving away from a "one size fits all" cloud approach. The new competitive field has ...