Welcome!

News Feed Item

Pulse Seismic Inc. Reports Q1 2014 Results and Declares Quarterly Dividend

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/01/14 -- Pulse Seismic Inc. ("Pulse" or "the Company") (TSX: PSD)(OTCQX: PLSDF) reports the financial and operating results of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and MD&A will be filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and will be available on Pulse's website (www.pulseseismic.com).

Pulse has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per common share. This dividend will be paid on June 20, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 6, 2014. Dividends are designated as an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax purposes. For non-resident shareholders, Pulse's dividends are subject to Canadian withholding tax.

HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

Pulse's key performance metrics which include cash EBITDA(a), shareholder free cash flow(a), funds from operations(b) and net earnings all declined in the three month period ending March 31, 2014 compared to the prior year. The Company experienced lower data library sales for the quarter and did not have participation surveys in progress.


--  Total seismic revenue of $5.5 million, consisted only of data library
    sales, compared to $26.9 million during the three months ended March 31,
    2013, which included $13.1 million participation survey revenue;

--  Cash EBITDA of $3.8 million, a 67 percent decrease from $11.3 million in
    the comparable period in 2013, and a 68 percent decrease on a per-share
    basis from $0.19 to $0.06 per share basic and diluted;

--  Shareholder free cash flow of $3.6 million, a 66 percent decrease from
    $10.4 million in the comparable period in 2013, and a 65 percent
    decrease on a per-share basis from $0.17 to $0.06 per share basic and
    diluted;

--  Funds from operations of $3.6 million ($0.06 per share basic and
    diluted) compared to $20.7 million ($0.34 per share basic and diluted)
    for the three months ended March 31, 2013;

--  Net loss of $1.8 million ($0.03 per share basic and diluted) compared to
    net earnings of $2.5 million ($0.04 per share basic and diluted);

--  Pulse purchased and cancelled, through its normal course issuer bid, a
    total of 35,000 common shares at a total cost of approximately $117,000
    (at an average cost of $3.34 per common share including commissions);
    and

--  At March 31, 2014 Pulse's cash balance was $787,000 and long-term
    debt(c) was $18.3 million, resulting in a net debt(d) position of $17.5
    million at March 31, 2014. This was an improvement of $6.5 million from
    a net debt position of $24.0 million at March 31, 2013.

Selected Financial and Operating Information
(thousands of dollars except per share data and number of shares)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Three months ended
                                            March 31,             Year ended
                                            2014          2013  December 31,
                                                   (unaudited)          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue
Data library sales                       $ 5,506      $ 13,864      $ 27,079
Participation surveys                          -        13,068        13,429
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenue                            $ 5,506      $ 26,932      $ 40,508

Amortization of seismic data
 library                                 $ 5,832      $ 20,027      $ 55,619

Net earnings (loss)                    $ (1,820)       $ 2,541    $ (18,834)
  Per share basic and diluted           $ (0.03)        $ 0.04      $ (0.31)

Cash EBITDA (a)                          $ 3,763      $ 11,341      $ 19,145
  Per share basic and diluted (a)         $ 0.06        $ 0.19        $ 0.32

Shareholder free cash flow (a)           $ 3,550      $ 10,371      $ 20,682
  Per share basic and diluted (a)         $ 0.06        $ 0.17        $ 0.34

Funds from operations (b)                $ 3,611      $ 20,707      $ 27,751
  Per share basic and diluted (b)         $ 0.06        $ 0.34        $ 0.46

Capital expenditures
  Participation surveys                      $ -      $ 20,700      $ 21,265
  Seismic data purchases and
   related costs                             183           298           961
  Property and equipment additions            14            74           127
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total capital expenditures                 $ 197      $ 21,072      $ 22,353

Weighted average shares
 outstanding:
  Basic                               59,346,453    60,958,068    60,280,876
  Diluted                             59,346,453    60,998,114    60,280,876
Shares outstanding at period end      59,314,120    60,927,170    59,349,120
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seismic library
  2D in kilometres                       339,991       339,991       339,991
  3D in square kilometres                 28,284        27,642        28,284


Financial Position and Ratios
(thousands of dollars except ratio calculations)
                                       March 31,     March 31,  December 31,
                                            2014          2013          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital                          $ 4,832      $ 11,440       $ 6,476
Working capital ratio                     2.32:1        1.85:1        3.71:1
Total assets                            $ 91,927     $ 148,546      $ 98,017
Long-term debt (c)                      $ 18,279      $ 25,707      $ 21,850
TTM cash EBITDA (e)                     $ 11,567      $ 34,032      $ 19,145
Shareholders' equity                    $ 62,880      $ 97,318      $ 65,962
Long-term debt to equity ratio            0.29:1        0.26:1        0.33:1
Long-term debt to TTM cash EBITDA
 ratio                                    1.58:1        0.76:1        1.14:1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) The Company's continuous disclosure documents provide discussion and analysis of "cash EBITDA", "cash EBITDA per share", "shareholder free cash flow" and "shareholder free cash flow per share". These financial measures do not have standard definitions prescribed by IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. The Company has included these non-GAAP financial measures because management, investors, analysts and others use them as measures of the Company's financial performance. The Company's definition of cash EBITDA is cash available for interest payments, cash taxes if applicable, debt servicing, discretionary capital expenditures and the payment of dividends, and is calculated as earnings (loss) from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less participation survey revenue, plus any non-cash and non-recurring expenses. Cash EBITDA excludes participation survey revenue as these funds are directly used to fund specific participation surveys and this revenue is not available for discretionary capital expenditures. The Company believes cash EBITDA assists investors in comparing Pulse's results on a consistent basis without regard to participation survey revenue and non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary significantly depending on accounting methods or non-operating factors such as historical cost. Cash EBITDA per share is defined as cash EBITDA divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Shareholder free cash flow further refines the calculation of capital available to invest in growing the Company's 2D and 3D seismic data library, to repay debt, to purchase its common shares and to pay dividends by deducting non-discretionary expenditures from cash EBITDA. Non-discretionary expenditures are defined as debt financing costs (net of deferred financing expenses amortized in the current period) and current tax provisions. Shareholder free cash flow per share is defined as shareholder free cash flow divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.

(b) Funds from operations is an additional GAAP measure. Funds from operations is defined as cash provided by operations as prescribed by IFRS, excluding the impact of changes in non-cash working capital. Funds from operations represents the cash that was generated during the period, regardless of the timing of collection of receivables and payment of payables. Funds from operations per share is defined as funds from operations divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Funds from operations for the comparative three months ended March 31, 2013 reflect a reclassification to conform to the current year's financial statement presentation.

(c) Long-term debt is defined as total long-term debt, including current portion, net of debt financing cost.

(d) Net debt is defined as total long-term debt, including current portion, net of debt financing cost less cash.

(e) TTM cash EBITDA is defined as the sum of the trailing 12 month's cash EBITDA and is used to provide a comparable annualized measure.

OUTLOOK

Pulse remains financially strong and well positioned operationally. Although the timing and level of data library sales are unclear, the Company can continue to operate under low revenue levels and still provide returns to shareholders. Individual data library sales can be large, and Pulse's annual revenues could increase substantially at any time. Pulse's profitability has tremendous leverage against revenues.

The Company maintains its cautious outlook for the remainder of 2014. Following relatively weak data library sales in the first quarter, positive indicators of a potential rebound in seismic revenue are:


--  Continued strength in current natural gas prices. Since the initial
    price spike in February, the intra-Alberta price at AEOC has held at
    well above $4 per gigajoule (GJ) and has often been closer to $5 per GJ,
    with a price of $4.84 per GJ on April 29, 2014 compared to $3.74 per GJ
    at the same time last year;
--  Record winter gas storage withdrawals in the United States of almost 3
    trillion cubic feet, the greatest since the commencement of record-
    keeping in 1994-1995, with overall stocks falling to approximately 850
    bcf in early April, more than 1 trillion cubic feet below the five-year
    average for the time of year;
--  Growing momentum in asset transactions. Publicly reported mergers and
    acquisitions and similar capital transactions in the first quarter of
    2014 total nearly $9 billion compared to $750 million in the first
    quarter of 2013; and
--  Growing cash flows among oil and natural gas production companies, and
    reports of strong field activity among service companies, particularly
    hydraulic fracturing providers, implying increasing capital spending
    among oil and natural gas producers.

These positive indicators are offset by continued flat to slightly lower year-over-year drilling activity over the past winter, flat initial forecasts for the year ahead, and by the continuing evolution in the nature of oil and natural gas asset ownership and development cycles in western Canada.

On balance, Pulse is hopeful that the trends noted will lead to greater field capital investment, including on seismic data. In the meantime, Pulse will practise prudent cost and capital management and remain focused on generating returns for shareholders.

CORPORATE UPDATE

Graham Weir will be retiring from the Board of Directors at the Annual General Meeting on May 21, 2014. Mr. Weir has been a director of Pulse since 2002, including Chair of the Board from 2007 to 2012. The Company and the Board of Directors would like to thank Mr. Weir for his extensive contributions and guidance during his 12 years of service and wish him all the best in the future.

CONFERENCE CALL

The Company's next conference call will be held after the release of its year-end 2014 results. Should investors or analysts wish to contact the Company, please feel free to contact Neal Coleman or Pamela Wicks at the information provided below.

CORPORATE PROFILE

Pulse is a market leader in the acquisition, marketing and licensing of 2D and 3D seismic data to the western Canadian energy sector. Pulse owns the second-largest licensable seismic data library in Canada, currently consisting of approximately 28,300 square kilometres of 3D seismic and 340,000 kilometres of 2D seismic. The library extensively covers the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin where most of Canada's oil and natural gas exploration and development occur.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains information that constitutes "forward-looking information" or "forward-looking statements" (collectively, "forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. This forward-looking information includes, among other things, statements regarding:


--  Pulse remains financially strong and well positioned operationally;
--  The Company can continue to operate under low revenue levels and still
    provide returns to shareholders;
--  Individual data library sales can be very large, and Pulse's annual
    revenues could increase substantially at any time;
--  General economic and industry outlook;
--  Pulse's capital allocation strategy;
--  Pulse's dividend policy;
--  Industry activity levels and capital spending;
--  Forecast commodity prices;
--  Forecast growing momentum in asset transactions;
--  Forecast oil and natural gas production companies capital budgets and
    cash flows;
--  Forecast horizontal drilling activity in unconventional oil and natural
    gas plays;
--  Estimated future demand for seismic data;
--  Estimated future seismic data sales;
--  Estimated future demand for participation surveys;
--  Management's expectations on the sufficiency of Pulse's capital
    resources;
--  Pulse's business and growth strategy; and
--  Other expectations, beliefs, plans, goals, objectives, assumptions,
    information and statements about possible future events, conditions,
    results and performance.

Often, but not always, forward-looking information uses words or phrases such as: "expects", "does not expect" or "is expected", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", "plans" or "does not plan", "estimates" or "estimated", "projects" or "projected", "forecasts" or "forecasted", "believes" or "does not believe", "intends" or "does not intend", "likely" or "unlikely", "possible", "probable", "scheduled", "positioned", "goal", "objective", "hopes", "optimistic" or states that certain actions, events or results "should", "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based upon current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to vary and in some instances to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Pulse does not publish specific financial goals or otherwise provide guidance, due to the inherently unclear visibility of seismic revenue.

The material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to:


--  oil and natural gas prices;
--  seismic industry cycles and seasonality;
--  the demand for seismic data and participation surveys;
--  the pricing of data library license sales;
--  relicensing (change of control) fees and partner copy sales;
--  the level of pre-funding of participation surveys, and the ability of
    the Company to make subsequent data library sales from such
    participation surveys;
--  the ability of the Company to complete participation surveys on time and
    within budget;
--  environment, health and safety risks;
--  the effect of seasonality and weather conditions on participation
    surveys;
--  federal and provincial government laws and regulation, including
    taxation, royalty rates, environment and safety;
--  competition;
--  dependence upon qualified seismic field contractors;
--  dependence upon key management, operations and marketing personnel;
--  loss of seismic data;
--  protection of Intellectual Property; and
--  the introduction of new products.

The foregoing list of risks is not exhaustive. Additional information on these risks and other factors which could affect the Company's operations or financial results are included in the Risk Factors section of the Company's MD&A for the most recent calendar year and interim periods. Forward-looking information is based upon the assumptions, expectations, estimates and opinions of the Company's management at the time the information is presented.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"MathFreeOn.com is a line coding platform for engineers and scientists. When they want to solve an engineering problem and they have to use software - they have to pay a lot of money for licenses - but with MathFreeOn you don't have to pay a lot of money. Just go to our site and write the code and you can check the result right away," explained Simon Lee, CMO of MathFreeOn, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Cla...
Enterprise IT has been in the era of Hybrid Cloud for some time now. But it seems most conversations about Hybrid are focused on integrating AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google ECM into existing on-premises systems. Where is all the Private Cloud? What do technology providers need to do to make their offerings more compelling? How should enterprise IT executives and buyers define their focus, needs, and roadmap, and communicate that clearly to the providers?
The many IoT deployments around the world are busy integrating smart devices and sensors into their enterprise IT infrastructures. Yet all of this technology – and there are an amazing number of choices – is of no use without the software to gather, communicate, and analyze the new data flows. Without software, there is no IT. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation; Alan Williamson, Principal...
Video experiences should be unique and exciting! But that doesn’t mean you need to patch all the pieces yourself. Users demand rich and engaging experiences and new ways to connect with you. But creating robust video applications at scale can be complicated, time-consuming and expensive. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Zohar Babin, Vice President of Platform, Ecosystem and Community at Kaltura, discussed how VPaaS enables you to move fast, creating scalable video experiences that reach your aud...
Get deep visibility into the performance of your databases and expert advice for performance optimization and tuning. You can't get application performance without database performance. Give everyone on the team a comprehensive view of how every aspect of the system affects performance across SQL database operations, host server and OS, virtualization resources and storage I/O. Quickly find bottlenecks and troubleshoot complex problems.
President Obama recently announced the launch of a new national awareness campaign to "encourage more Americans to move beyond passwords – adding an extra layer of security like a fingerprint or codes sent to your cellphone." The shift from single passwords to multi-factor authentication couldn’t be timelier or more strategic. This session will focus on why passwords alone are no longer effective, and why the time to act is now. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Chris Webber, security strateg...
Amazon has gradually rolled out parts of its IoT offerings in the last year, but these are just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to optimizing their back-end AWS offerings, Amazon is laying the ground work to be a major force in IoT – especially in the connected home and office. Amazon is extending its reach by building on its dominant Cloud IoT platform, its Dash Button strategy, recently announced Replenishment Services, the Echo/Alexa voice recognition control platform, the 6-7 strategic...
"We are an all-flash array storage provider but our focus has been on VM-aware storage specifically for virtualized applications," stated Dhiraj Sehgal of Tintri in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"We are a leader in the market space called network visibility solutions - it enables monitoring tools and Big Data analysis to access the data and be able to see the performance," explained Shay Morag, VP of Sales and Marketing at Niagara Networks, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Whether your IoT service is connecting cars, homes, appliances, wearable, cameras or other devices, one question hangs in the balance – how do you actually make money from this service? The ability to turn your IoT service into profit requires the ability to create a monetization strategy that is flexible, scalable and working for you in real-time. It must be a transparent, smoothly implemented strategy that all stakeholders – from customers to the board – will be able to understand and comprehe...
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smart...
Complete Internet of Things (IoT) embedded device security is not just about the device but involves the entire product’s identity, data and control integrity, and services traversing the cloud. A device can no longer be looked at as an island; it is a part of a system. In fact, given the cross-domain interactions enabled by IoT it could be a part of many systems. Also, depending on where the device is deployed, for example, in the office building versus a factory floor or oil field, security ha...
An IoT product’s log files speak volumes about what’s happening with your products in the field, pinpointing current and potential issues, and enabling you to predict failures and save millions of dollars in inventory. But until recently, no one knew how to listen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Dan Gettens, Chief Research Officer at OnProcess, discussed recent research by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and OnProcess Technology, where MIT created a new, breakthrough analytics model for s...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
SYS-CON Events has announced today that Roger Strukhoff has been named conference chair of Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo 2017 New York. The 20th Cloud Expo and 7th @ThingsExpo will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. "The Internet of Things brings trillions of dollars of opportunity to developers and enterprise IT, no matter how you measure it," stated Roger Strukhoff. "More importantly, it leverages the power of devices and the Internet to enable us all to im...