Welcome!

News Feed Item

First Quantum Minerals Reports Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/01/14 -- (In United States dollars, except where noted otherwise)

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. ("First Quantum" or "the Company") (TSX: FM)(LSE: FQM) today announced comparative net earnings(1) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 of $126.8 million or $0.22 per share inclusive of $26.7 million or $0.05 per share of unfavorable, recurring acquisition-related adjustments.


FIRST QUARTER 2014 HIGHLIGHTS(2)

- Increased production across all product lines:
  - Copper up 43% to 113,118 tonnes
  - Nickel up 7% to 11,838 tonnes
  - Gold up 8% to 60,164 ounces
  - Platinum and palladium up 22% to 15,342 ounces
- Lowered cash cost of production:
  - Copper down 9% to $1.38 per pound
  - Nickel down 18% to $4.37 per pound
- Significantly higher sales volumes
  - Copper up 15% to 102,786 tonnes despite a decrease at Kansanshi as local
    smelter constraints persisted
  - Nickel up 28% to 14,097 tonnes
- Gross profit unfavorably impacted by $152 million from lower commodity
  prices and the build-up in concentrate inventory at Kansanshi
- Enhanced financing and capital structure augmented by strong cash flow
  from operations
  - $370.1 million of cash flow generated by operations(3)
  - $833.3 million cash balance including restricted cash at March 31, 2014
  - Completed major elements of the reorganization of the financing and
    capital structure including the replacement of short-term debt with
    longer-term financing
- Invested $588.2 million in the expansion of the Company's production base
  - Advanced Sentinel to 86% overall completion; on track for staged
    commissioning to start in Q3 2014
  - Accelerated construction activities at the Phase 1 copper smelter
    including the addition of a night shift
  - Progressed detailed design for the Cobre Panama project
- Full year 2014 production and cost guidance maintained

(1) Earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company have been adjusted
to remove the effect of unusual items to arrive at comparative earnings.
Comparative earnings and comparative earnings per share are not measures
recognized under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and do
not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. The Company has
disclosed these measures to assist with the understanding of results and to
provide further financial information about the results to investors.

(2) Results are compared to the first quarter 2013, unless noted otherwise,
and include the results of the Cayeli mine (100%), the Las Cruces mine
(100%), and the Pyhasalmi mine (100%) from March 22, 2013, the date of
acquisition.

(3) Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital and tax
paid.

CEO'S COMMENTS

"This is a strong start to the year and builds on the momentum of 2013. All of our operations performed well from continued sound management of the factors under our control and benefits from the investments in process improvements. What has been achieved at Ravensthorpe and Kansanshi should not be underestimated. With a focus on keeping a good maintenance schedule and vigilance on sustainable cost and process improvements, Ravensthorpe has consistently delivered good performance from the start of operations in 2012. The mine's margin improvement year-over-year is the result of these efforts. With the nickel price improving, we expect Ravensthorpe to become an even more substantial contributor to First Quantum's profitability. At Kansanshi, the mine recorded one of its highest quarterly production numbers even though the seasonal rains were the most severe in its operating history. It is disappointing that the extent of what has been accomplished is somewhat obscured by the ongoing lack of in-country smelting capacity. However, we will continue to favor copper cathode production in order to draw down the copper concentrate inventory and release that working capital over the course of the year," noted Philip Pascall, First Quantum's CEO and Chairman.

"Good progress was made at each of our projects under development. The addition of a night construction shift at the Phase 1 copper smelter has made a difference and much of the schedule slippage incurred last year will likely be reversed. All areas in the development of Sentinel are tracking according to plan for the start of commissioning in Q3 2014 and within the original $1.9 billion capital estimate. This bodes very well for the Cobre Panama project which is being designed with the same concepts as Sentinel albeit on a larger scale.

"The completion of the major elements in the reorganization of our financing and capital structure within 12 months of the acquisition of Inmet is a significant accomplishment. While the new structure is more appropriate, cost efficient and provides the Company with the financial resources to complete its major development programs, we believe it is prudent to continue to look at opportunities to provide additional flexibility," Mr. Pascall concluded.


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                                                           -----------------
                                                              Three months
                                                                 ended

                                                                March 31
                                                           -----------------
(U.S. dollars millions, except where noted otherwise)          2014  2013(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales revenues                                                890.5    901.2
Gross profit before Inmet acquisition accounting
 adjustments(2)                                               308.3    322.6
Gross profit                                                  281.6    310.2
EBITDA(2)                                                     363.6    310.4
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company(3)   126.8    112.4
Earnings per share                                            $0.22    $0.23
Diluted earnings per share                                    $0.21    $0.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparative earnings(3)                                       126.8    153.8
Comparative earnings per share(3)                             $0.22    $0.32
Cash flow from operations, before changes in working
 capital and tax paid                                         370.1    324.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 include
 those of the Cayeli mine (100%), the Las Cruces mine (100%), and the
 Pyhasalmi mine (100%) from March 22, 2013, the date of acquisition.

(2) Gross profit before Inmet acquisition accounting adjustments and
 Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") are
 not recognized under IFRS. Refer to the "Regulatory Disclosures" section in
 the Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") for the three months
 ended March 31, 2014,for further information.

(3) Earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company have been adjusted
 to remove the effect of unusual items to arrive at comparative earnings.
 Comparative earnings and comparative earnings per share are not measures
 recognized under IFRS and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by
 IFRS. The Company has disclosed these measures to assist with the
 understanding of results and to provide further financial information about
 the results to investors.

OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

                                                           -----------------
                                                              Three months
                                                                 ended

                                                                March 31
                                                           -----------------
(U.S. dollars where applicable)                                2014  2013(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper production (tonnes)                                  113,118   79,308
Copper sales (tonnes)                                       102,786   89,109
Cash cost of copper production (C1)(2) (per lb)               $1.38    $1.52
Realized copper price (per lb)                                $3.10    $3.48
Nickel production (contained tonnes)                         11,838   11,072
Nickel sales (contained tonnes)                              14,097   11,048
Cash cost of nickel production (C1)(2) (per lb)               $4.37    $5.34
Realized nickel price (per payable lb)                        $6.57    $7.80
Gold production (ounces)                                     60,164   55,944
Gold sales (ounces)                                          53,126   58,791
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 include
 those of the Cayeli mine (100%), the Las Cruces mine (100%), and the
 Pyhasalmi mine (100%) from March 22, 2013, the date of acquisition.

(2) Cash costs (C1) is not recognized under IFRS. Refer to the "Regulatory
 Disclosures" section in the MD&A for the three months ended March 31, 2014,
 for further information.

FULL YEAR 2014 GUIDANCE

- Total production
  - copper between 418,000 and 444,000 tonnes
  - nickel between 42,000 and 47,000 tonnes
  - gold between 221,000 and 246,000 ounces
  - zinc between 59,000 and 65,000 tonnes
  - palladium and platinum between 22,000 and 24,000 ounces each
- Cash cost of production
  - copper between $1.32 and $1.48 per pound
  - nickel between $4.40 and $4.90 per pound
- Capital expenditures of between $2.1 billion and $2.2 billion, excluding
  capitalization of any pre-commercial production costs and capitalized
  interest

CONFERENCE CALL & WEBCAST

The Company will host a conference call and webcast to discuss the results on Friday, May 2, 2014.

Conference call and webcast details are as follows:


Date:      May 2, 2014
Time:      9:00 am (EDT); 2:00 pm (BST); 6:00 am (PDT)
Webcast:   www.first-quantum.com
Dial in:   North America: 800 741 5804 (toll free)
           International and North America: 1 647 722 6851
           United Kingdom: 0800 496 0830 (toll free) or 44 207 855 8972

Replay:    Canada and international: 1 416 626 4100
           OR
           Toll free North America: 800 558 5253
Passcode:  21715107

The conference call replay will be available from 11:00 am (EDT) until 11:59 pm (EDT) on May 9, 2014.

COMPLETE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The complete unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements, and MD&A for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are available at www.first-quantum.com and should be read in conjunction with this news release.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

This news release and the Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and are presented in United States dollars, except where noted. Changes in accounting policies have been applied consistently to comparative periods unless otherwise noted.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors of First Quantum Minerals Ltd.

G. Clive Newall, President

12g3-2b-82-4461

Listed in Standard and Poor's

For further information visit our website at www.first-quantum.com.

Cautionary statement on forward-looking information

Certain statements and information herein, including all statements that are not historical facts, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. These forward-looking statements are principally included in the Development activities section and are also disclosed in other sections of the document. The forward looking statements include estimates, forecasts and statements as to the Company's expectations of production and sales volumes, expected timing of completion of project development at Kansanshi, Sentinel, Enterprise and Cobre Panama, the impact of ore grades on future production, the potential of production disruptions, capital expenditure and mine production costs, the outcome of mine permitting, the outcome of legal proceedings which involve the Company, information with respect to the future price of copper, gold, cobalt, nickel, zinc, pyrite, PGE, and sulphuric acid, estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources, First Quantum's exploration and development program, estimated future expenses, exploration and development capital requirements, the Company's hedging policy, and goals and strategies. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements or information can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate" or "believes" or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

With respect to forward-looking statements and information contained herein, the Company has made numerous assumptions including among other things, assumptions about the price of copper, gold, nickel, zinc, pyrite, PGE, cobalt and sulphuric acid, anticipated costs and expenditures and the ability to achieve the Company's goals. Although management believes that the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that a forward-looking statement or information herein will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking statements and information by their nature are based on assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. These factors include, but are not limited to, future production volumes and costs, costs for inputs such as oil, power and sulphur, political stability in Zambia, Peru, Mauritania, Finland, Spain, Turkey, Panama and Australia, adverse weather conditions in Zambia, Finland, Spain, Turkey and Mauritania, labour disruptions, mechanical failures, water supply, procurement and delivery of parts and supplies to the operations, the production of off-spec material.

See the Company's Annual Information Form for additional information on risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the forward-looking statements and information. Although the Company has attempted to identify factors that would cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements or information, there may be other factors that cause actual results, performances, achievements or events not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. Also, many of these factors are beyond First Quantum's control. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. The Company undertake no obligation to reissue or update forward-looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date hereof except as may be required by law. All forward-looking statements and information made herein are qualified by this cautionary statement.

Contacts:
North American contact:
Sharon Loung
Director, Investor Relations
(647) 346-3934 or Toll Free: 1 (888) 688-6577
(604) 688-3818 (FAX)
sharon.loung@fqml.com

United Kingdom contact:
Clive Newall
President
+44 140 327 3484
+44 140 327 3494 (FAX)
clive.newall@fqml.com
www.first-quantum.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
Join us at Cloud Expo June 6-8 to find out how to securely connect your cloud app to any cloud or on-premises data source – without complex firewall changes. More users are demanding access to on-premises data from their cloud applications. It’s no longer a “nice-to-have” but an important differentiator that drives competitive advantages. It’s the new “must have” in the hybrid era. Users want capabilities that give them a unified view of the data to get closer to customers and grow business. The...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
Cloud applications are seeing a deluge of requests to support the exploding advanced analytics market. “Open analytics” is the emerging strategy to deliver that data through an open data access layer, in the cloud, to be directly consumed by external analytics tools and popular programming languages. An increasing number of data engineers and data scientists use a variety of platforms and advanced analytics languages such as SAS, R, Python and Java, as well as frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark...