Welcome!

News Feed Item

GrafTech Strongly Disagrees with ISS Report, Which Shows Complete Disregard for Key Governance Issues and Underscores ISS’s Lack of Understanding of GrafTech’s Strategy

GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE:GTI) (“GrafTech”) today issued the following statement regarding a May 2, 2014 report by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) relating to the election of GrafTech’s seven highly-qualified and experienced nominees to its Board of Directors at the Company’s May 15, 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ISS’s conclusion not to recommend the election of GrafTech’s seven highly qualified and experienced director nominees demonstrates a complete disregard for both the results of an independent investigation and for its own standards of ethical conduct and corporate governance. Moreover, it is clear that ISS does not fully grasp the long-term negative impact that the Milikowsky Group’s market-share focused commodity pricing strategy would have on GrafTech’s margins and how severely it could erode stockholder value.

ISS Shows Complete Disregard for Key Governance Issues

As an organization charged with the responsibility of advising its clients on issues regarding corporate governance and appropriate director conduct, we are appalled by ISS’s mischaracterization of the steps the GrafTech Board properly took to investigate leaks of proprietary information to a hedge fund and response to director misconduct, as well its misrepresentation of the Milikowsky Group’s proposed offer to submit to a review of that investigation.

Most notably, ISS incorrectly reported that, under the proposed offer, Nathan Milikowsky “would not take a board seat” until after such a review concluded that he did not violate his fiduciary duties. In fact, Nathan Milikowsky proposes that he be restored to the Board prior to the conduct of such a review.

Further, ISS failed to mention or consider that, under the proposed offer, Nathan Milikowsky could not be removed from the Board if—once again—he did not like or disagreed with the results of that review. In addition, ISS failed to mention or consider that the Milikowsky Group’s argument that the Company’s proposed structure for the review could take as long as two years is completely false and could actually be completed in three to six months—assuming that Nathan Milikowsky himself fully cooperates this time.

But more disturbing than these material failures is what ISS’s report does not say: That the chosen third-party would have no power to interview Nathan Milikowsky or request that he provide any further documentation to aid in reaching a conclusion about his actions. In fact, ISS failed to mention or consider many publicly disclosed facts, including that, during the independent Special Committee investigation, Nathan Milikowsky was the only director, officer or employee who failed to comply with a required legal hold and full document production, and that he was also the only director, officer or employee who avoided being interviewed by the independent and unbiased law firm retained to conduct the investigation.

Given ISS’s mission of supporting appropriate governance and board functioning, it is disappointing not only to see these issues given short shrift in a contested election report, but also to see them entirely disregarded in its conclusion.

ISS’s recommendation establishes a misguided precedent that governance standards for directors who are large shareholders are different from standards applied to other directors or to management or employees.

ISS Does Not Understand GrafTech’s Strategy

ISS also misses the mark on the risks to the Company of employing the Milikowsky Group’s proposed strategy, which underscores its fundamental lack of understanding of GrafTech’s global businesses and industry and, if implemented, would be detrimental to stockholder value. The Milikowsky Group’s strategy includes:

  • Flawed Industrial Materials Strategy: Redefining GrafTech’s graphite electrode commercial strategy to focus on capacity expansion and commodity pricing in an attempt to gain market-share would be met with an immediate competitive response and result in a long-term negative impact on GrafTech’s margins. The Milikowsky Group's commodity pricing strategy would create a race to the bottom and destroy value for GrafTech stockholders.
  • Flawed Needle Coke Strategy: Current low needle coke utilization levels have resulted in soft needle coke pricing. An expansion of Seadrift capacity in the current low price environment would have an immediate negative impact on GrafTech’s margins and liquidity.
  • Flawed Pricing Assumptions: The Milikowsky Group's value proposition requires the largest price increase in the history of the industry – approximately 40% and 35% for graphite electrodes and needle coke, respectively, at the same time it proposes to increase market-share. These assumptions are completely unrealistic in the current market environment.

We believe the market has recognized that GrafTech is pursuing the right strategy as evidenced by GrafTech’s stock rallying approximately 40 percent in the five trading days following the announcement of our rationalization plan. The Milikowsky Group’s plan essentially recommends undoing our global rationalization initiatives and implementing a strategy focused solely on market share with no regard to price discipline and competitive market reaction.

In short, a vote on the blue card would be a vote in favor of abandoning GrafTech’s thoughtful strategy, which independent third-parties have already acknowledged is the only realistic and viable strategy in the current macroeconomic environment. It is a vote to diverge from GrafTech’s management team and its successful execution of the Company’s strong strategic plan, which we believe would negatively impact stockholder value.

Vote the WHITE Proxy Card to Protect Your Investment

GrafTech strongly urges stockholders to protect their investments by voting the WHITE proxy card in support of ALL GrafTech’s director nominees. By voting the blue proxy card, stockholders could lose all but one of the existing qualified and experienced independent directors. The resulting board would only have two directors with meaningful independent public company board experience and would lose essential continuity and institutional knowledge of both the business and the industry.

In addition to the uncertainty created by losing critical continuity, voting the blue proxy card has the potential to strip the Board’s committees of the majority, if not all (as in the case of the Audit and Finance Committee), of their members. For example, given that Mr. Layman is retiring, if Ms. McClean and Mr. Shawley are not re-elected to the Board, the Audit and Finance Committee would be made up entirely of new directors.

By voting the WHITE proxy card, stockholders can ensure that their Board is well-balanced, retains the deep experience essential to overseeing the Company’s operations in the challenging macroeconomic environment in which it operates and ensures representation from the Milikowsky Group is added without the clearly identified governance risks.

As previously announced on May 1, 2014, leading proxy advisory firm, Glass Lewis & Co., recommended that GrafTech stockholders vote FOR all seven highly qualified and experienced director nominees on the WHITE proxy card. In its report, Glass Lewis supports the Company’s position that GrafTech has the right Board, the right team and the right strategy to continue building stockholder value, and acknowledges that the evidence and actions of Nathan Milikowsky support the position that he is not suitable to serve on the Board and that the Milikowsky Group does not have a realistic strategy.

GrafTech stockholders are reminded that their vote is important, no matter how many or how few shares they own. Whether or not stockholders plan to attend the Annual Meeting, they have an opportunity to protect their investment in GrafTech by voting FOR GrafTech’s seven director nominees using the WHITE proxy card today.

 

If stockholders have questions or need assistance in voting their shares, they should call:

 

480 Washington Boulevard, 26th Floor

Jersey City, NJ 07310

(800) 509-0917 (Toll Free)

e-mail: [email protected]

 

NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This letter contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) about certain nominations for election of directors, future or targeted operational and financial performance; growth prospects and rates, the markets we serve, strategic plans and our position in our industry. Our expectations are not predictions of actual performance and historically our performance has deviated, often significantly, from our expectations. Actual future events, circumstances, performance and trends could differ materially, positively or negatively, from those set forth in these statements due to various factors, including: unforeseen delays, costs or liabilities associated with our initiatives as well as our growth and other plans, changes in market prices of our securities, changes in business and economic conditions and growth trends in the industry, changes in customer markets and various geographic regions, uncertainties in the geopolitical environment, and other risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in our SEC filings, as well as future decisions by us. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any of them in light of new information, future events or otherwise. This letter does not constitute an offer or solicitation as to any securities.

IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: GrafTech and its directors and executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in respect of the 2014 Annual Meeting. GrafTech has filed a definitive proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies from GrafTech stockholders for the 2014 Annual Meeting. STOCKHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND ACCOMPANYING WHITE PROXY CARD WITH RESPECT TO THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE AS THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Detailed information regarding the identity of potential participants, and their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, is set forth in the definitive proxy statement and other materials filed with the SEC in connection with GrafTech’s Annual Meeting. Information regarding the direct and indirect beneficial ownership of GrafTech’s directors and executive officers in GrafTech securities is set forth in the definitive proxy statement and other materials filed with the SEC in connection with GrafTech’s 2014 Annual Meeting. Stockholders will be able to obtain free copies of the definitive proxy statement, any amendments or supplements to the definitive proxy statement and other documents filed with the SEC by GrafTech through the web site maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov and on GrafTech’s web site at http://ir.graftech.com/.

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that TMC has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo and Big Data at Cloud Expo, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Global buyers rely on TMC’s content-driven marketplaces to make purchase decisions and navigate markets. Learn how we can help you reach your marketing goals.
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organi...
"MobiDev is a Ukraine-based software development company. We do mobile development, and we're specialists in that. But we do full stack software development for entrepreneurs, for emerging companies, and for enterprise ventures," explained Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
"We focus on composable infrastructure. Composable infrastructure has been named by companies like Gartner as the evolution of the IT infrastructure where everything is now driven by software," explained Bruno Andrade, CEO and Founder of HTBase, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
Cloud applications are seeing a deluge of requests to support the exploding advanced analytics market. “Open analytics” is the emerging strategy to deliver that data through an open data access layer, in the cloud, to be directly consumed by external analytics tools and popular programming languages. An increasing number of data engineers and data scientists use a variety of platforms and advanced analytics languages such as SAS, R, Python and Java, as well as frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...