Welcome!

Related Topics: @ThingsExpo, Java IoT, Mobile IoT, Linux Containers, Agile Computing, @DXWorldExpo

@ThingsExpo: Article

How iBeacons Work for Indoor Location Based Services

Technical Guide and Recommendations

My colleague Peter Rogers is long suffering and obviously in need of sunshine.  He sacrificed his weekend to answer questions I presented him last week on the subject of iBeacons and how they work. I want to thank Peter for the following:

There is a lot of excitement about Apple's new iBeacon technology but most people still don't realise what it is or how to use it.

iBeacon is actually used in two contexts:

  1. It is primarily a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Profile that enables a device to broadcast its relative position
  2. It is any hardware device that uses the iBeacon BLE Profile

The following paragraph illustrates this terminology effectively. A third-party beacon can use the iBeacon BLE profile to advertise its relative location and therefore be classed itself as an iBeacon. An iPhone can also use the iBeacon BLE profile itself to act as a Virtual iBeacon. In this case the power levels are generally higher and so you may get a more accurate result. There is nothing to stop an Android 4.3 device being able to use the iBeacon BLE profile to advertise itself as a Virtual iBeacon too. In fact any device that supports BLE can communicate using the iBeacon BLE Profile. The core difference that iOS 7 offers is that is normalises the results from the iBeacon (in order to avoid fluctuations) and it offers the new iOS 7 CLBeacon class within the CoreLocation framework.

Here are some interesting fun facts:

  • Apple does not produce iBeacon hardware
  • iBeacon is not the only BLE profile for beacons, there are others that predated it (S-beacon, Gimbal, GeLo)
  • Most beacons allow over the air (OTA) software updates which can be used to load the iBeacon profile
  • The beacons from different vendors often behave quite differently
  • iBeacons CANNOT reliably be used to pinpoint a precise indoor position - more on that later

The iBeacon BLE Profile does not have any payload. Instead it just sends three pieces of information:

  1. UUID - beacon manufacturer's unique identifier
  2. Major - a value that can identify a group of beacons (can be used for general region)
  3. Minor - a value that can identify an individual  beacon with a group (can be used for a specific location within that region)

The CLBeacon class offers three different properties for determining the distance from the beacon:

  1. Accuracy - the accuracy of the proximity value allegedly in meters - in practice this doesn't map directly to meters in most cases
  2. Proximity - the vague definition of proximity - immediate, near, far and unknown
  3. RSSI - the received signal strength of the beacon in decibels

The CLBeaconRegion class enables notifications when the iPhone detects that the range of an iBeacon has changed and this can be used to launch your App even if it was not running. The class also enables the construction of a Virtual Beacon whereby the iPhone itself uses the iBeacon BLE Profile to behave like an iBeacon.

This means that we can detect proximity to an iBeacon quite easily by using the Proximity property. In practice this means using the CLBeaconRegion class to set up notifications when we get a proximity of "immediate" to certain strategically positions iBeacons. The accuracy of the beacons can be increased by more power and changing the frequency of updates (the default varies per vendor). Increasing these two parameters obviously decreases the battery life. The simplest option is to look for cases where ‘the device is close to a beacon and the accuracy confidence is high' which translates into immediate zone. If you were however to put your hand in front of the device and the iBeacon, this can provide enough interference to push it back to the ‘near zone' although neither the device or beacon has actually moved.

Immediate Zone (0-20 cm) (0-8")
When a device is held up close to a beacon
Accuracy confidence is high

Near Zone (20 cm - 2 m) (8"- 6.5')
Within a couple of meters to the beacon
Accuracy is fairly certain

Far Zone (2 - 70 m) (6.5 - 230')
More than a few meters away
Accuracy is low or the signal strength is weak
[https://community.estimote.com/hc/en-us/articles/201029223-RSSI-Range-Zones-and-Distance-Accuracy]

A simple strategy is to have a Cloud hosted data set that determines the positions of the beacons for an App to dynamically load and refer to. If you try and hardcode the iBeacon positions or have a non-updateable configuration file then you would have to go through the Apple App Store review process every time you want to physically add a new iBeacon. You could also host other information such as broadcast messages, regions and what the major and minor versions actually represent. It would certainly be interesting to have Location Data Stores that can describe multiple indoor positioning systems and that you can look up based on UUID, major and minor. That could be perceived as a security risk in certain situations though.

There are definite differences between the beacon vendors, and things you should be looking into are as follows:

  • Secure firmware update over the air
  • Cloud management platform
  • iBeacon profile support
  • Configurable properties: radio output power; RSSI; iBeacon advertising interval; UUID, major; and minor
  • Developer SDK with documentation

If you buy beacons without the iBeacon profile pre-installed and they are not firmware updateable over the air then you are limited to older profiles. Likewise if the UUID is not configurable and not communicated in the documentation then you are locked into the vendor SDK. If the iBeacon advertising interval is very slow by default and not configurable then your beacons will be less accurate. Finally not being able to configure the power and RSSI means the beacons cannot be configured to be more accurate. http://localz.co/blog/ibeacon-ble-hardware-commercial-comparison/

There are also differences in the accuracy of iBeacons and associated SDKs as followed:

  • Drop-out rate
  • Consistency of beacon results amongst the same vendor
  • Correct implementation of measured power (he value of measured RSSI at a distance of one meter)
  • Change in accuracy due to rotation
  • Beacon interference with each other (not something that should have an effect)

http://blog.shinetech.com/2014/02/17/the-beacon-experiments-low-energy-bluetooth-devices-in-action/

The challenge comes when you want to try and use triangulation with the RSSI or accuracy properties in order to find out a precise location rather than ‘immediate', ‘near' or ‘far'. Using the accuracy property is best summed up by the following statement in the iOS 7 API documentation, "Accuracy indicates the one sigma horizontal accuracy in meters. Use this property to differentiate between beacons with the same proximity value. Do not use it to identify a precise location for the beacon. Accuracy values may fluctuate due to RF interference. A negative value in this property signifies that the actual accuracy could not be determined."

The distance estimate provided by iOS is based on the ratio of the iBeacon signal strength (RSSI) over the calibrated transmitter power (txPower). The txPower is the known measured signal strength in RSSI at 1 meter away. iOS also normalises the values to negate the fluctuations.

"At first glance it would appear that accuracy does seem to resemble distance. However at 0.5 meters, the accuracy underestimated distance, and by 1.5 meters, accuracy was an overestimation of distance. I decided to extend the distance out to 8 meters to see if the accuracy continued increasing with distance, however over the course of 80 seconds the accuracy of the beacon only reported an accuracy of 3.87m - some 4.13 meters shy of 8 meters. This was less than convincing that accuracy was representing distance. In certain ranges with this beacon there does appear to be some correlation between accuracy and distance. I turned the power up to 100% (+4bBm) and measured the accuracy at the same varying distances. This time I was seeing a very close relationship between accuracy and distance between 1 and 5 meters, though it did start to slip at greater distances (however at 15 meters there were desks and computers obscuring the path, so perhaps this is expected)." http://blog.shinetech.com/2014/02/17/the-beacon-experiments-low-energy-bluetooth-devices-in-action/

One equation that sums up the way to calculate distance is as follows:
P(d)[dBm] = P(do)[dBm] - 10n log (d / d0) - Z

  • d             The distance we want to know
  • d0           A measure of distance for a known power output
  • n             The way the signal power degrades over distance
  • Z              The environmental effect (which is quite large).

http://www.codepilots.com/2014/03/ibeacons-accuracy/

To provide the algorithm for Android or to create your own custom version for iOS then you would need to do something like the following:

1.     Normalise the RSSI and txPower values

2.     Calibrate each IBeacon with the txPower value to allow accurate distance estimates.

3.     Measured a bunch of RSSI measurements at known distances, then do a best fit curve to match the data points

4.     Convert the best fit curve into an algorithm

protected static double calculateAccuracy(int txPower, double rssi) {
if (rssi == 0) {
return -1.0; // if we cannot determine accuracy, return -1.
}

double ratio = rssi*1.0/txPower;
if (ratio < 1.0) {
return Math.pow(ratio,10);
}
else {
double accuracy =  (0.89976)*Math.pow(ratio,7.7095) + 0.111;
return accuracy;
}
}
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20416218/understanding-ibeacon-distancing/20434019#20434019

There are mainly five issues with the approach of triangulation for more accurate positioning:

1.     In non-controlled environments, where you can find metals, and other objects that affect the signal, the received signal strength of the beacons changes so often that it seems impossible to get an error range below 5 meters.

2.     Other devices using 2.4 GHz frequency might be interfering with the Beacons' signal.

3.     Depending on the way that the user is handling the receiver device, the readings can change a lot as well. If the user puts his/her hand over the bluetooth antenna, then the algorithm will have low signals as input, and thus the beacons will supposed to be very far from the device.

4.     The directionality of the beacons and the receiver affects the readings.

5.     The beacons and their SDKs all have a different effect on the accuracy of the results

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20332856/triangulate-example-for-ibeacons

"Having completed these experiments, I've been able to conclude that achieving accurate distance measurements with a single beacon is potentially possible, provided you have the right beacon and the right brand. Out of eight beacons, I only found one that was consistently achieving accurate distances. Given that there is so much inconsistency between the beacons and there is no guarantee you will even receive a beacon in an order that does provide accurate results, it seems the only way to achieve accuracy is by using many beacons and averaging the results."
http://blog.shinetech.com/2014/02/17/the-beacon-experiments-low-energy-bluetooth-devices-in-action/

Recommendations

1.     Ceiling mounting of beacons reduces variance and the user blocking the path

2.     Signal transmission and reception are dependent on the orientation of both the transmitter and receiver

3.     Radio absorption by the user is significant in determining distance

4.     Other radio interference does not seem significant

5.     Clustering of beacons does not seem to have an impact

6.     The measured power does not decrease uniformly as we move away from the receiver, this is the biggest limiting factor in using this technology for accurate positioning

7.     Increasing the power to the beacons using the vendor SDK increases the relationship between accuracy and distance (on correctly configured beacons)

8.     One mooted solution is to try to set up a beacon every X meters (X being the maximum error tolerated in the system) so we can track on this beacons grid the position of a given device by calculating which beacon on the grid is the closest to the device and assuming that the device is on the same position

9.     Choose the beacon vendor carefully based on online reports because functionality does vary a lot

10. Use lots of beacons and take an average due to drop out rates and inconsistency amongst beacons in the same place

I leave you some other reading material and the general advice that using relative proximity is probably a far lot simpler than trying to implement precise location. That means designing your solution architecture and physical deployment appropriately. I can see the ability to track a user through a shopping centre of airport, but the ability to pinpoint out a product in a retail store will be challenging unless beacons with very high power levels are used and ceiling mounted.

Additional Resources:

************************************************************************

Kevin Benedict

Writer, Speaker, Editor

Senior Analyst, Digital Transformation, EBA, Center for the Future of Work Cognizant

View my profile on LinkedIn

Learn about mobile strategies at MobileEnterpriseStrategies.com

Follow me on Twitter @krbenedict

Browse the Mobile Solution Directory

Join the Linkedin Group Strategic Enterprise Mobility

Join the Google+ Community Mobile Enterprise Strategies

Recommended Strategy Book Code Halos

Recommended iPad App Code Halos for iPads

 

***Full Disclosure: These are my personal opinions. No company is silly enough to claim them. I am a mobility and digital transformation analyst, consultant and writer. I work with and have worked with many of the companies mentioned in my articles.

More Stories By Kevin Benedict

Kevin Benedict serves as the Senior Vice President, Solutions Strategy, at Regalix, a Silicon Valley based company, focused on bringing the best strategies, digital technologies, processes and people together to deliver improved customer experiences, journeys and success through the combination of intelligent solutions, analytics, automation and services. He is a popular writer, speaker and futurist, and in the past 8 years he has taught workshops for large enterprises and government agencies in 18 different countries. He has over 32 years of experience working with strategic enterprise IT solutions and business processes, and he is also a veteran executive working with both solution and services companies. He has written dozens of technology and strategy reports, over a thousand articles, interviewed hundreds of technology experts, and produced videos on the future of digital technologies and their impact on industries.

Latest Stories
With more than 30 Kubernetes solutions in the marketplace, it's tempting to think Kubernetes and the vendor ecosystem has solved the problem of operationalizing containers at scale or of automatically managing the elasticity of the underlying infrastructure that these solutions need to be truly scalable. Far from it. There are at least six major pain points that companies experience when they try to deploy and run Kubernetes in their complex environments. In this presentation, the speaker will d...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
The deluge of IoT sensor data collected from connected devices and the powerful AI required to make that data actionable are giving rise to a hybrid ecosystem in which cloud, on-prem and edge processes become interweaved. Attendees will learn how emerging composable infrastructure solutions deliver the adaptive architecture needed to manage this new data reality. Machine learning algorithms can better anticipate data storms and automate resources to support surges, including fully scalable GPU-c...
When building large, cloud-based applications that operate at a high scale, it's important to maintain a high availability and resilience to failures. In order to do that, you must be tolerant of failures, even in light of failures in other areas of your application. "Fly two mistakes high" is an old adage in the radio control airplane hobby. It means, fly high enough so that if you make a mistake, you can continue flying with room to still make mistakes. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Le...
Machine learning has taken residence at our cities' cores and now we can finally have "smart cities." Cities are a collection of buildings made to provide the structure and safety necessary for people to function, create and survive. Buildings are a pool of ever-changing performance data from large automated systems such as heating and cooling to the people that live and work within them. Through machine learning, buildings can optimize performance, reduce costs, and improve occupant comfort by ...
As Cybric's Chief Technology Officer, Mike D. Kail is responsible for the strategic vision and technical direction of the platform. Prior to founding Cybric, Mike was Yahoo's CIO and SVP of Infrastructure, where he led the IT and Data Center functions for the company. He has more than 24 years of IT Operations experience with a focus on highly-scalable architectures.
CI/CD is conceptually straightforward, yet often technically intricate to implement since it requires time and opportunities to develop intimate understanding on not only DevOps processes and operations, but likely product integrations with multiple platforms. This session intends to bridge the gap by offering an intense learning experience while witnessing the processes and operations to build from zero to a simple, yet functional CI/CD pipeline integrated with Jenkins, Github, Docker and Azure...
The explosion of new web/cloud/IoT-based applications and the data they generate are transforming our world right before our eyes. In this rush to adopt these new technologies, organizations are often ignoring fundamental questions concerning who owns the data and failing to ask for permission to conduct invasive surveillance of their customers. Organizations that are not transparent about how their systems gather data telemetry without offering shared data ownership risk product rejection, regu...
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Dhiraj Sehgal works in Delphix's product and solution organization. His focus has been DevOps, DataOps, private cloud and datacenters customers, technologies and products. He has wealth of experience in cloud focused and virtualized technologies ranging from compute, networking to storage. He has spoken at Cloud Expo for last 3 years now in New York and Santa Clara.
Enterprises are striving to become digital businesses for differentiated innovation and customer-centricity. Traditionally, they focused on digitizing processes and paper workflow. To be a disruptor and compete against new players, they need to gain insight into business data and innovate at scale. Cloud and cognitive technologies can help them leverage hidden data in SAP/ERP systems to fuel their businesses to accelerate digital transformation success.
Containers and Kubernetes allow for code portability across on-premise VMs, bare metal, or multiple cloud provider environments. Yet, despite this portability promise, developers may include configuration and application definitions that constrain or even eliminate application portability. In this session we'll describe best practices for "configuration as code" in a Kubernetes environment. We will demonstrate how a properly constructed containerized app can be deployed to both Amazon and Azure ...
Poor data quality and analytics drive down business value. In fact, Gartner estimated that the average financial impact of poor data quality on organizations is $9.7 million per year. But bad data is much more than a cost center. By eroding trust in information, analytics and the business decisions based on these, it is a serious impediment to digital transformation.
Digital Transformation: Preparing Cloud & IoT Security for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. As automation and artificial intelligence (AI) power solution development and delivery, many businesses need to build backend cloud capabilities. Well-poised organizations, marketing smart devices with AI and BlockChain capabilities prepare to refine compliance and regulatory capabilities in 2018. Volumes of health, financial, technical and privacy data, along with tightening compliance requirements by...
Predicting the future has never been more challenging - not because of the lack of data but because of the flood of ungoverned and risk laden information. Microsoft states that 2.5 exabytes of data are created every day. Expectations and reliance on data are being pushed to the limits, as demands around hybrid options continue to grow.