Welcome!

News Feed Item

Intrepid Mines: Letter to Shareholders

BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/07/14 -- Intrepid Mines Limited (TSX: IAU)(ASX: IAU) (the "Company" or "Intrepid") releases a letter to shareholders.

Dear fellow shareholder

As you will be aware, you are being asked to vote at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) on 13 May 2014 to replace the majority of the existing Board of Directors.

Activist shareholder Quantum Pacific is making another attempt to oust your Board with its requisitioned EGM next week. It has recently written to some shareholders, making several baseless allegations against your Directors.

Below are statements that set the record straight, make the Board's position absolutely clear and unequivocal to all shareholders and seek your support for the current Board by voting AGAINST each of the resolutions.

Quantum Pacific's current and previous actions have demonstrated that its ultimate goal is to gain control of the Company and its cash reserves without having to make a takeover bid.

It is important that you know the Company has explained to Quantum Pacific's spokesperson, Mr Greg Mazur that the EGM is an unnecessary and superfluous distraction and cost to the Company given that all of the current Directors are up for re-election at the Company's AGM on 30 May 2014.

And as previously advised, shareholders will be given the opportunity at the AGM to vote on a return of capital. The Board of Directors has also given an undertaking that shareholders will be asked to vote on any new investment opportunities proposed by the Company.

Your current Board of Directors - which has more than 35 years of experience with Intrepid - is ensuring that it will be shareholders that will determine the best way forward by voting on all options.

I have spoken with a number of major institutional shareholders in the lead up to the EGM and I am pleased to confirm that those shareholders continue to support your Board and management.

As to the baseless allegations by Quantum:

Allegation 1: Board has presented a flawed proposal by offering to return to shareholders substantially less than its current cash balance.

Reality: By pressing on the Board what is in effect a hasty and ill-considered proposal to wind up the Company, Quantum has created potential contingent liabilities that do not exist under a business-as-usual scenario. In every company, there are costs associated with winding up the business that are not listed in financial accounts which are prepared on a going-concern basis.

In Intrepid's case, these costs are potentially significant because the Company has operated in various jurisdictions around the globe. Final clearances in each of the jurisdictions in which it and its subsidiaries have operated need to be received from regulatory authorities before all available surplus funds can be released. To suggest that this indicates some form of conspiracy to hide cash away from shareholders is little short of ridiculous.

Allegation 2: The Board has decided to restrict shareholders to only voting on a return of capital, because it has a higher approval threshold, thus allowing the Board to ignore a majority vote in favour of a capital return.

Reality: The Board is giving shareholders the opportunity to vote on a return of capital at the AGM, because this is the only option that could have been put in the time available. A share buyback, because it does not necessarily affect all shareholders equally, requires a higher level of scrutiny, including an independent expert's report on the fairness of the proposed transaction. Despite Quantum's claims to the contrary, this form of return simply could not be prepared and reviewed by the regulator by the time the Notice of Meeting had to go to the printers to meet ASX and TSX statutory deadlines. The Board's view remains that if 75% of shareholders support the return of capital, then a decision will have been made, and we will move promptly to winding up the Company.

In the event that shareholders do not approve the return of capital, then the Board's aim will be to provide as much information as possible to allow you to see a range of alternatives before you irrevocably determine the Company's future. We will then bring all of those alternatives to yet another EGM in August 2014, including an investment proposition, a return of capital, a share buyback or even a combination.

It is noteworthy that in their Requisition for a shareholder meeting to consider returning money to shareholders, Quantum and Fides listed the Return of Capital as their preferred option presumably in full knowledge that the resolution required 75% approval.

Allegation 3: The Board favours a new acquisition, and is structuring the vote to maximise the probability of that being approved.

Reality: Your Board believes that in a situation where different shareholders have different objectives, a fully informed shareholder vote is the only way to resolve the differences fairly. We know that some shareholders currently prefer a return of capital, and this will be tested at the AGM. However, the only way that this will be an informed choice is if you also know what the alternatives are. It is Quantum Pacific who do not want you to see these alternatives, as they would only allow a vote on a return of capital.

Summary and recommendation

Quantum Pacific tried unsuccessfully to remove the Board in June 2013 and are doing so again, using misinformation as the basis for pursuing their own agenda. In calling for this meeting, Quantum is also causing the Company to incur unnecessary costs, given that the Annual General Meeting is just over two weeks later where all Directors are up for election, and the question of a capital return versus alternative uses of funds can be appropriately dealt with.

Shareholders (including Quantum Pacific) recently voted overwhelmingly in favour of a settlement to the Indonesian dispute - a clear endorsement of the actions of the present Board.

I urge you to vote AGAINST each of the resolutions, and to allow the present Board to continue to act in the interests of all shareholders. I look forward to chairing the Annual General meeting, discussing the future of the Company and giving shareholders the opportunity to guide the way forward.

In the meantime, should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or Scott Lowe.

Yours sincerely

Ian McMaster AM, Chairman

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
"We are a monitoring company. We work with Salesforce, BBC, and quite a few other big logos. We basically provide monitoring for them, structure for their cloud services and we fit into the DevOps world" explained David Gildeh, Co-founder and CEO of Outlyer, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
SYS-CON Events announced today that IBM has been named “Diamond Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st Cloud Expo, which will take place on October 31 through November 2nd 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, California.