Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Essex Announces First Quarter 2014 Results

Robust Housing Conditions Underlie 7.2% Same-Property Revenue Growth

PALO ALTO, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/07/14 -- Essex Property Trust, Inc. (NYSE: ESS) announced today its first quarter 2014 earnings results and related business activities.

Funds from Operations ("FFO") and Net Income for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 are detailed below. Total FFO and Net Income for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 includes $16.1 million in merger related expenses. Core FFO excludes merger expenses, acquisition costs and non-recurring items.


            ----------------------------------------------------

                                         Quarter Ended
                                           March 31,       %
            Earnings (in millions)        2014    2013   change
                                        ------------------------
              Total FFO                   $67.8   $77.4   -12.4%
              Core FFO                    $81.1   $73.2    10.8%
              Net Income                  $21.9   $25.2   -13.1%
            Per Diluted Share
              Total FFO                   $1.68   $1.97   -14.6%
              Core FFO                    $2.02   $1.87     8.0%
              Earnings per Share          $0.58   $0.68   -14.7%

            ----------------------------------------------------

First Quarter Highlights:

  • Completed the merger with BRE Properties on April 1st, creating the preeminent West Coast multifamily REIT.
  • On March 31, 2014, contributed $888 million in BRE properties to three new co-investment entities to fund a significant portion of the cash consideration of the BRE merger.
  • Grew Core FFO per diluted share by 8.0% compared to Q1 2013.
  • Increased same-property gross revenues and net operating income ("NOI") by 7.2% and 8.3%, respectively, compared to Q1 2013.
  • Achieved a 1.4% sequential increase in quarterly gross revenues and 2.6% sequential increase in net operating income ("NOI") for the same-property portfolio.
  • Completed the lease-up of Connolly Station, a 309 unit community located in Dublin, CA, and began the lease-up of two additional development communities during the quarter.
  • The Company was added to the S&P 500 Index on April 1, 2014.
  • Established Core FFO guidance range for the second quarter of 2014 of $1.96 to $2.04 per diluted share, which incorporates the BRE portfolio and recent financing transactions.
  • Revised the full year Core FFO per diluted share range to $8.15 to $8.45, raising the midpoint by $0.05 per share.

"We are pleased to highlight the Company's strong operating performance as we begin 2014, demonstrated by 7.2% same-property revenue growth. Fundamentals on the West Coast continue to be robust, driven by nation-leading job growth and muted deliveries of new rental and for-sale housing. We are also pleased with the performance of the legacy BRE portfolio, which generated a 5.6% increase in same-property revenues in the first quarter," commented Michael J. Schall, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Schall continued, "We are excited that the consummation of the merger with BRE occurred substantially as planned, and we look forward to continuing integration efforts for the next 12-18 months. Our recent capital markets activities support our belief that the Company's larger operating platform and unique geographic profile will provide cost of capital benefits that will complement a variety of synergies that are expected to be realized from the merger."

Same-Property Operations

Essex same-property operating results exclude properties that are not comparable for the periods presented. The table below illustrates the percentage change in same-property gross revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2013, and the sequential percentage change for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 versus the quarter ended December 31, 2013 by submarket for the Company:


                    Q1 2014 vs. Q1 2013 Q1 2014 vs. Q4 2013    % of Total
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
                       Gross Revenues      Gross Revenues   Q1 2014 Revenues
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Southern California
  Los Angeles
   County                   4.7%                0.9%              17.2%
  Ventura County            4.6%                1.6%              8.9%
  Orange County             5.3%                1.1%              11.2%
  San Diego County          4.6%                1.2%              5.6%
  Other Southern
   California               6.7%                0.4%              1.8%
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
    Total Southern
     California             4.9%                1.1%              44.7%
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Northern California
  Santa Clara
   County                   9.2%                1.9%              18.4%
  Contra Costa
   County                   8.0%                2.3%              6.4%
  Alameda County           11.3%                2.7%              5.8%
  Other Northern
   California              10.2%                1.1%              5.6%
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
    Total Northern
     California             9.5%                2.0%              36.2%
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Seattle Metro               8.3%                1.3%              19.1%
                    ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Same-Property
 Portfolio                  7.2%                1.4%             100.0%
                    =================== =================== ================


                                        Year Over Year Growth
                                  --------------------------------
                                     Q1 2014 compared to Q1 2013
                                  --------------------------------
                                     Gross    Operating
                                   Revenues   Expenses      NOI
                                  ---------- ---------- ----------
          Southern California        4.9%       4.5%       5.1%
          Northern California        9.5%       3.6%       12.0%
          Seattle Metro              8.3%       6.8%       9.1%
                                  ---------- ---------- ----------
          Same-property portfolio    7.2%       4.6%       8.3%
                                  ========== ========== ==========


                                          Sequential Growth
                                  --------------------------------
                                     Q1 2014 compared to Q4 2013
                                  --------------------------------
                                     Gross    Operating
                                   Revenues   Expenses      NOI
                                  ---------- ---------- ----------
          Southern California        1.1%       -1.8%      2.5%
          Northern California        2.0%       -3.3%      4.3%
          Seattle Metro              1.3%       5.1%       -0.6%
                                  ---------- ---------- ----------
          Same-property portfolio    1.4%       -1.0%      2.6%
                                  ========== ========== ==========


                                        Financial Occupancies
                                  --------------------------------
                                            Quarter Ended
                                  --------------------------------
                                   3/31/2014 12/31/2013  3/31/2013
                                  ---------- ---------- ----------
          Southern California        96.4%      96.3%      96.5%
          Northern California        96.5%      96.1%      96.5%
          Seattle Metro              96.5%      95.9%      96.6%
                                  ---------- ---------- ----------
          Same-property portfolio    96.5%      96.2%      96.5%
                                  ========== ========== ==========

BRE Merger Closed

As previously announced, Essex completed the merger with BRE Properties (BRE) on April 1, 2014. On March 31, 2014, 17 BRE properties were contributed to three joint ventures with a total estimated property value of $888 million. Properties were contributed to Wesco III, Wesco IV and a joint venture formed with AEW Capital Management. Please see page S-14 of the supplement for the list of properties contributed to the joint ventures. As of April 1, 2014, Essex has a 50% ownership interest in each of the joint ventures and will receive property management, acquisition, and redevelopment fees and a promote interest if certain return hurdles are achieved. New secured mortgage debt totaling $475 million was placed on the properties at LIBOR plus 160 basis points for a five year initial term with up to two years of extension options. The Company has swapped 80% of the $475 million of secured mortgages to an effective fixed rate of 3.6% for a 5.7 year term. As a result of the joint venture financing, Essex did not utilize the committed bridge loan facility it had in place at the time the merger was announced. Please see the press release dated April 1, 2014 for additional details about the merger.

On March 31, 2014, BRE contributed 14 properties valued at $1.4 billion to Essex Portfolio L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") in exchange for 8.6 million of Essex Operating Partnership Units ("OP Units"). The OP Units were subsequently retired by the Company on April 1, 2014. The purpose of this transaction was tax efficiency. The balance sheet at March 31, 2014 reflects the acquisition of these properties on the last day of the quarter along with the issuance of OP Units.

The table below represents the BRE Properties same-property revenue results for the stabilized portfolio of properties, excluding developments and properties held for sale. The Company did not own BRE during the first quarter 2014 but acquired the portfolio on March 31, 2014, as described above, and on April 1, 2014. Therefore, these results are not reflected in the Company's income statement during the quarter. The table below illustrates the percentage change in same-property revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2013, and the sequential percentage change for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 versus the quarter ended December 31, 2013 by submarket:

BRE Legacy Properties

                       Q1 2014 vs. Q1 2013 Q1 2014 vs. Q4 2013    % of Total
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
                          Total Revenues      Total Revenues   Q1 2014 Revenues
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Southern California
  Los Angeles County           4.1%               -0.4%              18.2%
  Orange County                4.5%                1.0%              18.4%
  San Diego County             3.5%                0.3%              16.6%
  Riverside County             2.6%                0.6%              3.7%
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
    Total Southern
     California                3.9%                0.3%              56.9%
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Northern California
  San Mateo County             9.0%                0.3%              8.6%
  Santa Clara County           5.9%                0.0%              4.3%
  Contra Costa County          9.6%                0.9%              3.5%
  Alameda County               8.7%                1.0%              9.4%
  Other Northern
   California                  9.6%                2.6%              1.3%
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
    Total Northern
     California                8.5%                0.7%              27.1%
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Seattle Metro                  6.7%                0.8%              16.0%
                       ------------------- ------------------- ----------------
Same-Property
 Portfolio                     5.6%                0.5%             100.0%
                       =================== =================== ================

MB360 Fire Update

On March 11, 2014, a fire broke out at one of the two buildings at BRE's MB360 development located in San Francisco, CA. The building that contained the fire consisted of 172 units, all of which were destroyed above the podium structure, which was also damaged. The second phase of the development, containing 188 units, suffered no damage and is expected to begin delivering apartment homes in the fourth quarter of 2014. BRE carried comprehensive insurance coverage, including lost profits, related to the property. Insurance proceeds will be set up as a receivable on the balance sheet. We estimate Core FFO for 2014 will be reduced by $0.03-$0.05 per share as the cost basis of MB360 that qualifies for interest capitalization is lower than the previous investment balance and the generation of rental revenue will be delayed. The insurance policies covering MB360 provide coverage for loss of rental income and soft costs, although we are not assuming recovery of these costs in 2014.

Investment Activity

Subsequent to quarter end, the Company acquired Piedmont Apartments for $76.8 million. The 396 unit community was built in 1969 and subsequently renovated in 1997 and 2005. The Company assumed a $44.8 million mortgage loan secured by the property at a fixed rate of 5.6% for a remaining term of three years. The property is located in Bellevue, a submarket of Seattle and within one mile of Microsoft's World Headquarters.

Dispositions

In January, the Company sold Vista Capri, a 106 unit community located in San Diego, CA for $14.4 million. The total gain on sale was $7.1 million, net of internal disposition costs. The gain has been excluded from the calculation of FFO.

In March, Essex Apartment Value Fund II, L.P. ("Fund II") sold one of the two remaining communities for $23.8 million. The total gain on sale was $11.4 million. The Company has a 28.2% ownership stake in Fund II and received promote income of $3.8 million which has been excluded from Core FFO.

During the first quarter, BRE, which was not owned by the Company at the time, sold three properties located in Sacramento, CA, Spring Valley, CA and San Diego, CA for total proceeds of $156.8 million.

Development Activity

During the quarter, Connolly Station, a 309 unit community located in Dublin, CA achieved stabilized occupancy. As of the end of April, the community was 99% occupied.

Leasing at Phase II of Epic, located in San Jose, CA, is proceeding ahead of schedule. As of May 5, 2014, 78% of the 289 units were leased. The Company now expects the community to stabilize during the second quarter 2014, six months ahead of schedule.

In March, the Company began leasing The Huxley, a 187 unit community located in West Hollywood, CA. Through May 5, 2014, 49% of the apartment homes were leased.

In March, The Avery, located in Los Angeles, CA received final certificate of occupancy and Essex purchased the property subject to a pre-sale arrangement, for approximately $35 million. The 121 unit community is currently 62% leased as of May 5, 2014.

As part of the merger agreement, the Company acquired two development communities that are currently in lease up. Solstice, a 280 unit community located in Sunnyvale, CA was 77% leased as of May 5, 2014. The Company expects to stabilize the community during the third quarter of 2014. Wilshire at La Brea, a 478 unit community located in Los Angeles, CA was 38% leased as of May 5, 2014. The Company expects Wilshire at La Brea to stabilize in the first quarter of 2015.

Extraordinary Events

During the first quarter, the Company incurred $1.6 million in damages at two properties that were related to earthquake damages and unusual wet weather in the Pacific Northwest. These costs were charged to earnings and excluded from Core FFO in the first quarter of 2014.

Liquidity and Balance Sheet

Common Stock

During the first quarter, the Company issued 958,055 shares of common stock for $157.6 million, net of commissions, at an average per share price of $166.24. Subsequent to quarter end through May 7, 2014, excluding the approximately 23.1 million shares issued in connection with the BRE merger, the Company has issued 197,600 shares of stock at an average price of $171.62, for total proceeds of $33.7 million, net of commissions.

Unsecured Notes Offering

In April, the Company issued $400 million of 3.875% senior unsecured notes that mature in May 2024. Please see our press release dated April 8, 2014 for additional details about the notes offering.

Balance Sheet

At the end of April, the Company had $5.1 billion in total debt outstanding, reflecting the approximately $1.7 billion of debt assumed from BRE and the new $400 million unsecured notes issued in April 2014. At the end of April, the Company had $845 million available on its $1.0 billion revolving line of credit and total shares and operating partnership units outstanding for Essex was approximately 64.0 million.

Guidance

The Company has revised its full year guidance for Core FFO per diluted share from a range of $8.10 - $8.40 to a range of $8.15 to $8.45. The revised numbers reflect the BRE transaction, timing of the first quarter equity offering, and the $400 million unsecured note offering announced in April. The Company has not revised its same-property NOI growth outlook for the Essex portfolio for the full year but will do so as part of its second quarter earnings release. The table below outlines the key assumptions relating to BRE and additional details can be found on page S-13 of the Supplemental Financial Information.

Key BRE Assumptions
(all dollars are in millions and at Essex's pro rata share)


                                              Q2 2014 to Q4   Full Year Run
                                                2014 Range      Rate Range
                                             --------------- ---------------
Operating & G&A Synergies                       $18 to $20      $24 to $27
Prop 13 Tax Adjustment                         ($15 to $17)    ($20 to $23)
Mark-to-Market Debt                             $17 to $21      $23 to $28
MB360 Fire Impact                               ($2 to $3)      ($2 to $3)

For the second quarter, the Company has established a range for Core FFO per diluted share of $1.96 to $2.04. During the quarter, the Company does not expect to achieve the full operating synergy benefits it expects on a full year run rate basis as it will take several months to implement new processes. In the fourth quarter, the Company expects the majority of the savings it has initially identified will be in-place. The second quarter will be impacted by the amount and timing of capital markets activities and a lower cost basis of MB360 that qualifies for interest capitalization.

Conference Call with Management

The Company will host an earnings conference call with management to discuss its quarterly results on Thursday, May 8, 2014 at 10 a.m. PDT (1 p.m. EDT), which will be broadcast live via the Internet at www.essexpropertytrust.com, and accessible via phone by dialing (877) 407-0784, no passcode is necessary.

A rebroadcast of the live call will be available online for 90 days and digitally for 7 days. To access the replay online, go to www.essexpropertytrust.com and select the first quarter earnings link. To access the replay digitally, dial (877) 870-5176 using the replay pin number 13578671. If you are unable to access the information via the Company's website, please contact the Investor Relations Department at [email protected] or by calling (650) 494-3700.

Corporate Profile

Essex Property Trust, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, develops, redevelops, and manages multifamily residential properties in selected West Coast markets. Essex currently has ownership interests in 234 apartment communities with an additional 14 properties in various stages of active development. Additional information about Essex can be found on the Company's web site at www.essexpropertytrust.com.

This press release and accompanying supplemental financial information will be filed electronically on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission and can be accessed from the Company's Web site at www.essexpropertytrust.com. If you are unable to obtain the information via the Web, please contact the Investor Relations Department at (650) 494-3700.

Funds from Operations ("FFO") Reconciliation

FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), is generally considered by industry analysts as an appropriate measure of performance of an equity REIT. Generally, FFO adjusts the net income of equity REITs for non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization of rental properties, impairment charges, gains/losses on sales of real estate and extraordinary items. Management considers FFO and FFO which excludes acquisition costs and items that are non-recurring or not related to the Company's core business activities, which is referred to as ("Core FFO"), to be useful financial performance measurements of an equity REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO and Core FFO provide investors with an additional basis to evaluate the operating performance and ability of a REIT to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures and the ability to pay dividends.

FFO does not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and is not intended to indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. It should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of the REIT's operating performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. FFO does not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all cash needs including principal amortization, capital improvements and distributions to shareholders. FFO also does not represent cash flows generated from operating, investing or financing activities as defined under GAAP. Management has consistently applied the NAREIT definition of FFO to all periods presented. However, there is judgment involved and other REITs' calculation of FFO may vary from the NAREIT definition for this measure, and thus their disclosures of FFO may not be comparable to the Company's calculation.

The following table sets forth the Company's calculation of diluted FFO and Core FFO for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:


                                                           Quarter Ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                       ---------------------
Funds from Operations (In thousands)                      2014       2013
                                                       ---------- ----------
Net income available to common stockholders               $21,912    $25,203
Adjustments:
Depreciation                                               50,312     47,144
Gains not included in FFO, net of internal disposition
 costs                                                   (10,292)          -
Depreciation add back from unconsolidated co-
 investments, and add back convertible preferred
 dividend - Series G                                        4,760      3,842
Noncontrolling interest related to Operating
 Partnership units                                          1,417      1,501
Depreciation attributable to noncontrolling interests       (329)      (327)
                                                       ---------- ----------
                 Funds from Operations                    $67,780    $77,363
                                                       ========== ==========
Acquisition costs                                             188        387
Gain on sales of marketable securities and note
 prepayment                                                 (427)    (2,611)
Gain on sale of land                                        (400)    (1,503)
Earthquake related and other                                1,571          -
Loss on early retirement of debt add back from
 unconsolidated co-investments                                197          -
Merger expenses                                            16,059          -
Co-investment promote income                              (3,848)          -
Income from early redemption of preferred equity
 investments                                                    -      (423)
                                                       ---------- ----------
              Core Funds from Operations                  $81,120    $73,213
                                                       ========== ==========

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995:

This press release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements include statements and estimates on page 1 and under the caption "Guidance" on page 6 with respect to Core FFO and same-property NOI growth for the second quarter 2014 and for the full year 2014, statements and estimates regarding plans for a dividend increase, regarding the timing and realization of cost of capital and synergy benefits from the BRE merger and regarding the anticipated insurance proceeds in connection with the MB360 fire and regarding stabilization dates of the development properties, and statements and estimates set forth under the captions "Development Pipeline -- March 31, 2014" and "Redevelopment Pipeline and Capital Expenditures -- March 31, 2014" on pages S-9 and S-10 of the Company's Supplemental Financial Information Package, which accompanies this press release, regarding estimated costs of property development and redevelopment and regarding the anticipated timing of redevelopments and of the construction start, initial occupancy and stabilization of property development and the various financial estimates and assumptions set forth in the columns "ESS Standalone 2014 Midpoint", "Impact from BRE Merger" and "2014 Revised Guidance Range for ESS"on page S-13 of the Company's Supplemental Financial Information Package and the forecasts, set forth on page S-15 of the Company's Supplemental Financial Information Package, of residential supply, jobs, and rent growth in various areas. The Company's actual results may differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, changes in market demand for rental units and the impact of competition and competitive pricing, unanticipated difficulties in integrating the businesses of Essex and BRE and realizing anticipated synergies, changes in economic conditions, unexpected delays in the development and stabilization of development projects, unexpected difficulties in leasing of development projects, total costs of development investments exceeding the Company's projections and other risks detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All forward-looking statements are made as of today, and the Company assumes no obligation to update this information. For more details relating to risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, and risks to our business in general, please refer to our SEC filings, including the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Digital Transformation is the ultimate goal of cloud computing and related initiatives. The phrase is certainly not a precise one, and as subject to hand-waving and distortion as any high-falutin' terminology in the world of information technology. Yet it is an excellent choice of words to describe what enterprise IT—and by extension, organizations in general—should be working to achieve. Digital Transformation means: handling all the data types being found and created in the organizat...
Public Cloud IaaS started its life in the developer and startup communities and has grown rapidly to a $20B+ industry, but it still pales in comparison to how much is spent worldwide on IT: $3.6 trillion. In fact, there are 8.6 million data centers worldwide, the reality is many small and medium sized business have server closets and colocation footprints filled with servers and storage gear. While on-premise environment virtualization may have peaked at 75%, the Public Cloud has lagged in adop...
SYS-CON Events announced today that HPM Networks will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. For 20 years, HPM Networks has been integrating technology solutions that solve complex business challenges. HPM Networks has designed solutions for both SMB and enterprise customers throughout the San Francisco Bay Area.
The time is ripe for high speed resilient software defined storage solutions with unlimited scalability. ISS has been working with the leading open source projects and developed a commercial high performance solution that is able to grow forever without performance limitations. In his session at Cloud Expo, Alex Gorbachev, President of Intelligent Systems Services Inc., shared foundation principles of Ceph architecture, as well as the design to deliver this storage to traditional SAN storage co...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
MuleSoft has announced the findings of its 2015 Connectivity Benchmark Report on the adoption and business impact of APIs. The findings suggest traditional businesses are quickly evolving into "composable enterprises" built out of hundreds of connected software services, applications and devices. Most are embracing the Internet of Things (IoT) and microservices technologies like Docker. A majority are integrating wearables, like smart watches, and more than half plan to generate revenue with ...
The Cloud industry has moved from being more than just being able to provide infrastructure and management services on the Cloud. Enter a new era of Cloud computing where monetization’s services through the Cloud are an essential piece of strategy to feed your organizations bottom-line, your revenue and Profitability. In their session at 16th Cloud Expo, Ermanno Bonifazi, CEO & Founder of Solgenia, and Ian Khan, Global Strategic Positioning & Brand Manager at Solgenia, discussed how to easily o...
The Internet of Everything (IoE) brings together people, process, data and things to make networked connections more relevant and valuable than ever before – transforming information into knowledge and knowledge into wisdom. IoE creates new capabilities, richer experiences, and unprecedented opportunities to improve business and government operations, decision making and mission support capabilities.
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
Rapid innovation, changing business landscapes, and new IT demands force businesses to make changes quickly. The DevOps approach is a way to increase business agility through collaboration, communication, and integration across different teams in the IT organization. In his session at DevOps Summit, Chris Van Tuin, Chief Technologist for the Western US at Red Hat, will discuss: The acceleration of application delivery for the business with DevOps
The speed of software changes in growing and large scale rapid-paced DevOps environments presents a challenge for continuous testing. Many organizations struggle to get this right. Practices that work for small scale continuous testing may not be sufficient as the requirements grow. In his session at DevOps Summit, Marc Hornbeek, Sr. Solutions Architect of DevOps continuous test solutions at Spirent Communications, explained the best practices of continuous testing at high scale, which is rele...
Growth hacking is common for startups to make unheard-of progress in building their business. Career Hacks can help Geek Girls and those who support them (yes, that's you too, Dad!) to excel in this typically male-dominated world. Get ready to learn the facts: Is there a bias against women in the tech / developer communities? Why are women 50% of the workforce, but hold only 24% of the STEM or IT positions? Some beginnings of what to do about it! In her Opening Keynote at 16th Cloud Expo, S...
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
"Alert Logic is a managed security service provider that basically deploys technologies, but we support those technologies with the people and process behind it," stated Stephen Coty, Chief Security Evangelist at Alert Logic, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.